AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BAKE SALE

PROLOGUE: FASCISM seeks COLLECTIVE “salvation”, eventually producing a TOTALITARIAN society of ONE, single, “organic” “WHOLE” benefiting ALL, COMPLETE CONFORMITY allowing no “separateness”. Fascism promises UTOPIA through THIS-worldly political “REBIRTH”, redemption and realization of “meaning”, “solutions” to never ending “CRISIS”, overcome with revolutionary “CRUSADES” of “ACTION” of “social justice” based on their own “WILL to POWER”, instincts and feelings, which typically produce reactionary tantrums by “heretics” who seek limitations on their power and/or critically question fascist utopian lack of “reason”, “reality” and/or DYSTOPIAN RESULTS. (“tragic” UNintended consequences) Totalitarian, all powerful GOD-STATES use political-religion to promise “heaven on earth”. Mussolini said “fascism IS a religion”. Fascists purposely mix and confuse politics and religion, Government and God, co-opting “God” in their pursuit of political POWER, a POLITICAL RELIGION OF government idol worship. The sheep-like MASSES, contemptible “clingers” and “deplorables”, require leadership by an elite “enlightened” political governing ruling class and/or messianic “CULT of PERSONALITY” (“gods” IN government). Contemptuous of freedom and democratic self-government, the “god OF government” seeks to SOCIALLY ENGINEER utopian “political paradise” through “science” and an evolutionary “Cult of “Progress”. A utopian FUTURE requires INDOCTRINATION of YOUTH and CENSORSHIP of anything contradicting politically correct conformity, preventing eventual totalitarian control on ALL aspects of society, propagated and proselytized by elite media “priests” and educational “seminaries”. Utopian idealism requires total elimination of anything old & corrupt, erasing past history, destroying politically INcorrect dogmas, and/or persecuting non-utopian “heretics” (“tragic” realist “phobes”) which question and PREVENT the “CULT of PROGRESS” and necessary transformational change “we can ALL believe in”.

FASCISM #1-The Collective #2-Rebirth #3-Crisis & Crusade #4-Action #5-Politics as Religion #6-Contempt for Democracy #7-The Cult of Personality #8-Social Engineering #9-Youth #10-Censorship #11- Fascist Economics (2017)

FASCISM: YESTERDAY and TODAY

#4) The CULT of “ACTION”

BASIC CRITERIA COMMON TO ALL or MOST TYPES of FASCISM:
“ACTION” – BUILDING UTOPIA – “FEELINGS” vs. “FACTS”
a “romantic” rebellion against “reason” and “reality”; glorification of violence,
Fascism then seek to REDEFINE REALITY ACCORDING to the WHIMS of the STATE
a “will to power” towards “social justice”, commanding “politically correct” conformity)
to ENSURE ABSOLUTE EQUALITY. As Robespierre put it, to be a citizen meant that
“ALL PRIVILEGES, ALL DISTINCTIONS, ALL EXCEPTIONS MUST DISAPPEAR”.
ANYTHING that HINDERS, PREVENTS or denies the new fascist REVOLUTION and “REALITY” MUST BE ELIMINATED as a HERETIC, and ENEMY of the “GOD-STATE”
ADAPTED from the BOOK LIBERAL FASCISM:
The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning
by Jonah Goldberg, an American conservative author, commentator and political columnist

“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a PEOPLE SEE EVEN
HEAVEN AS HELL or an extremely WRETCHED LIFE as PARADISE” – Hitler
If your are not prepared to use force to defend civilization,then be prepared to accept barbarism
– Thomas Sowell
It is not because the TRUTH is too difficult to see that we make mistakes … we make mistakes because the easiest and most comfortable course for us is to seek insight WHERE IT ACCORDS WITH OUR EMOTIONS – especially SELFISH ones. – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Psalm 2:1 – WHY do the HEATHEN RAGE, and the PEOPLE IMAGINE a VAIN THING?

ACTION: REJECTING “REASON, IMAGINING “REALITY
FACTS vs FEELINGS
IMAGINING (the Kindergarten of) “EDEN” – RE-GURGITATING REALITY
Adolescent Ignorance as Bliss – The War Against Thought, Judgement & Truth

Action: The Will To Power – “Romantic Revolutionaries” Rejecting Reason (& Reality
TABLE of CONTENTS

action: the will to power becomes terror as social justice
building utopia – disguising dystopia: the ends justify the means
action, violence and the will to power
“revolutionaries” rejecting “reason” – adolescent temper tantrums
progressive poison. power and cause: social [in]justice – the trojan horse of tyranny
totalitarian tyranny: mass delusion and the rejection of reason
ACTION: “FACTS” vs. “FEELINGS” –

ACTION: REJECTING “REASON, IMAGINING “REALITY
FACTS vs FEELINGS

“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”
– Aristotle
“At the core of liberalism is the SPOILED CHILD – MISERABLE, as all spoiled children are, UNSATISFIED, DEMANDING, ILL-DISCIPLINED, DESPOTIC and USELESS. Liberalism is a PHILOSOPHY of SNIVELING BRATS. – P.J. O’Rourke

SYNOPSIS
my “head” vs “heart”; the senses (“instinct”, “desire” and “passion”) were superior to “the mind”
historically, “romanticism” is a reaction against “reason”, which often morphs into adolescent “temper tantrums” denying the “cold logic” of their parents
UTOPIAN “OUGHT” (“feelings”) vs REALISTIC “IS” (“facts”)
historically, ROMANTICISM was a reaction against “reason”
historically, romanticism was a reaction against the “cold” logic of the Enlightenment
historically, romanticism embraced emotions, feelings and “passion” my heart vs. my head
the senses (“instinct”, “desire” and “passion”) were superior to “the mind”
”PASSION” for REVOLUTIONARY “IDEALS” of “SOCIAL JUSTICE”

PASSION LED to “ACTION” TOWARDS CHANGE and “PROGRESS”

ACTION: REJECTING “REASON, IMAGINING “REALITY (Feelings vs Facts)
“To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he’s doing is good” – Solzhenitsyn

“I would like to call upon AMERICA to be more careful with its TRUST … and prevent those … because of short-sightedness and still others out of self-interest, from FALSELY USING the STRUGGLE FOR PEACE and FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE to lead you down a FALSE ROAD. Because they are trying to WEAKEN you; they are trying to DISARM your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat. … I call upon you: ordinary working men of America … DO NOT LET YOURSELVES BECOME WEAK” – Solzhenitzyn
“The name of ‘reform’ simply covers what is latently a process of the THEFT of the national heritage.” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

AT WAR with REALITY
by Faye Voshell August 30, 2015

CHARACTERIZING the OPPOSITION AS INSANE is a favorite tactic of the left. To question their latest fatwa is for them an indicator of mental derangement on the part of the inquirer. But in case you haven’t noticed, within in the halls of academia, which once passed as the place for rational inquiry and analysis, the real crazies are hard at work introducing the equivalent of jabberwocky. Even language is supposed to adjust to the
CURRENT INSANITY.

Even language itself is to become anarchical – destroyed in the name of absolute.
EQUALITY for the crazies, ensuring incomprehensibility ensures confusion.
CONFUSION then ensures the MASSES are STUPEFIED. Stupefied masses then become
COMPLETELY MALLEABLE and subject to whatever definition the powers that be, usually
the almighty state, grant them.

Apparently, by “de-sexing” language a mere unit, not a human being who is either male or
female, is “born.” The COMPLETE SMASHING of INDIVIDUATION of ANY SORT is the
RESULT. We have seen the left’s attempt to shift the definition of what it means to be human
time and again. The 20th and now the 21st centuries have been rife with imitations and
variants of the attempts of the French Revolution to REDEFINE the HUMAN BEING
ACCORDING to the WHIMS of the STATE, which was to ENSURE ABSOLUTE
EQUALITY. As Robespierre put it, to be a citizen meant that “ALL PRIVILEGES,
ALL DISTINCTIONS, ALL EXCEPTIONS MUST DISAPPEAR”.

Under communism, equality meant that, so as to create the perfect communist drone,
ALL CLASSES MUST DISAPPEAR, ALL DIFFERENCES AMONG CLASSES MUST
BE ERADICATED. EVERYONE, WITHOUT DISTINCTION, was to be a
“COMRADE,” EQUAL in ALL RESPECTS. Mao Tse Tung was to imitate the Leninist and
Stalinist view of the classless society, ENFORCING UNIFORMITY and REGIMENTATION
to the point of EXTINGUISHING INDIVIDUALITY ALTOGETHER.

The existing pattern of society as it has been from time immemorial is not one they wish to
adjust to … so they make the INSANE ATTEMPT to DESTROY REALITY. In the long run,
perhaps that is what the crazies want. The reality of the world as it really is, divided equally
between those who are uniquely men and uniquely women, seems to be too much for them.
DISASTROUSLY, the ATTEMPT to RE-CREATE REALITY invites COERCION of the
MASSES who live in and with reality and who know the created order of the universe.

Disastrously, the attempt to re-create reality invites coercion of the masses who live in and
with reality and who know the created order of the universe, including the society in which
they live, will not really change according to the wishes of crazies, be they Robespierre,
Stalin, Mao tse tung, or Braquet. Men will REMAIN men; and women will REMAIN women
despite attempts to use linguistics as both a tool of denial and a useful weapon for enforcing
conformity.

If the insanity continues unchecked and unabated, COERCION by the crazies is NEXT.
Isn’t coercion always the END GAME of rabid ideologues? HUGE CHUNKS of REALITY are IGNORED, and when there are questions about the mental stability of the ideologues, the QUESTIONS ARE NOT ONLY UNANSWERED, BUT THEY ARE NOT EVEN PERMITTED. NOT ONLY IS THERE NO PERMISSION TO PROTEST OR QUESTION – IT FOLLOWS THAT FORCE MUST BE APPLIED IN ORDER THE UNREALITY OF THE IDEOLOGUES BE MAINTAINED.
Parents and others concerned about the annihilation of distinctions … should realize what’s at stake and refuse to allow the crazies to DEFINE how they, their children and the rest of us talk, write, speak and act.

ACTION: REJECTING “REASON, IMAGINING “REALITY (Feelings vs Facts)
Mark Levin, “Ameritopia”: the Utopians reject history – everything begins today
“In truth, therefore, utopianism is REGRESSIVE, IRRATIONAL, and pre-enlightenment.
It robs society of opinions and ideas that may be beneficial to the human condition, now and in
the future. It stymies human interaction, including economic activity, which progresses
through a historical process of self-organization.

“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a PEOPLE SEE EVEN HEAVEN AS HELL or an extremely WRETCHED LIFE as PARADISE” – Hitler
It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance -Thomas Sowell

IMAGINING (the Kindergarten of) “EDEN” – RE-GURGITATING REALITY
Adolescent Ignorance as Bliss – The War Against Thought, Judgement & Truth
“The battleline between good and evil runs through the heart of EVERY man” – Solzhenitsyn

“At the core of liberalism is the SPOILED CHILD – MISERABLE, as all spoiled children are, UNSATISFIED, DEMANDING, ILL-DISCIPLINED, DESPOTIC and USELESS. Liberalism is a PHILOSOPHY of SNIVELING BRATS. – P.J. O’Rourke
“I suspect that even most conservatives would prefer to live in the kind of world conjured up in the liberals’ imagination rather than in the kind of world we are in FACT STUCK WITH” – Thomas Sowell

– HOW MODERN LIBERALS THINK and WHY HE THINKS IGNORANCE is BLISS
by Evan Sayet
– ROMANTICISM ACCORDING to AYN RAND

SYNOPSIS
Mankind CAN return to Eden (or its secular version, the wonderful world of the kindergarten
playground) if only all efforts to use one’s intellect ended if mankind lost paradise when we
ate the apple and gained knowledge of right and wrong, regurgitating the apple, giving up on
knowledge of right and wrong, humanity can return to paradise – the only way to be moral is
to not discriminate between right and wrong, good and evil, better and worse, truth and lies
nihilism –
ANY “JUDGEMENT” BECOMES a “HATE CRIME” (EXCEPT THEIR OWN) –
“DISCRIMINATION is DISCRIMINATORY EXCEPT FOR MY DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ANOTHER’s DISCRIMINATION”)
a CHILD’s REJECTION of the ADULT RESPONSIBILITIES and REALITIES of life.

Evan Sayet was born in New York City and went to school in Rochester, New York. He would
soon move out to Hollywood in order to pursue a career as a stand-up comedian, television
writer, and eventually video producer as well. However, post 9-11, he rethought (or more
accurately, thought about for the first time) his political and social beliefs. Evan recognized
that he had been acting as a knee-jerk liberal, but was, in reality, a conservative at heart.

From that moment, he has dedicated himself to conserving and promoting the values of the
America that has given him freedom and allowed him to pursue his life of liberty and happiness.
Evan Sayet is is famous for the KINDERGADEN of EDEN (a.k.a. Regurgitating the Apple)
how modern liberals think and why he thinks ignorance is bliss.

If mankind lost paradise when we ate the apple and gained knowledge of right and wrong …
They believe that if they can just force us all to regurgitate the apple … mankind would
RETURN to EDEN (or its secular version, the wonderful world of the
KINDERGARDEN PLAYGROUND) if only all efforts to use one’s intellect ended if we give up on knowledge of right and wrong, we can return to paradise the only way to be moral is to not discriminate between right and wrong, good and evil, better and worse, truth and lies

The modern liberal’s policy on any given issue is the one that he is led to by HIS REJECTION
of MORAL and RATIONAL THOUGHT – his INDISCRIMINATENESS
“OBJECTIVITY is IMPOSSIBLE, and it is also UNDESIRABLE. That is, IF it were
POSSIBLE it would be UNDESIRABLE” – Howard Zinn

There are TWO KINDS of modern liberals – 1)the TRUE BELIEVER and
2)his MINDLESS FOOT SOLDIER
The MINDLESS FOOT SOLDIER subscribes to the first part of Zinn’s claim –
OBJECTIVITY is IMPOSSIBLE. Since objectivity is impossible, the mindless foot soldier
DOES NOT ENGAGE HIS INTELLECT to SEEK OUT the RIGHT ANSWERS.
His own point of view … is by definition, no more right and no more valid than any and
every other. The mindless foot soldier is convinced that anyone who would declare his own
point of view right or another point of view wrong is and can only be a BIGOT (for his side) or
a PHOBIC (against the other).

The true believer subscribes to the second part of Zinn’s statement, REJECTING USE of
HIS INTELLECT, not because he thinks objectivity is impossible, but because he knows its
PRODUCT – the TRUTH – is UNDESIRABLE.
The true believer is an IDEOLOGUE with a UTOPIAN VISION.
The TRUTH invariably GETS in the WAY.

Here an essential DISTINCTION must be drawn between INTELLECT and what I’ll call
‘INTELLECTUALISM’.
[Intellect] is the use of one’s mind to DISCOVER the RIGHTFUL ANSWERS”
intellectualism is the use of one’s mind to conjure CLEVER EXPLANATIONS for what is
already believed”
“intellect” – reason to discover “truth”
intellectualism – rhetoric used to manipulate truth

Seeing objectivity as impossible or undesirable, the modern liberal wholly rejects the intellect
and ENGAGES ONLY in intellectualism – something many people then confuse for ‘smarts’.
The true believer’s UTOPIAN VISION is predicated on the notion that if mankind lost paradise
when Adam and Eve ate the apple and GAINED the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL …
RIGHT and WRONG, BETTER and WORSE …”
“… then mankind can RETURN TO PARADISE if only everyone would just
‘REGURGITATE the APPLE’ and GIVE UP all recognition of the existence of the BETTER”

To the true believer, INDISCRIMINATELNESS – the TOTAL REJECTION of the
intellectual PROCESS – is a MORAL IMPERATIVE because it HOLDS THE KEY TO
RETURNING TO PARADISE.
For the true believer to come to this conclusion, he must be convince of something for which
there is NO LOGIC OR EVIDENCE and WHICH STANDS in OPPOSITION to
EVERYTHING ELSE HE BELIEVES ABOUT GOD and MAN.

He must be convinced that the HUMAN BEING is BORN MORALLY PERFECT and only
then CORRUPTED BY EVIL FORCES WITHIN SOCIETY, seeking to use him to advance
their own self-serving agendas.
Rousseau – “everything is good that leaves the hands of the author of things; everything degenerates in the hands of man.
Just WHO TURNED the FIRST MORALLY PERFECT HUMAN BEING ‘EVIL’ is
NEVER QUITE EXPLAINED – NOR is the existence of an ‘AUTHOR’ WHO CREATES
MORALLY PERFECT BEINGS, jibes with the modern liberal’s usual
ANTIPATHY for GOD and RELIGION.
If this is true, then not only is the modern’s UTOPIA POSSIBLE, it is EASILY ACHIEVED

If the modern liberal is right – if the human being is born morally perfect – then the true
believer’s utopia is not only possible, it is easily achievable. All the true believer would need
to do is find some way to RETARD the child’s moral and intellectual growth to a level
prior to his being corrupted by society and a morally perfect world would result.

To accomplish this goal, the true believer needs a MECHANISM for preventing children from
learning and adults from believing their eyes.
That mechanism is to make a MORAL IMPERATIVE out of the REJECTION of
OBJECTIVE FACTS … standards and logic – to declare objectivity itself
‘IMPOSSIBLE’ on the one hand and ‘UNDESIRABLE’ on the other”

The rationale used to OUTLAW REASON was that ANYTHING a PERSON THINKS is
going to have been so tainted by his personal prejudices. PREJUDICES born of such things
as the color of his skin, the nation of his ancestry, his economic status, his height, weight, sex
and so on – that only way for him NOT to be an evil BIGOT was for him to
NEVER THINK AT ALL.

ANYONE who takes a different position on any issue is NOT ONLY “WRONG,” he is EVIL
In Thomas Sowell’s words, he is “NOT MERELY in ERROR, BUT in SIN”.
This is because the opposite of indiscriminate-ness is the evil of having DISCRIMINATED.
Discriminating between these things might just be a reflection of your personal discrimination,
your bigotries. Indiscriminateness is a moral imperative because its opposite is the evil of
having discriminated.
the modern liberal SCORNS THE INTELLECTUAL PROCESS and worships at the altar of
indiscriminateness, … DREAMS of REGRESSING HUMANITY BACK to ADAM and EVE.

The modern liberal is convinced that it is beliefs – not what those beliefs are but
ANY BELIEF AT ALL – that are not only evil, but the font of all war, poverty, crime and injustice
They’re convinced that THINKING is a HATE CRIME.
Thinking an act so HEINOUS as to render one EVIL FOR SIMPLY ENGAGING IN IT and
an act that requires one to revile anyone who engages in it the only way not to be an evil bigot is
to NEVER THINK AT ALL.
The modern liberal sees FAITH and REASON as HATE CRIMES, but THEIR PRODUCT IS
and CAN ONLY BE WAR, POVERTY, CRIME and INJUSTICE
IF NOBODY BELIEVED IN ANYTHING, THEN there’d be NOTHING FOR PEOPLE
to DISAGREE ABOUT.

MANKIND WOULD RETURN TO EDEN (or its SECULAR VERSION), the wonderful
world of the KINDERGARTEN PLAYGROUND. If only all efforts to use one’s intellect
ended.

Rousseau – in many ways the godfather of modern liberalism – argues in essence that the
human being is BORN morally perfect and is only then corrupted by [EXTRNAL] evil forces
within society.
Seeking to use him to advance their own self-serving agendas. If this is true, then not only is the
modern liberal’s UTOPIA POSSIBLE, it is EASILY ACHIEVED.

All the modern liberal would need to do is FIND SOME MECHANISM to RETARD the
CHILD’S MORAL and INTELLECTUAL GROWTH at a LEVEL PRIOR to HIS BEING
CORRUPTED BY SOCIETY, and a morally perfect world would result.
That mechanism is to declare THINKING to be a HATE CRIME.

The result is millions and millions of people who believe, as the mega-selling book by Robert
Mulghum declares, that All I Ever Need To Know I Learned In Kindergarten.
The modern liberal’s policy on any given issue is the one that he is led to by HIS REJECTION
of MORAL and RATIONAL THOUGHT – HIS INDISCRIMINATENESS.

The song “IMAGINE” by JOHN LENNON is a near-perfect detailing of the modern liberal’s
“BLUEPRINT FOR UTOPIA”. The true believer’s blueprint for utopia was perfectly
articulated in one of the most popular and beloved anthems of the modern liberal era.

In ‘Imagine’, Lennon promises the world paradise, but only once people are left with nothing
to believe in or care about. If no one engaged in thought about the better forms of
governance – that’s what having “NO COUNTRIES” would do.
And if no one gave any thought to what the better moral codes to live by are – that’s what
having no religions would accomplish. Everyone is equally rewarded no matter their
behavior (like EVERY CHILD GETTING a COOKIE and NO CHILD GETTING TWO)

Then there would be no reason to seek out the better and rightful behaviors. Then mankind
would live in paradise without war, poverty, crime or injustice.
ACT ON INSTINCT – DO NOT THINK
Rejection of “logic”- discrimination against “discrimination”. The values of NO VALUE
judgement (ignoring the tree of knowledge of good and evil)

In ‘IMAGINE’, Lennon PROMISES the WORLD PARADISE, but only once people are left
with nothing to believe in or care about. According to Lennon’s plan, mankind can return to
Eden, but only after all consideration of the BETTER FORMS of GOVERNANCE is
ENDED. That’s what having ‘no countries’ would accomplish”

The reality of the PARADISE that is CHILDHOOD is where NEITHER TOIL NOR
INTELLIGENCE is much REQUIRED and the ADULTS ABSORB all of the
CONSEQUENCES of STUPIDITY.

