PROLOGUE: FASCISM seeks COLLECTIVE “salvation”, eventually producing a TOTALITARIAN society of ONE, single, “organic” “WHOLE” benefiting ALL, COMPLETE CONFORMITY allowing no “separateness”. Fascism promises UTOPIA through THIS-worldly political “REBIRTH”, redemption and realization of “meaning”, “solutions” to never ending “CRISIS”, overcome with revolutionary “CRUSADES” of “ACTION” of “social justice” based on their own “WILL to POWER”, instincts and feelings, which typically produce reactionary tantrums by “heretics” who seek limitations on their power and/or critically question fascist utopian lack of “reason”, “reality” and/or DYSTOPIAN RESULTS. (“tragic” UNintended consequences) Totalitarian, all powerful GOD-STATES use political-religion to promise “heaven on earth”. Mussolini said “fascism IS a religion”. Fascists purposely mix and confuse politics and religion, Government and God, co-opting “God” in their pursuit of political POWER, a POLITICAL RELIGION OF government idol worship. The sheep-like MASSES, contemptible “clingers” and “deplorables”, require leadership by an elite “enlightened” political governing ruling class and/or messianic “CULT of PERSONALITY” (“gods” IN government). Contemptuous of freedom and democratic self-government, the “god OF government” seeks to SOCIALLY ENGINEER utopian “political paradise” through “science” and an evolutionary “Cult of “Progress”. A utopian FUTURE requires INDOCTRINATION of YOUTH and CENSORSHIP of anything contradicting politically correct conformity, preventing eventual totalitarian control on ALL aspects of society, propagated and proselytized by elite media “priests” and educational “seminaries”. Utopian idealism requires total elimination of anything old & corrupt, erasing past history, destroying politically INcorrect dogmas, and/or persecuting non-utopian “heretics” (“tragic” realist “phobes”) which question and PREVENT the “CULT of PROGRESS” and necessary transformational change “we can ALL believe in”.
FASCISM #1-The Collective #2-Rebirth #3-Crisis & Crusade #4-Action #5-Politics as Religion #6-Contempt for Democracy #7-The Cult of Personality #8-Social Engineering #9-Youth #10-Censorship #11- Fascist Economics (2017)
BASIC CRITERIA COMMON TO ALL or MOST TYPES of FASCISM:
#8) SOCIAL ENGINEERING
an ALL-POWERFUL GOVERNMENT CO-ORDINATES A “TOTALITARIAN” STATE
(all political, economic, religious, and social aspects controlled by one centralized government)
co-ordinating “science” and social planning to “improve” the human condition
towards “PROGRESS”, a “new and improved” UTOPIAN society
“enemies of the state”: “heretics” hindering “progress”
– eugenics (engineering utopia)
the utopian god-state: population control saving the earth or global tyranny?
environmental “utopia”: global sustainable development
– government resource & population control through the REGULATORY STATE
– GREEN fascism environmentalism then and today
environmental religion: saving the earth through the god of government [saviors vs stewards]
environmental utopia: nature worship & salvation [green fascism]
Totalitarian government planning and control through social engineering:
SURVEILLANCE STATE and state-dictated EDUCATION – global indoctrination
#8) SOCIAL ENGINEERING – TABLE of CONTENTS
“PROGRESSIVE” GOVERNMENT and “SCIENCE” (building totalitarian utopia)
EUGENICS & POPULATION CONTROL
GLOBAL GOVERNMENT & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
the ENVIRONMENT – “GREEN” FASCISM saving the earth or global tyranny?
SURVEILLANCE – the POLICE STATE
EDUCATION – GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
an all-powerful (totalitarian) state government “co-ordinates” national “progress”
“science” and social planning promised to “improve” the human condition (e.g. eugenics)
– the STATE was charged with “redeeming”, turning everyone into compliant social organs; redemption” and “salvation” could only be achieved collectively
an all-powerful (totalitarian) state (government) was needed to “co-ordinate” national “PROGRESS” use of “SCIENCE” and “SOCIAL PLANNING”
promised to “IMPROVE” the HUMAN CONDITION (e.g. eugenics)
“faith” in “modernity” and “progress” “scientific” social engineering has a
FASCIST “FAITH” in the PERFECTIBILITY of MAN TOWARDS “PROGRESS”
totalitarians believe that the entire society was one organic whole. Your home, your private
thoughts, everything was part of the “organic” body politic – “dr. zhivago, you might not be interested in “the revolution”, but the revolution is interested in you”
no realm of human life (from food, sex, entertainment) is beyond political meaning …
the state was charged with “redeeming”, turning everyone into compliant social organs
“redemption” and “salvation” could only be achieved collectively
the nazis used the term “volksgemeinschaft” – “people’s or national community
Jonah Goldberg: “’islands of separateness’ – be they businesses, churches or people – were
worn down over time. there could be no rocks in the river of progress. the nazis had a word
for this process: “GLEICHSCHULTUNG” – A political word borrowed – like so many others –
from the realm of engineering, meaning ‘COORDINATION’. the idea was simple:
ALL intitutions needed to WORK TOGETHER as if they were part of the same MACHINE.
The entire society agreed to the FASCIST BARGAIN, in which they bought economic, moral
and political SECURITY in exchange for ABSOLUTE LOYALTY to the ideals of the reich.
This was a FALSE SECURITY; a faustian “[bait and swithch] bargain. not what the people
thought they were getting.
The OBJECTIVE of ROUSSEAU’s GENERAL WILL was to secure SOCIAL JUSTICE by
stripping the petty, covetous interests of individual human beings from the guidance of life.
“ROUSSEAU’s ‘GENERAL WILL’ became an INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATION for
FUTURE FASCIST and ‘TOTALITARIAN’ STATES.
Italian Fascist MUSSOLINI coined the term “TOTALITARIAN” to describe a
“BENEVOLENT” (bene = good) SOCIETY … “where everybody belonged and was
taken care of, where everything was inside and nothing outside” the state.
The “progressive” state/govt/god promised fascist spiritual rebirth through a utopian society:
“and they said, go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven;
and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth”
“and the lord said, behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they
begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have
imagined to do” genesis 10:6
“so the lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off
to build the city” Genesis 10:8
Dinesh D’souza: “the CRIMES of atheism have generally been perpetrated through hubristic
ideology that sees MAN, NOT GOD, as the CREATOR of VALUES, using the latest
techniques of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, MAN SEEKS TO DISPLACE GOD and
CREATE a SECULAR UTOPIA HERE ON EARTH. of course if some people –
the jews, the landowners, the unfit, or the handicapped – have to be eliminated in order to
achieve this utopia, this is a price the atheist tyrants and their apologists have shown themselves
quite willing to pay. Thus they confirm the truth of fyodor dostoyevsky’s dictum,
“IF GOD IS NOT, EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED”
“progress”? – eliminating the “old” feudal tyranny, napoleon became the world’s first new
“modern” dictator, promising and bringing “greatness”, but neglected to mention the death
and destruction that would ensue, the problems and price of “progress”
“Some of the biggest cases of MISTAKEN IDENTITY are among intellectuals who have trouble remembering that they are NOT GOD” – thomas sowell
“You must ENTIRLEY REFASHION A PEOPLE whom you wish to make free,
DESTROY ITS’ PREJUDICES, alter its habits, limit its necessities, root up its vices,
purify its desires” – Robespierre
The Committee of Public Safety during the French Revolution sought to convert the oppressed
french nation to democracy, ‘You must entirely refashion a people whom you wish to make
free,” … the revolution brought down france’s ancien régime and led to the establishment of a
NEW ORDER that promised to totally refashion society.
The RADICAL jacobins replaced church holidays with pagan, nationalistic celebrations.
Tthe jacobins invented their own calendar. in the declaration of the rights of man, “no body or
individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the NATION.
The church could no longer have any say in public matters – the secular state would now have
the FINAL WORD over EVERY aspect of human and social life.
Jonah Goldberg: “Ultimately, the general will resulted in a nationalistic “secular” religion in
which the PEOPLE WORSIPPED THEMSELVES. In 1933, the nazi congress of
German Christians stated, “god has created me a German”, “germanism is a gift of god”
Like the jacobins, the nazis replaced the traditional christian calendar. both the jacobins and
nazis re-started their calendar years at year one, begininning with their revolutions.
Horst Wessel was the most famous “youth leader” of the early nazi movement.
Wessel was eventually shot, “martyred” by the communists
wessel fit the 1960s ideal of a youth leader “from the streets” fighting for social justice
Stalin complained of russia’s economic “backward-ness”. His “solution” was totalitarian,
collective social engineering. In 1928, stalin implemented the first of several “five year plans”
stalin wanted quick industrialization of the new “soviet union”, seeking to build the
“second america”, a “communist” (anti-“capitalist”) industrial giant and “worker’s paradise”
stalin created a “totalitarian” society in which all aspects of life were controlled and/or
regulated by “the state”.
To do this, stalin would bring all economic activity under government control in a “command” economy, government officials make all economic decisions, owned all businesses and distributed all resources. stalin also brought agriculture under government control
stalin engineered a famine by massively raising the grain quota that the peasantry had to turn
over to the state. an estimated 14 million people starved to death khrushchev noted
“no one was keeping count”. an estimated 4 million children starved to death
The ukrainian famine has only recently been recognized as one of the most destructive
genocides of the 20th century. it was a crime to mention or refer to the famine.
a new utopian society was to be created, a new human being was to emerge
“I believe in one thing only, the power of human will”- Stalin [his own “iron/steel will”
“PROGRESSIVE” GOVERNMENT and “SCIENCE” BUILDING “UTOPIA”
Revolutionary ACTION meant “change” towards “progress” enacted by “progressive”
government, regardless of consequences.
Bismarck’s prussia and germany was the precursor to the American progressive
movement. This prussian general/politician unified the germans through “blood and iron”.
bismarck enacted “top down socialism” – eight hour work days, health care, social insurance
“the right to work as long as he is healthy, assure him care when he is sick, assure him maintenance when he is old.” – bismarck, 1862
bismarck left little room for debate: “a government must not waver once it has chosen it’s
course … it must not look to the left or right, but go forward. bismarck pioneered the concept
of liberalism without liberty. in return for social welfare from an all-powerful state, bismarck
bought off the forces of democratic revolution. reform without democracy empowered the
bureacratic state, while keeping the public satisfied. all individuals became “dependent” on
the state for their own well being
Bismarck’s germany was “a catalytic of american progressive thought”. Germany’s welfare
state was an “admirable system and most nearly perfected” in the world according to
future American President Woodrow Wilson. it made the middle class dependent on the state
many americans were impressed with bismarck’s german state. american “progressives”
sought to reform american society along the same lines. american reformers reacted against the
“chaos” and “excesses” of the “gilded age”
“the essence of progressivism was that the individual “marry his interests to the state”
– woodrow wilson
“we must demand that the individual shall be willing to lose the sense of personal achievment
…” “and shall be content to realize his activity only in connection to the activity of the many” – jane addams, american progressive
“progressives” sought government reform to the economic, social and political “corruption”
of the time. “progressive” government and “science” building “utopia”. “enlightened”
government was not the product of democracy, but an alternative to it.
progressive “totalitarian” government
LIBERAL “LIMITED” GOVERNMENT
“ENEMIES of the STATE”:
“HERETICS” HINDERING “PROGRESS”
– THERE were TWO CLASSES of PEOPLE – the STATE and IT’s ENEMIES
anyone who questioned state engineered “progress” was a heretic
enemies of the “common good” must be forced to conform to the general will
from the french revolution, nazi germany, stalin’s soviet union, mao’s cultural revolution, TODAYs POLITICAL CORRECTNESS”?
violence and terror was the fate of those who stood in the way of collective “progress”
There were two classes of people – the state and it’s enemies. Anyone who questioned state
engineered “progress”was a HERETIC against the spiritual re-birth” of the fascist collective
GOD-STATE. Blashemy desecrating the “cult of progress”. “Enemies of the state” must be
stopped at any and all costs – the ends justifie the means (i.e. say or do “whatever it takes” to
get the “right result”) “Conspiracy” by those plotting against “newness” and change,
traitors and scapegoats destroying for the goals and “sacred cows” of the fascist state religion.
“i am freeing man from the restraints of intelligence and a degrading … false vision called conscience and morality” – hitler
The french revolution ended the “old” feudal “absolutism” . however, there remained
enemies, forces of “reaction” (internal & external) against change conspiracy by “enemies of
the [new] state” was everywhere. The enemies of the “common good” must be forced to
conform to the general will violence and terror was the fate of those who stood in the way of
the group collective. (people, state and leader)
“enemies of the state” and “heretics” hindering “progress” had to be DESTROYED. 50,000 died in “the terror” – through “show trials” and public executions. “Show trials” convicted the guilty in the morning and executed them in the afternoon – politically correct “social justice”.
– “we must exterminate those miserable villains … eternally conspiring against the rights of man” – robespierre
revolutionary social engineering by robespierre “the incorruptible”. robespierre justified the
terror by saying it enabled french citizens to remain “true” to the revolution. He linked virtue
(“good”) with terror – the basis of “popular” government. in time of revolution:
”TERROR is nothing else than swift … JUSTICE; it flows then from VIRTUE.”
in robespierre’s utopian vision, the individual has the duty “to detest bad faith and despotism,
to PUNISH traitors. “progressive” social justice: scapegoating enemy of the state heretics.
hindering fellow revolutionaries who questioned or challenged his leadership were guillotined
rousseau considered state-sanctioned coercion as an act of “forcing men to be free”
orwellian “doublespeak” “PUBLIC SAFETY” (the STATE) “forced men to be free”
(from their lives – dead)
“We must exterminate those miserable villains … eternally conspiring against the rights of man” – robespierre
orwellian doublespeak?: the “rights of man” used to “exterminate” the “rights”/lives of men”?
“terror” to victims of the revolutionary “mob” manipulated by their “priestly” leaders
was the result more savage, cruel and violent than the king they replaced …
“Meet the new boss, same (or worse?) as the old boss” Won’t Get Fooled Again – The Who
SOCIAL ENGINEERING – EUGENICS
MARGARET SANGER, EUGENICS and PLANNED PARENTHOOD
the HORRIFYING AMERICAN ROOTS OF NAZI EUGENICS by edwin black
“PLANNED PARENTHOOD DIRECTOR CAUGHT ON TAPE SELLING ABORTED ‘BABY PARTS’
LIKE The GULAG ARCHIPELAGO, the PLANNED PARENTHOOD VIDEOS SHOW US THE VICTIMS of a UTOPIAN DREAM by jason jones & john zmirak
PLANNED PARENTHOOD’S CASH COW by steve c. craig
AMERICA’S CULTURE of DEATH by ben witherington
THERE’S NO PROOF RESEARCH FROM BODY PARTS of ABORTED BABIES ACTUALLY SAVES LIVES by sarah zagorski
DR. ROLAND CHIA – ethos institute
winston churchill warned of a “new dark age made more sinister … by perverted science”
“in an effort to strip away all the ‘invonveniences’ of being human we risk …
wiping out … our humanity” – laura ingraham
“if we cut up beasts simply because they cannot prevent us and because we are backing our own side in the struggle for existence, it is only logical to cut up imbeciles, criminals, enemies, or capitalists for the same reasons” – C.S. lewis
“I do not see why MAN should not be as CRUEL as NATURE” – Adolf Hitler
“Eugenics, as discussed, evidently means the control of SOME men over the marriage and unmarriage of OTHERS; and probably means the control of the FEW over the marriage and unmarriage of the MANY” – g.k. chesterton
“Eugenics asserts that ALL men must be so STUPID that they CANNOT manage their OWN affairs; and also so CLEVER that they can manage EACH OTHER’s” – G.K. Chesterton
“i do not see why man should not be as cruel as nature” – Adolf Hitler
In the second decade of the 20th century, EUGENICS became fashionable among those who
feel that it is their right to set social trends. wealthy families took it on as a pet cause, generously bankrolling its research. the new york times praised it as a WONDERFUL “NEW SCIENCE” Scientists, such as the brilliant plant biologist, luther burbank, praised it unashamedly
educators as prominent as charles elliot, president of harvard university, promoted it as a
SOLUTIONS to SOCIAL ILLS.
America’s public schools did their part. In the 1920s, almost three-fourths of high school
social science textbooks taught its principles.
Judges and physicians called for those principles to be enshrined into law. congress agreed,
passing the 1924 immigration law to exclude from american shores the people of eastern and
southern europe that the idea branded as inferior. in 1927, the u. s. supreme court joined the
chorus, ruling by a lopsided vote of 8 to 1 that the forced sterilization of men and women was
constitutional that idea was eugenics and in the english-speaking world it had virtually no
critics among the “chattering classes”
It was francis galton, the cousin of charles darwin, who first coined the term ‘eugenics’ in
1880. the modern eugenics movement received its inspiration from the social implications of
Darwinism. for almost a century (1880 to 1945), eugenics sought to improve the human race
through selective breeding based on the evolutionary theory broadly gleaned from darwin’s
origin of species. eugenicists in europe and america have accordingly proposed to direct human
evolution by increasing the frequency of ‘socially good genes’ in the population (‘positive
eugenics’) and decreasing the proliferation of ‘bad genes’ (‘negative eugenics’)
Some believe that utopia can be achieved if more biologically and intellectually superior
people are produced and inferior ones are slowly eliminated from the population
from its inception, the eugenics movement has wedded its vision of the future with the
remarkable advances in the natural sciences.
According to eugenicists, SCIENCE (by which is meant the pseudo-science of ‘hereditarian
biology’) has allegedly enlightened society on the genetic basis for social ills like poverty and
criminality. “science” had provided a method to eliminate social problems, in the form of
eugenics sterilization, this poisonious philosophy of life would lead not only to nazi
germany, but our own “culture of death”
Social Engineering: EUGENICS “BLINDED BY SCIENCE” EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
MARGARET SANGER was the founding mother of the birth control movement. Sanger
started writing a sex-advice column in 1912, stressing the importance of contraception.
Sanger preached “reproductive freedom” for women. Sanger sought to ban reproduction of the
“unfit” and regulate reproduction for everybody else.
… “more children from the fit, less from the unfit – that is the chief issue of birth control”
sanger, the pivot of civilization (1922)
“we want fewer and better children”, “no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without
a permit … no permit shall be valid for more than one child”
“the most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to KILL IT” – margaret sanger, women and the new race (eugenics publ. co., 1920, 1923)
American “progressives” used “eugenics” in an effort to “scientifically” engineer a more “fit”
population. “progressives” sought active government regulation and intervention to cure the
“ills” of society. in 1939, sanger created the “NEGRO PROJECT”, which aimed to get blacks
to adopt birth control
sanger: “The mass of significant negroes still breed carelessly and disastrously”
Back in america, sanger began her clandestine movement to RID the WORLD of who she
CONSIDERED LESS DESIRABLE by starting ‘the NEGRO PROJECT’.
sanger’s movement was helped along when she recruited black clergy to use their influence to
brainwash members of the black community to believe birth control and abortions were
good ways to HELP african americans advance economically
with the result that the increase … is [in] that portion of the population least intelligent and fit”
“i do not see why man should not be as cruel as nature” – adolf hitler
Progressives are hard-pressed to disconnect themselves from their marxian socialist roots
when one contrasts and compares the ideology of modern-day progressivism to marxian
socialism, the parallels are hard to ignore … the state over faith, collective over individual,
redistribution over free enterprise, common over competition, direct democracy over
representative government, democracy over republic, etc
It’s impossible to look at origins of progressivism and marxian socialism and not encounter
BIGOTRY of the FIRST MAGNITUDE.
Consider the words of Karl Marx: “being in his quality as a nigger, a degree nearer to the rest
of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, he is undoubtedly the most appropriate
representative of that district.”
Margaret Sanger hired black ministers, doctors and other leaders to HELP “PARE DOWN” the
SUPPOSEDLY “SURPLUS” BLACK POPULATION. Sanger’s Birth Control Review cast
Nazi Eugenics (and state enforced “sterilization”) in a positive light.
The book freakonomics (2005) argued that statistically abortion cuts crime. Legalized abortion
led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime” … “legalized abortion, therefore,
led to less crime. freakonomics excised all references to race. it never connected that the
ABORTED FETUSES were DIS-PROPORTIONATELY BLACK and THAT BLACKS
CONTRIBUTE DIS-PROPORTIONATELY to the CRIME RATE.
Therefore, REDUCING the size of the BLACK POPULATION REDUCES CRIME
the point – is “EUGENICS” (then and now) inherently BIASED and “RACIST” ???
WHO in society DECIDES. Who BREEDS and who does not?
Social Engineering – EUGENICS: “BLINDED by SCIENCE” – EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
theodore roosevelt to charles b. davenport, january 3, 1913, charles b. davenport papers, department of genetics, cold spring harbor, n.y.:
“i wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and
when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done.
“criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring
behind them … the emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed …”
society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind … any group of
farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the
worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum … some day we will realize that the
prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her
blood behind him in the world … and that WE HAVE NO BUSINESS to PERMIT the
PERPETUATION of CITIZENS of the WRONG TYPE”
“the most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to
kill it” – margaret sanger, women and the new race (eugenics publ. co., 1920, 1923)
on march 27, secretary of state HILLARY CLINTON accepted
planned parenthood’s margaret sanger award:
“The 20th century reproductive rights movement, really embodied in the life and
leadership of margaret sanger, was one of the most transformational in entire history.
“it ushered in demographic and social changes that have brought us closer to gender equality
than at any time. yet we know that margaret sanger’s work here in the united states and
certainly across our globe is not done. now, i have to tell you that it was a great privilege
when i was told that i would receive this award. i admire margaret sanger enormously, her
courage, her tenacity, HER VISION”
“Another of my great friends, ellen chesler, is here, who wrote a magnificaent biography of
margaret sanger, called women of valor and when i think about what she did all those years
ago in brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all
directions, i am really in AWE of HER”
Just who was Margaret Sanger? PATRON SAINT of a woman’s right to choose?
or GENOCIDAL COLLABORATOR of reproductive Eugenics,
who believed society [the state] had the right to sterilize those “unfit” to breed …
or abort the “unfit” or force them to live on government farms for the rest of their lives?
Does sex education and family planning provide a necessary “service” for citizens?
is this a good argument for state regulation of reproduction and/or forced sterilization?
sensical, wise government planning or racist, tyrannical “madness” ?
or should this primarily be an individual choice,
not involving any government “interference”?????
does state involvement “violate” the most individual and “personal” of choices? –
sex and reproduction government control of re-production and population
government control of health care ?
Although eugenics flourished in nazi germany, the ideal of a blond-haired, blue-eyed
master race WAS NOT adolf HITLER’s. it may surprise many to know that, in mein kampf,
hitler credited AMERICA with helping formulate his ideas on eugenics, and he admitted he’d
studied the laws of u.s. states to familiarize himself with selective reproduction and other
– James Morcan, the orphan conspiracies: 29 conspiracy theories from the orphan trilogy
The HORRIFYING AMERICAN ROOTS of NAZI EUGENICS
by Edwin Black
Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest
for a so-called ‘master race’” but the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master
nordic race did not originate with hitler. the idea was created in the united states, and cultivated
in california, decades before hitler came to power california eugenicists played an important,
although little known, role in the american eugenics campaign for ethnic cleansing
Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity. In 1863, sir Francis Galton, cousin of charles darwin,
theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be
measurably better offspring. American eugenic advocates believed with religious fervor that
mendel-ian concepts determining the color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed t
he social and intellectual character of man. Elements were enshrined as national policy by
forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in
twenty-seven states. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners COERCIVELY STERILIZED some
60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in
“colonies,” and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning.“
“Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing
by corporate philanthropies, specifically the carnegie institution, the rockefeller foundation
and the harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of america’s most
respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as stanford, yale, harvard and
princeton. in the early 20th century. Elitists, utopians and so-called “progressives” fused their
smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world. the intent:
populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and biological kind – and less
or none of everyone else.
In its first 25 years of eugenic legislation, california sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly
women, many classified as “bad girls,” diagnosed as “passionate,” “oversexed” or “sexually
‘wayward’”. in 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which
were on women.
In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is
BETTER FOR ALL THE WORLD, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for
crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly
unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Years later, the nazis at the nuremberg trials quoted holmes’s words in their own defense.
only after eugenics became entrenched in the united states was the campaign transplanted into
germany. hitler studied american eugenics laws. hitler was able to recruit more followers
among reasonable germans by claiming that science was on his side. the outlines of the eugenics
hitler adopted in 1924 were MADE in AMERICA
During the 1920s, carnegie institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and
professional relationships with germany’s fascist eugenicists“ “hitler proudly told his
comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the american eugenics movement.
hitler wrote a fan letter to american eugenic leader madison grant calling his race-based
eugenics book, the passing of the great race his ‘bible’”. during the reich’s early years,
eugenicists across america welcomed hitler’s plans as the logical fulfillment of their own
decades of research and effort“
“I do not see why MAN should not be as CRUEL as NATURE” – adolf hitler
In 1934, as Germany’s sterilizations were accelerating beyond 5,000 per month. Joseph
Dejarnette, superintendent of Virginia’s western state hospital, observed, ‘the Germans are
beating us at our own game’. More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America
funded germany’s eugenic institutions. by 1926, rockefeller had donated some $410,000 –
almost $4 million in 21st-century money – to hundreds of german researchers“
beginning in 1940, thousands of germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and
other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. between 50,000 and 100,000 were
eventually killed. human genetics became an enlightened endeavor in the late twentieth
Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the human code through the
human genome project. Now, every individual can be biologically identified and classified
by trait and ancestry. yet even now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for a
cleansing of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species. Because genetics
research is global, no single nation’s law can stop the threats. disposal of aborted babies is a
huge problem for abortion clinics where ordinary medical waste can be steam sterilized and
dumped in a landfill, aborted babies must be incinerated, sometimes to generate electricity.
the expense of disposing of dead babies is a substantial burden on abortionists.