Nietzsche argued the truly “authentic” man chose his own morality. Even the “right” choice is
wrong if it is made under the influence of others is the end result NIHILISM. (nothing-ness)
Notice that Lennon DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG,
BETTER and WORSE OR GOOD and EVIL.

It’s not what countries do that matters; it’s countries themselves. There is no difference to
Lennon between America – which has provided the world with food, medicines and
technological advances that has virtually ended all disease, hunger, poverty and pain …
and Nazi Germany which gave the world nothing but misery and death.

According to Lennon, PARADISE WOULD BE REGAINED, BUT ONLY IF ALL
DISCUSSION of the BETTER MORAL CODES CEASED.
THAT’S WHAT HAVING ‘NO RELIGION’ WOULD DO”
There is no moral or intellectual distinction drawn between a religion that teaches ‘love thy
neighbor’ and has brought us western civilization and one that preached ‘kill all infidels’ and has
brought us every war on the planet today”
Essential to the true believer’s blueprint for utopia, and a central point of every leftist ideology
from before Lenin to after Lennon, is having ‘NO POSSESSIONS’”.
This is because POSSESSIONS serve as TANGIBLE EVIDENCE of having ENGAGED in
the BETTER (MORE PRODUCTIVE) behaviors.

Since the modern liberal’s paradise REQUIRES DENYING the existence of the BETTER,
ALL behaviors – hard work and sloth, ingenuity and chicanery, sobriety and drug addiction –
must be EQUALLY and INDISCRIMINATELY REWARDED. Like the small child, one of
the “benefits” of this “paradise is that “all the people (are) LIVING FOR TODAY.

To usher in utopia, the true believer knows that he MUST SQUELCH ALL INQUIRY into the
PAST, for HISTORY PROVIDES AMPLE EVIDENCE of the EXISTENCE of the BETTER.
He must SEVERE ALL TIES to the FUTURE, for the modern liberal knows that caring for the
well-being of one’s children leads to seeking out and championing the better, if not for oneself
than for one’s progeny.

This is why the modern liberal knows, and lennon declares that heaven on earth requires ‘all
the people living for today’. In the modern liberal paradise that Lennon describes to perfection,
there is no reason to try to better oneself because there is no such thing as the better”action:
“you can, in fact, spend your life just ‘being yourself’ and doing ‘whatever ‘feels good’ at any given moment, for no matter what you do, you will be equally rewarded. Lennon sums up the true believer’s blueprint for utopia perfectly … when he promises a return to paradise, but only once anything and everything that mankind values has been devalued that there’s ‘nothing to “the reality of the paradise that is childhood is where neither toil nor intelligence is much required and the adults absorb all of the
Evan Sayet uses the example of BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN’S SONGS to illustrate his thesis.
WHAT IS THE WORST MOMENT in the SMALL CHILD’S LIFE?
It’s that moment when one of his parents leans out the window and shouts “playtime’s over; come in and do your chores. That’s the way the modern liberal sees having a JOB.
Because the right thinker believes in the existence of the better, he sees having a job as a way to fulfill his life’s purpose. He can make a better world by producing things and doing it well in the REALITY of CHILDHOOD in the MODERN LIBERAL ERA …
EVEN LESS is ASKED, MORE PROVIDED … CHILDHOOD ISN’T OVER”.
A JOB is the one and only thing that PREVENTS HIM from HIS LIFE’S PURPOSE.
The purpose of the small child’s daily life having fun and doing WHATEVER FEELS GOOD.

If you listen to Springteen’s lyrics they are NOT MATURE THOUGHTS about the role work
plays in the GROWN-UP’s life. They are the SMALL CHILD’S RANTINGS – albeit in
ADULT-SOUNDING verbiage about how horrible it is that the grown-up doesn’t get to
spend all of his time playing.
When Adam and Eve suddenly found themselves EVICTED FROM PARADISE (just as when
the child finally becomes an adult), there were ONLY TWO THINGS they NEEDED TO DO
that they’d never needed to do before.
Suddenly deprived of God’s generous welfare, they had to PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES
by USING THEIR INTELLECT to SEEK OUT the BETTER THINGS and THEN
THEY HAD to TOIL to BRING THOSE BETTER THINGS ABOUT.

Since these are the two things that leaving paradise required, they are the TWO THINGS that
the modern liberal is convinced are KEEPING HIM – and the world – FROM RETURNING
TO IT.

We’ve already discussed … ANTIPATHY TOWARD INTELLIGENCE; but still to be
discussed is his DISDAIN for TOIL, which is equal in every way.
The right-thinker’s goal in life is to better himself and in turn the world, having a job offers him
the chance to fulfill his purpose. Having a job – and bettering himself at that job – then, is filled
with great and profound rewards for the men and women of god and science.
The modern liberal, … not believing in the existence of the better, can see no upside to toil …
having a job is nothing other than unmitigated hardship”

Bruce Springsteen – dubbed ‘the WORKING MAN’S TROUBADOUR … describes the last
Springsteen man to have ever worked for a living. HIS FATHER DOUGLAS:
daddy WORKED HIS WHOLE LIFE FOR NOTHING BUT the PAIN.
Since the modern liberal’s purpose in life is to just ‘be himself’ and to do only that which
‘feels good’ to him at any given moment, HAVING A JOB is the one and only thing that
CONSTRAINS HIM FROM FULFILLING HIS LIFE’S WORK.

This makes having a JOB NOT JUST ‘HARD WORK’, but nothing less than SOUL
STEALING. This supposed champion of the working man in which someone with a job isn’t
going through a LIVING HELL because had to STOP PLAYING long enough to
DO a DAY’s WORK.
In one song, ‘Factory’, Springsteen takes us through a day in the life of a factory worker – this
despite the fact that Springsteen had LITERALLY NEVER WORKED a JOB and
DOESN’T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE LIFE OF SOMEONE WHO WORKS in a
FACTORY.

The lyrics suggest what a CLEVER and ARTICULATE MAN/CHILD THINKS IT MIGHT
FEEL like if he were ever able to stop playing (the guitar) long enough to earn his money.
SPRINGSTEEN IMAGINES IT [a JOB] the WAY a SMALL CHILD MIGHT IMAGINE
IT: HORRIFIC, JOYLESS, COLORLESS and DEAD, like that moment when the
FIVE-YEAR-OLD’s PARENT LEANS OUT the WINDOW and YELLS:
‘PLAYTIME’S OVER. COME IN”

Springsteen believes [jobs] stripped these ‘men’ of their identities and left them with
LESS HUMANITY than a piece of cold, hard steel. The modern liberal is convinced that
ANYONE WHO WORKS for a living must fall into one of only
THREE CATEGORIES: too STUPID to know, too DESPARATE to care or too GREEDY
to mind. Actors, like small children, spend their days PRETENDING to be doing things,
with no more cost to them in being wrong than there is to a five-year-old child being wrong
about how tea for her tea party is made.

To the modern liberal, anyone who is so soulless and in so much pain as those who work for a
living MUST BE … ON the VERGE of COMMITTING HORRIFIC ACTS of VIOLENCE.
The modern liberal knows this because he knows that he would surely go insane and become
violent if he were ever so constrained from his life’s purpose by having to go to work now and
then.

What convinces the influence that the Tea Party is constantly on the verge of violence? It is
simply this: the Tea Party is a movement comprised of people who HAVE JOBS.
Conversely, have you ever wondered why, despite the body count, the multiple rapes and the
assorted other violence at the Occupy Wall Street ‘Protests’ … believe the participants to be
so peaceful. It’s because it’s a movement comprised of folks who don’t have jobs.

The ‘PROTESTORS’ are just ‘being themselves’ and doing whatever ‘feels good’ to them, and
therefore … must have the INNOCENT SOULS of SMALL CHILDREN WHO HAVE
NEVER BEEN CORRUPTED BY SOCIETY. The modern liberal tries to undermine the
mission of people with jobs so they can stop working, get their jobs back and live in paradise …
enjoy bounty without toil.

Modern liberals believe that THEY are the VICTIMS of people who are INTENTIONALLY
DENYING THEM the UTOPIA to which THEIR INFANTILE BELIEF SYSTEM and
GRANDIOSE SENSE of SELF-ESTEEM CONVINCES THEM WOULD BE THEIRS IF
ONLY EVERYONE ELSE WOULD, LIKE THEM, JUST NOT DO OR MAKE ANYTHING.

The modern liberal is convinced that there’s something the matter with the people of GOD and
SCIENCE who DO and MAKE things and therefore, for the sake of PEACE, ‘SOCIAL
JUSTICE’ and THEIR UTOPIAN DREAMS (as well for the sake of the working people
themselves who are too stupid or desparate to know what’s best for them),
THEY MUST BE STOPPED.

Like Adam and Eve in paradise or a CHILD on the KINDERGARTEN PLAYGROUND, just
being himself and doing whatever feels good. The true believers efforts to elevate the naïve
and inexperienced child (the lesser) in esteem, stature, power and reward were met with an
equal and opposite effort to denigrate and weaken the better – the knowledgeable and
experienced adult.

Whereas western civilization TAUGHT THEIR CHILDREN TO ‘RESPECT THEIR
ELDERS’ and ‘HONOR THEIR MOTHERS and FATHERS’, the CHILD in the MODERN
ERA WAS INSTRUCTED ‘DON’T TRUST ANYONE OVER THIRTY’ and
‘QUESTION AUTHORITY’.
It is not a coincidence that the true believers chose thirty as the age when someone would
suddenly – almost magically – GO FROM TRUSTWORTHY to UNTRUSTWORTHY”
In the modern liberal era, thirty would become the age when the CHILD MIGHT FINALLY
FIRST GROW UP and REJECT the SHACKLES of RETARDATION that modern
liberalism requires. It was exactly the age when an adult might return and tell the children that
they’d TESTED the THEORIES TAUGHT in the modern liberal classrooms AGAINST the
REAL WORLD and FOUND THEM not only DEEPLY WANTING,
but PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS and DESTRUCTIVE

It is simply a truism that when children get to ‘question authority’ it is they who become the
Authority. With little knowledge or experience, the child doesn’t possess the tools needed to
rightly judge who is and isn’t truly authoritative in their fields.
This leaves the child with only his ‘feelings’ to determine who he’ll respect and agree to learn
From. Since the TRUTH of the REAL WORLD is sometimes sad – and NEVER UTOPIAN
– THOSE who SPOKE the TRUTH HURT the CHILD’s FEELINGS and thus were then
REJECTED.

Only those who reinforced the INFANTILE BELIEFS of the children were embraced by them
as being truly in the know. In fact, those who SPOKE the TRUTH were not only REJECTED,
there were REVILED. The authoritative are, by definition, recognized by society to have a
BETTER POINT of VIEW than others.
That’s something that the mindless foot soldier is sure can only be the result of society’s
bigotries and phobias and that the true believer, in the service of his blueprint for utopia,
simply declares to be so.
“in fact, those who spoke the truth were considered doubly evil” … [constraints] that
prevented the child from accomplishing the THREE PILLARS of HIS IDEOLOGY:
1)be yourself, 2)do what feels good 3)hold yourself in higher esteem than any and all others

In the REAL WORLD, the CHILD CAN’T CONTINUE to FOREVER JUST BE HIMSELF
IF HE EXPECTS to SURVIVE. HE MUST BETTER HIMSELF”
He can’t just do whatever feels good and expect to enjoy peace-of-mind and good relationships
in this life and the potential for salvation in the next. he must do good”
MODERN LIBERALISM is UTTER NONSENSE, an ideology invented by people who had
never done anything taught to children who were yet to have done anything taught to
children who were yet to have done anything.

To those who would enter the REAL WORLD and go on to do things and make things, the
BETTER made itself known in the most obvious and undeniable ways. If the modern liberal
were to acknowledge the existence of the truly authoritative, he’d have to ADMIT that the
BETTER DOES EXIST.

This would DESTROY the ENTIRE PREDICATE of the true believer’s UTOPIAN
IDEOLOGY and force the mindless foot soldier to admit that, morally and intellectually
RETARDED at the level of the small child – IT ISN’T HIM.
What binds the working people … together … is their shared belief in the existence of the
better and the moral and practical imperative that follows to use one’s intellect to seek it out
and then to toil to achieve it.

“The most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political left is that they DO NOT WORK. Therefore we should not be surprised to find the left concentrated in INSTITUTIONS where ideas DO NOT HAVE to WORK in ORDER to SURVIVE” – Thomas Sowell

What binds those at the very top, very top and the very bottom … is their
SHARED REJECTION of the EXISTENCE of the BETTER and … DISDAIN for …
RATIONAL THOUGHT and PHYSICAL TOIL.
This disdain for intellect and effort was on display in Obama’s famous speech in which he
declared, ‘IF YOU HAVE a BUSINESS, YOU DIDN’T BUILD THAT”.
Everyone … is convinced that he or she is a VICTIM, and every one of them agrees on who
THEIR VICTIMIZERS are: the men and women of GOD and SCIENCE who
DO and MAKE THINGS.
Their VICTIMIZERS are the people who, because they LIVE in the REAL WORLD, have to
engage in DISCRIMINATING THOUGHT and CHOOSE the BEST (but by definition
NOT UTOPIAN) answer.
The modern liberal at the bottom believes himself to be victimized by a society that
didn’t build a successful business (or life) for him.

“Like the frustrated artists and failed intellectuals [adolescent adults ?] who turn to mass
movements for fulfillment, rich heirs cannot win the game of comparison of individual
achievement …as zealots … they often attack the very things that made their good fortune
possible, as well as undermining the freedom and well-being of other people” – Thomas Sowell
“Where people TOIL from sunrise to sunset for a bare life living, they NURSE NO GRIEVANCES and DREAM NO DREAMS ” – Eric Hoffer

Evan Sayet: Like Adam and Eve just prior to eating from the apple, the modern liberal has
NEVER had a MATURE thought in his life. The [modern liberal] has never once attempted
to gather the facts, study the evidence and weigh these things in a rational formulation in
order to seek out the rightful answer.
To the modern liberal, IGNORANCE is the MOST CHERISHED of all TRAITS.
The REJECTION of RATIONAL THOUGHT and ELEVATED STANDARDS –
GOD and SCIENCE – is a MORAL IMPERATIVE because he sees it as the means to finally
ELIMINATE all of the world’s BIGOTRIES and PHOBIAS and the ‘social injustices’ that
they cause. When I say the modern liberal is MORALLY and INTELLECTUALLY
RETARDED at the level of the FIVE-YEAR-OLD CHILD, it IS NOT HYBERBOLE;
it’s a DIAGNOSIS.

The reason that this retardation occurs at the age of five, and not say, three, seven or ten, is that
five is exactly the age at which something happens to virtually every American child: he enters
kindergarten”, hence what is termed “the Kindergarden of Eden”
(a.k.a. Regurgitating the Apple)

Evan Sayet: “It is then and there that the modern liberal ‘EDUCATORS’ GET CONTROL of
AMERICA’s CHILDREN for the FIRST TIME. It is from this moment – the whole of his
formative years and then some – that the CHILD is TAUGHT the pillars of the CULT of
INDISCRIMINATENESS. Ignorance is the most cherished of all things because it is the
means for man to, once and for all, return to paradise.

Thought of in reverse, it was the ACQUISITION of KNOWLEDGE that ENDED
ADAM and EVE’s TIME in EDEN. It is the acquisition of knowledge that ends the
five-year-old’s blissful years of carefree existence.
The GREAT EVIL of the world – the only thing keeping man from returning to paradise – is
the acquired knowdedge of right and wrong, good and bad, better and worse, beautiful and
ugly and all the other things that then required the grown-up to engage in discriminating
thought in his pursuit of the better.
The modern liberal is morally and intellectually retarded at the level of the five-year-old
Child.

Morally and intellectually retarded does not mean that he ISN’T marvelously CLEVER.
It means only, as Voltaire wrote, it’s a ‘CLEVERNESS’ used in the design of
MAKING US ALL STUPID.
It doesn’t mean that modern liberals can’t be terrifically articulate, only that, as sowell observed,
their ‘articulateness’ is nothing more than a certain ‘verbal nimbleness (that) allows them to
ELUDE ALL FACT and REASON.
Their words are what Dwight Eisenhower called ‘EXQUISITE NONSENSE’.

If they weren’t so dangerous and destructive, one could smile and pat the modern liberal on
the head and tell him how cute he is and go on about the business of being an adult”
People didn’t seek to acquire knowledge for the purpose of becoming smarter and BETTER.
Instead, EVERYONE STARTED OUT PERFECT and then spent their lives
‘learning to love themselves’ AS THEY WERE.
The RETARDATION that comes from SELF-ADORATION [“self-esteem”?] was the very
centerpiece of the true believers’ blueprint for utopia”.
For this reason they made self-love paramount and reinforced it on a near constant basis
through incessant programs of wholly UNMERITED ‘SELF-ESTEEM’ BUILDING”
INTELLECTUAL NIHILISM COMBINED with PERSONAL NARCISSISM

You were perfect just for being you, which meant that the only way NOT to be perfect was to
attempt to CHANGE (I.E. BETTER) YOURSELF IN ANY WAY”
Not only were these concepts not progressive, but they couldn’t possibly have been more
regressive as they made … the SAME ‘FEELINGS’ THAT EVERY CHILD since the dawn
of man was BORN WITH – into the ARBITER of ALL TRUTHS. While they
ELIMINATED that which does progress with time – personal and collective WISDOM.

Action: Utopians Imagine “Eden” Progressive Paradise Rejecting Intellect Truth & “Reality”

ROMANTICISM ACCORDING to AYN RAND

Ayn Rand: “They CLAIM to PERCEIVE a REALITY EXEMPT from the law of identity, in
order to make THEIR WISHES – THEIR WHIMS – ABSOLUTES. There is no honest revolt
against reason. The motive is always to INDULGE ONE’s EMOTIONS, and the effect is
always to SUBVERT one’s ability to GRASP REALITY. The mystics seek to EVADE the law
of CAUSALITY – which is the law of identity applied to action – in order to gain values without
effort and justify their DEMAND for UNEARNED LOVE, ADMIRATION, WEALTH.

Since there is no actual escape from identity and causality, from the need to think and produce
in order to create values, the producers are expected to pay for the default of the
IRRATIONAL. In DENYING these TRUTHS, the mystics of muscle would REDUCE MAN’s
CONSCIOUSNESS to the LEVEL of a BABY OR a PRIMITIVE TRIBE. THEIR MOTIVE
is to REVERSE CAUSE and EFFECT, to DEMAND GOODS WITHOUT PRODUCING
THEM, TO CONTROL the PRODUCERS and to REDISTRIBUTE THEIR WEALTH.
The mystics of muscle and of spirit have had the same motive throughout history: TO UNDERCUT YOUR MIND and to RULE YOU by FORCE. Having SURRENDERED THEIR OWN JUDGMENT to avoid clashes with others, they regard the JUDGMENTS of others as a power superior to reason, believing that others have a mysterious link with reality.

Death is the only state that satisfies the mystics’ desire for exemption from identity and
causality. POVERTY, SUFFERING, DESTRUCTION and DEATH are the
CONSEQUENCES of THEIR MORAL CODE – and the REAL MOTIVE of the code. MYSTICS HAVE DEFAULTED ON the RESPONSIBILITY
to THINK, ACT and PRODUCE; THEY FEEL ENVIOUS HATRED TOWARD and WISH
to DESTROY, THOSE WHO HAVE NOT DEFAULTED.

The morality of death counts on the producers to think and produce, while denying them the
honor they deserve or the freedom they require. ITS STRATEGY is to INDUCE MORAL
GUILT in the MEN of REASON and ABILITY. The strikers refuse to accept guilt for their
ability.

Standards of morality in opposition to the requirements of living. It thus DEPRIVES YOU of
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE, MORAL CERTAINTY, and the CAPACITY FOR
HAPPINESS, DIGNITY and SELF-ESTEEM.
THERE are MORAL ABSOLUTES and MORAL JUDGMENT is a NECESSITY. IN ANY
COMPROMISE BETWEEN GOOD and EVIL, IT is ONLY EVIL THAT CAN PROFIT.

When men reduce their virtues to the approximate, then evil acquires the force of an absolute.
But now the best men have refused to submit to the rule of force and brutality. The strikers are
avenging the spirit of America. AMERICA was FOUNDED on REASON and
INDIVIDUALISM, on the inviolate supremacy of man’s right to exist and achieve.

Jonah Goldberg: “The enduring strength of both conservatism and libertarianism as
intellectual movements is that they acknowledge that they are, in fact, intellectual movements”
“WE [CONSERVATIVES] NOT ONLY KNOW WHAT WE BELIEVE, we know WHY we
believe it. But while liberals know what they believe, they have a HARD TIME
EXPLAINING WHY they believe it. They follow an ideology WITHOUT KNOWING
WHY it upholds and cherishes its ideas.

ACTION: The WILL to POWER
“ROMANTIC REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING REASON (& REALITY)

“Surely anyone with a sense of political REALITIES can smell the DANGER that these SILLY, KIND, IRRATIONAL people, in their CUSHIONED ISOLATION from REALITY, are bringing upon us ALL” … ”the danger starts with the universities, but it does not end there. that is what makes them much more SCARY” – Stewart Alsop

Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of REPLACING what WORKED with what SOUNDED GOOD. – Thomas Sowell
“FACTS are not liberals’ strong suit. RHETORIC is” – Thomas Sowell

THERE were NO DISTINCTIONS between GOOD and EVIL when it came to
TRANSFERRING POWER from the HAVES to the HAVE NOTS

TABLE of CONTENTS
LIBERAL FASCISM, by Jonah Goldberg
The LIBERAL MIND: The Psychological Causes of Political MADNESS
by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., M.D. 564
EVEN STEVEN – FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS WITH EQUALITY
by Deana Chadwell
The WEATHER UNDERGROUND

SYNOPSIS
fascism’s appeal was in it’s “WILL to POWER”, self-abandonment to one’s INSTINCTS”
fascists rejected the “cold logic” of their parents
a “progressive” future vs. “corrupt” traditional past:
adolescent defiance of parental authority
selfish, spoiled, angry children rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood” emotional, violent immature, self-destructive and self-indulgent “children” throw “temper tantrums” against “reality, satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence, compensation, immediate gratification, social “change“ and “justice”

fascists GLORIFY CRIME as REBELLION against the authority and “power” of the PASTNARCISISTIC NIHILISM? – VIOLENCE AND CHAOS AS POLITICAL REBELLION and POWER TOWARDS CLAIMED “SOCIAL JUSTICE”
– From the Nazi youth of german universities, to the college radicals of american universities in the 1960s, to saul alinsky style “community organizing”, revolutionary “action” was a “romantic” rebellion by resentful youth against “reason” and the past
– “revolution” an appeal and embrace of “violence” in the cause of “social justice”, MASKING a “passion” for power (lacking “principles”)
– like a child’s temper tantrum PROTESTING “REALITY, “FEELINGS” OVER “FACTS”

ACTION was BASED on a “ROMANTIC” APPEAL to “EMOTION”
“FEELING” = POWER = ACTION = VIOLENCE

Fascism’s appeal was in it’s “WILL to POWER” – SELF-ABANDONMENT to one’s
INSTINCTS”
Since Plato’s Republic, politicians, intellectuals and priests have been FASCINATED WITH
YOUTH. The LIBERAL CULT of CHILD is instructive in its similarities to fascist thought.
Children, like youth, are DRIVEN by PASSION, FEELINGS, EMOTION, WILL.
Youth represents the glories of ‘UNREASON’. These sentiments are deeply tied to the
NARCISSISTIC populism that celebrates the INSTINCTS of the masses.
“I want it now and I don’t care if it’s against the rules’ is the quinessentially childlike
populist passion. Fascism is a form of populism because the LEADER forges a
parental bond with his children. Without the emotional bond between the leader and
‘the people’. Fuhrer and Volk, FASCISM is IMPOSSIBLE.
“’I’m on your side’, ‘I’m one of you’, constitutes the sales pitch of every fascist and populist
Demagogue or as Willie Stark says to the nurturing crowd in all the king’s men:
‘you will is my strength. your need is my justice. Arguments, facts, reason: these are
Secondary. Nazi religion was a manifestation of ancient “pagan” ROMANTICISM.
Traditional Judeo-Christian values symbolized what HELD BACK the Germans.
“CONSCIENCE is a JEWISH INVENTION” – Hitler

Enlightenment ideas of “universal humanity” were mocked by the “post-modern” Nazis.
To the Fascists, traditional religion and morality was a “scam”. Since there were
NO FIXED ORUNIVERSAL TRUTHS …what was required, according to Hitler, was a
REVOLT AGAINST REASON” for “[I]NTELLECT has POISONED our people fascists
rejected the “cold logic” of their parents and “corrupt” traditions of society.
Judeo-Christian values were a “SLAVE MORALITY” that COUNTERED the
“NATURAL” FASCIST “WILL to POWER”
Are fascists “slaves” to their own passions and selfish “will to power”?
Judeo-Christian thought attached SPIRITUAL and MORAL SIGNIFICANCE of
MARRIAGE.
The Nazis sought to THROW OFF the “chains” of traditional religious and “bourgeois”
Morality. FOLLOW ONE’s “INSTINCTS” (“LUST”), abandon the “institution” of marriage
(“love”) One was “free-er” before they were “caged” by bourgeosie or “traditional” morality.

The Nazis adopted the ancient, “pagan” view of SEX AS GRATIFICATION.
“Marriage, … in bourgeosie society, is generally a thing AGAINST NATURE” – Hitler
Hitler dreamed of transforming germany into a warrior nation of “aryan spartans” loyal to
him alone. The elite S.S. were ordered “to father as many children as possible without
marrying”
The INDICTMENT of REASON, populist appeals to defeating ”the system”
Both the nazis and 1960s radicals shared a love of violence and hate of bourgeois
“civilization”. Bourgeois America was “radically evil” and had to be radically challenged.
They regarded family life as repressive and insincere”, sexuality, in and out of marriage, as
“shot through with hypocrisy. Parental religion was largely a sham, politics boastful and
trivial, economics unscrupulous, education stereotyped and lifeless, art trashy and sentimental.
Born in the middle class, the youth movement REJECTED, EVEN LOATHED, MIDDLE
CLASS LIBERALISM

Action: The Will To POWER – “Romantic Revolutionaries” Rejecting Reason (& Reality)

John Toland: “Their goal was to establish a youth culture for FIGHTING the BOURGEOISE
TRINITY of SCHOOL, HOME and CHURCH. CHILDREN THROW ADOLESCENT
“TEMPER TANTRUMS” AGAINST the “COLD LOGIC” of THEIR PARENTS.
Even before the Nazis seized power, student radicals were eager to challenge the stodgy
conservatism of German higher education, which cherished classically liberal academic freedom
and the authority of scholars and teachers.

A wave of Nietzschean pragmatism swept across Europe, bringing with it a wind that blew away the stale dogmas of their parents’ generation, revealing a new world to be seen with fresh eyes” “middle-class kids with no personal experience of poverty or suffering – compared to blacks in the south and the jews and others in europe and asia – all went around with alinsky’s rules for radicals in their backpacks

“UNIVERSAL EDUCATION is the most corroding and disintegrating POISON that
liberalism has ever INVENTED for its OWN DESTRUCTION – Adolf Hitler

Radicalism became ROMANTIC. Alienated and ignorant kids yearned to become Che
Guevara and KILL the capitalists. That’s how RICH KIDS like Bill Ayers and Bernardine
Dohrn LEARNED THEIR THEOLOGY. It’s how they became heroes in their own eyes.
such saintly people, giving their all for the poor and helpless.
Hillary rodham complained about her authoritarian father when she was a child, and instantly
on getting to Wellesley she fell for Alinsky and his Rules, and became an admiring disciple
of the MASTER of SCAPEGOATING. The PERSECUTED BECOME the PERSECUTOR.

Mike Royko, speaking about the radicals: “They came from a background of being
RICH KIDS, where apparently tantrums would get them what they wanted. And they
wanted IMMEDIATE GRATIFICATION and SOCIAL CHANGE
“IMMATURE, SELF-DESTRUCTIVE and SELF-INDULGENT “CHILDREN” WHO THREW “TEMPER TANTRUMS” AGAINST “REALITY” ?

Action: The Will To POWER – “Romantic Revolutionaries” Rejecting Reason (& Reality)
The LIBERAL MIND:
The PSYCHOLOGICAL CAUSES of POLITICAL MADNESS
by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., M.D.

VETERAN psychiatrist calls liberals mentally ill publishes extensive study on ‘psychological causes of political madness’ 11/12/2008

“Progressives love to emote when discussing politics. Emoting gives them an opportunity to
compassionately wring their [own] hands while blaming [others] for the suffering they
deplore. Liberals are typically SELFISH, SPOILED CHILDREN. They WANT what other
people have, but they DON’T want to actually WORK for it. It’s much EASIER TO THROW
TANTRUMS and demand the “right” to share in what others have earned. Because of this
outlook, most liberals bask in a PERPETUAL STATE of IMAGINED VICTIMHOOD.

NOTHING is THEIR OWN FAULT, and every woe in their life is caused by “SOCIETY”.
By “other people”… by “fat-cats” and “corporate greed”. In order to make yourself feel better,
you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself
appear better. Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals
relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says
Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author, “the Liberal Mind: the Psychological Causes of Political Madness”
Like SPOILED, ANGRY CHILDREN, they REBEL against the NORMAL
RESPONSIBILITIES of ADULTHOOD and DEMAND that a PARENTAL
GOVERNMENT MEET THEIR NEEDS from CRADLE to GRAVE. The roots of
liberalism – and its associated MADNESS – can be clearly identified by understanding how
children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the
irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says.

When the modern liberal mind WHINES about IMAGINARY VICTIMS, RAGES against
IMAGINARY VILLAINS and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to
run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.
Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda PREYS ON weakness and feelings of inferiority in the
population by creating and reinforcing perceptions of VICTIMIZATION.
Satisfying INFANTILE claims to entitlement, INDULGENCE and compensation,
augmenting primitive feelings of ENVY. Rejecting the sovereignty of the individual,
subordinating him to the will of the government.

A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice,
voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do,” he says. A political leader who
understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal
appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population
– as liberals do and a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment
of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character
and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do.

The liberal mind asks and answers the following critical question: why would anyone want a political system that RESTRICTS PERSONAL FREEDOM instead of enhancing it; DENOUNCES PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY instead of promoting it; SURRENDERS personal sovereignty instead of honoring it; attacks the philosophical foundations of liberty instead of defending them; ENCOURAGES GOVERNMENT DEPENDENCY instead of SELF-RELIANCE; and undermines the character of the people by making them
wards of the state?”

How the modern liberal agenda CORRUPTS the character of the people by appealing to their BASE INSTINCTS and undermining the constraints of CONSCIENCE. How the modern liberal agenda’s ideas and goals are self-contradictory and logically inconsistent. Why the liberal mind believes in the irrational principles of the liberal agenda – and what it takes to effect a cure. What the liberal mind is passionate about is a world filled with
pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice. They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited and victimized.
[A “TOTALITARIAN” TYRANNY of the “WEAK” – adolescent “tantrum” against adult;
“bullied victims” persecuting their “bully-ing victimizers”]

They BEAR NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR PROBLEMS. None of their agonies are
attributable to faults or failings of their OWN: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty
judgment, wishful thinking, lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or
defects in character.
None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the future or learn from
EXPERIENCE. [their rejection of the past, imagining and invent their “OWN” reality]

Instead, the ‘ROOT CAUSES’ of all this PAIN lie in FAULTY SOCIAL
CONDITIONS: poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic
and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization and imperialism.
In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and
persecutors: “big business, big corporations, greedy capitalists, U.S. imperialists,
the oppressors, the rich, the wealthy, the powerful and ‘the selfish’”.

The LIBERAL “CURE” for this ENDLESS MALAISE is a very LARGE
AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT that regulates and manages society through a
cradle to grave agenda of redistributive caretaking.
The liberal cure is a GOVERNMENT EVERYWHERE DOING EVERYTHING FOR
EVERYONE. The liberal motto is “IN GOVERNMENT WE TRUST”.

To RESCUE the people from their troubled lives, the AGENDA recommends DENIAL of
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, encourages self-pity and other-pity, FOSTERS government
dependency, PROMOTES sexual indulgence, RATIONALIZES violence, EXCUSES
financial obligation, JUSTIFIES theft, IGNORES rudeness, prescribes complaining and
blaming, DENIGRATES marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and
social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and REBELS AGAINST the DUTIES of citizenship.

The very premise on which the occupy movement and the liberal platform of wealth
redistribution are based in JEALOUSY. They WANT WHAT OTHERS HAVE, and they
want it WITHOUT COST TO THEMSELVES, either monetarily or based on time. They are
ENVIOUS of those with wealth, health insurance, homes, etc. It is a common attribute upon
which all liberal protesters rally around. The liberal movement amounts to nothing more than
MAKING EXCUSES to legitimize a platform of LAZINESS and ENTITLEMENTS.

We see this in the Occupy Protests. Their solution to counter corporate greed is to STEAL
from those that have worked hard to attain their level of wealth, and give to those who refuse
to reach such a work ethic. Money for nothing, or entitlement, seems to be a birthright for the
left. There are unlimited utopian constructs, for the mind is capable of infinite FANTASIES.
The FANTASIES take the form of GRAND SOCIAL PLANS or EXPERIMENTS,
the IMPRACTICABILITY and IMPOSSIBILITY of which, in small ways and large,
LEAD TO the INDIVIDUAL’s SUBJUGATION.

Socialism is a WONDERFUL IDEA. It is only as a REALITY that it has been DISASTROUS. Among people of every race, color, and creed, all around the world, socialism has led to hunger in countries that used to have surplus food to export…. Nevertheless, for many of those who deal primarily in ideas, socialism remains an ATTRACTIVE IDEA – in fact, SEDUCTIVE. Its every failure is EXPLAINED AWAY as due to the inadequacies of particular leaders. – Thomas Sowell

Action: The Will To POWER – “Romantic Revolutionaries” Rejecting Reason (& Reality)
EVEN STEVEN – FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS WITH EQUALITY
by Deana Chadwell December 6, 2014

The idea of FAIRNESS is one of the EARLIEST MORAL ideas that CHILDREN grasp.
If Little Steven sees his sister with a cookie, he’s going to throw a fit if he doesn’t get one,
too. You expect that in a little kid.
Grown-ups understand the more sophisticated concept of justice. Maybe steven’s sister ate
her broccoli and is being rewarded, maybe she helped wash the dishes and that is her wage.
Steven’s too little to GET THAT. Basically there are two faces to the concept of FAIRNESS:
fairness as in equality, and fairness as in justice.
WE CAN NO LONGER AFFORD TO CONFUSE the TWO.

FAIRNESS, as in EQUALITY, deals with OUTCOMES … that have to be FORCED.
Let’s say steven’s favorite aunt, nancy, takes pity on him and FORCES his sister suzy to share
her cookie. That’s NOT JUST – SHE EARNED IT and HE DID NOT.
But it is equal fairness, as in justice, deals with process with merit, with intrinsic value.
Suzy completed a task; she screwed up her face, squinted her eyes, held her nose then chewed
and swallowed the nasty vegetable. Her plate was clean and she had obeyed her parents.

Steven had just flat-out refused to be bribed into eating anything green.
Justice demands that he suffer the loss of the treat. that’s sad for him, but it is just because
equality is a lesser idea than integrity – it is NOT EQUAL to JUSTICE.
Equality suggests a NUMERICAL accounting. Justice suggests a MORAL or legal accounting.
Justice emphasizes action and accurate, truthful evaluation of that action.
Crowds comprehend the little boy level, the Steven level,
the YOU-GOT-YOURS-I-WANT-MINE LEVEL
EQUALITY IN OUTCOME CAN NEVER BE REALIZED.

When we INSTITUTIONALIZE equality, some human beings have to IMPOSE that equality,
and therefore those people are, by necessity, ABOVE all others. We could decide to read into it
our own desires to return to childhood dependency and throw fits whenever life didn’t give
us cookies. BEFORE LONG, NO ONE HAS ANY COOKIES –
Aunt Nancy has eaten them ALL, and Suzy’s mom has gotten TIRED of BAKING cookies;
everything is even-steven, yes, but NO ONE WANTS an EQUAL AMOUNT of NOTHING.

Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of REPLACING what WORKED with what SOUNDED GOOD. – Thomas Sowell

“Most of the young have missed all that, and their dumbed-down education is far more likely to present the INSPIRING RHETORIC of SOCIALISM than to present ITS DISMAL TRACK RECORD.
SOCIALISM is in fact a WONDERFUL VISION – a world of the IMAGINATION FAR BETTER than any place anywhere in the REAL WORLD, at any time over the thousands of years of recorded history. Even many conservatives would probably prefer to live in such a world, IF they thought it was POSSIBLE.
Who would not want to live in a world where college was free, along with many other things, and where government protected us from the shocks of life and guaranteed our happiness? It would be DISNEYLAND FOR ADULTS! – Thomas Sowell

John Toland: These young people thriving on MYSTICISM and impelled by IDEALISM,
YEARNED for ACTION, – ANY KIND of action. In the woods they would commune with
nature, awaiting “messages” from the forest. A fuhrer – a popularly acclaimed leader – might
read passages from Neitzsche or the poet Stefan George, who wrote: “the people and supreme
wisdom yearn for the man! – the DEED! … perhaps someone who sat for years among your
murderers and slept in your prisons will stand up and do the deed!’

Hitler rejoiced that he STOLE the HEARTS and MINDS of YOUTH, transforming
universities into incubators of ACTIVISM for the fatherland. Even before the nazis seized
power, student radicals were eager to challenge the stodgy conservatism of German higher
education, which cherished classically liberal academic freedom and the authority of scholars
and teachers.

A wave of Nietzschean pragmatism swept across Europe, bringing with it a wind that BLEW
AWAY the STALE DOGMAS of THEIR PARENTS’ generation, revealing a NEW WORLD
to be seen with fresh eyes. The Nazis told young people that their ENTHUSIASM SHOULD
NOT BE RESTRAINED through ACADEMIC STUDY – rather, it should be INDULGED
through political ACTION.

The tradition of study for its own sake was thrown aside in the name of ‘relevance’.
Let us read no more of Jewish science and foreign abstraction, they cried … learn of
Germans and WAR and what we can do for the NATION! INTUITION – which young people have in abundance – was MORE IMPORTANT THAN KNOWLEDGE and EXPERIENCE, insisted the radicals.

The Nazis believed that the UNIVERSITY should be an EMPOWERING INCUBATOR of
REVOLUTIONARIES. first and peddlers of abstraction a very, very distant second
In 1931, 60 % of all German undergraduates supported the Nazi student organization.
The Nazis were inspired by NIETZCHE and ROMANTICS, who believed that the spirit of the
ACT is more important than the IDEA behind it. This was the Nazi “CULT of the DEED”.
French fascists dubbed their movement the action francaise, putting ACTION on an equal
footing with NATION.

ACTION: The WILL to POWER –
VIOLENCE-TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”

“The very FIRST ESSENTIAL for SUCCESS is a perpetually constant and regular
employment of VIOLENCE”;”ONLY FORCE rules. FORCE is the FIRST LAW” – Hitler
Jonah Goldberg: “The reason Hayek refers to the ‘MIRAGE of SOCIAL JUSTICE’ is quite
simple: THERE’S NO SUCH THING”
“Justice creates a CLAIM ON OTHERS …social justice is based on RIGHTS – social rights,
economic rights, etc. – that CANNOT BE ENFORCED in a FREE society.
“Any man who has once proclaimed violence as his method is inevitably forced to take the LIE as his principle” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
“A MORAL MONOPOLY is the antithesis of a marketplace of ideas” – Thomas Sowell
Table of Contents:
– “RULES for RADICALS” Saul Alinsky
“DEMONIC” by Ann Coulter

ACTION: The WILL to POWER TERROR as SOCIAL JUSTICE
BUILDING UTOPIA –DISGUISING DYSTOPIA The ENDS JUSTIFY the MEAN
ACTION: The WILL to POWER TERROR as SOCIAL JUSTICE
BUILDING UTOPIA –DISGUISING DYSTOPIA The ENDS JUSTIFY the MEANS

SYNOPSIS
Mussolini talked about the power and importance of VIOLENCE. He liked the aesthetics of
violence, the sound of BRUTALITY, the poetry of revolutionary BLOODSHED” –
revolutions are INSANE, VIOLENT, IDIOTIC, BESTIAL” … They KILL, PLUNDER and
DESTROY. They are a man-made Biblical FLOOD”.

Mussolini defined both socialism and fascism as “MOVEMENT, STRUGGLE and ACTION”
– “to LIVE is NOT to CALCULATE, but to ACT! Hitler MOCKED those who believed that
arguments and reason should trump the NAKED POWER of the people.
SAUL ALINSKY stated he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything
Else. Alinsky’s worldview is strictly fascistic. Life is defined by WAR, CONTESTS of
POWER, the IMPOSITION of WILL. Power is a means (methods), disregarding the ends
(results)

Action: The Will to POWER – VIOLENCE-TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”- Promising Utopia – Disguising Dystopia

Mussolini talked about the power and importance of VIOLENCE. He liked the aesthetics of
violence, the sound of BRUTALITY, the poetry of revolutionary BLOODSHED” –
revolutions are INSANE, VIOLENT, IDIOTIC, BESTIAL” … they set fire to the Louvre and
throw naked bodies of princesses on the street. They KILL, PLUNDER and DESTROY.
They are a man-made Biblical FLOOD PRECISELY therein consists their great beauty”.

Mussolini defined both socialism and fascism as “MOVEMENT, STRUGGLE and ACTION”
– “to LIVE is NOT to CALCULATE, but to ACT!”
Hitler MOCKED those who believed that arguments and reason should trump the
NAKED POWER of the people.
The vanguard of the revolution would be the NEW breed of SUPERMAN. The plebs, who are EXCESSIVELY CHRISTIANIZED and HUMANITARIAN, will never understand that a higher degree of EVIL is NECESSARY so that the SUPERMAN might THRIVE.
Mussolini: The superman knows REVOLT ALONE.
EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS MUST BE DESTROYED.

The Nazis BEAT UP storekeepers, EXTORTED businessmen and VANDALIZED property.
The Nazis were AMORAL(had no morals),except when it came to their own WILL to POWER.