Stericycle was also fined over $42,000 in 2011 after the company was found to be illegally
dumping aborted babies into a municipal landfill in austin, texas with household and
Social Engineering – EUGENICS: “BLINDED by SCIENCE” – EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
Planned Parenthood achieved record numbers of abortions and posted record profit levels in
the 2011-2012 fiscal year, according to a report from the planned parenthood watchdog
organization life decisions international (ldi). The report notes that in 2011-2012 ppfa
“slaughtered a record 333,964 preborn children, generating an estimated $150 million,” and
that nearly $1.2 billion in revenue was generated in 2009-2010, government funding reached
$487.4 million. in 2010-2011 the figure jumped to $538.5 million. the total for 2011-2012
reached $542.4 million, which represents 45.2 percent of the group’s total annual budget,
the report states this ‘not-for-profit’ goliath ends every fiscal year with millions of dollars in
‘excess revenue over expenses,’” scott said. this “excess revenue,” he added, “is also known by
another name – ‘profit.’” ldi points out that the “excess” for 2010-2011 was a record
$155.5 million, while in 2011-2012, the excess was $87.4 million
“Still,” scott remarked, “planned parenthood and its affiliates often make wild claims whenever a
corporation, organization or government entity chooses to eliminate or cut funding”
Since the 2000-2001 fiscal year, ppfa has had a total ‘excess’ of $771 million.
“To COMPEL a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical” – thomas jefferson
“PLANNED PARENTHOOD BUSTED ON TAPE TRYING to SELL ABORTED BABY BODY PARTS
by Sean Davis July 14, 2015
Sean Davis: “In shocking video obtained by the center for medical progress, a top Planned
Parenthood executive is seen attempting to sell body parts from aborted babies“
Dr. Deborah Nucatola, planned parenthood’s senior director for medical services, is caught on
video bragging about how she aborts babies in such a way that their body parts and organs can
later be sold for PROFIT.
“we’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so i’m not gonna
crush that part,” nucatola tells actors posing as organ traffickers. “i’m gonna basically crush
below, i’m gonna crush above, and i’m gonna see if i can get it all intact”
“i’d say a lot of people want liver,” nucatola continued. “and for that reason, most providers
will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their
Live action’s lila rose pulled no punches in condemning planned parenthood’s outrageous and inhumane practices. planned parenthood’s barbaric practices reveal their contempt for rule of law and human life, rose said.
“PLANNED PARENTHOOD DIRECTOR CAUGHT ON TAPE SELLING ABORTED ‘BABY PARTS’ liveactionnews.org Jul 14, 2015
“An undercover video recorded by the non-profit organization, center for medical progress,
shows planned parenthood federation senior director of medical services, dr. deborah nucatola,
discussing their fetal parts business. nucatola is seen in the video having lunch with actors
posing as buyers who are interested in purchasing the body parts of babies who have been
aborted. the planned parenthood senior staffer notes how abortion procedures are modified to
ensure that requested body parts can be collected. We’ve been very good at getting heart,
lung, liver, because we know that, so i’m not gonna crush that part, i’m gonna basically crush
below, i’m gonna crush above, and i’m gonna see if i can get it all intact.
Nucatola also describes how planned parenthood abortionists move the preborn child into a
breech delivery position so that the body can be preserved. This account is an almost exact
medical description of partial-birth abortions which are illegal in the united states. in the video,
nucatola describes the procedure:
“i’d say a lot of people want liver. and for that reason, most providers will do this case under
ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps, the kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. calvarium – the head – is basically the biggest part. we’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so i’m not gonna crush that part, i’m gonna basically crush below, i’m gonna crush above, and i’m gonna see if i can get it all intact. so if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there’s dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end”
Planned Parenthood, though, appears to be concerned internally about the legality of their own
behavior, as nucatola notes how, ‘at the national office, we have a litigation and law
department which just really doesn’t want us to be the middle people for this issue right now’“
u.s. federal law states that, ‘it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or
otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects
live action president lila rose has been active for years in exposing wrongdoing at planned
parenthood through undercover investigations. she responded to the disturbing investigative
lila rose: “this investigation by the center for medical progress reveals the unimaginable horror that is planned parenthood. the exploitation of human life, the cover-up, and the black market profiteering by america’s largest abortion chain is not only egregious and heartbreaking, but exposes how the abortion giant is corrupt to the core“ from the ceo, cecile richards, down to the local clinic“
as live action has investigated through the years, planned parenthood’s barbaric practices
reveal their contempt for rule of law and human life. this latest expose of planned
parenthood’s trafficking of baby parts for profit should be the final nail in the coffin for the
abortion giant. congress must take immediate action to stop all taxpayer funding of planned
parenthood and end the bankrolling of this horrific human rights abuser. nucatola’s
admission is but the tip of the iceberg. daleiden told lifesitenews that a single planned
parenthood abortion facility “could easily make $100,000 a year off baby part sales just in one
PLANNED PARENTHOOD’s CASH COW
by Steve C. Craig americanthinker.com August 3, 2015
Steve C. Craig: “When revenue from harvested baby organs is considered, late term abortion is
one of Planned Parenthood’s highest ticket items.This very well may explain why the abortion
giant has resisted any attempt by legislators to restrict these horrific procedures.
This topic requires a discussion of abortion methods for which i apologize in advance,
because the details are disgusting and barbaric.
Abortion methods differ based on the age of the child. the most common method used during
the first trimester is suction curettage, which employs the use of a high power vacuum that
tears the child into small pieces”
After the first trimester, dilation and evacuation is the predominant method. this involves the
use of forceps to more slowly twist, tear and dismember the child – at a more advanced stage of
Ninety-six percent of all second trimester abortions are done this way. and as we have
recently learned from the undercover videos, this is the ‘less crunchy’ method that works best
for organ harvesting.
Until now, planned parenthood’s insistence on committing these late term dismemberments
has been a bit of a mystery. if, as planned parenthood claims, abortions are only 3% of its
services and, as the cdc claims, post-15 and post-20 week abortions are only 5.2% and 1.4%
of all abortions, then these abortions are only 0.15% and 0.04% of planned parenthood’s
the awful procedure and the negative press associated with it never seemed worth it, assuming
all abortions fetch the same price. now things are clearer. With the organ business properly
factored, we see thatlate term abortions are two to three times more lucrative than first
trimester procedures. here’s the math: from a young pregnant woman, living near the poverty
line, hudson peconic planned parenthood in new rochelle collects $525 for an early trimester
abortion but asks $900, $375 more, for a late term abortion done with forceps”
The bigger ticket late term abortion premium of $375 represents a 70% increase in planned
parenthood revenue as compared to the first trimester abortion. even before factoring in the
organ harvesting, late term abortions deliver significantly more revenue. they also deliver
bigger, more marketable baby parts. from the videos we know that a practiced abortionist can
skillfully dismember an older child; preserve the heart, liver, lungs or head; and sell the high
quality organs for $100 apiece.
counted four times (for the heart, liver, lungs and head), good big developed baby parts
add $400 to the $900 ticket, bringing the all-in late term abortion revenue to $1,300, or
2.7x the sales price of the $525 first trimester abortion. the extra $400 of organ harvesting
revenue drops straight to the bottom line. the concept, defensively floated by planned
parenthood, that the organ revenues are ‘reimbursement for handling expenses’ is laughable.
Follow the money. Assuming the cdc is correct and just 5.2% of planned parenthood’s 327,653
annual abortions are post-15 week procedures, that’s 17,000 annual revenue events at $1,300
each for a total of $22 million a year on late term dismember and harvest procedures”
Planned parenthood has to do many more first trimester procedures, over 42,000, to achieve the
same $22 million. said differently, president cecile richards needs only 385 dismember and
harvests to pay her $500,000+ salary, but about a thousand early trimester abortions to do the
same – a very efficient way to cover corporate overhead.
We are often too willing to be distracted by happy sounding “women’s health”
platitudes. the real value of these undercover videos is as a reminder about the truth of late
term abortion. these videos force us to ask and answer, “who are we?” and god help us if we
are a people who get self-righteous about the coal industry because of its environmental
impact or wall street because of income inequality, but don’t object to this.
by any standard, this is incomparably worse – one child, slowly torn and sold, is a far bigger
deal than tons of co2 and seven figure bonuses.
COLUMNIST MARK STEYN WROTE in 2006: “ONE consequence of abortion is that, in
designating new life a matter of ‘choice’, it made it easier to make judgments about which
lives are worth it and which aren’t … but it’s foolish to think you can raise entire populations to
make self-interested judgments about who lives and who doesn’t and expect them to remain
confined to three trimesters.
the “right to choose” is now being extended beyond the womb: the step from convenience
conception to convenience euthanasia is a short one, and the step from convenience euthanasia
to compulsory euthanasia shorter still though steyn was speaking specifically about abortion, this
mentality of “convenience conception” is rooted in the acceptance of contraception
we only need to look at history to see where this line of thinking goes: any time a society
accepts it as true that it is okay to value other human beings according to how much we
want to deal with them, there will always be death
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EUGENICS “BLINDED by SCIENCE”
“Really regenerated state government” would take steps…to prevent “crime and insanity” by
regulating who could marry and procreate” – herbert croly, the promise of american life
think of the “atrocities” of the 20th century committed in the name of “science”
“WHAT WE CALL MAN’S POWER OVER NATURE TURNS OUT to be POWER exercised by some men over other men with nature as it’s instrument” – C.S. Lewis
“science” used to rationalize power and “progress”, practiced by “big” government
henry drummond: defined life as “capacity to relate to one’s environment”
Dinesh D’Souza:The CRIMES of atheism have generally been perpetrated through a hubristic
ideology that sees man, not god, as the creator of values”
“using the latest techniques of science and technology, man seeks to displace god and create a
secular utopia here on earth. of course if some people – the jews, the landowners, the unfit, or
the handicapped – have to be eliminated in order to achieve this utopia, this is a price the
atheist tyrants and their apologists have shown themselves quite willing to pay”
“thus they confirm the truth of fyodor dostoyevsky’s dictum,
“IF GOD IS NOT, EVERYTHING is PERMITTED”
LIKE THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO, the PLANNED PARENTHOOD VIDEOS SHOW US the VICTIMS of a UTOPIAN DREAM
by Jason Jones & John Zmirak August 19, 2015
LIKE The GULAG ARCHIPELAGO, the PLANNED PARENTHOOD VIDEOS SHOW US
the VICTIMS of a UTOPIAN DREAM
by jason jones & john zmirak August 19, 2015
Jason Jones & John Zmirak: like the Gulag Archipelago, the Planned Parenthood videos show
us the victims of a utopian dream “millions of highly-educated americans still defend planned
parenthood. forty years ago, the same kind of people defended communism. They might have
regretted its excesses, and cringed at some of its methods, but its astronomically high ideals
inspired them, especially next to the gritty reality of free competition under law.
The Bolsheviks in russia, then mao’s cadres in china, and castro’s in cuba, were striving to free
men of 10,000 years of historical baggage, to tear out selfishness from its root in the human
heart and replace the squabbling, grasping consumers in the marketplace with a stark and
ascetical SPECIES: SOCIALIST MAN.
The party would use its absolute power for good, and not for evil. it would fill the earth
with mandatory franciscans, men and women forged in the blast furnace of struggle until
they were happily poor, proudly chaste and perfectly obedient. they would dwell in the
HAPPY PARADISE that marx had sketched out for them, free of shortage and strife, dabbling
at work in the morning, then writing poetry or hunting as the sun went down.
There are colorful icons depicting this HEAVEN ON EARTH which stalin commissioned.
Like marx and lenin, margaret sanger had a DREAM. She had grown up in a large family,
and seen her mother die shortly after childbirth. sanger chafed at the grim, biological fact
that the ecstasy of sex was chained to pregnancy, to medical risk and physical pain, to
squalling brats and stinking diapers” Why should the best, most exciting moments in life be
yoked by a pulsing, pink umbilical cord to years of sacrifice and self-denial?
Just as marx looked at how men interact economically and saw a dark conspiracy, sanger stared
at the facts of mammalian reproduction, and found them a CRIME AGAINST WOMEN.
An UNPLANNED PREGNANCY was a BIOLOGICAL INJUSTICE, and this
“woman rebel” (the title of sanger’s first magazine) would lead a revolution to CORRECT it.
“REVOLUTIONS HAVE VICTIMS, of course. It takes some heavy lifting to build
utopia on earth. as lenin said, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.
“some of them even fertilized,” sanger might add with a snicker, from her seat beside him in
The western left lived for decades in DENIAL of communism’s victims. just as neo-nazis
today seek to deny, minimize or explain away the holocaust, marxists throughout the world
colluded with soviet propaganda to HIDE the BRUTALITIES of the soviet regime, its
SAVAGE ABUSES of POWER. For every truth-teller like malcolm muggeridge and
robert conquest, there were at least a hundred wistful western marxists to wave away the
reports of bolshevik murder squads shooting priests, stealing land from ukrainian peasants
and leaving them to STARVE by the MILLIONS.
Hammering on doors at 3 a.m. to arrest innocent citizens in the tens of millions, and haul them
off to freeze or be worked to death in the icy camps of the gulag. it’s impressive, really, when
you think about it – the largely successful effort by partisans of marx to HIDE one of the
greatest CRIME waves in history.
“according to democide scholar r.j. rummel, the soviet regime murdered some 62 MILLION
people. and yet for decades, western marxists were able to sweep those people’s ashes under
the rug until solzhenitsyn. a courageous veteran of the world war ii red army and once a
believing marxist, alexander solzhenitsyn was sent to a gulag camp for penning a letter that
cracked a joke about stalin”
For years he worked, and froze, and nearly starved in those sub-arctic camps. It was in them
that he found god and first learned to pray. but he also learned something else: that most of
the “convicts” (zeks) who languished there were innocent like him. They weren’t “saboteurs,”
“wreckers,” or nazi spies, as his schools and the party newspapers had drilled him into
thinking”“they were ordinary people, who had tried to lead regular lives, and thus run afoul of
a system that denied human nature in service of a fantasy.
A DAYDREAM: Marx’s irresponsible musings about the shape of a PERFECT FUTURE,
the kind of rot that nowadays might appear at the daily kos. but this WISH-FULFILLMENT
FANTASY had captured the brains of intellectuals, and helped them to channel their
characteristic emotions – HUBRIS, ENVY and impotent RAGE. Then the dream got control
of a country, of hundreds of millions of flesh and blood experimental subjects whom those
intellectuals could run through their mazes, could SHOCK or STARVE, then KILL.
solzhenitsyn met the VISIONS of the DREAM, and asked them to tell their stories. He wove them together into a literaryand historical masterpiece, The Gulag Archipelago, which he spirited into the west, where it was published in 1973. The nattily tailored communists of paris and london scoffed at the book as CIA propaganda, or furiously denounced him.
But the TRUTH was OUT.
Social Engineering: EDUCATION – GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION
purposely, missing are the failures of socialism
stolypin railroad cars used by stalin to deport millions to build his “totalitarian” state what “a lesson on stalin” did not say:
railroads used by stalin to build “one of the world’s strongest industrial nations”
what “a lesson on stalin” did not say: millions of peasant “kulak” farmers “liquidated” for resting stalin’s farm collectivization
under “a lesson on stalin”: “an economy completely controlled by stalin
what “a lesson on stalin” did not say: millions killed, deported & “controlled“ by the “state” to build “worker’s paradise”
An ECONOMY COMPLETELY CONTROLLED by government … to build “one of the
world’s strongest industrial nations”
STALIN’S INDUSTRIALIZATION & “COLLECTIVIZATION”
during the period 1941-1953, some 132,000 lithuanianswere deported to remote areas of the ussr, in siberia, the arctic circle areas and central asia
during the same period, another 200,000 people were thrown into prisons in lithuania and elsewhere in the soviet union
some 150,000 of them were sent to the gulags, soviet russia‘s concentration camps, situated mostly in siberia
virtually no one has been called to account for what was done, and the west has paid little attention to the horrors of the soviet times. maybe it’s time?
“soviet fascism killed many more people than the germans, and the lies of soviet fascism were mostly more severe than those of german fascism,” says felix krasavin, a former soviet-time political prisoner
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EUGENICS “BLINDED by SCIENCE” EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
The HUMAN FETUS as GARBAGE: A NECESSARY COMPARISON to NAZISM
by Danusha Goska americanthinker.com August 8, 2015
The HUMAN FETUS as GARBAGE: A NECESSARY COMPARISON TO NAZISM
by Danusha Goska americanthinker.com august 8, 2015
Danusha Goska: “In july 2015, the center for medical progress began releasing a series of videos.
In these videos, planned parenthood personnel discuss the abortion procedures necessary to
obtain, from aborted fetuses, high-quality kidneys, hearts, skulls, arms, and legs.
These fetal body parts are then sold to medical researchers. the videos also show employees
dissecting human fetuses in order to harvest organs and body parts.
The efficacy of fetuses in medical research is DEBATED. Depending on their stance toward
abortion, some depict aborted fetuses as providing promising avenues for research. Others
downplay the value of human fetuses for medical research. This dichotomy indicates that
aborted fetuses’ value to medical research is not a slam dunk. If aborted fetuses were
inarguably necessary for a medical breakthrough that could save millions of lives,
planned parenthood would have said so by now.
Given that aborted fetuses’ use to medical research is not beyond reasonable question, taxpayers,
who help fund planned parenthood, are thinking long and hard about planned parenthood’s
practices. In at least two high-profile responses to the planned parenthood videos, pro-abortion
voices have referred to ABORTED HUMAN FETUSES as ‘GARBAGE’”
Entitled “planned parenthood is not selling baby parts, you [deleted] idiots:, rebecca watson’s
pro-abortion video twice specifically refers to human fetuses as ‘garbage’”. Watson’s
downplaying of what actually occurs in an abortion is not to her credit. watson continues, these
“pieces of fetal tissue” “are just going to be thrown away in the garbage, but the patient can
instead choose to donate [them] to important medical research.
Planned parenthood allows women,” watson says, “to aid in the research and treatment of
conditions like h.i.v. and parkinson’s disease, when instead those women could just be
throwing that tissue in the garbage! author amanda marcotte writes, “ask your conservative
relative if he would prefer the fetal tissue to be thrown in the trash, since that is the only
Of course, throwing a fetus in the trash is not the only alternative to exploiting it for medical
research; gestating that fetus and allowing it to grow and be born is the alternative.
The pro-abortion insistence that there are only two alternatives for a fetus: either to be
garbage or to be “life-saving medical research,” is interesting. It is interesting because it is false.
This insistence is interesting. It calls to mind Nazism”
Most nazi comparisons are easy, cheap, and dismissible. In this case a nazi comparison is
necessary. Many people have heard of nazis manufacturing SOAP from human beings.
It’s interesting that so many people have heard of this because the nazi manufacture of soap from
humans was very limited in time, space, the number of humans used, and the project’s
success. The soap was simply not very good.
So many people have heard of the use of human corpses for soap not because it was
widespread; it was not. The use of humans for soap – something common and cheap – violates
the conscience of the listener. Given that nazis had other, easier, cheaper, and more reliable
methods for soap manufacture at their disposal, one must ask why nazis made soap from
human beings at all, even in a limited way.
Nazis turned something SACRED – the human body – into something COMMON, CHEAP
and utilitarian, in order to fully convince themselves that their VICTIMS were INHUMAN.
Most Nazis did not start out as Nazis. They needed to be coaxed into being Nazis.
Germans were wracked by mass murder.
Einsatzgruppen, who shot their victims at close range, complained.
This PERSONAL method of MURDER gave way to IMPERSONAL death by GAS.
Nazis tortured their victims for a variety of reasons, but one reason was to convince
themselves that their victims were NOT WORTH of the regard that HUMANITY
commands. nazis did to human beings things that a decent person never does to another human
being not because they saw their victims as human, but to make themselves see their victims
as inhuman. in the planned parenthood videos, an employee who dismembers fetal corpses,
seeking marketable samples, talks about how “sickening” it is. she is inured to it now, though;
she reports it has become ‘fun’”
A medical professional has been taught – one might say BRAINWASHED – to regard
DESECRATION and EXPLOITATION of a human corpse as ‘FUN’. HOW?
By telling her that IT’s for MEDICAL RESEARCH. One can’t help but notice, though,
that handling human fetuses as if they are garbage has played a role in teaching some that
HUMAN FETUSES are indeed GARBAGE, and that they could never be
Social Engineering – EUGENICS: “BLINDED by SCIENCE” – EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
The NEW NAZIS
obvioustalk.blogspot.com August 4, 2015
“We live in a world where the OBVIOUS is HIDDEN and the ABSURD EXTOLLED.
i’ll try and do my bit to help REVERSE THAT. The New Nazis are the hard core pro-aborts
who support abortion for ANY REASON … at ANY POINT in the pregnancy – long after the
baby is VIABLE. even after seeing that planned parenthood denies medical care to babies
born alive due to a “botched” abortion. These monsters – for there is really no other term for
people who can be comfortable with denying medical care to a newly born baby – say
abortion SHOULD NOT be RESTRICTED in ANY way.
The New Nazi defense of denying medical care to a girl who survives an abortion attempt is
that the decision should be up to the doctor and the mother. By that reasoning if a hit man
fails to get a kill shot and only wounds his target we should count on the hit man and the man
who hired him to ensure that the former victim gets medical care. If a viable born baby
doesn’t have the right to medical care even if her abortionist and her mother disagree who
These new Nazis argue that utilizing the body parts of the unborn just makes sense as did the
nazis who legally murdered Jews for “scientific” reasons and then made lampshades out of
their skins. These new Nazis are eager to reduce the number of people they consider to be
“UNDESIRABLE”, such as people of color, which is why they aren’t bothered that roughly
80% of abortion mills are in or near minority neighborhoods. This isn’t surprising given that
the new Nazi solution to the problem of the third world consists mainly of providing
contraception and abortion in order to reduce the number of brown babies. Like the old nazis
the new nazis have their own BIZARRE PSEUDO SCIENCE that JUSTIFIES their support of
The Old Nazis worked hard to convince people that jews were NOT REALLY HUMAN and
the new Nazis work hard to DENY established science that the UNBORN are fully human.
Both groups like to define who is and is not a person; that is a human being with rights”
Henry Drummond defined life as “CAPACITY to RELATE to one’s environment”
To both groups society has the authority to define that some scientifically human beings are
not really human enough to have rights; like the right to life or the right not to be gassed to
death. Yet the new nazis DENY the humanity of the unborn right up until they’re haggling for
a higher price for ‘human tissue’ that MAGICALLY comes from a ‘clump of cells’.
Part of the problem for the new nazis is that they view the unborn as a DIRECT THREAT to
THEIR LIFESTYLES. The new nazis want SEX WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES;
to them the unborn are just another std. And like the old nazis the new nazis don’t believe that
ANY human life that stands in the way of THEIR DESIRES has ANY VALUE.
So in the eyes of the new nazis the UNBORN are ‘PARASITES’
JUST LIKE JEWS were ‘PARASITES’ in the eyes of the old Nazis”
It takes a coldness not seen since the nazis and communists to watch planned parenthood’s baby
chop shops in action and not be revolted. Bernard Nathanson, a famous abortionist who
championed the legalization of abortion, became a pro-life catholic and exposed the truth about
The roe in ROE v WADE, NORMA MCCORVEY was never a new nazi, she was just a poor
woman exploited by rich white pro-abortion lawyers. But she’s become a staunch pro-life
advocate. In fact there are many stories of abortion mill workers converting after being
exposed to the HORRORS of that trade.
Just as many Germans were APPALLED when they saw the camps because they could
NO LONGER HIDE from themselves what they SUPPORTED. Many of the new nazis when
forced to stare into the HORROR they support will recoil and rethink their beliefs.
If we can condemn RELIGION for the evils it has wrought, should we not do the SAME for
SCIENCE? Or would it not be more mature to recognize that MEN, whether
PRIEST or SCIENTIST, can be CAPABLE of INHUMANITY? At a minimum, it leads to
spiritual death, when people begin to live their lives closed to deep connections with
other humans. But there is usually also bodily death, as those who cramp the lifestyles of
those who are more powerful are gotten out of the way once and for all. and thus we end up in
a ‘CULTURE of DEATH’.