Alinsky advised his followers that the POOR have NO POWER. The REAL TARGET is
America’s WHITE MIDDLE CLASS, where the POWER is. They MANIPULATED
MIDDLE CLASS GUILT and SHAME to get what they wanted.
CAMOUFLAGE was key – “At first do not alienate with any type of crude language,
defiant demeanor, or menacing appearance … that suggested radicalism or a disrespect for
middle class mores and traditions.

TRUE REVOLUTIONARIES DO NOT FLAUNT THEIR RADICALISM,
ALINSKY TAUGHT. THEY CUT THEIR HAIR, PUT ON SUITS and
INFILTRATE the SYSTEM FROM WITHIN. ALINSKY VIEWED REVOLUTION as
a SLOW, PATIENT PROCESS. The trick was to PENETRATE EXISTING
INSTITUTIONS such as churches, unions and political parties.

Many leftists view Hillary Cllinton as a SELL-OUT because she claims to hold moderate
views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to
DO and SAY WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GAIN POWER.
CAMOUFLAGE. Joe Biden called Obama “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking
guy”.
EVENTUALLY, Alinsky noted the CHANGE in “OUR REBELS”, who STIGMATIZED and
REJECTED MIDDLE CLASS LIFE AS MATERIALISTIC, DECADENT, BOURGEOIS,
DEGENERATE, IMPERIALISTIC, WAR-MONGERING, BRUTALIZED and
CORRUPT.” Such are “CLINGERS” and “DEPLORABLES”.

Action: The Will to POWER – VIOLENCE-TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”- Promising Utopia – Disguising Dystopia
Mark Levin: The UTOPIAN PURSUIT COMMANDS the imposition of a purported design and structure atop society by a central authority to arrest the evolution of the individual and
Society.
Karl Popper: “[T]he POWER of the state is bound to increase until the STATE becomes nearly
identical with society. . . . it is the totalitarian intuition. . . . embraces . . . ALL social relations,
including ALL personal ones.
The [will to] POWER, according to Tocqueville, is “immense and tutelary” and
“takes upon ITSELF ALONE to secure” the people’s “gratifications and watch over their
fate that POWER is ABSOLUTE, minute, regular, provident, and mild.

Born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago, SAUL ALINSKY (1909-72) was a labor
Organizer who founded the Industrial Areas Foundation in 1940, building strong citizens
organizations for POWER – ACTION – JUSTICE. Alinsky asserted that he was more
concerned with the acquisition of POWER than anything else fascism’s appeal was in it’s
“WILL TO POWER” and self-abandonment to one’s instincts. Alinsky’s motto was, “the
most effective means are WHATEVER will achieve the desired results. [POWER]

Jonah Goldberg: Alinsky’s WORLDVIEW is STRICTLY FASCISTIC. Life is defined by
WAR, CONTESTS of POWER, the IMPOSITION of WILL. Alinsky shares with the fascists
and pragmatists of yore a bedrock hostility to dogma. All he believes in are the desired ends of
the movement, which he regards as the source of life’s meaning. Alinsky stated, “change
means movement. Movement means friction. Only in the frictionless vacuum of a nonexistent
abstract world can movement or change occur without that abrasive friction of conflict,

What comes through is his UNBRIDLED LOVE of POWER. Power is a good
in its own right for Alinsky.
“OUR is a WORLD NOT of ANGELS BUT of ANGLES”; “MEN SPEAK of MORAL
PRINCIPLES BUT ACT ON POWER PRINCIPLES” – Saul Alinsky, ‘Rules for Radicals”:
In the Alinsky model, “ORGANIZING” is a euphemism for “REVOLUTION”, a wholesale
“revolution” whose ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE is the systematic acquisition of POWER.

In Alinsky’s brand of SOCIAL WARFARE, the ENDS JUSTIFY WHATEVER MEANS are required in “the GREAT CAUSE”. Once you accept your own death, all of a sudden you’re free to live. You no longer care about your reputation. you no longer care except so far as your life can be used tactically to promote a cause you believe in.“ – Alinsky
Since the here and now is all there is, anything was “moral” in the pursuit of worldly power
Alinsky believed in SACRIFICING ETHICS and MORALS FOR the GREAT CAUSE –
“ethical standards must be elastic to stretch with the times”
“My aim here is to suggest how to ORGANIZE for power: how to get it and how to use it”
“LIFE is a CORRUPTING PROCESS from the time A CHILD LEARNS to PLAY HIS
MOTHER OFF AGAINST HIS FATHER in the politics of when to go to bed;
he who fears corruption fears life.”
“to say that corrupt means corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles. the real arena is corrupt and bloody” – Saul D. Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

Action: The Will to POWER – VIOLENCE-TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”
Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” is a “handbook” for social revolution “The Prince by
Machiavelli was written for the HAVES on how to HOLD POWER. This book is written for
the have not’s and how to take it away. Alinsky helped establish the tactics of conflict and
confrontation of the “turbulent” 1960s. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Cesar Chavez were
Alinsky “disciples”.
hillary clinton’s under-graduate thesis paper was on alinsky’s methods
hilary clinton declined alinsky’s request to work with him, going to law school instead
barack obama was trained by Chicago’s industrial areas foundation

In his native Chicago, Alinsky courted POWER wherever he found it. His alliance with
prominent Catholic clerics, such as Bishop Bernard Sheil, gave him respectability.
his friendship with CRIME BOSSES such as Frank Nitti – Al Capone’s second-in-command –
gave Alinsky CLOUT on the street.
In the Alinsky model, “ORGANIZING” is a euphemism for “REVOLUTION”, a wholesale
“revolution” whose ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE is the systematic acquisition of POWER.
In Alinsky’s brand of social warfare, the ends justify whatever means are required in
“the GREAT CAUSE”. [POWER]
Since the here and now is all there is, anything was “moral” in the pursuit of worldly POWER
“you no longer care except so far as your life can be used tactically to promote a cause you believe in“ – saul alinsky
THERE is NO REASON NOT to LIE, FABRICATE and OBFUSCATE [CONFUSE]

“I am freeing man from the RESTRAINTS of intelligence and a degrading …
FALSE VISION called CONSCIENCE and MORALITY” – Hitler

”To the questioner, nothing is sacred. he detests dogma, defies any finite definition of
morality, rebels against any repression of a free, open search of ideas no matter where they
may lead. he is CHALLENGING, INSULTING, AGITATING, DISCREDITING.
HE STIRS UNREST” – Saul Alinsky
“Without a moral framework, there is nothing left but immediate self-indulgence by some and the path of least resistance by others. Neither can sustain a FREE society” – Thomas Sowell

THERE were NO DISTINCTIONS between GOOD and EVIL when it came to
TRANSFERRING POWER from the HAVES to the HAVE NOTS

In Alinsky’s view, ACTION was more often the catalyst for REVOLUTIONARY FERVOR
than vice versa. The idea that the MASSES must be ROUSED from their doldrums is central
to fascism. The ORGANIZER needed to get people to ACT FIRST and RATIONALIZE
THEIR ACTIONS LATER. People raised from passive acceptance of the “machine” of
bourgeois Democracy.
Alinsky readily admitted that he DID NOT TRUST THE PEOPLE themselves.
“It is the SCHIZOPHRENIA of a FREE society that we outwardly espouse faith
in the people, but inwardly have strong doubts whether the people can be trusted”
Alinsky warned against an “attempt to answer all objections on the basis of
LOGIC and MERIT … with few exceptions this is a FUTILE procedure.”
i.e. appeal to “LOGIC” is USELESS and COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE
The organizer needed to get people to ACT FIRST and RATIONALIZE their actions
LATER – “get them to move in the right direction first,” said Alinsky.
They’ll EXPLAIN to THEMSELVES LATER WHY they moved in that direction.

“Society has good reason to FEAR the RADICAL. Every shaking advance of mankind
toward equality and justice has come from the radical. He hits, hurts, he is DANGEROUS”
“Conservative interests know that while liberals are most adept at BREAKING THEIR OWN
NECKS with their tongues, radicals are most adept at BREAKING the NECKS of CONSERVATIVES.” – Saul Alinsky, Reveille for radicals

Action: The Will to POWER – VIOLENCE-TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”- Promising Utopia – Disguising Dystopia
Georges Sorel, the French engineer turned intellectual, pioneered the idea that the MASSES
needed MYTHS to be moved to ACTION. Recognizing that Marxism, like all social science,
rarely panned out in real life, Sorel MARRIED William James’ WILL TO BELIEVE to
Nietzsche’s WILL to POWER and applied them to MASS PSYCHOLOGY.
Revolutionaries did not need to understand the reality of Marxism: they needed to believe in the
myth of marxism (or nationalism, syndicalism, fascism, and so on)

Jonah Goldberg: To concern oneself with social science is one thing and to mold
consciousness is another” – PASSION, NOT FACTS, was the FUEL for ACTION.
Mussolini said “reason is a TOOL, but it can NEVER be the MOTIVE force of a crowd.
The indictment of reason, the populist appeals to defeating “the system”, the table thumping for
a new volk-centric community that would replace capitalism with a more organic and
TOTALITARIAN approach.

Mussolini talked about the power and importance of violence and AESTHETICS of
VIOLENCE, the sound of BRUTALITY, the poetry of revolutionary bloodshed
Mussolini – “they set fire to the louvre and throw naked bodies of princesses on the street”
“they kill, plunder and destroy. they are a man-made biblical flood” … precisely therein consists their great beauty”
VIOLENCE in a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES”
Italian Fascist Mussolini coined the term “totalitarian” to describe a “benevolent”
(bene = good) society … “where everybody belonged and was taken care of, where everything was inside and nothing outside”
the state was the fascist “will to power” towards
“new-ness” and “change” really just an appeal to “old” (primitive) violence ???

THERE were NO LIMITATIONS to FASCIST AMBITIONS:
“I am freeing man from the RESTRAINTS of intelligence and a degrading …
FALSE VISION called CONSCIENCE and MORALITY” – Hitler

The dream of a UNIFIED, CLASSLESS Germany was deeply heartfelt by many Nazi joiners
Anything endangering the utopian progress of the collective must be “acted” against in
“appropriate” fashion. The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular
employment of violence to Heretics against the fascist, collective crusade.
Just as the line between good totalitarianism and bad is easily crossed, “dreams can quickly
become nightmares. Whatever admirable idealism they might have had quickly and
unavoidably turned into FASCIST THUGGERY.

The Nazis first APPEARED AS “LIBERATORS” in the countries they “conquered” until their
“nature” revealed itself. The hope and future of America lies with its radicals
saul alinsky: “this is the job for today’s radical — to fan … hopelessness into a flame to
fight” towards “change”. “CHANGE”? – Promising Utopia – Disguising Dystopia

“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a PEOPLE SEE EVEN HEAVEN AS HELL or an extremely WRETCHED LIFE as PARADISE” – Hitler
Socialism in general has a record of FAILURE so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it – Thomas Sowell One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them. – Thomas Sowell

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON” ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS
“At the core of liberalism is the SPOILED CHILD – MISERABLE, as all spoiled children are, UNSATISFIED, DEMANDING, ILL-DISCIPLINED, DESPOTIC and USELESS. Liberalism is a PHILOSOPHY of SNIVELING BRATS. – P.J. O’Rourke
“To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he’s doing is good” – Solzhenitsyn

“I would like to call upon AMERICA to be more careful with its TRUST … and prevent those … because of short-sightedness and still others out of self-interest, from FALSELY USING the STRUGGLE FOR PEACE and FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE to lead you down a FALSE ROAD. Because they are trying to WEAKEN you; they are trying to DISARM your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat. … I call upon you: ordinary working men of America … DO NOT LET YOURSELVES BECOME WEAK” – Solzhenitzyn
TOM HAYDEN was the son of middle-class parents in Detroit. Hayden played a role in the
early 1960s civil rights struggle in the south. At college, Hayden would become a radical
revolutionary leader. His 1962 “manifesto” student social action proclaimed that youth
must wrest control of society from their elders universities had to become incubators of
revolutionary social action ACTION = REVOLUTION ACTION = VIOLENCE
use of action (violence and “terror”) towards “justice”
colleague richard flacks told his wife, “i’ve just seen the next lenin!”
Lenin: “There’s NO REVOLUTION possible WITHOUT TERROR; the BREAKING of EGGS is NECESSARY to MAKE an OMELLETTE”
“TERROR” as an expression of the “WILL TO POWER”, masked as “social justice”

HAYDEN became an advocate of “Leninist” VIOLENCE and MAYHEM,
GLORIFYING CRIME as POLITICAL REBELLION.
These CHILDREN of WEALTH WORSHIPPED MEN of VIOLENCE, and
SANITIZED THEM – Che, Mao, Fidel, Carlos the Jackal, Ayers, Mumiah, the list goes on.
Hayden stated. I’ve had been FASCINATED by the simplicity and power of the
MOLOTOV COCKTAIL”. He openly supported Mao, Ho chi minh and the Black Panthers.
Hayden helped write the “Berkeley Liberation Program”. It declared “all oppressed people in
jail are political PRISONERS and must be “SET FREE”. Fascist “revolutionary” movements
often blurred the difference between crime and political rebellion.

“The future of our struggle is the future of CRIME in the streets”. – Tom Hayden
The only way to “revolutionize youth” was to have “a series of LIFE and DEATH
CONFLICTS”. Fascist violence was based on the cult of unreason, lust for action, and craving
for “authenticity”. Hayden was a “moderate”, according to Mark Rudd, leader of the 1968
Columbia University student “protest”.

HAYDEN was a “MODERATE”, according to MARK RUDD, leader of the 1968
Columbia University student “protest” … Rudd’s rallying cry was “up against the wall,
motherf###er!”, which he used against teachers and administrators. Rudd explained,
“nothing upsets our enemies more than this slogan”
“to them it showed how far we had sunk to brutality, hatred and obsenity. great!”
“COMPROMISE is NOT ALLOWED anymore … we are out for social and political
REVOLUTION, NOTHING LESS”. – MARK RUDD, leader of Columbia U. takeover
“I always held my flower in a clenched fist” – Abbie Hoffman

Fascists GLORIFY CRIME in the NAME of “SOCIAL JUSTICE”.
Fascists have a FASCINATION with VIOLENCE and “CRIME” as “SOCIAL PROTEST”.

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON” – ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS The PROGRESSIVES’ THUG AGENDA by Christopher Chantrill americanthinker.com May 19, 2015
“That’s what the PROGRESSIVE AGENDA is really all about. It is a DEMAND FOR
GOVERNMENT FAVORS: higher mandated wages, higher mandated benefits, more free
baby-sitting. And never mind where the money is coming from; enforcement officers will deal
with that. The progressive agenda tells us that progressives really don‘t care about low-wage
people, for their agenda is a mess of THUG POLITICS that won’t really help anyone.
But progressives do care about the low-wage vote.

The CALLOUS PURSUIT of ABSOLUTE DOMINATION and the unrelenting exercise of
the POWER of the MODERN STATE which disperses into the realm of enterprise over the
often derided and characteristically docile populace.

What many progressives call SOCIAL JUSTICE is NEITHER very SOCIAL NOR JUST, especially as concerns economics. James Cone: “what we need is the DIVINE LOVE as EXPRESSED in BLACK POWER, which is the power of black people to DESTROY THEIR OPPRESSORS here and now by any means at their disposal. Obama’s past has a long string of his mentors and allies who were marked by hatred of the U.S. The vision in which Obama has been steeped is one in which white western nations have oppressed and exploited non-white, non-western nations, becoming rich and arrogant at other people’s expense.
It is a VISION that CALLS OUT, NOT FOR JUSTICE, but for PAYBACK.

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS

SAUL ALINSKY often told the story of the old Chicago SCAM where you go into the restaurant, sit in the corner, have breakfast, then secretly switch checks with the guy who just came in for a cup of coffee.When it came to writing his dissertation, Alinsky chose to RESEARCH AL CAPONE, who ran the city of Chicago through the police force, the mayor’s ]office and the courts.
Approaching Capone was a gutsy life move. Once accepted into CAPONE’s MOB,
Alinsky WATCHED the PLANNING and EXECUTION of MURDERS as “an observer,” and
PARTIED with the MOB for two years before departing.
Alinsky’s retelling of the events is brash, disquieting and great cause to pause.
GLORIFYING CRIME as POLITICAL REBELLION.

Johan Goldberg: Bernardine Dohrn reflected the widespread new left FASCINATION with the
SERIAL-KILLING HIPPIE ubermensch CHARLES MANSON.
Abbie Hoffman set out to create a ‘vast myth’ of bloodshed and shock.
“WE WILL BURN CHICAGO to the GROUND’ – the intent was to FORCE a
CONFRONTATION that would SPILL BLOOD in the streets”
That VIOLENCE was CENTRAL to FASCISM is often an exaggerated point. Violence has
been ESSENTIAL to NEARLY ALL REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS.

Forcing mainstream liberals to CHOOSE SIDES on the assumption that most would follow
their sympathies to the left was the only way Hayden and others could usher in their revolution
This was what they meant by ‘BRINGING the WAR HOME’”

Saul Alinsky shared the fascist contempt for liberals as corrupted bourgeois prattlers:
‘Liberals in their meetings utter bold WORDS … and then issue a WEASEL-WORDED
Statement judging both sides; they sit and still sit.”

“Society has good reason to FEAR the RADICAL. Every shaking advance of mankind
toward equality and justice has come from the radical. He hits, hurts, he is DANGEROUS”
“Conservative interests know that while liberals are most adept at BREAKING THEIR OWN
NECKS with their tongues, radicals are most adept at BREAKING the NECKS of CONSERVATIVES.” – Saul Alinsky, Reveille for radicals

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS
“BOURGEOIS SELF-LOATHING lay at the very heart of the new left’s hatred of liberalism,
its love affair with violence and its willingness to take a sledgehammer to western civilization”
“We will BURN and loot and DESTROY. We are the incubation of your mother’s worst
Nightmare. The weathermen became the storm. Troopers of the new left, Horrifiying even
those who agreed with their cause.
Convinced that all whites were born tainted with the original sin of ‘skin privilege’, the
fighting brigade of the new left internalized racialist thinking as hatred of their own whiteness.
On one occasion the feminist poet Robin Morgan was breast feeding her son at the offices of
the radical journal RAT. A weatherman saw this and told her,
‘YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to HAVE THAT PIG MALE BABY’. ‘how can you say that? “,
morgan asked. ‘What should I do? PUT IT in the GARBAGE’, the weatherwoman answered.

Mark Rudd eventually joined the “Weather Underground” – “we are a guerilla organization”
revolutionary war against the U.S. government and the capitalist
system should begin immediately … to achieve “the destruction of u.s. imperialism and the
achievement of a CLASSLESS WORLD: WORLD COMMUNISM”
from september, 1969 to may, 1970, “radicals” committed about 250 BOMB ATTACKS in the
U.S. during the summer of 1970, there were 20 BOMBINGS a WEEK in California.
“It must be a WONDERFUL feeling to KILL a PIG or BLOW UP a BUILDING” – Mark Rudd
“The YOUTH must WREST CONTROL of society from their ELDERS” – Tom Hayden

BERNARDINE DOHRN, was a LSD loving law student turned weather underground
Revolutionary. Dorhn celebrated the murderous “hippies from hell” – the Charles
Manson “family”. Sharon Tate was the pregnant actress killed by the Manson family.
The pregnant tate was stabbed to death by the manson family, who also killed Leno and
Rosemary LaBianca. Pat Krenwinkel CARVED the WORD “WAR” INTO LENO’s
STOMACH, then stabbed him a number of times and left a CARVING FORK protruding
from his STOMACH and a knife from his throat.
Bernardine Dohrn: “DIG IT! first they KILLED those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same
room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach!” WILD!”
In appreciation, her weather underground cell made a THREE-FINGERED “FORK”
GESTURE into its OFFICIAL SALUTE.

Dohrn’s husband WILLIAM AYERS helped co-found the Weather Underground.
In 1970, Ayers explained what the Weather Underground was all about:
“KILL ALL the RICH PEOPLE” Ayers grew up in a suburb of Chicago, graduated from a
small prep school and the University of Michigan, his FATHER a CEO of Commonwealth
Edison. (1973 to 1980)
Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, KILL YOUR PARENTS, that’s where it’s really at”. Ayers participated in the DAYS of RAGE RIOT in Chicago in 1969, and was at the “WAR COUNCIL” meeting in Flint, Michigan.
They began a VIOLENT, ARMED STRUGGLE (e.g., bombings and armed ROBBERIES)
AGAINST the state without attempting to organize or mobilize a broad swath of the public.

Bill Ayers was the chief “theorist” of the weather underground. He participated in the
bombings of New York City Police headquarters (1970), the U.S. Capitol building (1971)
and the Pentagon (1972). Ayers, Dohrn or the Weathermen were connected to but not charged
or convicted for the fatal 1970 San Francisco Police Department park station bombing.
Ayers became involved in the Students For a Democratic Society (SDS), rising to national
prominence as an SDS leader in 1968 and 1969. As head of an SDS regional group,
The “Jesse James gang”, Ayers made decisive contributions to the weatherman orientation
toward MILITANCY.
The group Ayers headed became The Weatherman. Ayers became a prominent leader of the
group, which arose as a result of a schism in SDS. During that time AYER’S INFATUATION
with STREET FIGHTING grew and he developed a LANGUAGE of
CONFRONTATIONAL MILITANCY that became more and more pronounced over the year
[1969]. Later in 1969, Ayers participated in planting a bomb at a statue dedicated to police
casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Square riots between labor and the Chicago police. The blast
broke almost 100 windows and blew pieces of the statue onto the nearby Kennedy expressway.