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EUGENICS “BLINDED by SCIENCE” EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
AMERICA’s CULTURE of DEATH
by Ben Witherington patheos.com February 9, 2013
Ben Witherington: “We have in america two very different cultures vying for supremacy – a
culture of life and a culture of death. death seems to be winning on the one side of the ring is
the whole health and medical industry, mostly doing everything it can to prop up life,
cure disease, lengthen life, protect life, “except of course when it comes to abortion where it is
the very same industry that is called upon to provide clinical and safe and antiseptic death for
“And there is as well the pharmaceutical industry which for the sake of profits regularly puts products on the market that are not merely dangerous, they are often deadly, and lots of people have to die before they are taken off the market. even in the midst of a whole industry meant to promote life, SOMEHOW DEATH BECOMES A PART OF THE EQUATION THAT IS TAKEN FOR GRANTED with a SHRUG of a SHOULDER and a ‘WELL, YOU CAN’T SAVE EVERYONE’”
and john donne’s words are no longer listened to – “any man’s death diminishes me, for I am a
part of mankind … it has been said that you can learn a lot about a nation by analyzing what the
top value is in its ethical hierarchy. the usual big three are:
1) honor and shame; 2) truth vs. lies; 3) life and death”
“when a country loses its sense of honor, it also loses its sense of shame. In such a culture sins
just become errors of judgment, mistakes, boo boos. God is entirely taken out of the
equation, because make no mistake, sins are always against god, whoever else they may also be
against or do harm to. When a culture replaces the value of everlasting life, with the value of
this life extended as far as possible, the culture has become totally myopic, unable to see beyond
the immediate, the tangible, the empirical. Oddly enough when the lie that ‘this life is all there
is’ is believed, it makes it much easier to allow death to rule one’s mind, one’s fears, one’s
behavior. death simply becomes the price of doing business, or surviving. If you believe all of
this about ‘i am the life’, then you have to stand for life in all of its god-given manifestations no
matter what the world tells you, no matter what the prevailing culture is in your own country.
THERE’S NO PROOF RESEARCH FROM BODY PARTS of ABORTED BABIES ACTUALLY SAVES LIVES by Sarah Zagorski Aug 5 2015
In an attempt to spin their organ harvesting business into a HUMANITARIAN EFFORT, Planned Parenthood argues that “lifesaving” discoveries are made through conducting research on babies killed in abortions.
However, the problem with Planned Parenthood’s claim is that scientists indicate that fetal “tissue” research has been disappointing. For example, Harvard researcher, Ole Isacson, MD, said they have been fairly unsuccessful in using it to finding a cure for Parkinson’s. He said, “It is very difficult to obtain dopamine nerve cells from fetal tissue. It would be far easier to grow the cells in a laboratory from stem cells. There have been no stem cell transplants as of yet for Parkinson’s patients.”
The Federalist reports that even though fetal tissue research receives $76 million in taxpayer funding, scientists are moving on to other methods because they believe it will produce better results. The associate professor of bioethics at Case Western Reserve University, Insoo Hyun, explained, “Despite the long history of using fetal tissue in medicine and research, the practice could be on the way out. Even though it has led to important medical advances in the last several decades, ‘in the future, the need for fetal tissue will go down because of advances in stem cell [technology] that will take over.”
Ultimately, regardless of whether fetal tissue research is beneficial, the end doesn’t justify the means, and it is quite unbelievable that Planned Parenthood thinks Americans will disregard the plethora of problems with their sketchy practices.
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EUGENICS “BLINDED by SCIENCE” EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
DR. ROLAND CHIA
He is chew hock hin professor of christian doctrine at trinity theological college and theological and research advisor of ethos institute for public christianity
Dr. Roland Chia: “CHRISTIANS should have no truck with eugenic ideas and programs
because the bible provides us with a different vision of humanity:
“in the first chapter of genesis, human beings are distinguished from the rest of god’s
creatures because they alone are created in the ‘image and likeness of god’” (genesis 1:27)
this means that human life is a gift from god and the human being – regardless his age or health – must be valued and treated with respect”
As the gift of god, human life is sacred, and must be received with gratitude, cherished and
protected. The individual is not only responsible for his own life, but also for the lives of
others. that is why it is always wrong to take one’s own life or the life of another human
being. (exodus 20:13) Some supported the movement because of its connection with
darwinism, which was seen as a scientific account of the development of living organisms
To reject darwinism is to reject science, and to reject science is to be anti-progress
others were sincerely longing for a better society and believed that the eugenic method is the
way in which this reality can be achieved. The true evil of eugenics lied in its distorted
understanding of what it means to be a human community. The true evil of eugenics is it
fails to appreciate the value of human life and the responsibility that members of society have
for each other.
Eugenics signals the utter failure to see that the moral substance of any society can be acutely
gauged by its attitude towards its members, especially the most vulnerable: the unborn, the
very young, the aged, the disabled and the very sick. This distortion has in turn led to the
perversion of the very society that eugenics hopes to improve” a poisonious philosophy of life
would lead not only to nazi germany, but our own “culture of death”.
“OF ALL the PROBLEMS WHICH WILL HAVE to be FACED in the FUTURE, in MY OPINION, the MOST DIFFICULT WILL BE THOSE CONCERNING the TREATMENT of the INFERIOR RACES of MANKIND” – Leonard Darwin
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EUGENICS “BLINDED by SCIENCE” EVOLUTIONARY EVIL
Eugenics in the english-speaking world had virtually no critics among the “chattering classes”
with the most scathing assessments of the movement, g.k. chesterton argued that contrary to
the claims of its proponents, eugenics was not really supported by solid scientific evidence
G.K. CHESTERTON questioned the role that eugenicists gave to hereditary in shaping human societies and determining their future
Chesterton STOOD VIRTUALLY ALONE against the intellectual world of his day
Chesterton was the first to condemn what many of his peers praised.
“Eugenics, as discussed, evidently means the control of some men over the marriage and
unmarriage of others; and probably means the control of the few over the marriage and unmarriage of the many” – G.K. Chesterton
Chesterton showed no sign of being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary,
he thundered against eugenics, ranking it one of the great evils of modern society
In one of the most chillingly accurate prophecies of the century, Chesterton warned that the
ideas that eugenics had unleashed were likely to bear bitter fruit in another nation.
That nation was Germany, the “very land of scientific culture from which the ideal of a
SUPERMAN HAD COME. The very group that nazism tried to exterminate, eastern
European Jews, and the group it. Targeted for later extermination, the slavs, were two of
those whose BIOLOGICAL UNFITNESS eugenists sought so eagerly to confirm.
Chesterton also attacked the SCIENTIFICALLY JUSTIFIED regimentation that others call
the “health police”
The same rationalizations that justified eugenics, chesterton notes, can also be used to
deprive a working man of his beer or any man of his pipe; first published in 1922, there’s a
startling relevance to what chesterton had to say about mettlesome bureaucrats who deprive
life of its little pleasures and freedoms.
it’s now generally agreed that eugenics was born of a paranoia fed by evolution and by the
ignorance and blind prejudice” of social elites. The thing that really is trying to tyrannize
through government is SCIENCE. The thing that really does use the secular arm is science
and the creed that really is levying tithes and capturing schools, … enforced by fine and
imprisonment, … proclaimed not in sermons but in statues, and spread not by pilgrims but by
policeman – that creed is the great but disputed system of thought which began with evolution
and has ended in eugenics. – g.k. chesterton
“sparta must be regarded as the first völkisch state. the exposure of the sick, weak, deformed
children, in short, THEIR DESTRUCTION, was more DECENT and in truth a thousand times
more human than the wretched insanity of our day which preserves the most pathological
subject … IT IS NOT TRUTH that MATTERS, BUT VICTORY” – Adolf Hitler
SOCIAL ENGINEERING & “EVOLUTION”:
“PROGRESS” The GODS of GOVERNMENT and “SCIENCE”
“Science” is used to rationalize power and “progress”, practiced by “big” government
Hitler used evolutionary theory to justify the Holocaust.
Darwin’s idea that evolution means “the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life”
eventually led to Nazism and the Jewish Holocaust – even though Darwin himself would have
been appalled at the thought. hitler regarded himself as the incarnation of the will of Germany,
the purpose of that will being to guide the evolutionary destiny of its people.
Christianity makes no distinction of race or of color; it seeks to break down all racial
barriers. in this respect … christianity is against that of nature, for the races of mankind are
the evolutionary harvest which nature has toiled through long ages to produce?”
“of all the problems which will have to be faced in the future, in my opinion, the most difficult
will be those concerning the treatment of the inferior races of mankind” – Leonard Darwin
“I am FREEING man from the RESTRAINTS of intelligence and a degrading …
FALSE vision called CONSCIENCE and MORALITY” – Hitler
In mein kampf, hitler used the german word for evolution (entwicklung) many times, citing
“lower human types. In his chapter entitled “nation and race,” hitler said, “the stronger must
dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born
weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man;
for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (hoherentwicklung) of
organic living beings would be unthinkable a few pages later, he said, “those who want to live,
let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not
deserve to live”
The success in breeding cattle, dogs and other animals with certain desired characteristics
gave empirical support to the concept of racial breeding as advocated by eugenicists and later
hitler and others. In july 14, 1933, the german parliament passed legislation that allowed
persons with hereditary diseases to be sterilized without their consent and against their wishes
from 1934 to 1939, an estimated 300,000 to 350,000 people with schizophrenia, manic-
depressive syndrome, hereditary epilepsy and other conditions were sterilized
In 1934, adolf hitler issued a secret order that initiated a national euthanasia program to end
the lives of the institutionalized, which he disparagingly described as ‘USELESS EATERS’
This euthanasia program was introduced with the explicit aim of freeing up as many as 800,000
beds for expected war casualties. At around the same period, hitler launched an anti-semitic
program that sanctioned the state-sponsored mass murder or genocide of six million european
jews throughout german-occupied territory. The first to be killed were the aged [those who are
an economic burden, who detract from the happiness of society as a whole], the infirm, the
senile, the mentally retarded, and defective children [that included epileptics]
Instead of letting chance factors dominate reproduction decisions, Hitler proposed that the
SCIENTISTS USE the POWER of the STATE to influence these decisions so that the
gene pool would shift to what “informed conclusions” concluded was the desired direction.
Hitler believed that the Nazi race programs would further evolution by intelligently deciding which traits were not beneficial, and preventing those with them from reproducing
“From the ‘PRESERVATION of FAVORED RACES in the STRUGGLE FOR LIFE’ [THAT IS,
Darwin ‘s subtitle to Origin of Species] it was a SHORT STEP to the PRESERVATION of
FAVORED INDIVIDUALS, CLASSES OR NATIONS and from their PRESERVATION to THEIR GLORIFICATION.
DARWINISM BY ITSELF DID NOT PRODUCE the HOLOCAUST, BUT without
Darwinism, especially in its Social Darwinist and EUGENICS PERMUTATIONS, neither
Hitler nor his nazi followers would have had the NECESSARY SCIENTIFIC
UNDERPINNINGS to CONVINCE THEMSELVES and their collaborators that one of the
WORLD’s GREATEST ATROCITIES was REALLY MORALLY PRAISEWORTHY.
i.e. – science itself is not necessarily the problem … it’s humanity’s (flawed/”sinful”) use
of science for our own selfish, flawed means churchill’s “new dark age … made through power
practiced by “perverted” people [not science]
Reinhold Niebuhr and the PROBLEM of EVIL:
Reinhold Niebuhr: “the only explanation that can account for both the evil of the holocaust and
the compassionate response of the world community after the fact is the biblical
understanding of human nature. Evil is not to be traced back to the individual but to the
collective behavior of humanity. GOODNESS, armed with POWER, is CORRUPTED; and
pure love without power is destroyed.
In his mercy, God restrains human evil. The reason we react with horror to the nazi atrocities
is because we are made in the IMAGE of GOD, which includes the CONSCIENCE that God
has given us and our capacity for compassion and love. Yet the ultimate reason such atrocities
could be carried out is the same reason EVERYONE of US is CAPABLE of EVIL: HUMAN
NATURE is FALLEN under the CURSE of SIN.
“It is when people form together as GROUPS, under the “mask” of “righteousness”,
that people lose a sense of individual responsibility and ACT LIKE “BEASTS” – Aristotle
“The tendency to claim god as an ally for our partisan value and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism” – Reinhold Niebuhr
“Some of the biggest cases of mistaken identity are among intellectuals who have trouble remembering that they are not God.” – Thomas Sowell
“for just as man is the best of the animals when completed, when separated from law and adjudication he is the worst of all” – Aristotle (mankind’s “inhumanity”)
Is HUMANITY ESSENTIALLY “GOOD” OR “EVIL”?
“darwinism by itself did not produce the holocaust, but without darwinism … neither hitler
nor his nazi followers would have had the necessary scientific underpinnings to convince
themselves and their collaborators that one of the worlds greatest atrocities was really morally
Richard Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany
“the whole point of the eugenic pseudo-scientific theories is that they are to be applied
wholesale, by some more sweeping and generalizing money power than the individual
husband or wife or household” ― g.k. chesterton
“eugenics asserts that all men must be so stupid that they cannot manage their own affairs;
and also so clever that they can manage each other’s” ― g.k. chesterton
materialism is really our established church; for the government will really help it to persecute its”
G.K. Chesterton, Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State
i am not frightened of the word ‘persecution’…it is a term of legal fact. if it means the imposition by the police of a widely disputed theory, incapable of final proof – then our priests are not now persecuting, but our doctors are”
“eugenics, as discussed, evidently means the control of some men over the marriage and
unmarriage of others; and probably means the control of the few over the marriage and
unmarriage of the many” – g.k. chesterton
“you are a member of the first generation of doctors in the history of medicine to turn their
backs on the oath of hippocrates and kill millions of old useless people, unborn children,
born malformed children, for the good of mankind – and to do so without a single murmur
from one of you. not a single letter of protest in the august new england journal of medicine” – g.k. chesterton
SOCIAL ENGINEERING &“EVOLUTION”:
A secular Jew, David Berlinski nonetheless delivers a biting defense of religious thought.
this author has spent his career writing about mathematics and the sciences. david berlinski
turns the scientific community’s cherished skepticism back on itself,
daring to ask and answer some rather EMBARRASSING QUESTIONS:
Has anyone provided a PROOF of GOD’s INEXISTENCE? Not even close.
Has quantum cosmology EXPLAINED the EMERGENCE of the UNIVERSE or WHY IT IS HERE? Not even close.
Have the sciences explained why our universe seems to be FINE-TUNED to ALLOW for the existence of life? Not even close.
Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is NOT religious thought? Close enough.
Has RATIONALISM in moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is GOOD, what is RIGHT, and what is MORAL? Not close enough.
Has SECULARISM in the TERRIBLE twentieth century been a FORCE FOR GOOD? Not even close to being close.
Is there a narrow and OPPRESSIVE ORTHODOXY of thought and opinion WITHIN the SCIENCES? Close enough.
Does anything in the sciences or in their philosophy justify the claim that RELIGIOUS BELIEF is IRRATIONAL? Not even ballpark.
Is SCIENTIFIC ATHEISM a FRIVOLOUS EXERCISE in INTELLECTUAL CONTEMPT? Dead on.
berlinski does not dismiss the achievements of western science. the great physical theories, he observes, are among the treasures of the human race
berlinski explores the limits of science and the pretensions of those who insist it can be – indeed must be – the ultimate touchstone for understanding our world and ourselves
scientists do nothing to answer the questions that religion asks, and they fail to offer a coherent description of the cosmos or the methods by which it might be investigated
“the idea that the ‘world of matter’ is the ‘world that matters’ is simply not true”
this scientist vision, purely and simply materialistic, in which man is only a cog of a bigger mechanism: the society or the state, seek to “improve” the human race to the point of creating the “superman”
“the attack on traditional religious thought,” writes david berlinski in the devil’s delusion, “marks the consolidation in our time of science as the single system of belief in which rational men and women might place their faith, and if not their faith, then certainly their devotion”
militant atheism is on the rise. richard dawkins, sam harris, daniel dennett and christopher hitchens have dominated bestseller lists with books denigrating religious belief as dangerous foolishness
“a defense [of religion] is needed because none has been forthcoming. the discussion has been ceded to men who regard religious belief with frivolous contempt”
― David Berlinski, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions
“their books have in recent years poured from every press, and although differing widely in their style, they are identical in their message: because scientific theories are true, religious beliefs must be false”
These authors are merely the leading edge of a far larger movement – one that now includes much of the scientific community.
“what hitler … mao and the ss … gestapo … the nkvd … the commissars, functionaries, swaggering executioners, nazi doctors, communist party theoreticians, intellectuals, brown shirts, black shirts, gauleiters, and a thousand party hacks did not believe was that god was watching what they were doing
“and as far as we can tell, very few of those carrying out the horrors of the twentieth century worried overmuch that god was watching what they were doing either. that is the meaning of a secular society”
― david berlinski, the devil’s delusion: atheism and its scientific pretensions
“if moral statements are about something, then the universe is not quite as science suggests it
is … physical theories, having said nothing about god, … right or wrong, good or bad”
“to admit this would force philosophers to confront the possibility that the physical sciences offer a grossly inadequate view of reality”
“And since philosophers very much wish to think of themselves as scientists, this would offer
them an unattractive choice between changing their allegiances or accepting their irrelevance
– David Berlinski, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions
David Berlinsky: “Has anyone provided proof of God’s Inexistence? not even close
“has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here?
not even close.
are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious
thought? close enough.
have our sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? not even close.
Has rationalism and moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? not close enough
Has secularism in the terrible 20th century been a force for good? not even close, to being close
is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy in the sciences? close enough.
does anything in the sciences or their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? not even in the ball park.
is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt? dead on
“The argument that Hawking has offered may be conveyed by question-and-answer,
as in the Catholic catechism. A Catechism of Quantum Cosmology
Q: From what did our universe evolve?
A: Our universe evolved from a much smaller, much emptier mini-universe. You
may think of it as an EGG.
Q: What was the smaller, emptier universe like?
A: It was a four-dimensional sphere with nothing much inside it. You may think of that as WEIRD.
Q: How can a sphere have four dimensions?
A: A sphere may have four dimensions if it has one more dimension than a three-dimensional sphere. You may think of that as OBVIOUS.
Q: Does the smaller, emptier universe have a name?
A: The smaller, emptier universe is called a de Sitter universe. You may think of that as about time someone paid attention to de Sitter.
Q: Is there anything else I should know about the smaller, emptier universe?
A: Yes. It represents a solution to Einstein’s field equations. You may think of that as a good thing.
Q: Where was that smaller, emptier universe or egg?
A: It was in the place where space as we know it did not exist. You may think of it as a SAC.
Q: When was it there?
A: It was there at the time when time as we know it did not exist. You may think of it as a MYSTERY.
Q: Where did the egg come from?
A: The egg did not actually come from anywhere. You may think of this as ASTONISHING.
Q: If the egg did not come from anywhere, how did it get there?
A: The egg got there because the wave function of the universe said it was probable. You
may think of this as a DONE DEAL. Q: HOW did our universe evolve from the egg?
A: It evolved by inflating itself up from its sac to become the universe in which we now find
ourselves. You may think of that as JUST ONE OF THOSE THINGS.
This catechism, I should add, is not a parody of quantum cosmology.
It IS quantum cosmology.”
– David Berlinski, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions
“just who has imposed on the suffering human race poison gas, barbed wire, high explosives, experiments in eugenics, the formula for zyklon b, heavy artillery, pseudo-scientific justifications for mass murder, cluster bombs, attack submarines, napalm, intercontinental missiles , military space platforms and nuclear weapons? if memory serves it was not the vatican”
― David Berlinski, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions
darwin may have “MISLED SCIENCE INTO A DEAD END”, the biologist shi v.
liu observed “did you IMAGINE that SCIENCE was a DISINTERESTED PURSUIT
of the TRUTH? well, you were WRONG”
“Neither the nazis nor the communists … acted because of their atheism. they were simply
keen to kill a great many people. atheism had nothing to do with it. they might well have been
– david berlinski, the devil’s delusion: atheism and its scientific pretensions
“strain on the community – that’s a ridiculous argument. then nobody in the world should have children. i think asking people not to have children is just another form of genocide”
– rebecca lee, bobcat and other stories
They are intentionally devaluing human life. the progressives/liberals are carrying out what
their spiritual father satan demands. since we are created in god’s image, every time satan sees
one of us, he is reminded of god and will do everything he can to erase any resemblance we
have of our creator by getting us to do evil, to keep us on the path to hell or he will use others
to snuff out as many humans as he can.
The LEFT’s CIRCUS TENT SCIENCE
by peter heck americanthinker.com august 9, 2015
Peter Heck: “the voice leaving a message in my radio show inbox was dripping with equal parts
contempt and revelry. Finally,” he thundered, gay marriage is the law of the land and science has
triumphed over your backwards religious book of fairytales. i wonder if that’s the same
science that produced the most recent report from the centers for disease control showing 94.9%
of new hiv diagnoses in teenagers resulted from men having sex with men? science indeed”
not that the caller’s meme was something new. having abandoned belief in any moral
authority to the universe, liberal revolutionaries have been claiming the mantle of science as
justification for their agenda for far longer than i can remember.
and their hijacking of the word [“science”] has resulted in great success for them politically
and culturally. my only question remains, how long will our society be stupid enough to keep
after all, this is a movement that goes so far in their insistence that sexual attraction is
inborn and unchangeable that they seek to enact laws actually forbidding someone
experiencing unwanted same-sex attraction from seeking psychiatric help to overcome their
apparently ‘respecting the sexual preferences of the individual’ counts only when that sexual
preference is to act on an urge rather than resist it. but yet these same folks who claim that
sexual attraction is unalterable are also the ones who insist that men like bruce jenner,
undeniably born with genetic maleness (dna, chromosomes, bone structure, and functioning
reproductive organs of a male) can somehow ‘become’ a woman”
yes, the ‘party of science’ would have you believe that your attractions are unchangeably
genetic in nature, but your genetic biology is a matter of personal opinion.
call me crazy, but i think when your agenda convinces you that a white woman like rachel
dolezal can be black, a caucasian like elizabeth warren can be a cherokee indian, a man like
bruce jenner can be a woman … and an attention-obsessed girl like miley cyrus can be
something called ‘gender fluid’, it’s pretty clear your ideology finds its origin in a circus tent
rather than a laboratory. of course, that only scratches the surface. the recent revelations of
planned parenthood’s atrocious behavior also undermine the scientific pretensions
of the left
Forget the cavalier tone, the wine-sipping, and the lamborghini wishes from the
organization’s prestigious executives caught on camera. focus instead on the galling defense
liberals around the country are mounting for this ghoulish conduct”
writing in the new republic, dr. jen gunter protested that the ‘specimens’ being harvested are
not “baby parts,” but rather, mere ‘products of conception’. While the euphemism is
annoying enough, let’s ask a simple question: if planned parenthood offered the biotech firms
a goat liver instead of the liver from one of these “products of conception,” would they find
Of course not. the parts are desired precisely because they are human parts. it is either
rubber-room insanity or an intentional abuse of sound science that causes someone to dismiss
the humanity of life being extinguished in the womb, all while planned parenthood’s profit is
completely dependent upon that very humanity
while everyone knows the ‘scientists’ on the left oppose evil fossil fuels because of a fear
of global warming, let’s not forget they also oppose nuclear energy because it’s too dangerous,
protest wind farms because they kill birds, and block the expansion of hydroelectric power
because dams destroy aquatic ecosystems.
in other words, screw scientific advancements and drive a buggy. that is, if you are one of
the lucky ones to find food after liberals successfully end all genetically-modified organisms”
never mind that through scientific selection and breeding we have been genetically modifying
organisms since the dawn of civilization in order to feed our growing population.
no, tor eckman’s holistic healing and herb garden buffet sounds like a much better idea.
and heaven help you if, like conservative scott walker, you don’t submit to the left’s
“settled science” of Darwinism.
when asked msnbc’s chris matthews started using this as a litmus test back in 2009 when he
challenged then-representative mike pence on the issue. apparently, believing a supernatural
being created life according to its various kinds is tantamount to rejecting the scientific
method, that’s funny since matthews professes to be christian, thus believing a supernatural
being resurrected a dead body from the grave, and thereby violates the far more “settled
science” known as death. but no doubt chris would have a very scientific explanation for it.
they always do.”
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE: POPULATION CONTROL
SAVING the EARTH OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
– AL GORE BELIEVES BIRTH CONTROL CAN CURB POLLUTION cbnnews.com
– U.N. UNVEILS PLOT TO REDUCE AFRICAN POPULATION by alex newman
– CHINA’S POPULATION POLICE FORCE MOTHER TO ABORT BABY AT SEVEN MONTHS by dave bohon
– U.S. & U.K. TAXPAYERS FUNDING FORCED STERILIZATION IN INDIA
by alex newman
– UNITED NATIONS PUSHES POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA by raven clabough
– EXPOSING THE GLOBAL POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA by brian clowes, ph.d.
– KILLING US SOFTLY: CAUSES and CONSEQUENCES of the
GLOBAL DEPOPULATION POLICY by kevin mugur galalae
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE: POPULATION CONTROL
SAVING the EARTH OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill
all these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only
through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome”
– the EPA’S AGENDA 21 manual, stated:
“the real enemy is humanity itself. the damage people cause the planet is a function of demographics equal to the degree of development
– the agenda 21 manual: “the ecological crisis was really the POPULATION CRISIS … “CUT the POPULATION BY NINETY-PLUS PERCENT and YOU STOP INJURING the earth by an equal amount”
the epa’s agenda 21 manual, stated: “the ecological crisis was really the population crisis …
cut the population by ninety-plus percent and you stop injuring the earth by an equal amount
AL GORE BELIEVES BIRTH CONTROL CAN CURB POLLUTION
CBNNews.com June 23, 2011
Former vice presidental gore wants people to have fewer children. to save the planet “one of
the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to
stabilize the population. al gore: “one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and
educate girls and women. you have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so
women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children”
al gore : “you have to lift child survival rates so that parents feel comfortable having small families … the population stabilize[s] and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices”
are you comfortable with government control of “population planning”?
club of rome, the first global revolution, 1991:
“in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the
threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill” …
all these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through
changedattitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. all these dangers are caused by
human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be
overcome. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
section i: social and economic dimensions
achieving a more sustainable population and settlement in decision making
the epa’s agenda 21 manual, stated:
“the real enemy is humanity itself. the damage people cause the planet is a function of demographics equal to the degree of development
The REAL ENEMY is HUMANITY ITSELF
IS THERE a SINISTER, HIDDEN AGENDA to the SOCIAL ENGINEERING
of AGENDA 21 ?
the epa’s agenda 21 manual, stated: “the ecological crisis was really the population crisis”
the epa’s agenda 21 manual, stated:
“cut the population by ninety-plus percent and you stop injuring the earth by an equal
amount” massive re-structuring and re-settlement of humans into designated areas for living in
controled-zoned cities united nations planned massive human population”reduction” by 85% by 2030
AGENDA 21… The ‘PLANNED’ DEPOPULATION PROJECT… IT’S HAPPENING at STEALTH SPEED… RIGHT BEFORE YOUR EYES!
4/11/2011 UN Biodiversity Treaty UN Global Biological Assessment Sustainable Human Populations:
“population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere” (i.e. the earth) “it is
estimated that an ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants should be
able to support 5 to 7 billion people. areas of government, as well as private organizations that
would like to see the population of the world decrease at an astounding rate (up to 90%)
The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitist’s hold dear. this standard is called:
The HEGELIAN DIALECTIC:
Problem – Reaction-Solution
Create the Problem
Cause a Reaction
Offer a Solution
You will see exactly how they have created the problem; caused a reaction so widespread it is
really quite impressive how successful they have been; and offered a solution: a deadly solution
MIKHAIL GORBACHEV: “we must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception,
about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short,
is the population crisis.
JACQUES COUSTEAU unesco courier 1991: “in order to save the planet it would be
NECESSARY to KILL 350,000 PEOPLE PER DAY”
jacques cousteau: “if we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all
human beings to participate in our adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb
the population explosion that has a direct influence on the impoverishment of the less-
favored communities. otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the
ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.
Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from … any
nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside – by international
agencies helped in the formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental
Henry Kissinger, 1978: “U.S. POLICY TOWARD the THIRD WORLD SHOULD BE ONE of DE-POPULATION”
UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population; US Senate September 9, 1994: “a reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present north american material standard of living would be one billion people. this must be implemented within 30-50 years, 2/3 of the population must be cut”
David Rockefeller, 2000:“we are on the verge of a global transformation. all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order”
Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society 1953:
“there are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. the first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…”
“i do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing … war has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective”
“if a black death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full”…
“the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s”…
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional Committee: “And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool”
Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy:
“political unification in some sort of world government will be required… even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE:
POPULATION CONTROL SAVING the EARTH
OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
Bureau of Land Management Internal Working Document Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Management Objective/Purpose:
“all ecosystem management activities should consider human beings as biological resources…” this document was brought before congress. this statement created such an uproar that it was removed”
According to the Charter, we must:
“Adopt at ALL levels SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT plans and regulations….”
(This is a prescription for global socialism in a SUPER-REGULATED GLOBAL STATE)
“Prevent pollution of any part of the environment…” (Enforcing this dictum would mean stopping virtually all human activity.)
“Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price.” (This seemingly harmless sentence would empower the state to price, tax, and regulate all production and consumption.)
“Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction. (This is a thinly disguised call for that includes abortion and population control.)
“Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race … [and] sexual orientation.” (This provision is clearly aimed at criminalizing those who refuse to accept homosexuality as positive and good.)
“Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations”
The Earth Charter has not been ratified. Do not make the mistake of assuming it has not been
interwoven into our society, however! It is being taught in our schools and promoted
shamelessly by Hollywood, the UN, NBC (owned by GE), ABC, CBS, CNN, HLN and all the
Fox owned stations, with the exception of Fox News in order to keep the supporters blinded to
the machinations of Rupert Murdock. Do not be deceived! The ABILITY TO FREELY
PROCREATE is SOON to be REMOVED from US, much as it has been in China for many
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE: POPULATION CONTROL SAVING the EARTH OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
U.N. UNVEILS PLOT to REDUCE AFRICAN POPULATION
by Alex Newman TheNewAmerican.com January 2, 2014
alex newman: the united nations and its oftentimes barbaric population-control apparatus
are under fire again after releasing a deeply controversial report claiming that the african
population of kenya is too large and growing too quickly the more than 300-page
report, dubbed “kenya population situation analysis,” does not explicitly call for abortions
“to deal with the supposed “challenge,” as the u.n. and its ‘partners’ in the national government
put it, international bureaucrats are demanding stepped up efforts to brainwash kenyan
women into wanting fewer children”
Also on the agenda: more taxpayer-funded “family-planning” and “reproductive-health”
schemes to reduce the number of africans to levels considered “desirable” by the u.n.
Critics promptly lambasted the plot as undisguised eugenics, with some experts calling it a true
example of the “war on women”.
among other concerns, analysts outraged by the report noted that the u.n. population fund
(unfpa) and the establishment’s fiendish efforts to slash human populations
… “especially those considered “undesirable” by self-appointed guardians of the gene pool –
have a long and sordid history going back decades. once “science” bought into “evolution“, the
sky became the limit, because “science” became a tool of the totalitarian dictators and not to
discover gods world and how it works”
“SCIENCE” (and those who manipulate it) became the HUMANISTS’ “RELIGION”.
humanists believe that man is god. unsurprisingly liberals are humanists
alex newman: “today, the agenda marches on, as illustrated in the latest u.n. report calling for
drastically reduced numbers of Kenyans.
Especially troubling is the eugenics component of the agenda, critics say. “This kind of
eugenics by the united nations and their population-control conspirators is NOT HELPING the
black family BUT TURNING LARGE POOR FAMILIES INTO SMALL POOR
FAMILIES”, explained mark Crutcher, president of the U.S.-based group Life Dynamics
one issue surrounds the realization of the policy objective of reducing total fertility rates from
the current level of 4.6 to 2.6 children per woman by 2030,” observes the report,
TAKING SPECIAL AIM at the POOR. This is because the demand for children is still high
and is unlikely to change unless substantial changes in desired family sizes are achieved.
sustainable development requires kenya to be in a position to proactively address, rather than
only react to, the population trends that will unfold over the next decades,” the widely criticized
u.n. report continues.
alex newman: “another one of the international outfit’s controversial ploys – sustainability – to
empower itself at the expense of LIBERTY, HUMANITY and NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE.
as with coercive sterilization in india and forced abortions in china, american taxpayers are
unwittingly helping to fund the radical u.n. efforts across Africa. last year alone,
u.s. taxpayers were forced into providing more than $30 million to the unfpa.
The u.s. agency for international development (usaid), meanwhile, spent almost $11 million of
public funds in 2011 on “family planning” and “reproductive services” in Kenya. Population
research institute (pri) chief steven mosher: “the kenyan government, urged on by the unfpa and
usaid, is asserting the women of kenya should not be allowed to make their own decisions
regarding how many children to have, and should be re-educated into rejecting large
alex newman: “the unfpa and planned parenthood were accused by multiple experts of
participating in the enforcement of the communist chinese regime’s brutal ‘one-child’ policy”.
the draconian population regime set up by the mass-murdering dictatorship in beijing often
features gruesome forced abortions, reportedly assisted by unfpa and planned parenthood.
CHINA’s POPULATION POLICE FORCE MOTHER to ABORT BABY at SEVEN MONTHS by Dave Bohon June, 2012
dave bohon: The woman “was beaten and dragged into a vehicle by a group of family
planning officials while her husband, deng jiyuan, was out working. the officials asked for rmb
40,000 in fines from [her] family. when they did not receive the money, they forcibly aborted
feng at seven months, laying the body of her aborted baby next to her in the be
the u.n., however, regularly blasted by critics as the “dictators’ club,” remains as zealous as ever
in its goal of reducing the world population – especially in africa and the third world.
U.S. & U.K. TAXPAYERS FUNDING FORCED STERILIZATION in INDIA
by Alex Newman TheNewAmerican.com May 14, 2012
Alex Newman: U.S. and british taxpayers are funding brutal forced sterilizations and a
growing network of appalling “camps” in india through foreign-aid programs and even the
world bank, according to human rights activists and news reports their methods include
everything from promoting abortion and contraception to developing sterilization programs
targeting poor women in particular foreign-aid “family planning” money is being used by
indian authorities to forcibly sterilize indians using outright deception or even coercion.
“In some cases, authorities coerce families into consent by threatening to withhold food or
other essentials. sometimes the victims are bribed using western tax money without being told
what the procedures really accomplish – let alone the risks”
“Sworn affidavits by victims showing that population-control officials were completely out of
control” … “one night at one sterilization camp in the indian state of bihar, more
than 50 poor women were allegedly rounded up and sterilized in wildly unsanitary conditions
by unqualified ‘medical staff’. all of them are forced … generally, the people in the village are
very simple. they are very poor. some of them married at the age of 12 or 13”
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE:
POPULATION CONTROL SAVING the EARTH
OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
Alex Newman: “they do not know what it means. they are told it will be good for them. They
are not told it will make them permanently unable to bear children. no risks are explained to
them. in the u.k., the department for international development (dfid) gave a grant totaling more
than $250 million in 2005 to the so-called ‘reproductive child and health program’.
the scheme was supposed to offer “family planning” services to indian women – and
sterilization is by far the most common “service” provided under the plan”
“according to a government report cited by the u.k. guardian, some 500,000 indians were
sterilized in 2008 alone. experts say the true figure is much higher.
Direct methods are aimed at undermining fertility while the indirect methods are aimed at
undermining the family. both direct and indirect methods subvert people’s reproductive
COERCED SURGICAL STERILIZATION – INDIA
1952 – Population Control Policy (first in the world)
1976-77 – Indira Gandhi’s State-of-Emergency
2000 National Policy – replacement level fertility by 2010 (tubal ligations for women and vasectomies for men)
after two failed and misguided attempts to address the population problem (in 1952 and 1976), india, which is grossly overpopulated, has settled for coerced surgical sterilization as the method of choice
In less than 20 years, india has succeeded in surgically sterilizing 80% of its women of
childbearing age, which, considering that it is the world’s most populous nation after china and
has 1.2 billion people, it is an incredible accomplishment
It has succeeded not by persuasion or education as much as by coercion
Mobile medical caravans scour the country’s villages, where 80% of india’s people live, and
entice the villagers, who are for the most part illiterate and easily misled, with offers of free
medical care for every woman who has had two or more children
the women are then sedated and subjected without their knowledge or consent to a tubal
ligation, a procedure that takes circa 30 minutes, and that renders them irreversibly sterile for
the rest of their lives
The government of India offers incentives to men to voluntarily undergo a vasectomy, which is
a far easier and faster medical procedure than a tubal ligation, taking only seven minutes, but that
due to India’s culture, where men have far more authority than women, remains unpopular and
therefore a statistically less significant measure for addressing the population problem.
Alex Newman: “at the highest levels of the obama administration are people like “science czar”
john holdren, who suggested controlling population by forced abortions and secret drugging
administered by a “planetary regime” in his highly controversial book ‘ecoscience’”
Mosher noted that elitists have long used a wide range of LARGELY BOGUS CRISES TO
JUSTIFY BARBARIC EUGENICS CAMPAIGNS around the world.
“they’re using BAD SCIENCE, OUTDATED THEORIES of POPULATION and an
UNPROVEN THEORY about CLIMATE CHANGE to JUSTIFY REAL HARM TO REAL
PEOPLE IN REAL TIME,” explained population research institute chief steven mosher.
UNITED NATIONS PUSHES POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA
by Raven Clabough TheNewAmerican.com October 27, 2011
“President Obama’s science adviser john holdren wrote a book in 1977 called ecoscience in
which he indicated support for forced abortions, sterilization through infertility drugs or
through the nation’s drinking water or food”… “having babies seized from single mothers or
teen mothers and given away to couples, requiring that “people who contribute to social
deterioration … be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility”
“Maurice Strong, head of the united nations environmental program, alluded to population
control and more when he stated in 1990, “what if a small group of these world leaders were to
conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?
“in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”
“population control has also found support amongst other prominent americans, including
microsoft’s bill gates, u.s. supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg, sierra club director
david brower, planned parenthood founder margaret sanger, and david rockefeller”
united nations documents show 7 billion to be re-duced to 6 billion
thats 1 in every 7 people you know will be culled
reduce the population of america by two-thirds (66%) and designate the rest to mega-cities
within eleven mega-regions
if there are too many people, how exactly would “de-population” take place ???
global de-population or extermination through global eugenics programs ???
EXPOSING the GLOBAL POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA
by Brian Clowes, Ph.D. Human Life International
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE:POPULATION CONTROL
SAVING the EARTH OR GLOBAL GENOCIDE?
Our Mission – Human Life International’s mission is to defend the God-given right to life and dignity of all human persons from conception until natural death.
HLI is a Catholic apostolate … building a Culture of Life and of Love around the world through education, outreach, advocacy, and service.
Brian Clowes: “The UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL is the
highest decision-making body on foreign policy in the united states. on december 10, 1974, it
promulgated a top secret document entitled national security study memorandum 200,
also called the Kissinger Report, “nssm-200” is critically important to pro-life workers all over
the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and
methods of the population control movement.
according to nssm-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include:
the legalization of abortion;
financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates;
indoctrination of children; and
mandatory population control and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs.
this nssm-200 document, which is completely devoid of morality or ethics, has directly and
inevitably encouraged atrocities and massive human rights violations in dozens of the nations of
Peru – during the years 1995 to 1997, nearly a quarter of a million peruvian women were
sterilized as part of a program to fulfill then-president alberto fujimori’s family planning goals
“although this campaign was called the “voluntary surgical contraception campaign,” many
of these procedures were obviously coerced
“In fact, women whose underweight children were on government food programs were
threatened with the withholding of this food if they refused to be sterilized, and others were
kidnapped from their families and forcibly sterilized”
China – for many years, the united states government has funded the united nations population
one of the main targets of unfpa money is the people’s republic of china (prc) and its widely-
criticized forced-abortion and family planning program. According to its own documents, the
unfpa has donated more than $100 million to china’s population control program;
has bought and custom-designed a $12 million ibm computer complex specifically to monitor the
uganda became the first african country to roll back its adult hiv infection rate, from 21% in 1991 to about 6% in 2004, a 70% decrease
[uganda] accomplished this amazing feat by discouraging condom use and by changing the behavior of the people
“the population control groups could not allow this success to interfere with their inflexible template, so they aggressively undermined president yoweri museveni’s program”
“timothy wirth, president of the united nations foundation, called this highly effective program
“gross negligence toward humanity.” the united states … and others are pushing condoms as
hard as they can in uganda, and the hiv infection rate is creeping up once again”
“this is perhaps the most egregious example of population control ideology trumping the
science of proven hiv prevention programs
concentrating on “indoctrinating” [nssm-200’s language] the children of ldcs with anti-natalist
propaganda: Without diminishing in any way the effort to reach these adults, the obvious
increased focus of attention should be to change the attitudes of the next generation, those who
are now in elementary school or younger.
The UTOPIAN GOD-STATE:
population control saving the earth
or global genocide?
designing and instigating propaganda programs and sex-education curricula intended to convince couples to have smaller families, regardless of social or cultural considerations
can people “control” nature or does nature “control” people ?
agenda 21 pandemic alert may be coming soon prepare now bird flu could spark next global outbreak, urges expert
hunger is no game food is a necessity and the collectivists use it as a weapon
control of the food supply – when food is scarce or potentially unsafe, people are more easily controlled
hungry population is a submissive population
control of the food supply – when food is scarce or potentially unsafe, people are more easily controlled
adolph hitler used FOOD as a WEAPON, stating that FOOD is “a BEAUTIFUL
INSTRUMENT … FOR MANEUVERING and DISCIPLINING the MASSES”
food has been used as a weapon of war for centuries. Why then would it be outrageous for the
elite to use food as a weapon, both a physical and a psychological weapon, in a declared war on
overpopulation? As has been said time and time again, history repeats itself.
objective for this “new world order” of “agenda 21”
is to improve the social, economic and environmental “quality“
of human settlements” for “”everyone”” who will be working and living collectively !
SOCIAL ENGINEERING – ENVIRONMENTALISM
TABLE of CONTENTS
engineering global environmental utopia – agenda 21 and sustainable development
RESOURCE CONTROL – land, water, food regional planning commissions
GLOBAL GOVERNMENT – the REGULATORY STATE
NATURE WORSHIP – ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION: salvation and redemption
GREEN FASCISM Then and Today – utopia/distopia
environmental “utopia”: global sustainable development
AGENDA 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the united nations with
regard to sustainable development. environmental “utopia”: global sustainable development
agenda 21. agenda 21 is a product of the united nations conference on environment and
development (earth summit) held in rio de janeiro, brazil in 1992
it is an “action agenda” for the u.n., other multilateral organizations, and individual
governments around the world that can be executed at local, national and global levels
the “21” in agenda 21 refers to the 21st century. at the 1992 earth summit, 178 governments
voted to adopt the program. agenda 21 is a 300-page document divided into 40 chapters that
have been grouped into 4 sections:
section i: social and economic dimensions
directed toward combating poverty, especially in developing countries, changing
consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and settlement in decision making
section ii: conservation and management of resources for development
includes atmospheric protection, combating deforestation, protecting fragile environments,
conservation of biological diversity (biodiversity), control of pollution and the management of
biotechnology and radioactive wastes
according to the united nations, “agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken
globally, nationally and locally … by organizations of the united nations system, governments,
and major groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment”
the goal of agenda 21 is “sustainabilty development” – a term used to expound upon the u.n. position that human beings are destroying the earth’s atmosphere, its wildlife and natural resources
is “sustainable development” a pseudonym for centralized control over all of human life?
agenda 21 is a blueprint for international totalitarian control of all the earth and its resources – including “human resources?
virtually every behavior in which one engages in a free society would be effected by agenda 21
agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth
effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society,
unlike anything the world has ever experienced
… “a shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the united nations”
“a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources“
– environmental activist and attorney daniel sitarz
environmental “utopia”: global sustainable development
MAURICE STRONG, who has led every u.n. environmental initiative since the 1970s,
including the 1992 u.n. conference on environment and development that spawned agenda 21
in 1997, strong declared: “frankly, we may get to the point where the ONLY WAY of SAVING
the WORLD WILL BE FOR INDUSTRIAL CIVILIZATION to COLLAPSE”
“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat
intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning and suburban
housing are not sustainable’
”the concept of national sovereignty … is a principle which will yield only slowly and
reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation”
through his work in unesco, strong PROMOTES GAIA, the EARTH GODDESS, and as the
director of the temple of understanding in new york, strong encourages the REPLACEMENT
of CHRISTIANITY with the WORSHIP of “MOTHER EARTH”
the “sustainable environment” education standards are captured in “the earth charter,”
commissioned by the u.n. in 1987 and approved by unesco in march, 2000.
Claiming to represent “the values and principles for a sustainable future,” it is actually an
EARTH-CENTERED RELIGIOUS TREATISE carried to schools throughout the world in a
MOCK ARK-of-the-covenant called, “the ARK of HOPE”. The four sides of the ark carry
depictions of the FOUR PAGAN SPIRITS: earth, wind, fire and water. Mikhail Gorbachev,
who participated in writing the earth charter, said: “my hope is that this charter will be a kind of
ten commandments, a ‘sermon on the mount,’ that provides a guide for human behavior”.
Under agenda 21, all resources – land, water, minerals, air, the POPULATION must be
TIGHTLY MANAGED. Agenda 21 seeks to implement policies, “restricting” populations of
people from engaging in “RISKY” BEHAVIORthat these globalists deem as lacking
WHAT OR WHO would implement, “manage” or govern “agenda 21”?
WHAT behavior is considered “risky” or lacking sustainability?
WHO decides exactly what “risky” or lacking sustainability” is or means?
implementation of world-wide “sustainable development” are numerous
because agenda 21 is not a treaty, the senate was unable to hold a formal debate or vote on
it, nor was it ratified by the executive branch of the united states. several congressmen and
senators have spoken in congress. In support of agenda 21; these include representative
nancy pelosi, senator john kerry and senator harry reid. Agenda 21 and sustainable
development have been incorporated into our government through executive orders, the epa,
iclei and other regulatory agencies, boards and commissions.
nancy pelosi sponsored house congress resolution 353 on sustainable development
1993 – president clinton signed executive order 12852, creating the president’s council for
sustainable development bypassing congressional approval of agenda 21. This council was
tasked with injecting sustainable development and agenda 21 into all levels of our government
nationwide. The republican national committee has adopted a resolution opposing agenda 21,
and the republican party platform stated that “we strongly reject the u.n. agenda 21 as
erosive of american sovereignty. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening
of the multilateral system, including the united nations. In the united states, over 528 cities are
members of i.c.l.e.i., an international sustainability organization that helps to implement local
agenda 21 concepts across the world.
I.C.L.E.I. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
effective execution of agenda 21 will REQUIRE a PROFOUND REORIENTATION of ALL HUMAN SOCIETY, UNLIKE ANYTHING the WORLD HAS EVER EXPERIENCED
where will people live in an “agenda 21” world?
here is a description by an elected state committee woman in massachusetts:
“private property must be abolished in order to build ‘stackable communities,’ where people
are required to live on top of one another in mixed-use zones
“within walking distance from schools and work, thereby eliminating the need for transportation other than bicycles, buses and light rail”
Maurice Strong: “current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class
involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-
conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable’:
“we can’t drive our suvs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at
all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say ok“ – barack obama
“SMART GROWTH” is one of the more PLEASANT-SOUNDING EUPHEMISMS used to
hide its agenda inside a cloaked presentation of “environmental sustainability.
six new england cities had been selected for “smart growth assistance. Sustainable societies“
is the u.n.’s blueprint for social equity through an assault on private property via
environmental and economic regulations championed by globalists, “sustainable living”
initiatives sound good on the surface.
But the ULTERIOR MOTIVES comport with the u.n.’s vision of a one-world government
CONTROLLING YOUR LIFE, your children’s lives, all controlled by a select few. The
process is to take the public policy- making function away from elected officials and give it
to non-elected officials giving the appearance of broad public input into the decision-making
process. They START out SMALL, but their ULTIMATE goals are BIG and DESTRUCTIVE.
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
– REGIONALISM – THE BLUEPRINT FOR YOUR SERFDOM by michael shaw
– in THE PIPELINE: SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON WITH FIRE RING BAN
by chris epting
– the METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (mtc) –
the metropolitan planning organization (mpo) for the san francisco bay area
– BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT TARGETS HOTEL FOR LAND GRAB
by henry brean
– The CLEAR ACT of ANOTHER FEDERAL LAND GRAB
by Cassandra Anderson
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
REGIONALISM – The BLUEPRINT for Your SERFDOM by Michael Shaw
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIONS
“did you know that some of your local elected representatives are enabling a shadow
government to evolve? these people promote the reinvention of government through support
of and appointments to ‘regional’ boards that act like soviet councils”
“these [local] councils are funded to implement [global] agenda 21”
global sustainable development:
agenda 21/sustainable development includes smart growth, the grand boulevard initiative, climate action plans, carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, california legislation
AB 32 and SB 375
Many town officials are SELLING US OUT to GLOBAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
with help from the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI):
the process is designed to take the public policy- making function away from elected
officials and place it in the hands of non-elected officials, giving the appearance of broad
public input into the decision-making process. These community “awards” force federal
regulations on local governments and then exacerbate their finances once the grants expire.
Is The CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SCAMMING
The CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE?
by Ronald A. Zumbrun July, 2009
the author of ab 226 points out, the deposit of all penalties in the coastal act services fund
could now be used by the commission to further its enforcement activities. This is the creation
of a new source of funds for the commission from the fines or penalties imposed by the
commission itself. the list of unfair extortive tactics is endless – bills ab 226 and ab 291 c
ombined mean that the commission can bypass the courts, impose a penalty and place a
lien on the involved property. other regional environ-mental regulatory agencies:
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) was established in 1978 by Assembly Bill
402 out of a growing concern for a single, unified California transportation policy.
The Commission replaced and assumed the responsibilities of four independent bodies: The
California Highway Commission, the State Transportation Board, the State Aeronautics Board,
and the California Toll Bridge Authority
FIRE PITS COULD BE REMOVED FROM SOCAL BEACHES UNDER NEW PROPOSAL A PLAN TO IMPROVE AIR QUALITY COULD END a LONGTIME OCEANSIDE TRADITION by Chloe Stepney March, 2013
Air quality officials want all 840 fire pits on los angeles and orange county beaches to be
removed, because they say the smoke from the pits adds pollution to the basin.