In 1970, Weatherman Ted Gold, Ayers’ close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers’ girlfriend,
Diana Oughton were killed when a nail bomb being assembled in the house exploded.
An FBI informant stated that “Ayers, along with Dohrn, probably had the most authority
within the weatherman”. Ayers contended, “IT’s NOT TERRORISM BECAUSE IT
DOESN‘T TARGET PEOPLE … to EITHER KILL OR INJURE,
WHAT were NAIL BOMBS MEANT to DO THEN?

JOHN MURTAGH was a child in 1970 when The Underground placed BOMBS
UNDERNEATH the GAS TANK of the FAMILY CAR, at the HOME of his judge father.
Murtagh’s father presided over a case where the defendants, members of the black panther party,
were accused of plotting to bomb a department store and landmarks in New York City.

They left three sentences of blood-red graffiti on our sidewalk: free the panther 21;
the Viet Cong have won; KILL the PIGS.
In a New York Daily News op-ed on April 30, 2008, Murtagh wrote,
“I was only 9 then, the year AYERS’ WEATHERMEN TRIED to MURDER ME.
Murtaugh did skeptically wonder, “How can a sophisticated academic like yourself believe that
the INHERENT RECKLESSNESS of EXPLODING BOMBS … that you know too well
killed three of your own – you know the potential for deadliness there.”
“WE WEREN’T TERRORISTS,” Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001
“The reason we weren’t terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against
People. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United
States”, The New York Times reporter quoted him as saying.
“I DON’T REGRET SETTING BOMBS” and “I FEEL WE DIDN’T DO ENOUGH”.
In the ensuing years, Ayers has repeatedly avowed that he had “NO REGRETS” and that
“WE DIDN’T DO ENOUGH” he was speaking only in reference to his efforts to stop the
U.S. from waging the Vietnam War, efforts which he has described as “. . . inadequate [as] the
war dragged on for a decade”.

Ayers has maintained that the two statements were not intended to imply a wish they had set
more bombs. In a November, 2008 interview with The New Yorker, Ayers said that he had not
meant to imply that he wished he and the weathermen had committed further acts of violence.
Instead, he said, “I wish I had done more, but it doesn’t mean I wish we’d bombed more shit”
Ayers said that he had never been responsible for violence against other people and was acting
to end a war in vietnam in which “thousands of people were being killed every week”
He also stated, “While we did claim several extreme acts, they were acts of extreme radicalism
against property,” and “we killed … and hurt no one”.
ayers: “Three of our people killed themselves.” (building bombs)
“It must be a wonderful feeling to kill a pig or blow up a building” – mark rudd

Ayers was asked in a January, 2004 interview, “how do you feel about what you did?
Would you do it again under similar circumstances?”
Being almost 60, it’s impossible to not have lots and lots of regrets about lots and lots of
things, … but the question of did we do something that was HORRENDOUS, AWFUL? …
“I DON’T THINK SO. I think what we did was to respond to a situation that was
unconscionable.
Ayers, his wife Bernardine Dohrn and other W.U.O. figures WERE NOT PROSECUTED
because of ALLEGED FBI MISCONDUCT while investigating the foreign influence in
domestic terrorism. At the end of Ayers book Fugitive Days, he writes that
HE is “GUILTY as HELL, FREE as a BIRD – IT’s a GREAT COUNTRY”

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS
REBEL WITHOUT a PAUSE
Bernardine Dohrn and her Weatherman cohorts were blowing up buildings. Today, she has a new-respectable -revolution to lead.
by Patricia Lear Chicago Magazine May, 1993

Bernardine Dohrn was a leader of the weatherman, a radical splinter group of the SDS that
was UNABASHED about PROMOTING VIOLENCE. At the end of 1969, SDS held a
“national war council” in Flint, Michigan. Dohrn declared there was going to be an
“ARMED STRUGGLE” She lacerated the more moderate SDS leaders and cited the
Charles Manson Family – “first they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room
with them, then they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach! wild!'”
Then she held up three fingers in a manson fork salute.

As the Vietnam War dragged, Dohrn and some colleagues turned increasingly militant, forming
a group called weatherman, after Bob Dylan’s refrain “you don’t need a weatherman to know
which way the wind blows”. In 1969, they decided to ‘BRING the WAR HOME’ by
protesting the Chicago trial of the eight men who’d been accused of conspiring to disrupt the
1968 Democratic National Convention here. She was a PRIME MOVER in the days of rage,
the rampaging protest over the Chicago Eight conspiracy trial.

During the days of rage, as the protest was called, 300 weathermen convened in lincoln park,
built bonfires out of park benches, gave rousing speeches, and went on a window-breaking spree
armed with pipes, bats and rocks.

TV newsman Bill Kurtis recalls covering the action. “They were dressed in leather jackets and
motorcycle helmets and they had clubs and baseball bats and they came ready to do business,”
he says
“I followed them out of Lincoln Park and watched them smash windows up and down a variety
of streets and I even watched six cops drive their squad car into the middle of a group of about
300 that were headed for [conspiracy trial judge julius] hoffman’s house or down Michigan
Avenue. The cops cut the group in two, jumped out, and just beat the hell out of everybody and
LITERALLY PROBABLY SAVED North Michigan Avenue.
“But it was a real turn,” Kurtis adds. “The demonstrators for the convention only a year BEFORE were NOT VIOLENT. BUT these had CLEARLY STEPPED OVER the LINE.”
On the second day, Dohrn was at the head of a group of women armed with helmets and lead pipes who wildly charged a draft induction center”

Ken Kelley says, “In the context of the time, I really believed, and a lot of people really believed,
that revolution was imminent and . . . that we’re going to TAKE OVER OR we were going to
DIE TRYING”. I think the favorite saying of that time was, well, in a few years, we’re going to
either be DEAD, UNDERGROUND OR IN JAIL”.

On March 6, 1970, a townhouse in Greenwich Village blew up. Several Weathermen had been
building a bomb in the basement and something went wrong. An accidental bomb blast in 1970
killed Diana Oughton and Ted Gold and drove the rest of the weatherman group, including
Dohrn, underground. Between 1970 and 1974, the group took credit for 12 bombings,
including one of the U.S. Capitol and another of police cars – though they tried to make the
point that their targets were property, not people, and no one was injured. “Bombs as a media
event,” says Ken Kelley.

Today, asked about the bombings, Dohrn says, “I think what happened during that era was
generally appropriate and restrained. Of course, in today’s context, it’s unimaginable”
But, in the context of those times and in the context of a million people being killed [in
vietnam] because of U.S. policies, I feel like it was a moral and popular opposition to an illegal
and immoral war.

Bombing conspiracy charges against the couple had been dropped in the mid-1970s because of
illicit government surveillance. Prosecutions for the bombings themselves were never
pursued. Ayers was charged with nothing. Dohrn was allowed to plea-bargain for three years
of probation and a $1,500 fine. As Ayers reportedly once said: “guilty as hell, free as a bird –
America is a great country.
In 1987, Dohrn and Ayers and their three children moved back to Chicago. Ayers had earned a
Ph.D. at Columbia University and been offered a job at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Backed by funding from the John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation, Dohrn has
undertaken a project with Northwestern University’s law school to reform Chicago’s juvenile
courts. A number of people who have followed Dohrn’s career are furious that she hasn’t been
made to pay a heavier price for her past.

Peter Collier, a radical turned conservative whose 1989 book, Destructive Generation, is
bitterly critical of late-sixties political movements
Peter Collier: “The part that I think is outrageous has very little to do with her,” he says.
It’s Northwestern and it’s Macarthur and it’s the bar. What it shows me … really hit a nerve
here on this notion of the CULTURAL ELITE”. The idea that these people would protect and
enhance the reputation of this VICIOUS, BLOODY-MINDED WOMAN who is kind of the
LADY MACBETH of the movement. This is an amazing thing and it could happen only on
the left.

In Destructive Generation, Collier recounts a chance meeting between Dohrn and Mark
Rudd, another radical leader who’d also been underground for a time. SHE ASKED HIM
[RUDD] WHAT HE THOUGHT ABOUT the WHOLE EXPERIENCE,” Collier writes.

He told her that he thought of it as seven years of wasted life; that neither he nor they had
accomplished anything, and he wished he’d gotten out at the beginning. I couldn’t believe the
rhetoric. The SAME OLD SHIT. I just said to myself, ‘oh, later for you, lady,’ and
TOOK OFF. She got furious [Rudd recounts] and said:”but what about the contribution we
made to the overall struggle for armed struggle and revolution in America?”

Later on it occurred to me how HER EGO was still totally involved with all that DEAD
HISTORY. How LITTLE SHE HAD LOOKED AT HERSELF all those years. She should
have had to ADMIT HOW WRONG HER IDEAS WERE, HOW MESHUGA HER
SELF-CONCEPTION WAS”
Rudd: “A great revolutionary leader? she had NO GREAT REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS.
NONE OF US DID. She was just the daughter of a credit manager of a milwaukee furniture
store’. Her brother-in-law john ayers, adds, “I DON’T THINK SHE’S ASHAMED IN ANY
WAY. She continues to have a radical view of American society.

For Ayers, certainly, it was a return to the turf [Chicago] that HIS FATHER had once dominated
as a LEADER of the ESTABLISHMENT”
Tom Ayers was ‘a big, monster-sized executive, and a very, very genuinely nice man with a
SOCIAL CONSCIENCE,’ says Chicago newspaper columnist Mike Royko. For years, Bill
had been a source of great anguish. John Ayers says of his father, “he was a socially conscious
business guy, very involved in integration, very pro-integration and change in the cities. It was
rough on them. It was a difficult time.” In 1970, son Bill Ayers explained what the Weather
Underground was all about: “KILL all the RICH people … break up their cars and apartments.
bring the revolution home, KILL YOUR PARENTS, that’s where it’s really at”.

“I used to joke with him, you know, ‘Bill’s risen to the top of his field’.’ By all accounts, father and son worked things out between them. Bill ayers is a retired professor in the College of Eduation at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Ayers’ focus – elementary school education.
fascist obsession with youth – “empowering” youth through “community outreach”
Mike Royko, speaking about the radicals: “They came from a background of being rich kids, where apparently tantrums would get them what they wanted”. And they wanted IMMEDIATE GRATIFICATION and SOCIAL CHANGE
IMMATURE, SELF-DESTRUCTIVE and SELF-INDULGENT “CHILDREN” WHO THREW “TEMPER TANTRUMS” AGAINST “REALITY” and “REASON”
VIOLENCE for a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES (“social justice”)

“Liberals seem to assume that, if you don’t believe in their particular political solutions, then you don’t really care about the people that they claim to want to help.” – Thomas Sowell

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS
DEAR OCCUPY WALL STREET, By Dave Ramsey
“I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore!” Yeah, that’s great. But what do you WANT? What are your GOALS? What are your DEMANDS? What RESULT are you looking for?
The beauty of being VAGUE is that anyone who has any EMOTION can get caught up in the EXCITEMENT and JOIN YOUR CRUSADE. They’ll just get mad at something and assume that you’re both mad about the same thing. Put a few hundred of these people together, and boom. You’ve got a crowd, a headline and a lot of attention … BUT NO MESSAGE.
A lot of people on Twitter are saying I totally agree with the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) demands and goals. The only problem is that I have NO IDEA WHAT THEIR DEMANDS and GOALS are. and NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE. If all you ever do is stomp around, yell and hold up signs protesting a million different things, sure you’ll get some attention, but over time, you’ll just look foolish. You end up coming across like a three-year-old having a temper tantrum.
This is what’s happening to the OWS movement. They’re being discredited because no one has stepped forward and really stated what it is they’re after. The WHOLE GROUP is just coming across like a BUNCH of JACKED-UP, JOBLESS, WANNABE HIPPIES. That’s not going to change anything in this country. You’ve got to state your goals clearly if you want to accomplish something.
So in the absence of any clear goals, let me comment and offer some helpful advice in some areas that seem to be getting a lot of disorganized OWS attention.
“NO GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS!” Banks and big companies should not receive taxpayer money for a bailout while their CEOs are making hundreds of millions of dollars. If that’s your gripe, then you’re protesting in the wrong location. Pack up and head to Washington, D.C., to deliver your message to the current administration. Don’t get me wrong—I totally support a company’s freedom to pay their leaders well. I just don’t believe that I, as a taxpayer, should subsidize those huge salaries in the form of taxpayer bailouts. I pay my own team members; I don’t need to pay everyone else’s too.
By the way, you may be shocked to learn that the Tea Party agrees with you on this one—and so do I.
“DOWN WITH CORPORATE GREED! – Gordon Gekko was wrong. Greed is not good. Greed is bad – very bad. It’s a spiritual disease, and it is a disease that sadly affects a lot of companies across the country. If you believe a specific company is acting purely out of greed, then don’t just get mad – DO SOMETHING. Point out where and how they’re greedy and let the world know. Stop doing business with them. If enough people listen to you, the company will get the message because you’ll hit them where it hurts: the bottom line. If they don’t get their act together, then they’ll go out of business and another business will take their place.
But if you’re saying that ALL BUSINESSES are GREEDY and that CAPITALISM ITSELF is EVIL and INEFFECTIVE, then I’m sorry – you’re just being STUPID. You’re being MISLED and MISINFORMED by some of the louder voices around you. Are you wearing clothes? Have you eaten any food lately? Do you have an iPhone in your pocket to check in with Twitter and Facebook while you’re out marching around? Good. All of those products and services are brought to you by quality companies dedicated to serving you well in a CAPITALISTIC SYSTEM that WORKS just fine.
“WALL STREET is EVIL!” If you have this painted on a sign, well, now you just look ignorant. Wall Street is a street that people drive on. The New York Stock Exchange is a building where people exchange stocks in New York. This is the flea market of the financial world. Don’t turn Wall Street into some terrible monster attacking American citizens. It’s just a road with some buildings on it.
But here’s what happens. Sometimes when people don’t understand something, they start to FEAR it. And as the fear grows, it turns into ANGER. But just because you don’t understand something, you shouldn’t see it AS BAD OR FRIGHTENING OR A CONSPIRACY. You should just think of it as an OPPORTUNITY to LEARN something NEW – something that could actually be a BLESSING to you.
For example, imagine a group of natives out in the jungle in the farthest part of the world. I mean, picture a group of people who have never seen anyone outside of their tribe and have certainly never seen any kind of machine. What would they think if they saw a Red Cross helicopter land near them? And what would they think of the strange-looking men and women who jump out of the chopper and start walking toward them? They’d be freaked out! They wouldn’t know or care if the Red Cross was there to help them with food or medicine. They’d think it was the end of the world or something because their minds would be totally blown!
I hate to say it, but a lot of OWS protestors are just about as UNINFORMED as those jungle natives when it comes to HOW the AMERICAN FINANCIAL SYSTEM WORKS. A road and an office building. That’s Wall Street.
“WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION is the ANSWER!”- I’ve heard a lot about wealth redistribution over the past few years, and I’m sure you’ve heard it too. Call it whatever you want, but this is how it usually sounds to most Americans: “We are the 99% of Americans who don’t have as much as the 1%, so we’re mad and think the government should take their wealth and property away so that I can have a piece of it. Wealth inequality is a moral breakdown! We should all spread the money around so everyone gets a fair share!”
I have my toughest critique for those who believe this: YOU are a THIEF. When someone takes my money and gives me no say in the matter, that’s called THEFT – whether they’re using a gun or the government. At the CORE of this DEMAND is ENVY. And that’s NOT the SAME as JEALOUSY.
Jealousy just says, “I want what you have.” ENVY is a different beast. Envy says, “I don’t think I can ever have what you have, SO YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE IT EITHER.” Decades of horrible economic teaching and the politics of envy have kept this MONSTER ALIVE and growing and moving forward.
This way of thinking makes you assume that all rich people are evil and have scammed their way into wealth. That may be true in the tale of Robin Hood, but I choose to live in the real world. Sure, there are some scoundrels, but the vast majority of successful men and women got that way by working hard and serving people – lots of people. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates changed the world in ways we’re just now starting to realize. Their positive impact on the world has helped all of us live better lives, and they made fortunes for themselves by doing so. Why is it that you’re holy if you help one person but evil if you help a million? That’s just stupid.
A good friend of mine is a country music legend. He’s made a bazillion dollars over his career, and he just bought a $400,000 car. He’s worked like a crazy person his whole life, spending decades in tour buses, writing songs in the middle of the night, and entertaining enormous crowds of cheering fans. He paid a price to get there, and I’m happy for his success. WOULD IT BE RIGHT FOR ME to WALK INTO HIS HOUSE and DEMAND MY “FAIR SHARE” of HIS WEALTH? Heck no! I’m a terrible singer! I didn’t do one thing to contribute to his success, so why would I be entitled to a share of his wealth? He’s given me years of entertainment through his music. That’s my fair share of his hard work.
MY PROBLEMS AREN’T HIS FAULT. And my problems aren’t McDonald’s fault or Home Depot’s fault or Walmart’s fault, either. MY PROBLEMS are MY FAULT! And the more people these companies serve, the more money they make – and that’s none of my business! If you don’t like McDonald’s, then here’s an idea: Don’t eat there. But don’t walk into the restaurant and demand a portion of their proceeds for the day.
When you scream, “I’m in the 99%!” you just look like a whiner. Those of us willing to pay the price to win look at you and shrug. Heck, when it comes to the music business, I’m in the 99% myself! But that doesn’t mean I have to tear Toby Keith, Brad Paisley or even Kanye down. Oh, and a special note just for Kanye: Capitalism has been pretty good to you. I celebrate your success, but you look hypocritical protesting capitalism while wearing a $50,000 watch.
Celebrate the Land of OpportunityThis is the greatest country on the planet, but even here, you’re not guaranteed wealth, talent, fame, a full head of hair or six-pack abs. Those things are not in the Constitution. You are, however, guaranteed the freedom to make your life what you want it to be. And when you do that, when you build your life around your dreams and passions and hard work, you’re guaranteed the right to keep it. NO ONE has the RIGHT to TAKE IT AWAY FROM YOU.
So to summarize, I’m not very impressed at the moment. I’m not impressed by YOUR TEMPER FIT. I’m not impressed at your lack of goals and focus. I’m not impressed by the fact that the only thing I see about your movement is IGNORANCE, IMMATURITY and ENVY. GROW UP – and get a job.
Yes, there are jobs out there. There are jobs out there that haven’t even been invented yet. Go create the next Facebook or Weed Eater. Go pick up so much dog poop that you can start your own fertilizer company. And stop complaining that companies are TOO RICH while also complaining that they aren’t RICH ENOUGH to hire you! I’ve seen a lot of you guys. I wouldn’t hire you, either. But if you take all of that energy and excitement and pour it into something new and creative, you’ll get the chance to serve a whole lot of people really well, and over a decade or two, YOU’LL GET TO BECOME THE VERY THING YOU’RE NOW PROTESTING: RICH people who actually EARNED THEIR MONEY.