However, many beach-goers call the fire pits a summer staple. The changes are being discussed
by the south coast air quality management district, which is considering two proposed
amendments that would alter rules for wood-burning devices and open burning.
aqmd governing board is set to vote on the proposed rule amendments may 3
IN the PIPELINE: SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON with FIRE RING BAN
by Chris Epting April, 2013
Chris Epting: “the air quality management district’s (aqmd) heavy-handed approach of
ceremoniously banning fire rings in huntington BEACH (and ACROSS SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA) without providing any specific evidence certainly seems suspicious and even
underhanded. but until i attended the ‘public consultation hearing’ thursday, i had no idea
just how bad this all is. it concerns me intensely how aqmd is looking to alter southern
california culture without having presented any evidence about why they are doing so”
so i asked the man chairing the session, assistant deputy executive officer laki tisopulos, if
aqmd has done original data research in huntington beach to validate their call for a
ban. i approached him with a question. given how sudden and sweeping this imposed ban is,
has aqmd done specific research in huntington beach to justify this ban? ‘no’, he said
“would aqmd have ever told us? but here’s perhaps the worst. 89.3 kpcc recently quoted aqmb governing board chairman william burke as saying, he’s ‘100 percent certain’ that the aqmd will lift its exemption on beach bonfires when it meets in may”
“got that? game over. fix is in. 100% guaranteed by the governing board chairman
(who also sits on the coastal commission)”
I was on radio speaking about this with doug mcintyre and i think he has it right. “we’ve had
too much experience with these fascistic, totalitarian boards that nobody votes on – and they
are the judge, jury and executioner”
“they want to redefine culture and trash our economy? let them tell a mob, face to face. not
slip it under the door in the middle of the night”
reconnecting america lauds metropolitan transportation commission funding for transit-
oriented affordable housing march, 2011
the metropolitan transportation commission (mtc) – the metropolitan planning organization
(mpo) for the san francisco bay area – officially committed $10 million to the bay area transit-
oriented affordable housing fund (toah fund)
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIONS
created by the state legislature in 1970, the mtc is the transportation planning, coordinating
and financing agency for the nine-county san francisco bay area – over the years, the agency’s
scope has grown. the bay area air quality management district (baaqmd) is a public agency
that regulates the stationary sources of air pollution in the nine counties of california’s san
francisco bay area
UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 21 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT and the REGIONAL ONE BAY AREA PLAN February, 2013
Many in the bay area have been fighting against a plan that will socially re-engineer lives
referred to as the one bay area plan it will transform the lives of over 9 million people and
towns in 9 counties over the next 25 to 30 years. high density stack and pack housing next to
mass transit all in the name of saving the planet and reducing ghgs (green house gases)
private property outside of city and county will be highly restricted and/or off limits as part
of the first ever statewide re-wilding and corridor system in california is created.
the crazy thing is no one seems to know about it. bay area residents and taxpayers have been
kept out of the process. most have never heard of the regional unelected bodies pushing plans
or the legislation we are now being asked to follow. all will be affected by it in some way in the
near future. This is happening all over the state and country under different names
these planswere hatched long before the state legislation was enacted by a small group of
ngo’s (non-governmental organizations), foundations and regional unelected bodies bodies
funded with tax payer money.
there are three main pieces of legislation that are being followed in california to complete the
transformation and socially re-engineer our lives
SB 375 (2008 Sustainable Communities Strategy), AB 32 (2006 Global Warming Act) and
AB 2785 (2010 California Essential Habitat Connectivity Map)
ALL of THESE BILLS were SIGNED INTO LAW by GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER
the global warming bill
ab 32 calls for a reduction in green house gases to 1990 levels by 2020
the sb 375 bill links land use to transportation and specifies the majority of future construction
be compact, high density, low income housing next to mass transit
compact, high density, low income housing next to mass transit in order to
force californians out of their cars and single family homes
ab 2785 identifies (maps) an animal and vegetation corridor system throughout california
ab 2785 identifies government regulated land
to complete the california wildlands corridors
The few, regular citizens, who have found out about the one bay area plan were horrified
where did this plan come from? and why are unelected regional agencies dictating how and where the people of the bay area will live in the future?
this plan is being duplicated all over the country and the world, but the bay area is one of the four initial pilot programs within the U.S.
the pilot areas were denver, atlanta, chicago and the bay area
is america being transformed into an orwellian prison camp right in front of our eyes, and very few people are even objecting to it?
THEY START OUT SMALL, BUT THEIR END GOALS ARE BIG AND DESTRUCTIVE
“there have existed, in every age and every country, two distinct orders of men – the lovers of freedom and the devoted advocates of power” – Robert Hayne
under agenda 21 land, water, minerals, the air, the population itself all must be TIGHTLY MANAGED
land in rural areas no longer be allowed to become “buildable” and be given “wilderness“ to protect “bio-diversity”
the government has been purchasing land for many years, ever broadening its areas that cannot be inhabited by humans
land is the means of production, “property” a “natural” right
without “private property”, individuals are reduced to selling their labor for wages, as they have no other way to produce wealth
the local agenda 21 planning guide – a u.n. manual for global transformation (home from the 1996 un conference on human settlements in istanbul) was prepared by the international council for local environmental initiatives (iclei)
land … cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the markets
private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice
if [private property] is unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes
public control of land use is therefore indispensable ….” (item #10 in the un agenda at the 1976 habit)
buffer zones are areas that agenda 21 has designated as not inhabitable for humans. this is detailed under the “wildlands project”
lands would be reserved as wilderness
with connecting corridors
connecting corridors of wilderness, pushing ever-outward the buffer zones, and surrounding the entire area with an ever-expanding “zone of cooperation”
the wildlands project seeks to determine the majority of land in america as core reserves or buffer zones
epa usurping privately owned land for agenda 21 buffer zones
most of alabama has already been gobbled up by the southern appalachian biosphere reserve, one of 47 u.n. biosphere reserves
bureau of land management.
what we do. – energy; fire; grazing; planning; recreation
BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT TARGETS HOTEL FOR LAND GRAB
by Henry Brean Las Vegas Review Journal February, 2004
the hacienda hotel and casino on u.s. highway 93 near boulder city is on the bureau of land
management’s proposed list of environmentally sensitive lands that could be purchased by the
government. for one, the property is “within a congressionally designated unit set aside for
environmental and recreation uses, in the middle of habitat used by several protected species,
including desert tortoise and bighorn sheep, said jim holland, park planner for the lake mead
national recreation area.
the park service nominated the hacienda for the blm’s fifth round of land purchases under the
southern nevada public land management act of 1998. The hotel-casino is one of 33 parcels
on the blm’s proposed list, which includes nearly 37,900 acres valued at approximately
The CLEAR ACT of ANOTHER FEDERAL LAND GRAB
by Cassandra Anderson Infowars.com July, 2010
U.S. representative louie gohmert (r-tx) addressed congress to report the natural resources
committee’s passage of hr 3534, the consolidated land, energy and aquatic resources act.
(clear act) of 2009 clear act contains a provision for the federal government to spend
$900 million a year to purchase private land over the next 30 years, for a grand total of
$27 billion dollars over 3 decades. Gohmert noted that the federal government already owns
or manages about 30% of the land in America, most of it in the western states.
ghomert went on to say that when the federal government acquires land, it promises revenue
but then fails to utilize the resources; an example is timber, as logging is prohibited in most
federal lands gohmert then showed a graph of how much money the federal government has
spent to acquire more land over the last few years
2008 – $100 million
2009 – $150 million
2010 – $300 million
Gohmert was incredulous that the federal government intends to raise its purchasing
allocations to $900 million a year for the next 30 years and questioned “how in the world does
that make sense”?
It makes perfect sense when the objectives of the u.n.’s agenda 21 are understood.
Agenda 21 is the blueprint for depopulation and total control from the international level all
the way down to the individual level, using the environment as the excuse. The clear act’s
funding for private property purchase by the federal government is just one part of the
machinery that is overtaking america’s private land. Agenda 21 sustainable development
goals are to MAKE 50% OF AMERICA INTO ‘WILDLANDS’ that are OFF-LIMITS
to HUMANS and to HERD PEOPLE INTO ‘SMART GROWTH’ CITIES.
Almost all wealth is derived from land and its resources – the more land the federal
government owns, the more control they have.
Less than 6% of America is considered DEVELOPED (with roads and buildings) but the
federal government is devoted to REDUCING these developed areas. There is an abundance of
natural resources in the west, but the resources are locked up, through conservation measures to
prevent prosperity and energy independence.
Ken salazar, Secretary of the department of interior, rejects bids and returns checks to oil
companies for drilling in utah, wyoming and Colorado. Gohmert mentioned that obama is
advocating spain’s ‘green’ energy model for wind and solar development that has proven to be
an economic disaster. Senator jim demint exposed obama’s plan to takeover 10 million acres
of land in the west because the western states’ federal lands are already “federalized”. It is
likely that it intends to purchase private land in the midwestern and eastern states that is
resource rich. (especially with oil, gas and water)
sustainable development – control and depopulation is a blueprint to scrape humans off of
50% of america’s landscape through “rewilding”. federal control: centralized control over
resources follows u.n. policy. The most basic resource being water. Dams are being destroyed
in the name of “restoration”, using phony environmentalism to achieve these U.N. goals.
Marmot dam, oregon’s largest dam, is being removed,
Hydro power dam destruction: collapse of energy infrastructure to return to a primitive
Existence. Land use & value are drastically changed when property is turned into a swamp or
Desert. Water rights: massive water rights re-allocation hangs in the balance (the colorado
river may be up for grabs)
Depopulation: when water is cut off from farmers, this affects the food supply.
The EPA is adding regulations to force farmers to shut down. (e.g. implementing buffer zones
around waterways to supposedly protect them from pesticides) In short, the epa is adding
regulations and seizing farm land all over the u.s.
“Excessively high temperatures” are “already” harming public health nationwide, pres. obama
declared on nov. 1, 2013, two months before today’s assault by record low temperatures” …
In his executive order on climate change, obama warned that too much rain – and not enough
rain – also dictated that executive action against climate fluctuations:” …
The impacts of climate change – including an increase in prolonged periods of excessively
high temperatures, more heavy downpours, an increase in wildfires, more severe droughts,
permafrost thawing, ocean acidification, and sea-level rise are already affecting communities,
natural resources, ecosystems, economies and public health
across the nation. these impacts are often most significant for communities that already face
economic or health-related challenges, and for species and habitats that are already facing other
Managing these risks requires deliberate preparation, close cooperation, and coordinated
planning by the federal government as well as by stakeholders, to facilitate federal, state, local,
tribal, private-sector, and nonprofit-sector efforts to improve climate preparedness and
resilience help safeguard our economy, infrastructure, environment and natural resources; and
provide for the continuity of executive department and agency (agency) operations, services
REGULATION NATION: Farmers Worry Over Crop of New Rules
September, 2011 FoxNews.com
Farmers are concerned that some new, tighter federal regulations on agriculture are stunting
the growth of their businesses. regulatory uncertainty makes it difficult to plan for the future
In addition to local regulations, farmers say that uncertainty about what could come from
washington is one of their main concerns
environmental protection agency rules intend to cut down on runoff into the chesapeake bay
regulatory uncertainty from the e.p.a. helps keeps eastern virginia grain farmer calvin haile awake at night
haile’s family farm includes 2,600 acres of corn and soybeans in virginia’s northern neck
“[a]ny kind of regulation from the epa is worrisome to us”; “they have a lot of power and nobody seems to have a hold on what they can do”
The OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S TRANSPARENT LACK of TRANSPARENCY
OP-ED FORBES.COM 10/31/2013
“ONE THAT has RECEIVED ATTENTION from SEN. DAVID VITTER and OTHER[s] on
the environment and public works committee is the “sue and settle” maneuver that federal
agencies,” … “including the fish and wildlife service and epa, use to advance their radical
environmental agenda in a way that substitutes a judicial mechanism for the customary
interface of legislation and agency rulemaking.
the way this works is that extremist environmental groups (some of which receive
government grants) sue the federal government on the grounds that agencies are failing to meet
their regulatory obligations, … and then, behind closed doors, the activists and obama
administration officials concoct a settlement agreement that furthers activists’ (and regulators’)
this process is typically pursued without consulting affected parties, including states,
counties and municipalities that are the sites of the alleged deficiencies of regulation
once a judge approves a settlement, the administration moves forward with implementing costly
regulations that resulted from “wink-wink, nod-nod” negotiations between activist environmental
groups and the government.
according to sen. vitter, “of the 250 species listings that could occur as a result of the 2011
closed-door settlements, many could have a significant impact on states and local governments,
private property rights, energy development, and economic growth.”
leaving aside the merits of these agreements, they are arrived at via a flagrantly non-
transparent process that evades the checks and balances of federal rulemaking and oversight
north idaho residents feel they’ve become victims of a heavy-handed federal government
PROPERTY OWNERS TANGLE with EPA OVER WETLAND
by John Miller Associated Press December, 2011
Boise – an environmental protection agency dispute with a north idaho man over whether he
illegally destroyed a wetland. priest lake-area property owner jack barron successfully fought
off a criminal indictment last year. barron began excavation work in april, 2007 on land along
lamb creek four miles from where it flows into priest lake before building a house
the epa contends the four-acre site is a wetland, requiring a permit from the u.s. army corps of
engineers before it can be filled in. in 2009, the agency ordered barron to restore the
property, plant native grasses and monitor developments until 2020, barron contends his
property isn’t a wetland, claiming the epa is trying to eject him from his property
barron stated, “the epa refuses to allow me to use my land and is threatening me with more
legal charges.” the epa contends barron degraded a wetland that could potentially harm priest
lake’s water quality. barron successfully fought off a criminal indictment last year.
A jury declared him not guilty. In u.s. district court of violating the federal clean water act
but barron still faces a separate epa civil order to restore wetlands he filled in on his property
– or be forced to pay $37,500 daily fines
barron’s continuing fight has revived cries that washington, d.c.-based bureaucrats are
trampling on private property rights. bonner county commissioner cornel rasor said, “the
federal government should have acknowledged the decision of the court, just as citizens are
required to do. the e.p.a. responded last month that the criminal-court victory didn’t relieve the
agency of its responsibility to enforce clean water act civil provisions
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: GOVERNMENT RESOURCE CONTROL – The REGULATORY STATE
In the wetlands case that’s to be heard by the u.s. supreme court, mike and chantell
sackett of priest river are fighting epa regulators. epa regulators determined the sacketts
failed to get needed federal permits before filling a wetland on property they
were developing. mike and chantell sackett paid $23,000 for a lot near priest lake in northern
idaho in 2005, buying the site for a new home. they got a long feud with the epa and a
supreme court case that could bolster the rights of landowners facing costly demands from the
The sacketts were filling in their lot with dirt and rock, preparing to build a simple three-
bedroom home in a neighborhood where other houses have stood for years. Three federal
officials showed up and demanded they stop construction, claiming the 0.63-acre lot was a
wetland, protected under the clean water act. The sacketts say they were stunned – they
had secured all the necessary local permits before work began, chantell drove two hours to
coeur d’alene, idaho, to consult with an army corps of engineers official. She says the army
corps official told her orally, though not in writing, that she did not need a federal permit.
the EPA issued an order requiring the sacketts to put the land back the way it was, removingthe
piles of fill material and replanting the vegetation they had cleared away.
The property was to be fenced off and the sacketts would be required to submit annual reports
about its condition to the epa the agency threatened to fine them up to $32,500 a day until they
complied. The sacketts instead tried to get a hearing in federal court, seeking a declaration that
their property wasn’t a protected wetland. the plot is not connected either to the lake or a
nearby creek, though part of the land got “wet” at times in the springL
Two lower courts turned the couple away, saying they could not make that argument until the
epa asked a federal judge to enforce the order. Yhat left them in limbo – restoring the property
as the EPA DEMANDED WOULD COST HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of DOLLARS and
if they ultimately won the case they’d have to clear the land a second time. Defying the order
potentially meant racking up $32,500 in FINES EACH DAY – and perhaps criminal liability if
they continued with construction.
the agency’s favorite enforcement tools – each year it issues up to 3,000 “administrative compliance orders” to businesses and individuals. Administrative compliance orders demand an end to alleged violations and pressure those accused who typically give in before the agency has to justify the action before a judge. The epa argues the rules are reasonable. while fines may accrue, they won’t actually be assessed until the sacketts have a chance to make their case to a judge. E.P.A. agency officials declined to be interviewed a ruling in favor of the landowners would reverberate beyond the epa, forcing both state and federal agencies to seek court permission to enforce policy is the “goal” of the EPA to PREVENT HUMANS FROM DRAINING the EARTH’s LIMITED RESOURCES.
SIGNFICANT CONCERNS with the SUSTAINABLE LANDS STRATEGY
by John Koster Snohomish County Councilman July, 2012
John Koster: “my purpose in writing this short article is to bring attention to some critically
important land use changes under consideration for Snohomish County. These plans, should
they succeed, will PERMANENTLY ALTER the CHARACTER of the COUNTY. Proponents
of the sustainable lands strategy (sls) have presented these major policy change as a
“win-win” situation . Others are not so sure. At stake are thousands of acres of designated
farmland coveted by environmental interests seeking ways to “enhance” salmon and
Concern with a strategy that seeks to create “fish habitat” by destroying thousands of acres of
farmland, much of it by means of salt and/or fresh water inundation normally, such a change
would require a de-designation process that involves public hearing and decisions made by the
county’s elected officials. Instead, a short-cut avoids such procedures and takes the
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS AWAY FROM THE COUNTY COUNCIL TO VEST THE
AUTHORITY WITHIN a NEWLY CREATED BUREAUCRACY. What is being sold as a
worthy conservation PROGRAM COULD MORPH INTO a MUCH LARGER LAND
CONTROL MECHANISM, involving restrictions on land use with penalties for property
owners guilty of INSUFFICIENTLY “SUSTAINABLE” ACTIVITIES.
Section i: Social and Economic Dimensions
Achieving a more sustainable population and settlementin decision making.
WHAT EXACTLY is MEANT by “SUSTAINABLE” POPULATION AND SETTLEMENT in DECISION MAKING?
relocation of populations of people to “sustainable communities” is a necessary part of the
“sustainable” equation buffer zones are areas that agenda 21 “wilderness project” has designated
as NOT INHABITABLE FOR HUMANS
World Wildlife Fund, World Resources Institute International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN):
the iucn involves the epa, us fish & wildlife service, the national park service, the united states
forest service, sierra club, the nature conservancy, the national wildlife fund, the national
audubon society, national resources defense council, unesco, the environmental defense fund, the u.n. environmental program, etc…
BIUCN 1992: Covenant On the Environment and Development:
“Eventually a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute
the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. the remaining half of the u.s. would b
used as buffer zones” the wildlands project seeks to determine the majority of land in
america as core reserves or buffer zones lands would be reserved as wilderness with
connecting corridors is the epa a “tool” to prevent humans from draining the earth’s limited
resources ? The epa would essentially RESTRICT 61% of the USABLE FARMING LAND
and SEVERELY LIMIT FOOD PRODUCTION by these small farms. The rest of the land in
the U.S. will be under the control of the wildlands project for use in conjunction with
biological diversity “crazy” conspiracy or developing “reality” ?
Re-structuring and RE-SETTLEMENT of humans into designated areas for living in controled-zoned cities.
OPINION: SOUNDS CRAZY, BUT AGENDA 21 is ALREADY HERE
by Brad Jones GPAA Editor 2/8/2012
Brad Jones: “u.n. agenda 21 may seem like a paper tiger to some of you –
just a bobble-headed idea by a bunch of environmental elitists. it seems to me that much of
what people said would never happen back in 1993 already has.
Now, that we’ve taken a step back to see the big picture – the whole forest, let’s look closer at
the trees. the u.s. forest service, bureau of land management and department of interior
are all complying with AGENDA 21.
A.G.O. – The Obama Administration’s AMERICA’S GREAT OUTDOORS INITIATIVE – is in STEP with AGENDA 21.
Wildlands, wilderness areas, wildlife corridors, national monuments, national forests, national
parks, national recreation areas, roadless rules, wild and scenic rivers designations to restrict
public access to public lands fits into the agenda 21 plan. if it walks like a duck, swims like a
duck and quacks like a duck, don’t let these environmental wackos and government
bureaucrats tell you it’s not a duck. the nature conservancy protects earth’s natural resources
and beauty. our conservation efforts are driven by our members.
the nature conservancy – “we’re working with you to make a positive impact around the world
in more than 35 countries, all 50 united states and your backyard. the nature conservancy is a
u.s. “charitable” environmental organization that works to preserve the lands and waters on
which all life depends their contractors include tetra tech, the huge environmental company that
prepares resource management plans and environmental assessments for the bureau of land
the public is led to believe that the nature conservancy buys land with private money and sets
up nature reserves to help the environment. tom deweese describes the reality: “the nature
conservancy buys private land from owners (usually at drastically reduced, land-grab prices)
who think it will remain in private hands and then sells it to the government! in fact, tnc has
sold more than 9 million acres to the government at a nice profit. The nature conservancy
frequently uses phony front companies to get land and it purchased “most of the islands off the
coast of virginia, containing 40,000 acres and sixty miles of coastline
the nature conservancy was able to stop all private development and control the use of land,
damaging the tax base, killing thousands of jobs, and severely curbing the locals from hunting,
fishing and camping on the islands. tnc is endowed with assets amounting to nearly $3 billion
it would be directly in control of some 90 million acres worldwide, with more than 12 million
acre in the u.s.
rural cleansing” – clearing the rural land from all human inhabitants and relocate everyone
from the country to the cities, where they can be better managed. the land made useless by
the prohibition of using the lands resources by “protecting” the environment endangered
species act (this is a common excuse to render land unusable
water shortages, compliments of the endangered species act (e.s.a.)
man-made droughts have been created by congress, using their authority under the e.s.a., to
stop irrigation water from flowing to farms
CALIFORNIA’s MAN-MADE DROUGHT
The GREEN WAR AGAINST SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY FARMERS
Wall Street Journal September, 2009
thanks to environmental regulations designed to protect the three-inch long delta smelt, one of
america’s premier agricultural regions is suffering in a drought made worse by federal
regulations. the u.s. fish and wildlife service issued what a “biological opinion” imposing water
reductions on the san joaquin valley to safeguard the federally protected the delta smelt
as a result, tens of billions of gallows of water from mountains have been channelled away
from farmers and into the ocean, leaving hundreds of thousands of acres of arable land dry
the result has already been devastating for the state’s farm economy. in the inland areas affected by the court-ordered water restrictions, the jobless rate has hit 14.3%, with some farming towns like mendota seeing unemployment numbers near 40%
governor arnold schwarzenegger said that he “doesn’t have the authority to turn on the
pumps” that would supply the delta with water, or “otherwise, they would be on. he did,
however, have the ability to request intervention from the department of interior
under a provision added to the endangered species act in 1978 after the snail darter fiasco, a
panel of seven cabinet officals known as a “god squad” is able to intercede
the “god squad” is able to intercede in economic emergencies, such as the one now parching
california farmers. Despite a petition with more than 12,000 signers, mr. schwarzenegger has
refused that remedy. in june, the administration denied the governor’s request to designate
california a federal disaster area as a result of the drought conditions
The pacific legal foundation has filed a lawsuit on behalf of three farmers in the valley, calling
the federal regulations “immoral and unconstitutional because the delta smelt is only found
in california, the foundation says. It does not fall under the regulatory powers provided by the
constitution’s commerce clause. on a statutory basis, the fish and wildlife service neglected to
appropriately consider the economic devastation the pumping restrictions would bring
broad and unbridled authority given to the epa to prevent humans from draining the earth’s
limited resources. all these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes
land made useless by the prohibition of using the lands. “Protecting” the environment the
wildlands project and smart growth are really two sides of the same coin
the wildlands project is designed to clear people off of 50% of the american landscape. by
making the land useless. social engineering to make people move into cities in order to be
“managed”. smart growth is the consolidation of people into cities, designed so that they
don’t have to travel outside of the city. The objective of agenda 21 is “communally and
collectively owned and managed land.
biucn 1992: covenant on the environment and development:
“eventually a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute
the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. the remaining half of the u.s. would be
used as buffer zones”
“crazy” conspiracy or future “reality” ?
political agendas intersect with philosophical views of “nature”
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
“GREEN” ENERGY – THE POWER OF WISHFUL THINKING
SPAIN ADMITS “GREEN JOBS” PROGRAM A DISASTER BY MICHAEL W
JOB LOSSES FROM OBAMA GREEN STIMULUS FORESEEN in SPANISH STUDY
by gianluca baratti
– PRESIDENT OBAMA’S TAXPAYER-BACKED GREEN ENERGY FAILURES
by ashe schow
global sustainable development: “green” energy, the power of wishful thinking
newspaper la gaceta exposed the failure of the spanish renewable policy; according to
the spanish government, the policy has been such a failure that electricity prices are
skyrocketing and the economy is losing jobs as a result
government numbers indicate that each green job created costs more than 2.2 traditional jobs
the premiums paid for solar, biomass, wave and wind power – which are charged to consumers in their bills – translated into a $774,000 cost for each spanish “green job” created since 2000, said gabriel calzada, an economics professor
the 2009 stimulus set aside $80 billion to subsidize politically preferred energy projects
of that $80 billion in clean energy loans, grants, and tax credits, at least 10% has gone to companies that have since either gone bankrupt or are circling the drain
SPAIN ADMITS “GREEN JOBS” PROGRAM a DISASTER
May, 2010 by Michael W
“Eventually, no matter hard one tries to wish it away, REALITY will smack you in the face.
As predicted was inevitable, the spanish newspaper la gaceta runs with a full-page article
fessing up to the truth about spain’s ‘green jobs’ boondoggle. which happens to be the one
naively cited by president obama no less than eight times as his model for the united states”
it is now out there as a bust, a costly disaster that has come undone in spain to the point that
even the socialists admit it, with the media now in full pursuit”
la gaceta boldly exposes the failure of the spanish renewable policy and how obama has
been following it. the headline screams: “spain admits that the green economy as sold to obama
is a disaster. according to the spanish government, the policy has been such a failure that
electricity prices are skyrocketing and the economy is losing jobs as a result.
the internal report of the spanish administration admits that the price of electricity has gone up,
as well as the debt, due to the extra costs of solar and wind energy
even the government numbers indicate that each green job created costs more than 2.2
traditional jobs, as was shown in the report of the juan de mariana institute
besides that, the official document is almost a copy point by point of the one that led to calzada
being denounced [lit. “vetoed”] by the spanish embassy in an act in the u.s. congress.
the presentation recognizes explicitly that “the increase of the electric bill is principally due to
the cost of renewable energies
in fact, the increase in the extra costs of this industry explains more than 120% of the variation in
the bill and has prevented the reduction in the costs of conventional electricity production to be
reflected on the bills of the citizens. despite these facts, which have been known for quite some
time, the obama administration is still planning to move ahead with its own policy based on the
that fight [over the “green economy” policy] begins anew with the likely senate vote on s.j. res.
26, the murkowski resolution to disapprove of the environmental protection agency’s attempt
to impose much of this agenda through the regulatory back door, without congress ever
having authorized such an enormous economic intervention. just as with the obamacare
boondoggle that was rammed into law despite its (a) known problems that are only now being
admitted to, (b) real costs that are only now becoming evident and (C) UNACCEPTABILITY
to the vast majority of Americans” …
obama is going full steam ahead with this ‘green economy’ nonsense”, regardless of facts or
reality, this administration is dead set on re-creating america in the image it likes best (i.e.
european social democracy), regardless of the costs. as we end up with all the bells and
whistles that are the hallmarks of our european betters”
(e.g. universal health care, carbon taxes, depleted military, enhanced welfare state,
overwhelming government controls of the economy, sufficiently apologetic “transnationalist” foreign policy)
The ACTUAL RESULTS of that “TRANSFORMATION” are UNIMPORTANT
JOB LOSSES From OBAMA GREEN STIMULUS FORESEEN in SPANISH STUDY
by Gianluca Baratti March, 2009
subsidizing renewable energy in the u.s. may destroy two jobs for every one created if spain’s
experience with windmills and solar farms is any guide. for every new position that depends on
energy price supports, at least 2.2 jobs in other industries will disappear, according to a
study from king juan carlos university in madrid
U.S. president barack obama’s 2010 budget proposal contains about $20 billion in tax incentives
for clean-energy programs. in spain, where wind turbines provided 11% of power demand last
year, generators earn rates as much as 11times more for renewable energy compared with
burning fossil fuels
the premiums paid for solar, biomass, wave and wind power – which are charged to consumers
in their bills – translated into a $774,000 cost for each spanish “green job” created since
2000, said gabriel Calzada, an economics professor at the university and author of the report.
the loss of jobs could be greater if you account for the amount of lost industry that moves out
of the country due to higher energy prices,” calzada said in an interview
spain’s acerinox sa, the nation’s largest stainless-steel producer, blamed domestice energy costs
for deciding to expand in south africa and the u.s., according to the study.
microsoft and google moved their servers up to the canadian border because they benefited from
cheaper energy there,” said the professor of applied environmental economics.
PRESIDENT OBAMA’s TAXPAYER-BACKED GREEN ENERGY FAILURES
by Ashe Schow October 18, 2012
“it is no secret that president obama’s and green energy supporters’ (from both parties) foray
into venture capitalism has not gone well. but the extent of its failure has been largely ignored
by the press. the government’s picking winners and losers in the energy market has cost
taxpayers billions of dollars, and the rate of failure, CRONYISM, and CORRUPTION at the
COMPANIES RECEIVING the SUBSIDIES IS SUBSTANTIAL.”
The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:
Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
the 2009 stimulus set aside $80 billion to subsidize politically preferred energy projects.
since that time,1,900 investigations have been opened to look into stimulus waste, fraud and
abuse (although not all are linked to the green-energy funds) and nearly 600 convictions have
been made. of that $80 billion in clean energy loans, grants, and tax credits, at least 10% has
gone to companies that have since either gone bankrupt or are circling the drain. when the
government plays venture capitalist, it tends to reward companies that are connected to the
policymakers themselves or because it sounds nice to ‘invest’ in green energy”
“nature” vs. human nature
the dividing issues are what is “renewable” and “sustainable”?
are natural resources “renewable” under our current lifestyle ?
are natural resources “sustainable” under our current lifestyle ?
“I’m a SOVEREIGN HUMAN BEING who deserves life and freedom”
“i’m a PARASITIC ORGANISM killing my host planet and need to be eradicated” is this part
of an environmental “agenda” to create massive controls over human activities?
SAVING the EARTH through the GOD of GOVERNMENT
“sustainable development”, like communism or fascism, is a philosophy of governance
complete with its own agenda, beliefs and goals. “Sustainable development”, is a
“worldview” based upon philosophical assumptions, a political philosophy claiming to be
“scientific”. sustainable development is a political philosophy that is built upon three pillars
known as the “3e’s”, or “the triple bottom line” – ecological integrity, economic prosperity and
social equity sustainable development demands that the perfect balance of “the triple bottom
line” be the deciding lens through which all community development, growth, and decisions are
viewed all growth which fails to achieve this perfect balance is considered unsustainable
ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION SAVING the EARTH through the GOD of GOVERNMENT
[SAVIORS vs STEWARDS]
america and the world are in the midst of what the sustainable development movement calls
“the great transition” to a “sustainable” new model of living
traditional capitalism and american way of life is a failing and inequitable system that must be
replaced with a new governance system to achieve sustainability and a just world
“stewards” say humanity can use the earth’s “renewable” resources within the political
framework of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” capable of responsibly using the earth’s
resources without destroying the earth)
environmental “saviors” complain of self-destructive human nature incapable of preservation;
we must “save” the earth from a “myopic” (near-sighted) humanity bent on destroying it’s
“host”. the pro-agenda 21 worldview says we must “save” the earth from a “myopic”
(near-sighted) humanity bent on destroying it’s “host”. in the not far off future, america and the
world are in the midst of what the sustainable development movement calls “the great
transition” to a sustainable new model of living.
united nations sustainable development seeks to bring everything under its controlling grasp
traditional capitalism and the american way of life is a failing and inequitable system that must be replaced with a new governance system in order to achieve sustainability and a just world.
sustainable development philosophy teaches that humanity is living beyond the “carrying capacity” of the earth. we are in the midst of multiple crises that are converging to create conditions that are not livable unless they are halted by a rapid global transition to a sustainable development system. the radical new philosophy of sustainable development calls for a complete change in the lifestyle of the average american citizen.
the following practices are all considered to be unsustainable: fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism, dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of pastures” – joan peros
radical change – where and how we build our homes, what products we use, which food
we eat, what and how much we consume, and which methods of transportation. We choose
almost every college and university in the nation has become indoctrinated with the philosophy
of sustainable development, from campus infrastructure and administration to student life and the curriculum america’s universities are awash in this radical, collectivist philosophy
sustainable development and agenda 21 promote a paradigm shift away from the norm of
national borders and individual nation-states toward a globalist, collective, one-world,
interdependent and interconnected planetary mindset. sustainable development promotes high
density, urban, pedestrian oriented, low carbon, walkable communities and discourages
traditional american automobile usage, suburban lifestyles and development. the sustainable
development philosophy perceives the car and the ongoing use of fossil fules as unsustainable
conflicting “worldviews” –
”stewards” vs. “saviors” of the earth
physical “nature” vs. human “natural rights”
stewards” say humanity can use the earth’s resources within the political framework of
“life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. stewards” capable of responsibly using the earth’s
renewable” resources (without destroying the earth)
the pro-agenda 21 worldview says we must “save” the earth from a “myopic” (near-sighted)
humanity bent on destroying it’s “host””. “saviors” complain of self-destructive human
nature (incapable of preservation). human beings are the “problem”, not the “solution”
critics of the “saviors” say they have a “flawed” view of nature
“saviors” exhibit a narrow, fundamentalist “worship” of “nature”
bumper sticker in berkeley: “animals are little people in fur coats”
do animals = people ???
critics of the “saviors” say global warming or “climate change” is questionable “science”
critics of the creation of this idealistic “new” human and society criticized it for its lack of
“surely anyone with a sense of political realities can smell the danger that these silly, kind, irrational people, in their cushioned isolation from reality, are bringing upon us all”
“would you bet your paycheck on a weather forecast for tomorrow?
If not, then why should this country BET BILLIONS on GLOBAL WARMIN
PREDICTIONS that have EVEN LESS FOUNDATION?“ – Thomas Sowell
CRITICS of the “SAVIORS” SAY ENVIRONMENTALISM BECOMES a “TOOL” to HIDE a HIDDEN AGENDA POWER (and global tyranny)
“THERE HAVE EXISTED, in EVERY AGE and EVERY COUNTRY, TWO DISTINCT ORDERS of MEN – the LOVERS of FREEDOM and the DEVOTED ADVOCATES of POWER” Robert Hayne
ENVIRONMENTAL UTOPIA: NATURE WORSHIP & SALVATION [GREEN FASCISM]
– LINDBERGH, NAZISM and ENVIRONMENTAL FASCISM by mark musser
– the GREEN NAZIS: ENVIRONMENTALISM in the THIRD REICH
by jurriaan maessen
– NAZI GREENS – An INCONVENIENT HISTORY by martin durkin
environmental “crisis” is used by fascist elite who “know better” to “socially engineer” a
utopia or a future dystopia the environmental agenda is a spiritual agenda with earth
worship at its root ; most environmentalists love collectivism and are prepared to marry
almost every regime that claims to work for a clean and green environment
modern environmentalism passed through nazi germany, nazis created nature preserves, championed sustainable forestry, curbed air pollution, and designed the autobahn highway network to bring germans closer to nature
environmental ‘good intentions’ become hijacked, original environmental objectives abandoned, towards oppression and control used to trick the masses, replacing it with sacrifice for the greater good [“fooled again”]
a fascist blending of anthropology, social darwinism, romanticism, existentialism,
environmentalism and science was the very ideological bread and butter of national socialism”
“Most environmentalists love collectivism and are prepared to marry almost every regime that
claims to work for a clean and green environment. that makes this group extremely susceptible
to the arguments of tyrants. environmental “crisis” is used by a fascist elite who “know
better” to “SOCIALLY ENGINEER” a UTOPIA OR a FUTURE DYSTOPIA.
The ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA is a SPIRITUAL agenda with EARTH WORSHIP at its
ROOT. unbeknownst to many, the highway to modern environmentalism passed through nazi
germany. By 1935, the third reich was the greenest regime on the planet. many scholars have
rightly focused on nazi racism over the years, but have often failed to notice that
GERMAN SOCIAL DARWINISMWAS ROOTED IN ECOLOGY.
what the nazis derogatively labeled “the eternal jew”, the jew who tried to overcome
nature through international commercialism and cosmopolitanism, was specifically targeted.
it is a well documented though seldom highlighted fact that the nazis were very much into
environmentalism – NOT FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM’SSAKE, BUT RATHER as a
MEANS of OPPRESSION and CONTROL.
The nazis created nature preserves, championed sustainable forestry, curbed air pollution,
and designed the autobahn highway network as a way of bringing germans closer to nature
it can be credited to the CUNNING OF THE DICTATOR THAT HE REALISED HE
COULD NOT SUBMIT THE GERMAN PEOPLE BY TERROR ALONE. it was vital that
they would LEARN to LOVE THEIR OWN ENSLAVEMENT. Hitler reasoned lots of
trees and wide-open spaces would take the minds of his subjects off the war he was preparing
and the liberties lost. as clearly illustrated by the current environmental groups,
PERSONAL LIBERTY is GLADLY SACRIFICED FOR WHAT is CALLED
‘the GREATER GOOD’.
LINDBERGH, NAZISM, and ENVIRONMENTAL FASCISM
by Mark Musser October 19, 2013
Charles Lindbergh (1902-1974) is known as the first pilot to cross the atlantic solo in 1927
piloting the spirit of st. louis, but his nazi sympathies are often downplayed, and few know
that he was an extreme environmentalist. lindbergh became heavily involved in protecting
polar bears and blue whales along with saving of coral reefs in the equatorial pacific
lindbergh was a director of the world wildlife fund, an advisor to the nature conservancy, a
representative of the international union for the conservation of nature, and also worked with
the oceanic foundation.
manila – june 23, 1969 – charles augustus lindbergh, whose life for the last 40 years has been
devoted to aviation, has taken on a new role – that of a passionate and articulate spokesman for
conservation. profoundly convinced that civilization is imperiled by modern man’s reckless
disregard for important wildlife species, for primitive peoples, for irreplaceable timberlands and
for unique marine life, he is spending a substantial part of his time and energies as a
conservationist. thanks to his environmental passion, the “lone eagle” became an
international star for the fledgling green movement of the 1960s. lindbergh played a very
significant role in developing the green movement into an international phenomenon”
yet lindbergh’s outspoken views on national socialism and his later worship of all things
environmental are by no means inconsistent with each other. in 1933, the nazis passed an
animal rights law that initially tried to outlaw animal experimentation. it was also anti-semitic
in that it barred certain features of jewish kosher slaughter, something the fuhrer was very
proud of that same year, the nazis also promoted sustainable forestry practices
national socialism can easily be considered the first western government to take seriously the
idea of environmental sustainability as a national goal. the nazi regime explicitly sought a
fascist synthesis between racial economic development and harmony with the natural
landscape. in 1935, the nazis passed the reich nature protection act which promoted social
engineering environmental schemes over private property related to building activities.
the environmental slogan for this law was holistic, all-encompassing, and
“it shall be the whole landscape!” late in life lindbergh said, “the primitive developed life.
civilization must be based on life. we should never forget that human life was created in and for
millions of centuries, was nourished by primitive wildness. We cannot separate ourselves
from this ancestral background. it is folly to attempt to do so. I believe that many of the
social troubles we face today result from our being already too far removed from our
ancestral environment” …
i think there is nothing more important for modern man than to merge his intellectual knowledge
of science with the instinctive wisdom of wildness. in short, in order for man to cleanse
himself, he must root himself in nature, and make nature the ethos of his ‘civilized’ life”
such a fascist blending of anthropology, social darwinism, romanticism, existentialism,
environmentalism and science was the very ideological bread and butter of national socialism”
The GREEN NAZIS: ENVIRONMENTALISM in the THIRD REICH
by Jurriaan Maessen Infowars June 18, 2009
it is a seldom highlighted fact that the nazis were very much into environmentalism-
not for environmentalism’s sake, but rather as a means of oppression and control
environmentalism fits the form of tyranny like a well tailored suit.
as clearly illustrated by the current environmental groups, personal liberty is gladly sacrificed for what is called ‘the greater good’ it is a well-known fact that most of the environmental fanatics care nothing for matters of liberty, gladly surrendering it to tyrants and their promises of ‘environmental sustainability’
but the hardcore environmentalists who had found their champion in the person of adolf
hitler were soon to be disappointed. by the end of the 1930s, with a world war imminent, Hitler
abandoned most of the environmental pretexts he had used to trick the masses, hook, line
and sinker, replacing it with a war-ethos of sacrifice for the greater good and ‘lebensraum’
the many similarities to our own time, where any and every environmental ‘good
intention’ is hijacked by the elite for the advancement of its own objectives. it is true; most
environmentalists love collectivism and are prepared to marry almost every regime that claims
to work for a clean and green environment. That makes this group extremely susceptible to the
arguments of tyrants”
GREEN FASCISM TOTALITARIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM THEN and TODAY
NAZI GREENS – AN INCONVENIENT HISTORY by martin durkin
“The nazis conducted horrific experiments on children (i have seen footage so upsetting it
can’t be shown on tv) but at the same time they banned medical experiments on
animals green. the same nazi monsters who committed crimes of unimaginable barbarity also
advocated vegetarianism, organic agriculture, forest preservation and homeopathic
how can we possibly explain this? what was the connection between the inhuman brutality
of the nazis and their gushing idealization of ‘nature’?” the purpose of exploring nazi
environmentalism is not just to upset the greens. environmentalist ideology was not an
accidental, optional-extra to national socialism. green ideas were at the core of nazi thinking.
nazis and environmentalists share a “fascist” return to a “MYTHICAL” EDEN
“the german volk and nazi movements marched beneath the banners of ‘nature’ and the ‘organic’. a brief history of early environmentalism writ large. as will become clear, it is not so easy to draw a line between two types of green thinking.”
To understand why green ideology emerged at all, and why it happened in germany, we
need to go back in time, a few centuries, to set the scene. the transition from feudal society to
capitalism. To the greens this great historical change is more or less the source of all evil”
“nietzsche, the romantic anti-capitalist, was appalled by the notion that the ‘common man’
(bourgeois and proletarian alike) should enjoy democratic rights. he poured scorn on the
enlightenment and humanism: ‘man’, said nietzsche, ‘is something to be overcome’
for german reactionaries like nietzsche, the abolition of serfdom was a tragedy. mankind’s
redemption (namely from its masters) is well under way; everything is becoming visibly
judified or christified or mobified. to arrest this poison’s progress
throughout the body of mankind seems impossible’.”
nietzsche belonged to a reactionary school of german thought which became known as the
‘volk’ movement. “volk” acquired its name because its adherents were constantly harking back
to a more authentic golden age when the german people were not just people who happened to
live in germany and speak german, but were, in a deeper, mystical sense, a ‘volk’ (or‘folk’).
volkish ideology had what we would recognise today as a green tinge –
friedrich ratzel: they came to life on the same soil … life is always bound to the earth … and
cannot, partially or as a whole, be separated from the earth and its soil.’
“the ‘volk’ (the people) had a deep, mystical, essential bond with each other and the earth.
the true volk society was connected with the soil (volksboden), it was organic and natura
(organisirtes naturproduct), determined by nature (naturbedingtheit), shaped by earthly forces
and conditions (bodenständigkeit), inseparable from the EARTH itself (erdgebundenheit).
the landscape had formed the people, and their culture was part of the landscape
(kulturlandschaft). the volkists spoke of a healthy society’s ‘rootedness’ (verwurzelung).
the land, say the greens, was not there simply to be bought and sold “in nietzsche we find the usual volkish green simpering about nature: ‘remain faithful to the earth’ demands zarathustra, we must ‘re-animalise man’ and ‘return to nature’”
“the yearning for ‘rootedness’ was nothing other than the desire to keep the peasants tied to
the land. ‘rootedness’ was a perfect description of feudal society.”
Because of capitalism, the serfs, instead of being “rooted” to the land, were now
physically and socially mobile. if the proletariat was to be feared, said the volkists, capitalism
\and the bourgeoisie was to be blamed and the people singled out for special culpability were
the jews. for, as professor mosse, says,
‘The Jews were not a volk, had no peasants, and owned no land, but were only traders and
parasites.’ To oppose the jews meant to struggle against the champions of the materialistic
world view as well as the evils of modern society’. volkish and nazi hatred of jewish people
was not religious. The volkists and nazis hated christianity, almost as much as they despised
judaism, and tried to establish a state pagan religion to replace it. to hitler, it was the jews,
he said, who had brought to germany all those devilish democratic modern ideas, ‘bubbling
over with “enlightenment”, “progress”, “liberty”, “humanity”, etc.’
just as today’s greens idealize pre-capitalist society, so did the volkists and the Nazis.
“their ‘blood and soil’ racism was wholly the product of this backward fantasy. it was
nothing more than the desire to cling onto the world as it was before. as with the nazi’s
demonization of jewish people, it was an expression of their fear and loathing of the physical
and social mobility which came with capitalism”
like nietzsche and the volkists, hitler and the nazis hated the enlightenment. they rejected its humanism [and] spurned the human-centered morality of the judeo-christian tradition.”
They despised the moral restraints of civilisation and embraced the romance of pagan
savagery as more ‘authentic’.
the volkists and nazis were green. in 1934, the nazis ‘declared that the third reich had ushered
in a new era of environmental stewardship. they foresaw a new era of ‘organic’ land use
planning that stressed long-term sustainability over short-term profitability”
of course the green policies of the nazis, like the policies of the greens today, were riddled
with contradictions. the fact that the absurd green fantasies of the nazis were impractical did
not seem to disturb them, as indeed it seems not to disturb greens today. environmentalism
and the appeal to nature was at the heart of nazi belief.
heidegger contrasts wonderful peasant life, which involved ‘dwelling’, with horrid footloose
capitalism which involves ‘homelessness’. his feudal eden has been destroyed by capitalism”
“in contrast to today’s over-consuming and ecologically sinful masses, the peasants enjoyed a
deeper kind of happiness, a happiness which sprang, not from shallow materialism, but from the
stability and orderliness and coherence of their traditional, pre-capitalist lives”
should we be at all worried about any of this? after all, modern environmentalism, to many people, seems so innocent. the green policies of the nazis were more than a mere episode or aberration in environmental history at large. they point to larger meanings and demonstrate with brutal clarity that conservationism and environmentalism are not and have never been value-free or inherently benign enterprises”
we should heed the warning of lukács, that, ‘fascist demagogy and tyranny was only the
ultimate culmination of a long process which initially had an ‘innocent’ look”
the idealisation of nature and the organic, the nostalgia for the middle ages, the anti-capitalism, the hatred of bankers, … cities and industry, the idealisation of peasant life … all this defined their poisonous ideology.
it was the green attempt of the nazis to RECREATE a PEASANT SOCIETY
it was their GREEN REJECTION of the judeo-christian tradition and of the enlightenment
and its humanist values, and their green RETURN TO PAGAN ANIMAL-WORSHIP.
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: The TOTALITARIAN SURVEILLANCE STATE –
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
the key is total monitoring, total measuring and total rationing of everything
everything: all energy, food, water, housing, transportation, education, land use, medical care,
right to travel and the monitoring of everything you say and do
this is meant to restrict movement throughout the country and control food production by
reassessing farm lands to projects that “save the environment”
was this environmental agenda 21 created with the intention to CREATE massive controls over human activities?
agenda 21 initiatives through government grants are being pushed in every state in the nation
“the essential principle of totalitarianism is to make laws that are impossible to obey.”
– christopher hitchens
they start out small, but their goals are big and destructive
are we “progressing” into a world that will make “1984” by george orwell look like a cheery story about a sunday picnic ?
barack obama, the first u.s. president to chair the united nations security council, said in a 2008
speech, “we cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national
security objectives that we’ve set. we’ve gotta have a CIVILIAN NATIONAL SECURITY
force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
“Their goal – they are obsessed with searching out any small little premise of the planet where
some form of communications might take place without they being able to invade it.”
– Glenn Greenwald
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: The SURVEILLANCE STATE BIG BROTHER is WATCHING
– GEORGE ORWELL’S 1984
– AMERICA’s GIANT SURVEILLANCE GRID
– OH, BROTHER? SCHOOL TO TRACK KIDS WITH CHIPS by jonathan anker
– OBAMA COLLECTING PERSONAL DATA for a SECRET RACE DATABASE
by Paul Sperry
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: The SURVEILLANCE STATEBIG BROTHER is WATCHING
Our country is being systematically transformed into a giant surveillance grid far more
comprehensive than george orwell ever dreamed of maxine waters: “the president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. the surveillance grid is expanding in thousands of different ways, so even if you stopped one form of surveillance you would hardly make a dent in the astounding growth of this system
our country is being systematically transformed into a GIANT surveillance grid far more
comprehensive than george orwell ever dreamed of anything that existed.
outside or in. opposition to the political god-state was heretical
totalitarian collectivism and “re-birth”and building utopia does not tolerate “competition”
fascist “crisis” required “action” (censorship) to protect political “progress”
totalitarian utopia left no room for those who did not want to “progress” or “evolve”
enforced political “correct-ness” through control of information and censorship
in orwell’s 1984, the main character winston is shown as one who does not quite fit in with the
rest of his society. he has a continuous feeling in the back of his head that life as he knows it is
not what it should be and begins writing in a journal about his thoughts, which is strictly
illegal. winston saw that he had left the diary open on the table. ‘down with big brother’ was
written all over it. (orwell, page 20)
the society that winston lives in is governed by the inner party, and ultimately by a figure
referred to as big brother. no members of the society are allowed to speak out or even
think out against the government every house, building, street and public place has something
called a telescreen, which constantly monitors the people and each of their actions, speech and
If a person even appears to have a different thought than what they are mandated by big
brother to have, this person will be arrested by the thought police and eventually vaporized
orwell goes into great depth as to the advancement of the party’s strategy against its enemies,
we do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them” (1984, 265)
as 1984 progresses winston becomes more aware of his individuality and eventually is unable
to hide it – all the alienated characters … [the] hand of the government … [is] ready to
rationalize the right and duty of the government to possess such control over its people
the novel attempts to instill in the reader a sincere fear of the loss of their individual
freedoms as well as the ability of such a technologically advanced society to find deviants
every single piece of electronic communication is monitored and stored on something called tv
one,. washington watch with roland martin interviewed maxine waters, talking about obama’s
second term roland martin said to her, “the reality is, like anything else, you’d better get what
you can while he’s there, because, look, come 2016, obama’s gone.