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS OCCUPY VIOLENCE: IT’S DIFFERENT, SOMEHOW by John Hinderaker in Liberals, The sick left May 4, 2012 The Occupy movement has a HORRIFIC RECORD of VIOLENCE. Occupy Wall Street Exposed has counted a dozen deaths, including three murders; more than a dozen rapes; more than 25 disgusting cases of indecent exposure, public defecation, etc; more than 500 thefts; more than 6,800 arrests; and in excess of $12 million in property damage. A sorry record by any standard.
#OccupyWallStreet: A Protest, Or A Temper Tantrum?
by Doug Mataconis October 5, 2011
… I’m taking Occupy Wall Street – or, perhaps more specifically, the ‘We Are The 99 Percent’ movement – seriously. There are a lot of people who are getting an UNUSUALLY RAW DEAL RIGHT NOW. There is a SMALL GROUP of people who are GETTING an UNUSUALLY GOOD DEAL RIGHT NOW. That doesn’t sound to me like a stable equilibrium.
The organizers of Occupy Wall Street are fighting to upend the system. But what gives their movement the potential for power and potency is the masses who just WANT the SYSTEM to WORK the WAY THEY were PROMISED IT WOULD WORK. It’s not that 99 percent of Americans are really struggling. It’s not that 99 percent of Americans want a revolution. It’s that 99 percent of Americans sense that the FUNDAMENTAL BARGAIN of OUR ECONOMY – WORK HARD, PLAY BY THE RULES, GET AHEAD – HAS BEEN BROKEN, and they want to see it RESTORED.
So, let’s take a look at some of the “GRIEVANCES”:
“I am young. I am educated and hard working. I am not able to pay my bills. I am afraid of what the future holds.”
I am a 19 year old student with 18 credit hours and 2 part time jobs.I am over 4000 dollars in debt but my paychecks are just enough to get me to school and back. Next year my plan was to attend a 4 year college and get my BFA, but now I am afraid that without a co-signer I will have no shot at a loan and even if I can get a loan I AM AFRAID that I WILL LEAVE COLLEGE WITH NO FUTURE and a CRIPPLING DEBT.”
The first thought I had when I looked through the Tumblr account is that THESE PEOPLE CAN’T BE DOING ALL THAT BAD if they’ve got access to the internet and a computer with a webcam necessary to create the posting that they put up at Tumblr. In any event, though, what strikes me more than anything else is that a lot of these people are frustrated 20-somethings who have gotten out of college and found that the ROAD to the GOOD LIFE ISN’T QUITE as SMOOTH AS THEY THOUGHT IT WOULD BE. Of course, things are more difficult today than they were ten years ago but that doesn’t mean they were easy back then. ESTABLISHING YOURSELF in LIFE is ALWAYS a CHALLENGE, especially if you run up tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt WITHOUT REALLY THINKING ABOUT HOW you’re going to pay it off.
WHAT COMES ACROSS to ME the MOST, THOUGH, is a SENSE of ENTITLEMENT from SOME PEOPLE and THEY IDEA that the SITUATION THEY’RE in CLEARLY CAN’T BE THEIR FAULT SO IT MUST BE the BLAME of SOMEONE ELSE. There’s an attitude about the protests that there is something morally wrong about the fact that not everyone is suffering equally in the current economy as well. So when they look up and see that some people have managed to succeed during these rough economic times, that sense of entitlement becomes intermingled with a sense of envy and the belief that the ONLY WAY THESE OTHER PEOPLE COULD HAVE SUCCEEDED is by CHEATING. As a result these protester blame their situation on someone else, blare out largely incoherent slogans, and engage in a PROTEST that has NO DISCERNIBLE PURPOSE.
As one writer at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog notes, these are the same people who have, for the most part, separated themselves from the political process:
Many of these AGGRIEVED YOUTH believe that the government has become unresponsive, that their voices have been silenced, and therefore protest is the only option. But this strikes me as a fundamental misreading of the past three years. It is likely that few of the protesters have actually taken part in the more mundane aspects of the system they’d like to take down – for example, only 24% of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in the 2010 mid-term elections.
Some on the left have already started the claim that “Occupy Wall Street” is a left-wing Tea Party, but in order for that work they have to actually be involved in the system. More importantly, though, it’s fundamentally clear that THESE PROTESTERS are DIRECTING THEIR ANGER in the WRONG DIRECTION.
IT WASN’T WALL STREET that CREATED EASY-TO-GET STUDENT LOANS and gave young people and incentive to apply for them, the GOVERNMENT DID THAT. IT WASN’T WALL STREET that has made COLLEGE TUITION SO ABSURDLY HIGH that four years of student loans ends up creating a crushing debt load, for the most part government did that too. IT WASN’T WALL STREET that created the monetary conditions that made the HOUSING BUBBLE possible and used Fannie Mae and Freedie Mac to encourage banks to GIVE OUT LOANS to PEOPLE WHO SHOULDN’T HAVE GOTTEN THEM, GOVERNMENT DID THAT. It’s not Wall Street that is SADDLING THEIR GENERATION with a CRUSHING NATIONAL DEBT and an ENTITLEMENT SYSTEM that is UNSUSTAINABLE in its current form, government is doing that.
A PROTEST on Wall Street is NOT GOING to FIX any of these problems. Heck, any kind of protest isn’t going to fix any of these problems. You want to have your voice heard, then you need to get INVOLVED in the SYSTEM not hang out in some park in Lower Manhattan.
The other thing that is MISSING from the laments of the “99%-ers” is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Running up huge student loan debts getting a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree and then complaining when you can’t find a job to pay them off, like this woman does, doesn’t strike me as very responsible. Even in a good economy, you’re going to find more people with B.FA.’s waiting tables at the local bar than giving tours at some museum somewhere. When you make choices that put you in a bad situation, the person to blame isn’t the broker on Wall Street, it’s man or woman in the mirror.
There’s something PRETTY IMMATURE ABOUT BLAMING OTHER PEOPLE FOR YOUR SITUATION in life. There’s no question that the INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BUSINESS and GOVERNMENT is a BAD THING, that’s why I’ve said repeatedly that the answer is to get the government out of those situations where it is entering into “partnerships” with business and picking winners and losers through direct and indirect subsidies. Those are the situations in which business is indeed taking advantage of taxpayers and it OUGHT to be STOPPED, BUT to a large degree that WON’T HAPPEN UNLESS and until we drastically reduce the size and scope of government involvement in the economy.
The Occupy Wall Street crowd isn’t asking for that, though. To the extent they’re asking for anything, THEY’RE CLEARLY ASKING for MORE GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT in the ECONOMY. They want what they think they’re entitled to, which apparently includes a job and forgiveness of all their student debt. THEIR MAIN PRIORITY SEEMS TO BE TAKING FROM ONE GROUP and GIVING to ANOTHER, but what they don’t realize is that all the government will do is take from one POLITICALLY DISFAVORED group and GIVE TO ANOTHER, POLITICALLY FAVORED, GROUP, thus creating an entirely new group of “others.” Moreover, from a moral point of view, taxing the rich to help pay down the deficit is one thing, taking from the rich and giving to another group is quite another. One is, as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr put it, the price of civilization. The other is NOTHING MORE THAN NAKED THEFT FUELED by RESENTMENT and ENVY. If that’s the AGENDA the Occupy Wall Street crowd wants people to sign up for, then count me out.

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS ‘FLASH MOB’ of 150 teens attacks Temple University students, cops in Philly
by Derek Hawkins October 26, 2016
‘Flash mob’ of teens attack bystanders in Philadelphia
Philadelphia police released surveillance footage of a mob of teenagers on the night of Oct. 21. Police say the crowd attacked random pedestrians, including Temple University students and a police officer. (Philadelphia Police)
It started with an Instagram post. It ended with four arrests, at least eight injuries and a major security ramp-up at Temple University.
On Friday evening, dozens of teenagers began to gather outside the Pearl Theater in North Philadelphia, brought together by what police said were calls on social media to meet for a 6:45 p.m. showing of the movie “Ouija: Origin of Evil.”
Word spread. By 8 p.m., more than 150 youths had amassed at the intersection near the theater, located at the southern end of Temple’s campus.
Then things turned VIOLENT.
As the crowd moved down the street, several smaller groups of youths started attacking random pedestrians, many of them university students who were returning to campus from a Temple football game across town, according to the university’s independent student paper. The teenagers punched, kicked and tackled people indiscriminately, police said, fanning out into the North Philadelphia neighborhood and assaulting passersby over the next few hours.
As of Monday, police had taken four kids between 14 and 17 years old into custody in connection with the attacks, which authorities compared to “flash mobs” that have cropped up in the city in recent years, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. Authorities said they’re still looking for other suspects.
Joe Lauletta of Holland, Penn., said his 19-year-old daughter was badly beaten after the mob broke out. In a Facebook post that went viral, he wrote that she had just emerged from the subway after watching the Temple football game when a group of 30 to 40 teenagers SWARMED AROUND HER.
“Every part of her body is BADLY BRUISED,” Lauletta wrote. “IT MAKES ME CRY JUST THINKING ABOUT IT.”

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS Race fears fester after huge flash mob of alleged ‘black teens’ attack random victims and cops after Temple football game
October 25, 2016 BizPacReview.com
Like much of the country, Temple University in North Philadelphia has seen better days.
In a frightening series of events Friday night, a MOB of VIOLENT TEENS HARASSED, BEAT, and sometimes STOLE from reportedly random victims – including police officers. The CRAZED GROUP of around 150 teens was organized through a meet up on Instagram and seemed to mimic FLASH MOBS that recently hit Center City, Philly.com reported.
TU Alert: Increased police activity due to large groups of juveniles along Broad Street on/near Main Campus. Police responding. Avoid area.— Temple University October 22, 2016
A motive for the attacks as not been cited, but a statement from the father of one victim named Christina Lauletta, indicates that RACE could play a factor: “I find out that her and her 2 male friends were badly beaten by a group of 30-40 black teenagers on their way home from the Temple football game,” Joe Lauletta wrote.
NEITHER the RACE of the PERPETRATORS NOR the ATTACKERS HAVE BEEN CITED as a MOTIVE by LOCAL NEWS REPORTS, LEAVING the WIDESPREAD NARRATIVE that THESE were RANDOM ATTACKS.
Christina was beaten so badly she needed to be hospitalized. Her father, Joe continued to vent his anger about the incident to Facebook. “These SICK ANIMALS held her down and KICKED and STOMPED on her repeatedly,” Joe wrote, noting workers at a local pizza shop intervened. “Every part of her body is badly bruised. It makes me cry just thinking about it.”
Christina was with two male friends who were also beaten according to reports. But possibly the most bold attack was aimed at a mounted police officer.
According to Philly.com: One 15-year-old, who police say was seen throwing rocks at passing cars, knocked an officer pursuing him on bicycle to the ground. He was later apprehended and charged with aggravated assault and resisting arrest, among other offenses.
In probably the most BRAZEN ACT of VIOLENCE, police say a 16-year-old came up to a mounted officer and PUNCHED the POLICE HORSE twice in the face. Police later apprehended him and charged him with assaulting a police service animal.
Only four teens ranging from ages 14 to 17 have been arrested in connection with the violent assaults, while 50 were taken into custody, NBC reported.
And DANGEROUS EXCUSE MAKING for the HORRIFIC BEHAVIOR HAS BEGUN.
“It sounds like they were just trying to get everybody together,” Charlie Leone, director of Campus Safety Services wrote of the violent mob in a letter to Temple News .
“But when kids get together, especially a couple hundred, it can turn into something like this, unfortunately.”
Wrong! A group of teens out on a Friday night doesn’t just “turn into something like THIS.”
Why can’t we talk about the black role in flash mobs?
by Newsmachete americanthinker.com July 4, 2015

There has been a lot of ink spilled about the lack of blacks in technology. Just 49 of Twitter’s 3,000 employees are black. Only 1.5% of Facebook employees are black. But one area where young blacks have been overwhelmingly overrepresented in technology is in flash mobs.
Flash mobs are people who organize through Facebook or Twitter or other social media for the purposes of meeting at a place and performing an activity. Sometimes the activity is harmless, like performing a dance routine, but often it involves illegality and violence, such as attacking people and looting stores. AT had a classic example only yesterday, where a Walmart got ransacked.
And the video showed that most of the participants were black. It’s hardly an isolated incident. Flash mobs frequently gather to rob stores or beat up white people.
At the Wisconsin State fair, groups of black teens numbering anywhere from 25 to 100 “were targeting anyone who was white or appeared to look white,” and beating them, according to the local police chief. At least 18 people were injured, and 30 have been arrested. In Denver, white couples leaving restaurants were being attacked by groups of black men with baseball bats.
Anna Taylor, Emily Guendelsberger, and Thomas Fitzgerald were beaten to the ground and stomped in separate black flash-mob attacks in PHILADELPHIA. According to local news, police have battled large, black flash-mob beatings and vandalism “EVERY WEEKEND in July,” in GREENSBORO, NC. A young white woman was taunted and beaten by a black mob in MILWAUKEE, with one attacker saying, “WHITE GIRL BLEEDS A LOT.”
And YET the RACE of the MOB is RARELY TALKED ABOUT. IF a MOB of WHITE PEOPLE ATTACKED BLACKS, WE WOULD HEAR ABOUT IT to NO END.
Why can’t we say that a disproportionate percentage of flash mob participants are blacks? Because in our society, saying the behavior of a black person or a group of black people is unacceptable leaves you open to claims that you’re a racist. It’s much safer to talk about the Confederate flag or the 7% of black murder victims who are killed by non-blacks.
But why can’t we criticize anyone of any race, based on behaviors? Let’s give it a try. Why are these kids going out late at night and doing these acts of violence and robbery? Where are their parents? Some of them don’t have fathers, but they do have mothers, right? Why are their mothers not monitoring where they are and what they are doing? The high black participation level in flash mobs is clearly a failure of parenting. We should be able to have a conversation about this and talk about the poor parenting of some black parents. If Michelle Obama were concerned about black children, she would be talking about this, not carrots and lettuce.
We are forced to live in a 1984-type environment where we have to pretend that root causes either don’t exist or are falsely correlated with unrelated things like flags. I notice that President Obama never looks at store security footage and says that some of the people in it look like they COULD BE HIS CHILDREN. He never starts a national conversation about race when black children are participating in a flash mob.
We need to be able to break the taboo about criticizing bad behavior among SOME black people. The more of us who talk about it, the more acceptable it will become. But if we are silent, we become almost willing participants in THIS INCREASINGLY UNEQUAL RACIAL SOCIETY WE LIVE IN.

ACTION , VIOLENCE and the WILL to POWER: “REVOLUTIONARIES” REJECTING “REASON
ADOLESCENT TEMPER TANTRUMS RANDOM INNOCENTS VICTIMS of INTERRACIAL VIOLENCE in DEADLY ‘KNOCKOUT’ GAME RACE DEMOGOGUERY
On January 7, 2009, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under President Bush filed criminal
charges against those responsible. But in May, 2009, the Obama Justice Department filed a
notice of voluntary dismissal. In June, 2010, J. Christian Adams, who had served in the
voting section of the U.S. Department of Justice for 5 years, resigned over the
“CORRUPT NATURE of the DISMISSAL of the CASE”.

Wrote Adams in 2010: “Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open AND PERVASIVE
HOSTILITY within the justice department to bringing civil rights cases against non-white
defendants on behalf of white victims. EQUAL ENFORCEMENT of justice is NOT a
PRIORITY of this Administration. Open contempt is voiced for these types of cases.

Calling Sharpton “a voice for the voiceless and … dispossessed,” Obama stated: “What national
action network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the
bottom up. One very disturbing recent example of … blind and senseless rage against innocent
people is the phenomenon of flash mobs of black youths attacking unsuspecting white
bystanders – known as the “KNOCKOUT GAME”. I don’t think I need to point out what sort
of REACTION we would be witnessing from the White house and the liberal media
IF the MOBS were YOUNG WHITE MALES attacking innocent black victims.
The National Guard would probably have been deployed to every major city by now.
This sort of “MOBOCRACY” was something our founders warned us about –
the TYRANNY of the MOB sans the rule of law.

SOCIAL [IN]JUSTICE – The TROJAN HORSE of TYRANNY
The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell]

“Lofty talk about ‘social justice’ or ‘fairness’ boils down to greatly expanded POWERS FOR POLITICIANS, since those pretty words have NO CONCRETE DEFINITION. They are a BLANK CHECK for CREATING DISPARITIES in POWER that DWARF DISPARITIES in INCOME – and are FAR MORE DANGEROUS.” – Thomas Sowell
Liberals believe that the real problem with the world is that the institutions are wrong. If the institutions were right; THERE’S NOTHING in HUMAN NATURE THAT WOULD CAUSE US TO BE UNHAPPY, it’s the fact that we have the WRONG INSTITUTIONS.”
Conservatives believe man is FLAWED from day one. There are NO SOLUTIONS; there are ONLY TRADEOFFS. WHATEVER YOU DO to DEAL WITH ONE of MAN’s FLAWS, IT CREATES ANOTHER PROBLEM. But that you TRY to get the best tradeoff you can get. And that’s all you can hope for. – Thomas Sowell
“To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he’s doing is good” – Solzhenitsyn

“I would like to call upon AMERICA to be more careful with its TRUST … and prevent those … because of short-sightedness and still others out of self-interest, from FALSELY USING the STRUGGLE FOR PEACE and FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE to lead you down a FALSE ROAD. Because they are trying to WEAKEN you; they are trying to DISARM your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat. … I call upon you: ordinary working men of America … DO NOT LET YOURSELVES BECOME WEAK” – Solzhenitzyn
SOCIAL [IN]JUSTICE – The TROJAN HORSE of TYRANNY The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell]
WHAT DOES ‘SOCIAL JUSTICE’ MEAN?
by Jonah Goldberg May 14, 2012

Jonah Goldberg: George Orwell says that a writer can avoid the heavy lifting of making an original or insightful argument by simply turning his pen on autopilot and fueling it with ‘ready made’ CLICHÉS. They will perform the important service of partially CONCEALING YOUR MEANING EVEN FROM YOURSELF,” writes Orwell.
LIBERALISM IMPOSES ITSELF NOT THROUGH SUSTAINED ARGUMENT, BUT
THROUGH a SHABBY TYRANNY of CLICHÉS, which HIDES ITS IDEOLOGICAL
UNDERPINNINGS behind a façade of trite phrases and homespun truisms.

Let us start with the example of ‘SOCIAL JUSTICE’ A cry for social justice is usually little
more than a CALL for GOODNESS; “progressive” has become a substitute for “all good
things” “but sometimes the word is TOO VAGUE”

If you ask, “what does ‘social justice’ mean?” you are likely to get an exasperated eye roll,
because YOU JUST DON’T GET IT. Social justice IS GOODNESS, and if you can’t see
that, man, you’re either unintentionally “part of the problem” or you’re for badness”
“the U.N. warns: “present-day believers in an absolute truth identified with virtue and justice
are neither willing nor desirable companions for the defenders of social justice.

Translation: if you actually believe in the antiquated notion that rights exist outside the schemes
of governments and social planners, then you are not part of the global effort to promote
“GOODNESS”

In 1840, the theologian luigi taparelli d’azeglio came up with the concept as a way to defend
civil society from the ever-increasing intrusions of the state. social justice, according to
Taparelli, was the legitimate realm of justice beyond formal legal justice”

Since then, the term has become COMPLETELY INVERTED. “Social justice’ has become
an ABRACADABRA PHRASE granting the state access to every nook and cranny of life”
The reason Hayek refers to the ‘MIRAGE of social justice’ is quite simple:
THERE’S NO SUCH THING. JUSTICE CREATES a CLAIM on OTHERS
“social justice is based on rights – social rights, economic rights, etc. –
THAT CANNOT BE ENFORCED in a FREE SOCIETY”

Jonah Goldberg: “EACH EXPLICIT DEMAND FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE CARRIES WITH IT
the IMPLICIT BUT NECESSARY REQUIREMENT that the STATE DO the FIXING”
A society dedicated to the pursuit of perfect social justice must gradually move more and more
decisions under the command of the state, until it is the sole moral agent.
Hayek is working from the assumption that we do and, more important, should live in a free
Society. That is the ideological prior conclusion, as it were, from which he launches his attack
on the stupidity of social justice. You are free to respond that the concept of social justice is
worthwhile, but in order to do so, you must first concede that you are coming from a
specific ideological perspective as well.
To say “social justice requires x” is to say the state is justified in compelling or coercing x“.
And that’s the point. social justice is not a non-ideological concept that simply draws on ethics
or morality. No, it is a deeply ideological set of assumptions that most practitioners of social
justice REFUSE TO OPENLY and SINCERELY ACKNOWLEDGE, preferring instead to
roll their eyes and proclaim that they are on the side of goodness.
“Social Justice isn’t so much a “MIRAGE” as it is a TROJAN HORSE,
CONCEALING A MUCH MORE RADICAL AGENDA”

The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell]

Jonah Goldberg: “Cults often have a will to power all their own. ”we “resist” and “reject” the
fascism of another, but are tempted to “replace” it with one of your own. goldberg’s point:one
side imposing it’s vision on the other means we all lose a fascist, totalitarian impulse
and ”temptation” to impose one’s cultural vision in the political realm will always result in a
“closed” society. tricked and “fooled again” – if you win, we all lose.

COMMENTARY:
‘SOCIAL JUSTICE’ is a EUPHEMISM FOR ‘TYRANNY’
Wisconsin Law Journal March 29, 2010

The POWERLUST that motivates what is called “the social justice crowd” has always been
something I couldn’t fathom. I gave up trying to understand their motivation decades
ago …in rereading John Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” though, I may have finally found the
understanding I was seeking the most powerful passage in the poem is when, upon his
expulsion from heaven, Satan wakes up next to the burning lake in hell and delivers a
monologue to rationalize his situation –
“BETTER TO REIGN in HELL THAN SERVE IN HEAVEN”

That desire to reign in hell, I believe, must be what drives all those who advocate for positive
rights, such as the right to health care, as opposed to negative rights, such as the right to free
speech logically, something like health care cannot be considered a right. after all, if one
person has a right to do nothing, yet still receive free health care, then so does everyone.
But someone has to actually provide the health care, someone has to invent and manufacture
pills, and someone else has to create the wealth needed to pay for it all.

Yet all those people have the right to do nothing while someone else provides for their health,
Too. Creating a right to health care for all ultimately must lead to no health care for anyone
until that point was reached, though, what would happen if health care were to be recognized as a
right is that a new class would arise – the class that gets to order doctor a to provide health
services to citizen a, and citizen b to pay for it
In other words, someone gets to reign in hell; the social justice crowd wants to be the
ones who do.
By returning to milton’s classic work, i finally discovered that speaking of positive rights is just
code language for expressing the DESIRE to REIGN, RATHER THAN to SERVE
“SOCIAL JUSTICE” is JUST a EUPHEMISM FOR “TYRANNY”.

Jonah Goldberg: “’SOCIAL JUSTICE’ is a profoundly ideological term,
MASQUERADING as a generic term for GOODNESS. It is a TYRANNICAL cliché, a
SEEMINGLY BENIGN TRUISM that, like a pill with a pleasant protective coating,
CONCEALS a mind-altering substance within. But all contain within them ideological, radical,
or just plain dumb ideas about the role of the state, the nature of politics, or man’s place in the
world.