MAXINE WATERS: “The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life … “that’s going to be very, very powerful. that database will have information about everything, on every individual, in ways that it’s never been done before”
But even if you got rid of all of your electronic devices, you would still be constantly
monitored. The surveillance grid is expanding in thousands of different ways, so even
if you stopped one form of surveillance you would hardly make a dent in the astounding growth
of this system. the following are signs that america is being systematically transformed into a …
GIANT SURVEILLANCE GRID
#1 NEW SOFTWARE that will store and analyze millions of our VOICES
did you know that there is software that can positively identify you using your voice in just a
matter of seconds? Law enforcement authorities all over the u.s. are very eager to begin using
new russian software that will enable them to store and analyze millions of voices
#2 UNMANNED AERIAL DRONES will be used inside the u.s. to spy on you
unmanned aerial drones have been used with great success by the u.s. military overseas
will be used inside the u.s. to spy on you. the u.s. government is promoting their use to local law
enforcement authorities all over america
#3 HIGH TECH GOVERNMENT SCANNERS that can secretly scan you from 164 feet
away a new scanner has been developed can scan your body, your clothes and your luggage
from 164 feet away high tech government scanners will soon be used at airports and border
crossings all over america
#4 The DNA of NEWBORN BABIES born all over the u.s. is systematically collected
these days, the invasion of our privacy begins just after birth
did you know that the dna of almost
every newborn baby in the u.s. is systematically collected and stored in databases?
#5 TWITTER IS BEING USED TO MONITOR YOU
hopefully you understand by now that nothing you do on the internet will ever be private again
twitter is being used as a law enforcement tool more than it ever has been before
#6 YOUR CELL PHONE is SPYING ON YOU if you want to have no privacy whatsoever,
own a cell phone and carry it around with you constantly your cell phone is constantly tracking
everywhere that you go and it is constantly making a record of everything that you do with it
#7 STUDENTS are INCREASINGLY BEING TRACKED by RFID MICROCHIPS
rfid microchips are increasingly becoming a part of our every day lives
#8 SPY CAMS IN HOSPITALS TO MONITOR HANDWASHING
would you want a surveillance camera watching you in the restroom?
don’t laugh – this is actually happening in some places.
a hospital in new york had sensors placed on the doors to identify workers entering and exiting and cameras placed to view sinks to insure proper hand hygiene
#10 THE NSA WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS
virtually every single electronic communication in the world (including all phone calls and emails) is intercepted and recorded by an international surveillance network run by the nsa and other intelligence agencies
law enforcement authorities in unmarked vans looking inside your cars and even under your clothes using the same backscatter technology currently being used by the tsa
#12 AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS
automated license plate readers are now being used to track the movements of a vehicle from the time that it enters washington d.c. to the time that it leaves
more than 250 cameras in d.c. and its suburbs scan license plates in real time, helping police pinpoint stolen cars and fleeing killers, expanding beyond what anyone had imagined even a few years ago
#13 DATA MINING
private companies are almost more eager to invade your privacy than the government is
corporations are making a fortune by gathering every shred of information about you that they possibly can and selling that information for profit
#14 FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY
the use of facial recognition technology has absolutely exploded in recent years
did you know that there are now 32 states that use some type of facial recognition technology for dmv photos?
#15 RAPID DNA TESTING
even better than facial recognition technology is dna testing
#16 The FBI’S NEXT GENERATION IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
this will combine the most advanced BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION technologies to create a database superior to anything that law enforcement in the u.s. has ever had before
#17 TRAPWIRE – did you know that a huge network of incredibly advanced spy cameras is currently being installed nationwide ?
it sounds like something off of a television show, but this is actually true. it is called “trapwire”
you are being watched. the government has a secret system – a machine – that spies on you
every hour of every day
there is a large percentage of the american people that are aware of many of these things, but
are convinced that these technologies are actually making society “better” and “safer”
radio-frequency identification (rfid) is the wireless non-contact use of radio-frequency
electromagnetic fields to transfer data, for the purposes of automatically identifying and tracking
tags attached to objects
in 1945 léon theremin invented an espionage tool for the soviet union which retransmitted
incident radio waves with audio information
rfid tags can be attached to clothing, possessions, or implanted within people. the possibility
of reading personally-linked information without consent has raised privacy concerns
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: The SURVEILLANCE STATE BIG BROTHER is WATCHING
OH, BROTHER? SCHOOL to TRACK KIDS WITH CHIPS
by Jonathan Anker June, 2012
Two schools in san antonio, texas are planning to begin tracking and monitoritng over 4,000
students using rfid. micro-chipped identification cards. a texas school district will scan id
cards to track students’ locations. the idea here is to be able to determine where any given
student is at any time during the school day. the chips will be able to detect when a student
boards a school bus and where in the school they are located, though it won’t work outside of
school grounds. The program aims to boost safety and district’s bottom line – attendance income
mom: “privacy is all well and good until you want to know where your kid is”
Does tracking school children with computer chips make them more safe – or more
vulnerable? the aclu pointed out that these “insecure” card readers have been copied “with a
handheld device the size of a standard cell phone that was built using spare parts costing $20″
equipped with a reader-scanner,they argue, it would be simple for anyone to track a student.
chips could also be copied, allowing would-be kidnappers to take a child off campus while
the duplicate chip continues to tell rfid readers that the child is safely at school.
because state funding is partly based on attendance, the school district also stands to make
more funding by tracking students. do the proposed safety and financial benefits
outweigh privacy concerns?
zeitgeist the movie presented rfid chips as a negative technology, theorizing that they will one
day be used to track the world population and keep them under control. “smart” gas and
electricity meters use wireless signals to transmit up-to-the-minute usage data rather
than requiring visits from meter readers. smart meters have been a source of controversy in
california since pg&e began installing them in late 2009.
concerns about privacy and accuracy have created an upswell of opposition from bakersfield to
santa cruz smart meters can control consumer consumption at peak energy times.
databases for sale of private information of power usages with the electrical signature of
every appliance and time use in the home
this is powerful marketing and control data in the hands of control-freak bureaucrats and
marketing gurus. the smart meter is only the initial device – chips in all plug-in devices
will be next. the rise of ‘connected’ gadgets controlled by rfid apps will mean that people ‘bug’
their own homes”, said cia director david petraeus. patreaus stated, “we’ll spy on you through
your dishwasher. Network connected appliances will be remotely turned off and on at various
times during the day by utility companies. ”Old” devices without rfid chips in them will be
“punished“ – you will be charged more on your utility bill to reflect the use of inefficient
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: The SURVEILLANCE STATE BIG BROTHER is WATCHING
OBAMA COLLECTING PERSONAL DATA for a SECRET RACE DATABASE
by Paul Sperry nypost.com July 18, 2015
paul sperry is a hoover institution media fellow and author of “the great american bank robbery,” which exposes the racial politics behind the mortgage bust
Paul Sperry: “a key part of president obama’s legacy will be the fed’s
unprecedented collection of sensitive data on americans by race” the government is prying
into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and
economic justice”. Unbeknown to most americans, obama’s racial bean counters are furiously
mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even
how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between
minorities and whites.
this orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of
discrimination databases, which obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases
against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many
blacks; cities that don’t offer enough section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities;
and employers who turn down african-americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds”
big brother barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the
data in them will be posted online.
so civil-rights attorneys and urban activist groups will be able to exploit them to show patterns
of “racial disparities” and “segregation”, even if no other evidence of discrimination
exists”“the granddaddy of them all is the affirmatively furthering fair housing database, which
the department of housing and urban development rolled out earlier this month to racially
balance the nation, zip code by zip code
it will map every us neighborhood by four racial groups – white, asian, black or african-
american and hispanic/latino – and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances,
the agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for
classifying segregated areas. federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be
pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in
affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white
areas. hud’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential
areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites
hud plans to drill down to an even more granular level, detailing the proximity of black
residents to transportation sites, good schools, parks and even supermarkets. if the
agency’s social engineers rule the distance between blacks and these suburban ‘amenities’ is too
far, municipalities must find ways to close the gap or forfeit federal grant money and face
possible lawsuits for housing discrimination
“civil-rights groups will have access to the agency’s sophisticated mapping software, and will
participate in city plans to re-engineer neighborhoods under new community outreach
requirements. by opening this data to everybody, everyone in a community can weigh in,”
obama said. “if you want affordable housing nearby, now you’ll have the data you need to
make your case. meanwhile, the federal housing finance agency, headed by former
congressional black caucus leader mel watt, is building its own database for racially balancing
the so-called national mortgage database project will compile 16 years of lending data,
broken down by race, and hold everything from individual credit scores and employment
records/mortgage contracts won’t be the only financial records vacuumed up by the database”
according to federal documents, the repository will include “all credit lines,” from credit cards
to student loans to car loans — anything reported to credit bureaus. this is even more
information than the irs collects. the fhfa will also pry into your personal assets and debts and
whether you have any bankruptcies. the agency even wants to know the square footage and
lot size of your home, as well as your interest rate. fhfa will share the info with obama’s
brainchild, the consumer financial protection bureau, which acts more like a civil-rights
agency, aggressively investigating lenders for racial bias”
the fhfa has offered no clear explanation as to why the government wants to sweep up so
much sensitive information on americans, other than stating it’s for ‘research’ and
‘policymaking’. however, cfpb director richard cordray was more forthcoming, explaining in a
recent talk to the radical california-based greenlining institute: “we will be better able to
identify possible discriminatory lending patterns. cfpb is separately amassing a database to
monitor ordinary citizens’ credit-card transactions. it hopes to vacuum up some 900 million
credit-card accounts – all sorted by race – representing roughly 85% of the us credit-card
market. why? to sniff out “disparities” in interest rates, charge-offs and collections.
cfpb also just finalized a rule requiring all regulated banks to report data on minority hiring to an
office of minority and women inclusion. it will collect reams of employment data, broken down
by race, to police diversity on wall street as part of yet another fishing expedition.
through its mandatory civil rights data collection project, the education department is
gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public
school district in the country. districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for
reform. those that don’t comply will be punished. several already have been forced to revise
their discipline policies, which has led to violent disruptions in classrooms.
obama’s educrats want to know how many blacks versus whites are enrolled in gifted-and-
talented and advanced placement classes. schools that show blacks and latinos under-enrolled in
such curricula, to an undefined “statistically significant degree,” could open themselves up to
investigation and lawsuits by the department’s civil rights office. count on a flood of private
lawsuits to piggyback federal discrimination claims, as civil-rights lawyers use the new
federal discipline data in their legal strategies against the supposedly racist us school system.
even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism,
the numbers themselves will ‘prove’ that things are unfair. such databases have never before
existed. obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in u.s history.
he is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers
will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society. the first black
president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by
racial data that will outlast his administration”
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EDUCATION – GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION
“universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating
poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction” – Adolf Hitler
– education for sustainable development (esd)
– education is a driving force for the change needed
(united nations department of economic and social affairs division for
sustainable development, 2003)
– “is leftist school indoctrination unstoppable? by bruce thornton
– education for sustainable tyranny by michael j. chapman
fascists seek the new man and society, through the children, “captured” for social engineering purposes
the state is sovereign over family; government the true parent of the child
the “progressive” state took the place of the influences of the family; the home would no longer be seen as an island, separate from the rest of society
progressive education sought to make public schools incubators of a national religion
promoting world citizenship over national sovereignty is now official u.s. government policy for education
education is no longer about preserving liberty based on american principles, but transforming america based on international principles, e.g. “sustainable development”
harold rugg, an american top educator, described the plan this way in his book
“the great technology” (1933): “through the schools of the world we shall disseminate a new
conception of government. one that will embrace all the activities of men, one that will
postulate the need of scientific control … in the interests of all people. he’s talking about one or
another version of socialism/scientific control” says it all. if you want to serve this program of
subversion and social engineering
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EDUCATION GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION
Bruce Deitrick Price: [improve-education.org]
JOHN DEWEY, our preeminent educator, laid out precisely this program a century ago:
indoctrinate teachers at the ed schools, and then return them to towns everywhere to
indoctrinate the young. the education establishment in this country, ever since john dewey 100
years ago, has been emotionally and intellectually committed to. That’s as much a fact of
american history as washington crossing the delaware. from their point of view collectivism
was inevitable. they wanted to be in the vanguard. they wanted to be righteous
revolutionaries. In roughly 1932 … the education establishment insists that all public schools
throw away their reading books and, at great expense, buy a whole new kind of reading
book, basically the dick and jane type of reader. the educators wanted to jump in front with
this radical bold idea. reading as these people understood it was to be an ideological tool that
could serve to keep each class of students at roughly the same level. recall that the central
feature of look-say was that students would memorize x-number of \words each year” “
regardless of whether that number is 800 (as first hoped) or 200- (as turned out to be more
“ALL students are artificially restrained, collectivized at a mediocre level, and prevented
from actually becoming independent readers who can pick up a newspaper and read it, as had
happened routinely in the past. the point was to have all the second graders more or less doing
the same things, and all the third graders, etc. look-say readers, even the fast ones, were
delayed by many years. the slower ones were turned into functional illiterates, of which we
have 50,000,000. they DELIBERATELY SET OUT TO TRANSFORM THE SCHOOLS,
presumably in order to TRANSFORM the SOCIETY. trouble is, what they regarded as
transforming, most other people regarded as deforming.
the common term is DUMBING-DOWN.
(it’s a matter of historical record that john dewey and virtually all of his successors were far to
the left; and visions of SOCIAL ENGINEERING danced in their heads” “the road to a
SOCIALIST AMERICA, they believed, ran directly THROUGH the CLASSROOM.
in my imagination this conspiracy required scores of smart, dedicated people who decided
among themselves: it’s FAIRER if kids are more or less EQUAL. when EVERYBODY
is SEMI-LITERATE. let’s face it, the public is never going to vote for our political views.
the only option is to sneak them through, and realistically speaking, dumbed-down citizens
will be less likely to see what we’re up to. the united states HAS 50 MILLION
FUNCTIONAL ILLITERATES. i think it’s reasonable to conclude that such massive damage
couldn’t happen by accident. you need lots of high-ranking people working together, over
many decades. here’s my short take: a lot of socialist educators said the HECK with
KNOWLEDGE, FACTS and all that ACADEMIC STUFF, the big job is to
TURN CHILDREN INTO FUTURE SOCIALISTS”
“on the other hand, if you start talking about conspiracy, one common response is, no, no,
we don’t need any crazy theories like that. the problems in the schools are clearly due to
lazy parents, difficult kids, the internet, drugs, sex, television, rock ‘n roll, etc., etc. why go
poking around in the past? dewey’s been dead forever
my sense is that many people are content to stay on the surface and to blame the victims. they
don’t want to rock the boat. they don’t want to blame any of their nominal allies. they don’t
want to look at root causes. well, in this case, the political beliefs of our education
establishment a century ago are the root causes. traditional, academic education was not
their main priority. once they committed to a secret agenda that the public did not ask for or
approve of, you are witnessing a conspiracy.
the education establishment – with considerable see-no-evil cooperation by the major media
and elite universities – pushed look – say as relentlessly as philip morris pushed cigarettes.
it’s not possible to understand the many foolish ideas promoted by our education
establishment unless you allow for the fact that they are aiming at something different from
what you think they mean when they use the word ‘education’ (they mean: indoctrination)
orwell [in 1984] plunges deeper than anyone else into the totalitarian impulse, the will to
absolute power, the lust to inflict pain upon other humans. it’s a harrowing plunge. you don’t want to believe that people can be so evil. you don’t want to imagine yourself the victim of the cruel and stupid society described in 1984. you probably don’t want to deal with these unsettling questions: how would you behave in this inhuman world? would you betray your family? could you be made to love big brother? which characters do you most identify with and why? perhaps some of you have not read 1984 or you have been misled by these dishonest slants. let me quote a few sentences from the major character named o’brien. he is candid in describing the world of 1984: “the party seeks power entirely for its own sake. we are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together in new shapes of your own choosing.
in our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph and self-abasement. there will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over defeated enemy there will be no art, no literature, no science … there will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness.
if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever. the power of the book comes from orwell’s remorseless, almost matter-of-fact-prose, his relentless depiction of the ultimate nightmare. the essence of 1984 is room 101 – the torture chamber where you confront the threat that will finally reduce you to a whimpering remnant capable only of total surrender to big brother, and total betrayal of everything and everyone you once loved. in the party’s eyes, as o’brien explains, an obedient citizen is not enough.
unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? power
is in inflicting pain and humiliation.
the fascist quest for the new man and society, through the children. the state is sovereign over
the family. the progressive followers of john dewey expanded program to make
PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCUBATORS of a NATIONAL RELIGION. progressive” global
education catechizing a global religion. agenda 21 chapter 36.2 states the plan to
“re-orient” worldwide education toward sustainable development. they discarded the
militaristic rigidity of the prussian kindergarden model, but retained the AIM of
INDOCTRINATING CHILDREN. fascism “captures” children for social engineering
Purposes. government is the true parent of the child.
jesuit educational maxim:‘give me a child until he is seven and i will give you the man’”
hitler: “your child belongs to us already”
The CRUSADE AGAINST KNOWLEDGE – The CAMPAIGN AGAINST MEMORY
by Bruce Detrick Price: improve-education.org
DUMBING-DOWN was certainly not on any citizen’s wish list. if we got dumbing-down, that
has to be because our top educators decided among themselves that dumber was what they
desired america to be. and why would they decide that? for ideological reasons. then, as now,
the “enlightened” people tended to be socialists. in schools, this tendency favored cooperative
children, minimal competition, and as much LEVELING as could be managed. our educators
were concerned with creating peas in a pod.
all the things traditionally esteemed in education became IRRELEVANT, even a nuisance,
have i exaggerated? not at all. this crusade against knowledge, this campaign against memory,
this devotion to ignorance, can be told via endless quotes from the top minds in the field of
education. in 1897 john dewey wrote: “the true center of correlation on the school subjects is
not science, not literature, nor history, nor geography, but the CHILD’S OWN SOCIAL
ACTIVITY. in 1899 john dewey wrote: “the mere absorbing of facts and truths is so
exclusively individual an affair that it tends very naturally to pass into selfishness. there is no
obvious social motive for the acquirement of mere learning, there is no clear social gain in
success thereat. so THERE GO FACTS, TRUTHS and LEARNING.
perhaps the most devastating gimmick of all was not well recognized. it was subtle and
operated invisibly. however, it showed up in all subjects, for all ages, from k to college, and
thus spread its damage widelythis was the attack on MEMORIZATION itself. this attack,
implicit in dewey pre-1900, called for the STEADY DEMONIZATION of KNOWING
ANYTHING, of actually having knowledge inside your head. we might think of it as an
OFFICIALLY-PROMOTED CULTURAL AMNESIA
in 1929 edward thorndike and arthur gates, in their textbook about education, zeroed in on the real problems: “artificial exercises, like drills on phonetics, multiplication tables, and formal writing movements are used to a wasteful degree. subjects such as arithmetic, language and history include content that is intrinsically of little value”
In 1936 the nea journal summed up the guiding philosophy: “let us not think … in terms of
specific facts or skills [that children acquire] but rather in terms of growing”
the thing you have to keep reminding yourself of is that the education establishment in this
country doesn’t know anything more about memory than the average mushroom knows.
The policies were never about memory …the intent was to foreclose the possibility of
knowledge; to stop people from remembering anything. that was the shamefully stupid –
one can as well say SUICIDAL – POLICY PROMOTED by people who DISLIKED
AMERICAN CULTURE and civilization, and WISHED THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS to
BE EMPTY-HEADED and PLIABLE
Jonah Goldberg: The state took the place of the anti-organic, contra-evolutionary influences of
the family. the home would no longer be seen as an island, separate from the rest of society
while the nazis often paid homage to the family, in practice the nazis “invaded” the family to
break it’s “autonomy”. The “traditional” FAMILY is the ENEMY of “totalitarian collectivism
because the family contains loyalties outside state control.
parents complained: “we no longer have rights over our children. their children became
strangers, contemptuous of monarchy or religion. barking and shouting like … prussian
sergeants” – historian Michael Burleigh. Hitler: “your child belongs to us already”
“you will pass on. your descendants … now stand in the new camp. in a short time they will know nothing but this new community” – Hitler
“a major goal … should be … to organize a worldwide education program …” al gore (2000)
in september, 2003 in prague the united nations declared 2005 through 2015, “the decade of
education for sustainable development (esd). to nobody’s surprise, the un also named unesco
(the united nations education, scientific, and cultural organization) as the lead agency for this
global effort. on june 12, 2002, president bush had announced that america would rejoin unesco
and “…participate fully in its missiom. according to unesco, “the decade of esd is a far-
reaching and complex undertaking… that potentially touches on every aspect of LIFE
The basic vision…is a world where everyone … learns the values, behavior, and lifestyles
required for a sustainable future and for positive societal transformation
the term “sustainable development” was introduced in 1987 at the world commission on
environment and development their report entitled, “our common future” defined sustainable
development as: “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs”
our common future revealed that sd involves “…a progressive transformation of the
economy and society (p.43), international interdependence (p.47), redistribution[of wealth]
(p.50 … less material and more equitable growth (p.50-52), …ensuring a sustainable level of
population (p.55), … merging environment and economics in decision making (p.62);
…and a new ethic between man and nature above all (p.71).
chapter titles of agenda 21 reveal the extent of government control necessary to implement
sustainable development, including goals to: change consumption patterns; promote
sustainable human settlements; plan & manage all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests,
mountains, oceans, fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; ensuring equity;
an increased role for non-government organizations (ngos)
in june, 1993, as president bill clinton signed an executive order creating the president’s council
on sustainable development. in 1994, the pcsd published “education for sustainability: an
agenda for action,” calling on educators “to serve society by fostering the transformations
needed to set us on the path to sustainable development
that same year, the efa/esd goals became president clinton’s “goals 2000” establishing the
framework for our national standards, curriculum and assessments all 50 states adopted.
goals 2000 in order to receive the funding that came with it today, president bush’s no child left
behind (nclb) holds states “accountable” to implement their previously signed agreements.
PROMOTING WORLD CITIZENSHIP OVER NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY IS NOW OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY FOR EDUCATION
to illustrate their mission, the cce posted an article on their website called: “teaching democracy
globally, internationally, and comparatively: the 21st century mission of schools”
it explains: “in the past century, the civic mission of schools … was education for democracy in
a sovereign state in this century, by contrast … education will become everywhere more global
we ought to…improve our curricular standards for a world transformed by globally accepted
and internationally transcendent principles …. education is no longer about preserving liberty
based on american principles, but transforming america based on international principles.
“i am convinced of the necessity of bringing about a complete regeneration” of CREATING A NEW PEOPLE” – Robespierre
OBAMA’s CAMPAIGN PLEDGED to FUNDAMENTALLY “TRANSFORM”
the United States
“the day i’m inaugurated, the country looks at itself differently. and don’t underestimate that
power. don’t underestimate that transformation”
– barack obama, national urban league convention, st. louis
change we can believe in: barack obama’s plan to renew america’s promise. education of
youth to prepare them for global citizenship. global management: agenda 21: educating
american children to be citizens of the world. it is abundantly obvious that the american public
education system and programs (e.g., goals 2000, school to work, no child left behind) is being
internationally guided for the purposes of intentionally de-emphasizing the value of american
citizenship. principles such as patriotism and the teaching of american students to honor and
respect american sovereignty are rapidly being ripped out of american classrooms
… and being replaced with notions of global governance and the “global sustainability”
programs which owe their origins to the united nations.
the interests of unesco, the education arm of the united nations, and the u.s. department of
education (doe) have merged under the NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT implemented after
president bush’s 2000 election victory. former secretary of education secretary, ron paige,
while addressing (10/3/2003) the united nations round table on education, best sums up the
marriage between unesco and the doe as he stated: “ the united states is pleased to return to
unesco… we agree that we must make education a universal reality. our governments have
entrusted us with the responsibility of preparing our children to become citizens of the world”
most americans parents assume that american schools are teaching the values of american
citizenship to american school children it is clear that unesco’s efa programs and the subsequent
no child left behind act hold american values. (e.g., national sovereignty, the value of american
citizenship) in complete disdain. the department of education farms out various agenda 21
programs to a variety of non governmental organizations (ngo), who promote world citizenship
over honoring the values american citizenship. this philosophy of global allegiance
is now the official united states government policy for education, the implementation arm of
agenda 21 education goals lies inside a little known ngo called the center for civic education
(cce), funded by the united states department of education
in 1994, the cce was commissioned to write america’s “national standards for civics and
government. with this decisively international approach, education is no longer about
preserving inalienable rights based on united states constitutional principles. rather, education
is becoming a case of BRAINWASHING AMERICA’S YOUTH into a world view based on
INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
AMERICAN EXCELLENCE [“EXCEPTIONALISM”] MUST BE DRAMATICALLY
DOWNPLAYED when teaching social studies to america’s youth. the teaching of american
excellence and superiority is not fair to other nations and people whose children may be
attending our american schools. produce a “global citizen who adheres to principles of
in a fourth grade houghton-mifflin text: “to be a community, people must share the same
customs and have some common purpose…. you also belong to the world community”
“…ask students to find out more about the idea of a ‘global village’” commands the teacher
manual (this is my country,1994)
“universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction. – adolf hitler
chapter 36 of agenda 21 emphasizes “that education is critical for promoting sustainable
development and improving capacity of the people to address environment and development
issues.. education is a driving force for the change needed (united nations department of
economic and social affairs division for sustainable development, 2003) How to improve our
current curricular frameworks and standards for a world transformed by globally accepted
and internationally transcendent principles and processes of democracy” (cce, 2005, pp. 1-2)
the founding fathers placed a premium on the power of local rule in order to avoid the imposition of tyranny from a centralized government. local control of education has largely been forfeited to an unelected group of corporate bureaucrats who clearly have an agenda to transform the patriotic beliefs of american children. remove the memories and knowledge of what america has traditionally stood for by controlling what american school children learn
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EDUCATION GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION
EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE TYRANNY
by Michael J. Chapman February, 2007 NewsWithViews.com
one good example of the “new earth ethic” is, “dear children of the earth,” a popular
children’s book written as a letter from mother earth heavily illustrated with mystical paintings
of animals, children are frightened into believing people are a cancer and threat to the
sustainability of the planet the text, under one illustration of a dying rhinoceros, explains: “
the animals have told me, ‘we are worried, mother earth. we are afraid because our homes are
being destroyed by people who don’t know better, or don’t care.
tell me, my children, where will the animals live when my forests are gone? where will the
whales and dolphins swim when my oceans are too dirty to live in? likewise, mainstream
textbooks include such scare tactics based on questionable science. ne popular second grade
textbook celebrates earth day by asking second graders: “how would you feel if there were
no trees? another popular fifth grade social studies textbook parrots the dying-earth theme by
summarizing: “the earth needs your help… we are all children of the earth. it does not matter
what country you look at. we are all earth’s children and we should treat her as our mother.”
the threat of environmental catastrophe is used to justify global governance including a planned economy. students are INDOCTRINATED TO ACCEPT TOTAL CONTROL THROUGH BIASED ECONOMIC LESSONS IN THEIR SOCIAL STUDIES TEXTS
under “a lesson on stalin”: “an economy completely controlled by government is called a
command economy … within just 20 years the soviet union became one of the world’s strongest
industrial nations … thousands of railroad cars crisscrossed the country, linking towns and
cities that had never been connected before.”missing are the failures of socialism
WHAT “a lesson on Stalin” DID NOT SAY:
stolypin railroad cars used by stalin to deport millions to build his “totalitarian” state
railroads used by stalin to build “one of the world’s strongest industrial nations”
millions of peasant “kulak” farmers “liquidated” for resting stalin’s farm collectivization
an economy completely controlled by stalin
millions killed, deported & “controlled“ by the “state” to build “worker’s paradise”
An ECONOMY COMPLETELY CONTROLLED by government … TO BUILD “one of the world’s strongest industrial nations”
STALIN’s INDUSTRIALIZATION & “COLLECTIVIZATION”
During the period 1941-1953, some 132,000 lithuanians were deported to remote areas of the
ussr, in siberia, the arctic circle areas and central asia. During the same period, another 200,000
people were thrown into prisons in Lithuania and elsewhere in the Soviet Union.
some 150,000 of them were sent to the gulags, soviet russia‘s concentration camps, situated
mostly in Siberia. virtually no one has been called to account for what was done, and the west
has paid little attention to the horrors of the soviet times. maybe it’s time?
“soviet fascism killed many more people than the germans, and the lies of soviet fascism
were mostly more severe than those of german fascism,” says felix krasavin, a former soviet-
time political prisoner.
MAO’S CHINA: [next to a picture of mao surrounded by cheering peasants]:
“the communists had become very popular…. the communists also worked with farmers,
showing them ways to produce more crops … “produced more crops”…
what the “lesson” did not say: mao’s “great leap forward” led to “the great famine”, causing
tens of millions to starve to death “produced more crops” the great famine
the great famine they provided housing, medical care, and food supplies for city workers
they supported education for all, along with equal rights for women … the cultural revolution
led to “class warfare” that “terrorized” the chinese into submission and conformity …
students are indoctrinated to accept total control through biased economic lessons in their
social studies texts … for some people life became better under castro’s communist
dictatorship; there is less poverty since castro gained control
what a “lesson” on CASTRO’S CUBA did not say: “for some people” – castro’s estimated net
worth is $900 MILLION DOLLARS “for some people”– how can the castro regime build these
mansions for foreigners while regular cubans are forced to live in dilapidated houses?
“for some people” – the answer is simple: the foreigners can pay the cuban dictator in hard
currency and regular cubans cannot because he is the only employer in the island and he pays
his slaves in pesos … 11 million cubans have to suffer the exploitation of the omnipotent state,
rationed food, lack of housing and the indignity of being second class citizens in their own
country … It is the worse form of capitalism, the capitalism of the state … For some people
life became better under Castro’s Tourists … Buffet at the Bucanero Hotel, where no Cubans
are allowed and no ration cards … The refrigerator of a typical Cuban family, with the few
items that they can buy using the ration card … Supermarkets for tourists, no ration cards
Supermarkets for Cubans
CUBAN “FREE”HEALTH CARE
while the country has reduced the pockets of extreme misery that existed during the batista
dictatorship, a majority of cubans are poorer and have fewer opportunities to improve their lives than they did 50 years ago
WHAT a “LESSON” on Castro’s Cuba DID NOT SAY: “FOR SOME PEOPLE” –
cubans’ average wage is nearly $20 a month, which would translate to an average income of
$240 a year. Foreigners who visit cuba, are fed the official line from castro’s propaganda
machine: “all cubans are now able to receive excellent healthcare, which is also free.”
but the truth is very different – castro has built excellent health facilities for the use of
foreigners, who pay with hard currency for those services
“cuba has two parallel health care systems – one for its regular citizens usually lacking a lot
of supplies, with hospitals lacking medicine, paramedical supplies and with old equipments and
superstructure … the other is the one you can see in michael moore’s documentary or even get
in touch personally when a foreigner visits cuba. cubans who require medical attention must go
to other hospitals, that lack the most minimum requirements needed to take care of their
patients. most of these facilities are filthy and patients have to bring their own towels, bed
sheets, pillows, or they would have to lay down on dirty bare mattresses stained with blood
and other body fluids
Cuban Hospitals, on the other hand, have to resign themselves and be content with something
more like this: CIMEQ is OUTSIDE Havana, in a neighborhood where you can find western
diplomat residences, Cuban high ranked officials’ houses, where all Cuba’s elite is living… in a
different world that they are proclaiming to the rest of Cuba.
And that picture belongs to one of the Children Hospitals in Havana. Very different story, isn’t
it? in the core of Havana’s downtown, this Cuban medical institution is lacking in windows
and paint, but also attention by Cuban authorities who never show this image
CIMEQ is NOT a Hospital for REGULAR Cubans and they know that.
CUBA’s “PARALLEL” HEALTH CARE
Emergency room of hospital only for CUBANS. Medical services only for TOURISTS.
the only way a cuban can get access to the hospital [featured in the film] is through a
bribe or contacts inside the hospital administration
(reuters) – three new york rescue workers injured in the september 11 attacks got the best
treatment cuba can offer in michael moore’s film critique of u.s. health care, the cuban doctors
who attended them said this week
havana has been a favored medical tourism hub in the americas for nearly half a century, not
only for its cheap, high quality health care, but also for its attractive recuperation options
best known for their cancer treatments, cosmetic and orthopedic surgeries, as well as
rehabilitation for drug addicts, havana hospitals typically offer savings of up to 80% against u.s.
photos were taken in may of 2011 by julio muñoz, a cuban-american who left cuba 19 years
ago and went back this year to visit his family in the island. during his stay in havana, he had to
take his aunt to the emergency room at hospital clínico quirúrico to receive medical care in
one of her fingers. while there, muñoz took these pictures of the deplorable conditions at the
hospital, very different from the hospital portrayed by michael moore in his documentary
the x-ray rooma ripped mattress; ancient equipment (probably pre-castro era) and the ceiling
caving in the emergency room; medical supplies that had been used on other patients could be
seen on the floor. the restrooms that the visitors are supposed to use. if you were not sick
before going to that hospital, you’ll be by the time you leave. this photo was taken by a tourist.
this man said that he was taking his sick father to the hospital on a wheelbarrow because there
were no ambulances available
max suarez ramirez died of an abdominal tumor after this photo was taken when doctors could not locate the necessary medicine
dr. sergio vilches holds resterilized equipment beside yuniesky moreno leon, a young boy
recovering from an operation to remove a brain tumor. due to a shortage of simple replacement
parts, the hospital cannot supply moreno leon with a humidifier that would provide more protection from germs
at the american arias maternity hospital in havana, dr. jose maria perez uses an antiquated
listening device to check the heartbeat of dasiel castillo’s unborn child. there is only one
ultrasound machine in the hospital and it is located on a different floor
an operating table dating to 1961 is used as the c-section table in a recently opened rural
hospital in mariel, cuba
the lack of foreign currency is reflected in sharp decreases in health care investment, a growing
scarcity of drugs and the inability of the health care sector to easily obtain disposable medical
supplies and replacement parts for aging, pre-revolution equipment made in the u.s.
what a “lesson” on castro’s cuba did not say: “for some people”
cuba has one of the highest suicide rates in the americas
american economics: “understanding imperialism:
the chief motivation behind imperialism is usually economic gain (i.e. “greed”)
many americans believed that they had a right and obligation to extend what they considered their superior culture to people less fortunate than themselves”
COMMUNISTS SOUGHT to REPLACE SELFISH GREED WITH COLLECTIVE ENVY”
the message for our children is: true economic success comes from government control, but in
america, success came from imperial aggression and greed
is this a “fair” or “balanced” view of economics and/or “reality”?
the ultimate goal of education for sustainable development is to prepare children to accept the
total transformation of america under global totalitarian control – for the “good” of “all”
a popular mcmillan 7th grade teachers’ edition explains the methodology used to build
understanding toward the goal:
“a growing awareness of deep national and international interdependenceis vital”
2nd grade silver burdett and ginn teacher’s edition: “why is the earth one community? …
second graders develop a sense of being involved with other people and of the earth being
everyone’s global home”
4th grade houghton-mifflin: “to be a community, people must share the same customs and
have some common purpose…. you also belong to the world community
4th grade houghton-mifflin: “…the things we share in our world are far more valuable than
those which divide us. …what might ‘global village’ mean?
5th-9th grade constitutional rights foundation curriculum: “the police power also allows
the government to restrict the use of property…or force an owner to give up his or her land
under the exercise of eminent domain
the textbook demotes america’s bill of rights as an antiquated “document of the eighteenth
century, reflecting the issues and concerns of the age in which it was written”
the lesson then promotes the universal declaration of human rights as “positive” rights and the next phase in mankind’s social evolution
america’s declaration of independence, our founders understood the primary function of
government was to protect those inalienable creator-given rights
the universal declaration by contrast, limits human rights to an enumerated list, and then
gives government the power to take them away
according to article 29.3 “these rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to
the purposes and principles of the United Nations. under the universal declaration of human
rights, man – as represented by a united nations global government – becomes god!
once government becomes god, citizenship takes on a new meaning
according to the cce, “citizenship” is defined as “the status of being a MEMBER of a STATE,
one who owes allegiance to the government. not allegiance to the principles of liberty – but
allegiance to government – the new source of our rights. according to the cce, “civic virtue”
now means: “the dedication of citizens to the common good, even at the cost of their individual
interests and liberty
SOCIAL ENGINEERING: EDUCATION GLOBAL INDOCTRINATION
“IS LEFTIST SCHOOL INDOCTRINATION UNSTOPPABLE?
February 27, 2013 by Bruce Thornton
Bruce Thornton: “we often focus on the ideological biases of the university, where the more
lunatic examples of political correctness get the most attention. but in education as in
economics, there is a trickle-down effect. the grandees at the elite universities train the phds
who go on to second and third tier institutions, where they in turn train the students who get high
school and grade school teaching credentials. they also write most of the textbooks that end
up in k-12 classrooms. thus the progressive ideology metastasizes throughout the educational
system, determining the curriculum, the textbooks, and the point of view of the teachers.
at that level the ideas may be garbled, half-baked, incoherent, and a collection of clichés and
slogans, but they are still toxic and effective at transmitting a world-view to impressionable
“when my kids were in public school i witnessed this process over and over. questionable
leftist ideas i had to sit through in graduate seminars turned up regularly in my kids’ english
and history courses and textbooks. in the marxiste interpretation of history, traditional
historical narratives reflect the “false consciousness” of capitalism’s academic publicists
justifying and “mystifying” a history marked by oppression and atrocities in service to a
“the founding of the united states, then, was not about things like freedom and inalienable
rights, but instead reflected the economic interests and power of wealthy white property-
owners. the civil war wasn’t about freeing the slaves or preserving the union, but about
economic competition between the industrial north and the plantation south. the settling of the
west was not an epic saga of hardships endured to create a civilization in a wilderness,
but genocide of the indians whose lands and resources were stolen to serve capitalist
exploitation. inherent in this sort of history were the assumptions of marxist economic
determinism and the primacy of material causes over the camouflage of ideals and principles”
“various strains of postmodernism added a cultural relativism that put out of bounds any judgments of a culture’s values, since all such standards reflect the economic needs of the dominant power.
Generations of english and history professors approach their traditional subjects – as
narratives justifying an unjust, racist, exploitative western power of which all right-thinking
people should be ashamed. The politicizing of the universities has led to TWO ILL
first, the gresham’s law of education means that adding all this material to the curriculum
necessitates the driving out of the traditional curriculum. driving out of the traditional
curriculum – based (imperfectly, to be sure) on fact and argument – that could provide the
empirical antidote to this left-wing toxin
second, generations of credential students have sat in these courses and then gone on to teach
in high schools and grade schools, and to write the textbooks and curricula that propagate this
ideology. the RESULT is a STUDENT POPULATION IGNORANT of the BASIC FACTS
of HISTORY, the VACUUM FILLED with MELODRAMAS of VICTIMIZATION,
RACISM, OPPRESSION and VIOLENCE that cast the u.s. as a global villain guilty of
crimes against humanity.
So too with the movies, books, television shows, and popular music limbaugh identifies as
vectors of this disease. having been schooled in the evil designs of oppressive, greedy
corporations that abuse workers and rape the planet, these cultural consumers are natural
audiences for the plots of movies and television shows that recycle these dull clichés.
having spent years being indoctrinated with romantic environmentalism and disney-fied visions of nature, they are susceptible to an anti-carbon politics that retards development of american oil resources in the name of “protecting the planet” from an apocalyptic rise in global temperatures caused by human and corporate misbehavior, a notion that barely qualifies as a hypothesis, let alone a scientific fact. but how could most products of our dysfunctional educational system tell the difference?
agenda 21 chapter 36.2 states the plan to “re-orient” worldwide education toward
sustainable development. the jesuit educational maxim was, ‘give me a child until he is
seven and i will give you the man’. today’s progressives get children until they are 18 and
sometimes 21. that kind of influence is hard to match.
in 2008, presidential candidate barack obama committed to making sure that every child has the chance to learn by creating a global fund for education. a new global fund for education… must be capable of mobilizing the approximately $7 billion annually still needed to achieve education . secretary of state hillary clinton has recently called for a new architecture of global cooperation the “education for all” developer is unesco. both the u.n.’s educational goals (via unesco and “education for all” ) and “common core” do sound very appealing on the surface
both unesco’s educational goals and common core are heavily funded by activist
and philanthropist bill gates, one of the wealthiest billionaires on earth
agenda 21 chapter 36.2 says they plan to “re-orient” worldwide education toward
sustainable development. education is indispensable to changing people’s attitudes so that
they have the capacity to assess and address their sustainable development concerns.
it is also critical for achieving environmental and ethical awareness, values and attitudes, skills
and behavior consistent with sustainable development and for effective public participation in
to be effective, environment and development education should deal with the dynamics of both
the physical/biological and socio-economic environment “race to the top” grants promote a
socialist education system but call it a state-led common core. but the problem, in a nutshell, is
simply: whose version of “sustainable” do you want to “re-educate” everyone to believe? …
assuming that you can accept massive-scale propagandizing for the promotion of one single
belief system, under which people didn’t get a representative vote. I can’t believe how many
parents and educators have told me that they are willing to give up a little bit of control in
education to the federal government as long as their child gets a better education”
The three e’s of “sustainability”: environment, economy and equity referring to the u.n.
blueprint for environmental regulations, economic manipulation and social equity
“universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction” – Adolf Hitler
“GOVERNMENT EXISTS to PROTECT US FROM EACH OTHER. Where
GOVERNMENT has gone BEYOND ITS LIMITS is in DECIDING to PROTECT US
FROM OURSELVES” – Ronald Reagan
“Government isn’t the SOLUTION to our problems, government is the PROBLEM.”
– Ronald Reagan January 20, 1981
Reinhold Niebuhr – modern man lacks the humility to accept the fact that the whole drama of
history is enacted in a frame of meaning too large for human comprehension or management”
“The WAVE” The Road to Totalitarian Tyranny ”
the wave” promised simple but deceptive answers regarding change in a complicated and
confusing world … giving up individual freedom for the promise of communal
“greatness” the promise of “progress” and “newness” comes with unintended consequences
the confusing chaos of freedom lost to communal tyranny
do we learn this lesson, or are we constantly “fooled again” by the “promise” of fascism?
“fooled again”by the “possibilities” of “change” and “newness”
the promise and lure of change and “progress”
(utopia) leading to something far worse (dystopia)than before …
the promise and lure of change and “progress”
fascists are often “progressives” that believe government can & should
“And THEY SAID, GO TO, LET US BUILD US a CITY and a TOWER, WHOSE TOP MAY REACH UNTO HEAVEN; and LET US MAKE US a NAME, LEST WE BE SCATTERED ABROAD UPON the FACE of the WHOLE EARTH” Genesis 10:4
The LESSONS of ENGINEERING FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERS
by Chet Richards February 10, 2016
Have you ever wondered why seasoned engineers are almost invariably politically
conservative? with a fresh-minted bachelor’s degree, enthusiastic on my first professional job, i
was a committed liberal this was the kennedy era and my attitudes were conventional among
my contemporaries my older engineering colleagues just shook their heads and tolerantly
suggested that my opinions would change of course they did. my story as an increasingly
conservative engineer is one played out a multitude of times in a multitude of places within the
engineering profession why are most engineers politically conservative?
the answer is that ENGINEERS FAIL MOST of the TIME
in engineering there is a cycle of design, test, test failure, diagnosis and redesign,
until a product is perfected. Failure is the natural state of engineering. new devices
through their repeated failures, competent engineers are forced to become rigorously honest
and functionally conservative. this honesty is notably lacking in the ungrounded wishful
thinking of the political left. the great failure of liberals is that they never fail (according to
them). learning to deal with failure changes one’s attitude from youthful idealism into a kind of
skeptical realism about top-down liberal social engineering projects – projects that,
ostensibly, never fail.
there are THREE CLASSES of TOP-DOWN SOCIAL ENGINEERING.
government programs to restructure society is one class. government laws, regulatory
mandates, and court orders to change behavior is a second. the third is liberal social
pressure, often with government complicity, to control thought. we call this third method
engineers have an expression: kiss – keep it simple, stupid. the simplest design solution is
almost always the best. now, consider american society. america has hundreds of millions of
people. each individual is infinitely complex and unique each has desires, intentions and
needs that normally are incompatible with any master schem. and yet, the left has the
arrogance to assume that a master planner can engineer a social system that best for all the
people – a “ONE SIZE FITS ALL” program. there is no way, other than forcing everybody to
be identical robots, that centralized social engineering can kiss.
this “my way or the highway” hubris is the signal hallmark of today’s progressive busybody
bullies. what about modern liberals? many of them optimistically go along with progressive
ideas their critical distinction from change-everything progressives is that most liberals really do
appreciate the gifts our forbearers have given us.
unfortunately, most political democrats, and many establishment republicans as well, have
been seduced by a lifetime of pro-government experience into believing that top-down,
big-government programs are the answer to all ills. it is vanity to think that they are specially
chosen to steer everyone’s life of the seven deadly sins, theologians say the most deadly of all
was vanity the greeks called it hubris. we call it arrogance. all the other deadly sins derived
from vanity this sin is really at the heart of progressive, or liberal, social engineering programs
one can do no wrong if one’s heart is in the right place – so liberals believe.
our founding fathers thought otherwise. they realized that no person, or selected group, could
anticipate all circumstances. they therefore created a constitution that allowed for local
adaptation within a protective framework … a framework that inhibits vanity by enlisting
contending interests in making the most important decisions. the american constitution was
designed for a society whereby people manage their own affairs and solve their own
beyond promoting trade among the states, protecting against foreign invasion, and ensuring
the rights of property, the federal government really has no legitimate role in structuring
society. society was intended to evolve social arrangements on its own within the
protective framework of the Constitution. thus, this progressive idea that government has the
right to impose social change is contrary both to the spirit and to the words of the constitution
within america there exist highly complex and very successful social structures – the community, charitable, and economic structures that comprise civil society and they have come about independent of government direction. how is this possible?
the answer is that successful complex structures grow organically: start small and simple
find out what works. try adding features. edit out those elements that don’t work and build on
those that do work. but, for the changes made at each stage of increasing complexity, keep it
simple! all successful innovations start simple and evolve complexity as discoveries are made
about what works and what doesn’t. on the other hand, we are supposed to believe that complex
top-down liberal programs never fail [actually not: i’m being sarcastic here]
they reach their goals and then either continue to provide popular benefits or are voluntarily
terminated having done their job. let’s test that assertion by recalling massive liberal social
engineering programs which have been great successes: [crickets] the usual excuses for these
programmatic disappointments, and for the need for them to continue in perpetuity, are:
“not enough money has been spent,” or, “it’s someone else’s fault,” or “conservatives are
sabotaging the program”
actually there are a few government programs, mostly non-social in nature, which have
withstood the test of time: the national parks program is a great success – but it has always
been an overwhelmingly popular initiative. and, it started small. the interstate highway
program was a centerpiece of the eisenhower administration and has produced major social
benefits but that program was justified as for national defense, which is a legitimate function
of the federal government. the resulting social benefits were developed through individual
private initiatives. maybe that tells us something. i should add that many people, including
many conservatives, believe that social security has been a success. in fact, social security is
a great, compulsory, ponzi scheme. but even it, too, started small: merely as insurance against
personal catastrophe. it has grown to be a monster that is devouring the national budget and
jeopardizing national security.
there is no money in its so-called “trust fund” and it is generally conceded that the program
is on the verge of financial failure, the only dispute being when insolvency will occur
what i receive in social security benefits is a small fraction of what i have actually
contributed adjusted for compound interest growth and inflation. private pension funds, and
401k accounts, do much better than social security,
contrast the few successful government programs with the many notorious failures
obamacare is the contemporary classic. but, what we have not yet seen is all the damage that
obamacare has in store. examples of programs where we do see the wreckage are those “great
society” antipoverty programs initiated by president Johnson. enough time has passed to
validate the early warnings. senator daniel moynihan warned, all the way back in 1965, that
liberal poverty policy was leading to disaster:
disaster … the breakup of families, crime, drug use, wasted lives and all the other horrid
consequences that have followed. the liberal community did not listen and, today, we are stuck
with the predicted social disaster. i am an antediluvian, troglodyte, knuckle dragging, tea party,
politically conservative engineer. half a century of professional experience warns me to never
believe in liberal social engineering causes. I HEAR the PROMISE that THIS TIME the
PROGRAM is SURE to be WONDERFUL. NO THANKS, I’LL PASS
PSALM 2 –
1 WHY DO the HEATHEN RAGE, and the PEOPLE IMAGINE a VAIN THING?
2 the kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the lord, and against his anointed, saying,
3 let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us
4 he that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh:the lord shall have them in derision
5 then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them
6 yet have i set my king upon my holy hill of zion
7 i will declare the decree: the lord hath said unto me, thou art my son; this day have i begotten thee.
8 ask of me, and i shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession
9 THOU SHALT BREAK THEM with a ROD of IRON; THOU SHALT DASH THEM in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
10 be wise now therefore, o ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
11 serve the lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
“PROGRESSIVE” GOVERNMENT and “SCIENCE” BUILDING “UTOPIA”
“And the LORD said, behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do” Genesis 10:6
“So the LORD SCATTERED THEM ABROAD from THENCE UPON the FACE of ALL the EARTH: and THEY LEFT OFF to BUILD the CITY” Genesis 10:8
MAN PLANS, GOD LAUGHS
“REALITY is THAT WHICH, WHEN YOU STOP BELIEVING IN IT, DOESN’T GO AWAY” Philip K. Dick