Progressive ideas about the world are every bit as ideological as conservative ideas, and often far
more so. BUT PROGRESSIVES WON’T ADMIT IT, NOT EVEN to THEMSELVES.
The CALLOUS PURSUIT of ABSOLUTE DOMINATION and the unrelenting exercise of
the POWER of the MODERN STATE which disperses into the realm of enterprise over the
often derided and characteristically docile populace.
What many progressives call SOCIAL JUSTICE is NEITHER VERY SOCIAL NOR JUST,
especially as concerns economics.
James Cone: “What we need is the DIVINE LOVE as EXPRESSED in black POWER,
which is the power of black people TO DESTROY THEIR OPPRESSORS here and now by
any means at their disposal. Obama’s past has a long string of his mentors and allies who were
marked by HATRED of the U.S. The vision in which Obama has been steeped is one in which
white western nations have OPPRESSED and EXPLOITED non-white, non-western nations,
becoming rich and arrogant at other people’s expense.
It is a vision that calls out, NOT FOR JUSTICE, but for PAYBACK.
“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”
– Aristotle

SOCIAL [IN]JUSTICE – The TROJAN HORSE of TYRANNY The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell]
The QUEST FOR COSMIC JUSTICE
by Thomas Sowell

Let me try to summarize the message of The Quest for Cosmic Justice in three propositions which may seem to be axiomatic, but whose implications are in fact politically controversial:
– The impossible is not going to be achieved. – It is a waste of precious resources to try to achieve it. – The devastating costs and social dangers which go with these attempts to achieve the impossible should be taken into account.
The VAST RANGES of UNDESERVED INEQUALITIES FOUND EVERYWHERE are
the FAULT of “SOCIETY” and so the REDRESSING of those INEQUALITIES is called
SOCIAL JUSTICE, going BEYOND the TRADITIONAL JUSTICE of presenting
EACH INDIVIDUAL with the same rules and standards.

Presumably, the vast ranges of undeserved inequalities found everywhere are the fault of
“society” and so the redressing of those inequalities is called social justice, going beyond the
traditional justice of presenting each individual with the same rules and standards.

However, even those who argue this way often recognize that some undeserved inequalities may
arise from cultural differences, family genes, or from historical confluences of events not
controlled by anybody or by any given society at any given time. For example, there was no
way that Pee Wee Reese was going to hit as many home runs as Mark McGwire, or Shirley
Temple run as fast as Jesse Owens. There was no way that Scandinavians or Polynesians
were going to know as much about camels as the Bedouins of the Sahara – and no way that
these Bedouins were going to know as much about fishing as the Scandinavians or Polynesians.

In a sense, proponents of “social justice” are unduly modest. WHAT THEY are SEEKING to
CORRECT are NOT MERELY the DEFICIENCIES of SOCIETY, BUT of the
COSMOS. What they call SOCIAL JUSTICE ENCOMPASSES FAR MORE THAN ANY
GIVEN SOCIETY is CAUSALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR. CRUSADERS FOR SOCIAL
JUSTICE SEEK to CORRECT NOT MERELY the SINS of MAN BUT the
OVERSIGHTS of GOD OR the ACCIDENTS of HISTORY. What they are really seeking is
a universe tailor-made to THEIR VISION of equality. They are seeking cosmic justice.

Cosmic justice is one of the IMPOSSIBLE DREAMS which has a VERY HIGH COST and
VERY DANGEROUS POTENTIALITIES. But fairness in this cosmic sense was NEVER
an option. As noted at the outset, the impossible is not going to be achieved.

Nothing that the schools could do would make things fair in this sense. It would have been an
IRRESPONSIBLE SELF-INDULGENCE for them to have pretended to make things fair.
FAR WORSE than UNFAIRNESS is MAKE-BELIEVE FAIRNESS

The argument here is not against real justice or real equality. Both of these things are desirable
in themselves, just as immortality may be considered desirable in itself. The only arguments
against any of these things is that they are impossible – and the cost of pursuing impossible
dreams are not negligible.

Socially counterproductive policies are just one of the many costs of the quest for cosmic
justice. The rule of law, on which a free society depends, is inherently incompatible with
cosmic justice. Laws exist in all kinds of societies, from the freest to the most totalitarian.
But the rule of law – a government of laws and not of men, as it used to be called – is rare and
vulnerable.
You cannot redress the MYRIAD INEQUALITIES WHICH PERVADE HUMAN LIFE by
APPLYING the SAME rules to ALL or by applying any rules other than the
ARBITRARY DISPENSATIONS of THOSE in POWER.
The final chapter of The Quest for Cosmic Justice is titled “The Quiet Repeal of the American
Revolution” – because that is what is happening PIECEMEAL by zealots devoted to their
OWN PARTICULAR APPLICATIONS of COSMIC JUSTICE.

They are not trying to destroy the rule of law. They are not trying to undermine the American
republic. They are simply trying to produce “GENDER EQUITY,” institutions that “look like
America” or a thousand other goals that are incompatible with the rule of law, but corollaries
of cosmic justice.

Because ordinary Americans have not yet abandoned traditional justice, those who seek cosmic
justice must try to justify it politically as meeting traditional concepts of justice. A failure
to achieve the new vision of justice must be represented to the public and to the courts as
“discrimination.” Tests that register the results of innumerable inequalities must be represented
as being the cause of those inequalities or as deliberate efforts to perpetuate those inequalities by
ERECTING ARBITRARY BARRIERS to the advancement of the less fortunate.

In short, to promote cosmic justice, they MUST MISREPRESENT what is happening as
violations of traditional justice – as understood by others who do not share their vision.
Nor do those who make such claims necessarily believe them themselves. As Joseph
Schumpeter once said: “The FIRST THING a man will do FOR HIS IDEALS is LIE.”

The next thing the idealist will do is CHARACTER ASSASSINATION. ALL THOSE WHO
DISAGREE with the GREAT VISION must be shown to have MALIGN INTENTIONS,
IF NOT DEEP-SEATED CHARACTER FLAWS. They must be “Borked,” to use a verb
coined in our times. They must be depicted as “A Strange Justice” if somehow they survive the
Borking process. They must be depicted as having some personal “obsessions” if they carry out
the duties they swore to carry out as a special prosecutor.

In short, DEMONIZATION is one of the costs of the quest for cosmic justice. The victims of
this process are not limited to those targeted. The society as a whole loses when its decisions
are made by character assassination, rather than by rational discussion, and when its pool of
those eligible for leadership is drained by the exodus of those who are not prepared to
sacrifice their good name or subject their family to humiliations for the sake of grasping
the levers of power.
This loss is not merely quantitative, for those who are willing to endure any personal or
family humiliations for the sake of power are the most dangerous people to trust with
power.

In a sense, those caught up in the vision of cosmic justice are also among its victims. Having
committed themselves to a vision and demonized all who oppose it, how are they to turn around
and subject that vision to searching empirical scrutiny, much less repudiate it as evidence of its
counterproductive results mount up?

Ironically, the quest for GREATER ECONOMIC and SOCIAL EQUALITY is promoted
through a far greater INEQUALITY of POLITICAL POWER. If rules cannot produce cosmic
justice, only raw power is left as the way to produce the kinds of results being sought.
In a democracy, where power must gain public acquiescence, not only must the rule of law be
violated or circumvented, so must the rule of truth. However noble the vision of cosmic
justice, ARBITRARY POWER and SHAMELESS LIES are the ONLY PATHS that
EVEN SEEM TO LEAD IN ITS DIRECTION. As noted at the outset, the devastating costs
and social dangers which go with these attempts to achieve the impossible should be taken into
account.

SOCIAL [IN]JUSTICE – The TROJAN HORSE of TYRANNY The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell]
How Social Justice Warriors Are Creating An Entire Generation Of Fascists by Joshua Goldberg
One lasting legacy (among others) of the Soviet Union is its deceptive distortion of language – DRESSING UP UGLINESS with INNOCUOUS and NICE-SOUNDING TERMS, as predicted by George Orwell in his seminal and much-quoted work Nineteen Eighty-Four. For example, if someone says that they’re for “human rights”, that means that they’re for Stalinist thought control, hardcore government authoritarianism, and international warmongering. “Human rights activists” are, in actuality, a vile, twisted, and extremely dangerous plague upon humanity. So, too, are the SELF-PROCLAIMED SUPPORTERS OF “SOCIAL JUSTICE” (who are, of course, often the same people). “Social justice” blogging is most associated with Tumblr, a blogging platform started in February 2007 which is now among the most visited sites on the Internet. “SOCIAL JUSTICE” BLOGGERS are NOTORIOUSLY ZEALOUS and EXCEPTIONALLY NASTY PEOPLE, which has led to the coining of the ironic term “social justice warrior”, or SJW for short.
SJWs – almost all of whom are white, upper-middle-class college students – PICTURE THEMSELVES AS PERSECUTED, OPPRESSED CRUSADERS FOR PEACE and EQUALITY. But, upon any level of inspection, this claim immediately falls apart. I have been on the Internet since I was a small child and I have perused some of the most extreme and disturbing corners of the web. I have had personal encounters with every manner of vile cretin – the sorts of people who would make even Charles Manson himself blush. With that said, never have I encountered anyone who was so giddy about their hatred than the people who make up the SJW community. These are people who, on a regular basis, CALL FOR VIOLENCE AND GENOCIDE AGAINST “OPPRESSORS”, whether it’s white people, heterosexual people, thin people, or JUST ANYONE WHO EVEN SLIGHTLY DISAGREES WITH THEM.
One favorite tactic that SJWs use to quash all opposition is DOXXING – they will publish the personal information (real name, job, phone number, address, and so forth) of ANYONE THAT THEY DEEM TO HAVE COMMITTED an ACT of THOUGHTCRIME, then they will usually encourage people to commit acts of violence against that person in real life and will do their best to have that person fired from wherever they work at. One individual who has personally experienced a wave of harassment and doxxing from legions of feral SJWs is a popular right-wing Tumblr blogger who goes by the screen name of Communismkills. I spoke to Communismkills about her experiences with SJWs. This article should not be seen as an endorsement of anything that Communismkills says. Rather, it exists simply to provide an EXAMPLE of JUST HOW NASTY, VILE and HATEFUL the ONLINE “SOCIAL JUSTICE” CRUSADE TRULY IS.
Ashley posted a limerick about the recent shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri: “There once was a thug named Brown / Who bum-rushed a cop with a frown / Six bullets later / He met his creator / Then his homies burnt down the town”. Funny? Perhaps not. But, however distasteful this poem may have been, it couldn’t possibly hold a candle to the reaction that SJWs would give to it. The sustained harassment campaign against Ashley for this poem – which, as of this writing, is ongoing – was kicked off by two SJW bloggers known as agalaxtical and slutsonlyclub, who posted Ashley’s personal information and ENCOURAGED OTHER USERS TO BURN HER HOUSE DOWN.
After that, Ashley began to face a non-stop barrage of DOXXING, HARASSMENT, ABUSE, and THREATS. In the name of “social justice”, Tumblr users proceeded to post Ashley’s Facebook, her mother’s Facebook, her work information, her mother’s work information, her parents’ home address, her school information, and her phone number. Numerous users have threatened to murder her and to burn down her house. They have also bombarded her university’s Facebook page in the hopes of getting her expelled. As of right now, Ashley tells me, she cannot even have her phone on due to the sheer volume of calls that she is receiving. The threats have not only been sent to Ashley, but to her mother as well.
Hundreds of thousands of posts have been made about Ashley, with many of them being gruesome threats calling for Ashley and/or her mother (who had no role in any of this) to be raped, burned, tortured, and/or murdered. AND WHY DO THEY DO THIS, YOU MIGHT ASK? THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE: THEY DO IT FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, PEACE ON EARTH, EQUALITY, and HARMONY. After all, what could possibly be more just and righteous than sending gory death threats to aging mothers? Isn’t that what “social justice” is all about?
Humans are perpetual morons who always need a bad guy. To neo-Nazis, the bad guys are Jews, “degenerates”, and non-whites. To SJWs, the bad guys are people like Communismkills: not only is she a white person who isn’t self-flagellating, but she’s also a woman who doesn’t see herself as a victim of some evil patriarchal conspiracy. TO an SJW, THAT’s HERESY: ALL WHITE PEOPLE are EVIL and ALL WOMEN are VICTIMS. If a woman doesn’t think that she’s a victim, then she has “internalized misogyny” and she just doesn’t know any better, so she needs SJWs to speak on her behalf. Likewise, if a black person doesn’t tow the SJW line exactly, then they will be immediately labeled an “Uncle Tom” or “house nigger” by the extremely patronizing SJWs who see minorities as nothing more than political props and tools and who VIEW ALL RACES AS MONOLITHS with INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS (which, ironically, is the absolute definition of racism).
ALL VICTIM FRAMEWORKS WORK UPON SINGLE “OPPRESSORS”, and an “US vs. THEM” MENTALITY is a VERY SIMPLE WAY to JUSTIFY IDEOLOGICAL DICHOTOMY. The “SOCIAL JUSTICE” MOVEMENT is NOT AT ALL ABOUT SOCIAL JUSTICE, BUT ABOUT RELENTLESSLY BULLYING ANYONE WHO DOES NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THEIR STALINIST IDEOLOGY. Stormfront is often held up as an example of “online hate”, but it must be noted that the white supremacists on Stormfront do not participate in organized harassment campaigns, do not send gruesome rape and death threats to people, do not regularly call for violence, and do not engage in doxxing. Compared to the people who claim to be on “the right side of history” and crusaders for “SOCIAL JUSTICE”, Stormfront is a bastion of kindness and civility. What does that say about you, SJWs, when you make neo-Nazis look positively civilized by comparison?
ASHLEY’S EXPERIENCE is NOT the LEAST BIT UNUSUAL in the WORLD of ONLINE “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – MANY, MANY MORE LIKE HER HAVE EXPERIENCED RELENTLESS BULLYING, ABUSE, INTIMIDATION, DOXXING, THREATS, AND EVEN REAL, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE JUST FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING that UPSET the SJW HIVEMIND.
WHAT SEPARATES SJWS from COMMON SOCIOPATHIC BULLIES is that SJWS GENUINELY BELIEVE that what they are doing is HELPING to ADVANCE SOCIETY and to TURN the WORLD INTO a MORE LOVING, EQUAL PLACE.
They abuse and threaten people with the FULL APPROVAL of THEIR OWN CONSCIENCES, COMPLETELY SECURE IN THEIR BELIEF that WHAT THEY are DOING is the GOOD and RIGHTEOUS THING.
A villain who sincerely believes that they are a hero is perhaps the worst kind of villain there is. To quote C.S. Lewis: “OF ALL TYRANNIES, a TYRANNY SINCERELY EXERCISED FOR THE GOOD OF ITS VICTIMS MAY BE THE MOST OPPRESSIVE. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
SOCIAL [IN]JUSTICE – The TROJAN HORSE of TYRANNY The TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATION – Promising Utopia [heaven], Delivering Dystopia [hell] Social Justice BULLIES: The Authoritarianism of Millennial Social Justice
by Aristo Orginos April 8, 2015
Social justice, as a concept, has existed for millennia  –  at least as long as society has had inequity and inequality and there were individuals enlightened enough to question this. When we study history, we see, as the American Transcendentalist Theodore Parker famously wrote, “the arc [of the moral universe]… bends towards JUSTICE.” And this seems relatively evident when one looks at history as a single plot line. Things improve. And, if history is read as a book, the supporters of social justice are typically deemed the heroes, the opponents of it the villains.
Millennials are grown up now  – and they’re ANGRY. As CHILDREN, they were told that they could be anything, do anything, and that they were SPECIAL. As adults, they have formed a unique brand of Identity Politics wherein the groups with which one identifies is paramount. With such a strong narrative that focuses on WHICH GROUP ONE BELONGS TO, there has been an increasing BALKANIZATION of IDENTITIES.
The resulting sociopolitical culture among millennials and their slightly older political forerunners is corrosive and destructive to progress in social justice. And herein lies the problem  –  in ATTEMPTING to SOLVE pressing and important social issues, millennial social justice advocates are VIOLENTLY SABOTAGING GENUINE OPPORTUNITIES for progress by INFECTING a liberal political narrative with, IRONICALLY, HATE. BLOODTHIRSTY, MILLENNIAL SOCIAL JUSTICE ADVOCATES have taken to verbal, emotional  –  and sometimes physical  – VIOLENCE.

This particular brand of millennial social justice advocates have WARPED an ADMIRABLE CAUSE for SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, and POLITICAL EQUALITY INTO a SOCIALLY AUTHORITARIAN MOVEMENT THAT HAS DIVIDED and DEHUMANIZED INDIVIDUALS ON the BASIS of an INSULAR IDEOLOGY GUISED as ACADEMIC THEORY. The modern social justice movement launched on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Jezebel, Slate, Huffington Post, et al. is FAR MORE REMINISCENT of a RED SCARE (pick one) THAN the CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT.
When George Orwell wrote Nineteen Eighty-Four (and here some will lambast me for picking a white male author from a historically colonialist power despite the fact that he fought and wrote against this colonialism), he wrote it to warn against the several dangers of extremism on either side of the political spectrum. Orwell’s magnum opus is about authoritarianism on both ends of the political spectrum. IF the ARC of the MORAL UNIVERSE BENDS TOWARD JUSTICE, then the arc of the POLITICAL SPECTRUM BENDS TOWARD AUTHORITARIANISM at both ends.
The very fact that I am drawing a connection between the text most referenced when discussing politics-gone-bad is a problem in itself. But it warrants further exploration.
2 + 2 = 5
“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and YOU WOULD
HAVE TO BELIEVE IT. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later:
the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very
EXISTENCE of EXTERNAL REALITY, was TACITLY DENIED BY THEIR
PHILOSOPHY.”  –  George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

IDOLS of Political Correctness Sacred Cows of Liberal Myth-Theology
“CRITICAL THEORY”: DECONSTRUCTION – DESTROYING EXCEPTIONALISM
Leveling, Distortion, Dystopia, Dictatorship

HOW DOES AMERICAN SOCIETY BREAK OUT of
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS JAIL?
by Michael L. Grable March 13, 2016

“CRITICAL THEORY” is the ACADEMY’s WEASEL PHRASE FOR
NONTRADITIONAL SCHOLARSHIP that SEEKS to CHANGE SOCIETY INSTEAD of
STUDYING IT. Traditional scholarship would, in other words, be
“traditional theory” rather than “critical theory”. The “CRITICAL” has NOTHING TO DO
with UNDERSTANDING and EXPLAINING society. It has everything to do with
CENSURING and CHANGING society. It’s the academic provenance of Obama’s political
VOW to FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA.

That nexus should surprise no one. The academy’s the laboratory of culture. ALL POLITICS
are CULTURAL. Obama’s the academic product of occidental college, columbia university
and harvard university. The modern American academy’s the leftist hotbed of
domestic neo-marxist social activism indeed, when the nazis chased max horkheimer’s
critical-theory institute for social research out of Germany in 1933. Horkheimer in 1934
reformed the institute as part of Columbia University Department of Sociology.

Karl Marx got the ball rolling:
“The philosophers have only INTERPRETED the world . . . the POINT is to CHANGE it”.
But marxism at the end of a rifle barrel didn’t work out well in the Soviet Union, It was
horkheimer’s critical-theory institute which RESTATED NEO-MARXISM’s OBJECTIVE:
“The REVOLUTION WON’T HAPPEN WITH GUNS, rather it will HAPPEN
INCREMENTALLY, year by year, generation by generation. we will GRADUALLY
INFILTRATE their EDUCATIONAL institutions and their political offices,
TRANSFORMING them SLOWLY into MARXIST entities as we move
TOWARDS UNIVERSAL EGALITARIANISM
The academy-INDOCTRINATED result is a generational cadre of establishment elites –
politicians, jurists, lawyers, journalists, teachers, bureaucrats, entertainers, and social-justice
warriors of every stripe whose “UNIVERSAL EGALITARIANISM” now plunders
mainstream america at the behest of itself, the welfare dependency that votes for it, and the
wall-street titans and crony capitalists who fund it.
CRITICAL THEORY is BUT ECONOMIC MARXISM by CULTURAL MEANS.

Economic Marxism has FAILED for over a century EVERYWHERE it’s been TESTED.
Cultural marxism here will EVENTUALLY IMPLODE AMERICA as inevitably as
economic marxism once did the soviet union. So what does critical theory’s cultural marxism do
when its own failure becomes empirically manifest? IT SHUTS DOWN DISCOURSE, AS
EVERY UTOPIAN IDEOLOGY EVERYWHERE HAS ALWAYS DONE when it senses the
proletarian pack hot on its trail. “POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is,” as theodore dalrymple
said, “COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA writ small. Dalrymple concluded: “the PURPOSE of
communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to
HUMILIATE. Therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better when people are
FORCED to REMAIN SILENT when they are being told the MOST OBVIOUS LIES, or
even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their
sense of probity.

TO ASSENT to OBVIOUS LIES is to CO-OPERATE WITH EVIL, and IN SOME
SMALL WAY to BECOME EVIL ONESELF. One’s standing to resist anything is thus
eroded, and even destroyed. a society of emasculated liars is EASY to CONTROL.
I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to political
correctness is critical theory’s jailor, and mainstream America is ready to bust out of its
PC JAIL. In order to empower ‘men of action’ to SOLVE SOCIETY’s PROBLEMS through
bold experimentation and the UNFETTERED POWER of the STATE”.

“Sweeping dismissals of the past are more than just a passing fashion or a personal vanity.
they are a dangerous destruction of the hard-earned experience of millions of human beings,
living through centuries of struggle with the tragedy of the human condition, and the
replacement of this rich legacy with unsubstantiated and SELF-FLATTERING FANCIES“
– Thomas Sowell
“The culture of this nation is being DISMANTLED, brick by brick, but so gradually that many will not notice until the walls start to sag – just before they cave in“ – Thomas Sowell

The FIRST task of any fascist reformation is to DISCREDIT the AUTHORITY of the PAST.
“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a PEOPLE SEE EVEN
HEAVEN AS HELL or an extremely WRETCHED LIFE as PARADISE” – Hitler
If your are not prepared to use force to defend civilization,then be prepared to accept barbarism
– Thomas Sowell

ACTION (VIOLENCE) TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE”
SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – POLITICALLY CORRECT CONFORMITY

“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”
– Aristotle

The FRENCH REVOLUTION ENDED the “OLD” FEUDAL “ABSOLUTISM” . However,
there remained enemies, forces of “reaction” (internal & external) against change,
conspiracy by “enemies of the [new] state” was everywhere. The enemies of the “common
good” must be forced to conform to the general will – SOCIAL JUSTICE. Violence and terror
was the fate of those who stood in the way of the group (people, state and leader).

50,000 died in “the TERROR” – put on “SHOW TRIALS” and PUBLIC EXECUTIONS,
necessary “SACRIFICES” on the “ALTAR” of SOCIAL JUSTICE:
“We must exterminate those miserable villains … eternally conspiring against the rights of
man”.

Robespierre “the incorruptible” justified the terror by saying it enabled French citizens
to remain “true” to the revolution. ‘Enemies of the State” were put on “show trials” in the
morning and executed in the afternoon The “rights” of the citizen collective superceded the
individual “right” to life, political liberty and/or legal “due process”.
Destroying “enemies’, the “revolution” would EAT IT’s OWN”

ROBESPIERRE linked virtue (“good”) with terror – the basis of popular government
in time of revolution ”terror is nothing else than swift … justice; it flows then from virtue.”
In robespierre’s utopian vision, the individual has the duty “to detest bad faith and despotism,
to punish traitors …“to assist the unfortunate and respect the weak, to defend the oppressed.
to do all the good one can to one’s neighbor, and to behave with justice towards all men”.

“ENEMIES” of the REVOLUTION BECAME ANY POTENTIAL RIVALS of
Robespierre. Fellow revolutionaries who questioned or challenged his leadership were
Guillotined. Rousseau considered state-sanctioned coercion as an act of
“forcing men to be free”. Orwellian “doublespeak” – a Committee on “Public Safety” that conducted public executions. mass murder for the “masses” – “social [in]justice”.

The “rights of man” were used to EXTERMINATE the lives of “men”, “TERROR” to victims
of the revolutionary “mob”, manipulated by their new revolutionary “priestly” leaders,
the result more savage, cruel and violent than the king they replaced.
Revolutionary action towards “change” napoleon’s “action” spread the “romantic” ideals.
of “the revolution”, bringing “modern” change and “rebirth” to Europe, “transformation”
from its old feudal ways. The state was not the “private property” of the monarch. Instead, the
“public good” of the revolutionary political god-state belonged to “the people”.

Was Napoleon a revolutionary “HERO” or a “HYPROCRITE”? A hypocrite, subjugating
France, Europe and the world to his imperial rule through a fascist “will to POWER”?
Politically correct conformity promised “social justice”. Totalitarian tyranny ensued.
Napoleon developed a fascist “cult of personality” – I am “the revolution on horseback”
A “secret police” swore loyalty to napoleon, and letters de cache. Did Napoleon just use “the revolution” and the French nation for his own gain and power ?
A “hero” romising “the people” political “rights” and the “progress” of “modernity”, a “hypocrite” re-creating for himself (“king”/“emperors”) the same thing “the revolution” sought to eliminate?

The French Revolution sent the hated Austrian Queen Marie Antoinette to the GUILLOTINE,
a “sacrifice” (scapegoat?) for “revolution”. Napoleon eventually married an
Austrian princess, who produces an “heir” to “his” throne.
Were both King Louis and Napoleon megalomaniac “tyrants” who used their “tyrannical”
states for their own purposes, a demagogue manipulating the French polis-nation for his own
benefit?
Destroying “old” feudal tyranny, creating the world’s first “modern” dictatorship?
Progress? feudal “tyrants” vs. “totalitarian” dictatorship
“modern” tyrants who promised revolutionary “action” would bring romantic “progress” and
“greatness”, but neglected to mention the chaos, death and destruction progress would bring.
Denouncing the “corrupt” use of power in their political rivals or enemies, deconstructing the
“old”,

Mussolini talked about the power and importance of VIOLENCE. He liked the aesthetics of
violence, the sound of BRUTALITY, the poetry of revolutionary bloodshed” – “revolutions are
INSANE, VIOLENT, IDIOTIC, BESTIAL” … they set fire to the Louvre and throw naked
bodies of princesses on the street. They KILL, PLUNDER and DESTROY. They are a
man-made Biblical FLOOD PRECISELY therein consists their great beauty”.
VIOLENCE for a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES (“social justice”)

Johan Goldberg: Bernardine Dohrn reflected the widespread new left FASCINATION with
the SERIAL-KILLING HIPPIE ubermensch CHARLES MANSON.
Abbie Hoffman set out to create a ‘vast myth’ of BLOODSHED and SHOCK.
WE WILL BURN CHICAGO to the GROUND’ – the intent was to FORCE a
CONFRONTATION that would SPILL BLOOD in the streets”
That VIOLENCE was CENTRAL to FASCISM is often an exaggerated point.
VIOLENCE has been ESSENTIAL to NEARLY ALL REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS.
VIOLENCE in a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES”

The avant-garde fascists IDEALIZED VIOLENCE as an END in ITSELF, seeing it as
‘REDEMPTIVE’ and ‘TRANSFORMATIVE’. Violence suffused their political talk;
physical violence merely punctuated it. Violence for the new left and fascists alike worked on
numerous symbolic levels. It elevated the sense of CRISIS craved in order to POLARIZE
SOCIETY, an identical strategic objective for the new left and the Nazis.

Forcing mainstream liberals to CHOOSE SIDES on the assumption that most would follow
their sympathies to the left was the only way Hayden and others could usher in their revolution
This was what they meant by ‘BRINGING the WAR HOME’”

Saul Alinsky was born in 1909 of Russian Jewish parents in New York City. Why was the
Alinsky family living in America in 1909 rather than Minsk or Pinsk or Omsk or Chomsk?
Because they FLED the Russian POGROMS of 1890-1910, like thousands of other Jews.
The Alinsky family fled to the U.S. because life was intolerable in the old country.
They FOUND SAFETY in AMERICA”.

Alinsky grew up and wrote Rules for Radicals, and DEDICATED HIS LIFE to … the
VERY SAME ART of WHIPPING UP MOBS that HIS PARENTS FLED FROM.

The kulaks were Russian peasants who owned a couple of cows instead of just a scrawny goat
like most others, and therefore provided HATE OBJECTS FOR the MOB. Rules for radicals
might have been written by a MEDIEVAL MOB AGITATOR; only a few words need to be
changed. Alinsky was a MASTER at SCAPEGOATING.
‘pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.’ “SUBSTITUTE ‘HERETIC’ or
‘WITCH’ for ‘TARGET’ and you have all the religious PERSECUTIONS in human history.

Jonah Goldberg: Saul Alinsky shared the fascist contempt for liberals as corrupted bourgeois
prattlers: ‘liberals in their meetings utter bold WORDS … and then issue a weasel-worded
statement … judging both sides; they sit and still sit. [with no action] Alinsky stressed the need
for organizers to convince their followers that the chasm between the enemy was vast and
unbridgeable. “before men can act,” he said, “an issue must be polarized”
“Men will act when they are convinced THEIR CAUSE is 100% on the side of the ANGELS,
and that the OPPOSITION are 100% on the side of the DEVIL” It is not enough for the
organizer to be in solidarity with the people. He must also CULTIVATE UNITY AGAINST
A CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE ENEMY.
He must “single out (SCAPEGOAT) precisely WHO is to BLAME for the “particular EVIL”
that is the SOURCE of the PEOPLE’S ANGST”

Saul Alinsky: “In a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to
single out WHO is to BLAME for any particular evil in the choosing of a target is that it must
be a PERSONIFICATION, not something general and abstract such as a community’s
segregated practices – or a major corporation or city-hall.
There must be a FACE associated with the PEOPLE’S DISCONTENT. Alinsky summarized:
“Pick the TARGET, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it, prepare to attack again and again”

ALINSKY WASN’T LOOKING TO GAIN AGREEMENT, he was DEMANDING that the
pressure be held in place and that the “ENEMY” BE DEFEATED. If someone were to agree
with an attacker, “ok good point, now where do we go from here,” RATIONAL BEINGS
WOULD SIT DOWN and FIND SOLUTIONS. NOT ALINSKY. ATTACK DOESN’T END
WITH COOPERATION and a MEETING of the MINDS. IT CONTINUES with the
NEXT PREPARED ATTACK”, INGENIOUSLY SETTING UP his political ENEMIES to be
BLAMED for the woe and SUFFERING HE, HIMSELF is INITIATING.

Marxist Revolutionaries DESTROY EXISTING civilizations and build their totalitarian
DYSTOPIAS on the ash heaps of their carcasses and over the bodies of their own people whom
are IDEOLOGICAL ENEMIES that they EXTERMINATE.

In our dysfunctional political system, the RULING CLASS is AT WAR with The PEOPLE,
and THEIR ANSWER is to REPLACE the PEOPLE. Policy decisions are IRRATIONAL
and SELF-DESTRUCTIVE, and if you complain, you become a TARGET for demagogues
and race-baiters. The biggest crooks know how to play the system. Visible corruption goes
unpunished. Under cover of the media mob, massive fraud and abuse take place.

VIOLENCE for a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES (“social justice”)
The French Revolution slogan was “liberty, fraternity and equality” – “Fraternity”and
“equality” in the revolutionary “collective”. The GUIILOTINE was a “humane” way to
execute those who got in the way of collective “progress”. Collective “MO RULE” was
“humane” violence and TERROR towards collective “progress”. Mob tactics implement
their idea of rousseau’s “general will'”.

Demagogues EXPLOIT popular PREJUCICES, FEARS and FALSE CLAIMS and
PROMISES in order to GAIN POWER. Leninism is malignant because it DIVIDES all of
humanity into good versus evil, like some bad spaghetti western. It gets actively harmful
because it is a political program aimed at ABSOLUTE POWER – not just an academic
philosophy.

“Failure is a big part of a free market’s success. People fail to live up to their potential, or to carry out all their good intentions, in all kinds of economic and political systems. Capitalism makes them pay a price for their failures, while socialism, feudalism, fascism and other systems enable personal failures, especially by those at the top, to be ignored.” – Thomas Sowell

ACTION (VIOLENCE); TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – POLITICALLY CORRECT CONFORMITY
“DEMONIC” by ANN COULTER

Ann Coulter: The demon is a MOB, and the mob is demonic. Everything else changes, but
mobs are always the same. A mob is an IRRATIONAL, CHILDLIKE, OFTEN VIOLENT
organism that derives its energy from the group “collective”. Intoxicated by MESSIANIC
GOALS, the promise of INSTANT GRATIFICATION, and adrenaline-pumping
exhortations. Mobs create MAYHEM, CHAOS and DESTRUCTION, leaving a smoldering
heap of wreckage for their leaders to climb to power.
“CROWDS are TOO IMPULSIVE to be MORAL” – Gustav Le Bon
The very idea of a “community organizer” is to STIR UP a mob for some political purpose.
The twisting of truth, stirring of PASSIONS, DEMONIZING of OPPONENTS, and relying
on propagandistic images in lieu of ideas. MANIPULATING the MOB to gain POWER, to
appeal to the least informed, most weak-minded and perpetually alarmed members of the
public.
Historian Eric Durschmied: “As so frequently happens when a crowd goes wild, there is always one who shouts louder and thereby appoints himself as their leader”

“The OVERALL guiding principle to understand is the ‘organizer’ of the group … the person who will be responsible for creating the vision of the group is GOD-LIKE in Alinsky’s vision.

In her book “Demonic“, Ann Coulter traces the history of VIOLENT MOB RULE/
“The MOB is DEMONIC. It is the NIHILISTIC MOB of the French Revolution; …
it is the revolutionaries who seized control of RUSSIA at the beginning of the twentieth century
It is the MAOIST gangs looting villages and impaling babies in china. It is the KU KLUX
KLAN terrorizing republicans and blacks in the south. It is the 1992 LOS ANGELES RIOT
that left fifty dead and did $1 billion of damage after the first Rodney King verdict. It is the
bloody riots at the 1968 democratic national convention. It is the masked hoodlums smashing
up SEATTLE when bankers came to town (1999). It is the 500,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS
marching under a foreign flag in LOS ANGELES. It is throngs of Islamic Fanatics attending
the Ayatollah Ruhollah KHOMEINI’s FUNERAL, tearing his body out of its coffin.
It is left-wing protesters destroying property and attacking delegates at the 2004 and 2008
Republican National Conventions.

GUSTAVE Le BON CAPTURED the MOB PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE in HIS
1896 book, “The CROWD: A STUDY of the POPULAR MIND”
All the characteristics of MOB BEHAVIOR were set forth by Le Bon.
The first to identify the phenomenon of mass psychology, “The Crowd” paints a disturbing picture of the behavior of mobs. Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini used Le Bon’s book to learn HOW to INCITE a MOB: simplistic, extreme black-and-white thinking, fear of novelty,
inability to follow logical arguments, acceptance of contradictory ideas. Manipulating them by
images, a religious worship of their leaders and a BLIND HATRED of their OPPONENTS.

Mobs love slogans because the “laws of logic have no action on crowds”. Mobs, le bon says,
“are NOT to be influenced by REASONING, and can only comprehend rough-and-ready
associations of ideas. Crowds CAN‘T GRASP LOGIC, only IMAGES.
“These IMAGE- LIKE IDEAS,” Le Bon says, “are NOT CONNECTED by any LOGICAL
bond of analogy or succession,” …
AFFIRMATION is the creation of a slogan, FREE of ALL REASONING and all PROOF.
CROWDS are TOO IMPULSIVE to be MORAL, according to Le Bon.
The NAZIS were “amoral” (had no morals), except when it came to their own “will to power”.
There were NO LIMITATIONS to FASCIST AMBITIONS. And their “WILL to POWER”.

In most cases of revolutionary “action”, violent revolution would “EAT IT’S OWN”
The French Revolution: e.g. the guillotine, the Nazi “night of long knives”
Stalin’s “Great Purge” of the communist party Soviet secret police and “gulags”
Mao’s “cultural revolution the hippies weather underground today’s political correctness?
“alas, how many have been persecuted for the wrong of having been right? – jean-baptiste say
DEMAGOGUES, MOBS and SCAPEGOATS
Demagogues were a NEW kind of leader who emerged from the lower classes. The ancient
Greeks first invented the word ‘demagogue’ to describe a new class of mob leaders who quickly
evolved to fill a power vacuum left by the demise of a reigning class of elite statesmen.

The verb (to demagogue) described popular leaders who alternately flattered and incited
the MASSES . Demagogues relentlessly advocated action, usually violent – immediately and
without deliberation. Demogugues tell lies to stir up hysteria, exploiting crises to intensify
popular support for their calls to immediate action and increased authority. Their trick was to
obtain and expand their OWN PERSONAL POWER by CLEVER RHETORIC

demagogue: a leader who uses their charisma and public speaking to EXPLOIT POPULAR
PREJUDICES, FEARS and FALSE CLAIMS and PROMISES in order TO GAIN POWER.
Their trick was to obtain and EXPAND THEIR OWN PERSONAL POWER by clever
Rhetoric, DIRECTED AGAINST the BETTER OFF, coupled with promises of more
entitlements for the ‘poor’ paid for by a demonized ‘THEM’. The “LEADER” of “US”
against “THEM”

Fascism’s success almost always depends on the cooperation of the “losers” during a time of
economic and technical change. Populist RESENTMENT against “fat cats” using
“the system” at cats too big to fail CLASS RESENTMENT by state leaders on behalf of the
“common” people”.
CLASS WARFARE – the “HAVES” exploiting the forgotten “HAVE NOTS”

Mark Levin: “Utopianism finds a receptive audience among the society’s disenchanted,
disaffected, dissatisfied and maladjusted who are unwilling or unable to assume responsibility
for their own real or perceived conditions, but instead blame their surroundings, ‘the system,’
and others. They are lured by the false hopes and promises of utopian transformation and
the criticisms of the existing society, to which their connection is tentative or nonexistent “

Improving the malcontent’s lot becomes linked to the utopian cause. Moreover, disparaging
and diminishing the successful and accomplished becomes an essential tactic. No one should
be better than anyone else, regardless of the merits or values of his contributions. By
exploiting human frailties, frustrations, jealousies, and inequities, a sense of meaning and self-
worth is created in the malcontent’s otherwise unhappy and directionless life“. “simply put,
equality in misery – that is, equality of result or conformity – is advanced as a just, fair, and
virtuous undertaking. liberty … is inherently immoral, except where it avails equality.
For these reasons and more, some become fanatics for the cause. They take to the streets and,
ironically, demand their own demise as they protest against their own self-determination
and for ever more autocracy and authoritarianism.
“WHEN THEY VOTE, THEY VOTE to ENCHAIN NOT ONLY THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS BUT, UNWITTINGLY, THEMSELVES “ – George Orwell

ACTION (VIOLENCE); TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – POLITICALLY CORRECT CONFORMITY

OBAMA, ALINSKY and SCAPEGOATS
by James Lewis americanthinker.com April 24, 2009

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it” – Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.

James Lewis: That’s what Barack Obama taught his acorn followers in all his community
agitator classes in Chicago. It is an exact prescription for whipping up mobs – by race, class,
gender, ethnicity, religion. In psychiatry, SCAPEGOATING is called “DISPLACEMENt of
RAGE,” and it is often said to be a low-level defense, one that comes easily to people who are
already emotionally troubled or impaired.
With mature adults scapegoating doesn’t work very well – not unless you can make them into
insecure wrecks by destroying their incomes, for example. That’s what happened to the
German middle class in the Weimar Republic.

SCAPEGOATING is very SIMPLE and very MALEVOLENT. It is the defining feature of
human Destructiveness –
My administration is the only thing between you [CEO’s] and the pitchforks – Barack Obama

All the truly irrational actions in human history involve DISPLACED RAGE.
Pathological societies in the world are always torn by a search for new scapegoats.
Scapegoating is a really effective manipulation for mobs that have long ago decided that their
REAL ENEMY is ANYBODY. Because that overwhelming feeling of rising rage matters
much more than whoever is the victim of the moment. That overwhelming tension is
intolerable and SEEKS an OUTLET.

Alinsky did not write his little book of Rules against the tsar of Russia, nor against mob
demagogues in general. Alinsky wrote it in a RAGE AGAINST FREE MARKET WEALTH,
against CAPITALIST INDIVIDUALISM, against the PROSPEROUS MIDDLE CLASS and
its most successful home, the United States of America.

ACTION (VIOLENCE); TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – The ENDS JUSTIFIES the MEANS
“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”
– Aristotle
the callous pursuit of absolute domination and the unrelenting exercise of the power of the modern state which disperses into the realm of enterprise over the often derided and characteristically docile populace
what many progressives call social justice is neither very social nor just, especially as concerns economics
in our dysfunctional political system, the ruling class is at war with the people, and their answer is to replace the people
policy decisions are irrational and self-destructive, and if you complain, you become a target for demagogues and race-baiters. the biggest crooks know how to play the system
the biggest crooks know how to play the system. visible corruption goes unpunished. under cover of the media mob, massive fraud and abuse takes place
jonah goldberg: “we’re all fascists” now – whether it be liberal, progressive “unity” or conservative “conformity”
jonah goldberg: “it is not unity he left longs for but victory; unity on terms not their own (such as the staid conformity of the 1950s)
in the 1930s and 1960s, the left’s popular-front approach yielded power – and that is the true object of liberal nostalgia; nothing more, nothing less
“peace and love hippies or violent, fascist “hippie-crites” ??? critics of the creation of this idealistic
“new” human and society criticized it for its lack of realism
“surely anyone with a sense of political realities can smell the danger … that these silly, kind, irrational people, in their cushioned isolation from reality, are bringing upon us all” … the danger starts with the universities, but it does not end there. that is what makes them much more scary” – stewart alsop, the greening of america

hoffman mastered the art of calling anyone he did not like or opposed a “fascist”
“Peace and Love Hippies or violent, fascist “hippie-crites” ???
when “moderates” who questioned the use of violence at columbia in 1968 tried to dissuade a radical, rudd responded “You … liberals don’t understand what the scene’s about.
THE MORE BLOOD THE BETTER”
VIOLENCE in a COLLECTIVE “CAUSE LARGER THAN OURSELVES”

ACTION (VIOLENCE); TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – POLITICALLY CORRECT CONFORMITY
BILL AYERS’ PLANS FOR “RE-EDUCATION CAMPS” and “ELIMINATION”
by Kris Zane WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM May 26, 2012

Kris Zane: The radical left have ROMANTICIZED the 1970s weather underground period, with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn being viewed as a type of Bonnie and Clyde, fighting against the slaughter of innocents in Vietnam. But Vietnam was merely a side issue. The IMMINENT COMMUNIST REVOLUTION was the MAIN PURPOSE of the BOMBINGS … to FACILITATE WHAT THEY BELIEVED MOST AMERICANS WANTED:
a DICTATORIAL COMMUNIST UTOPIA VIA a REVOLUTION.

Ayers and Dohrn, being part of the movement that brought forth this supposed revolution, felt of
course that they should be part of the communist bureaucracy that would administrate this
NEW WAY of LIFE. Of course, the question was asked within our Bonnie and Clyde clique;
WHAT TO DO with those FORMER AMERICANS that REJECTED COMMUNISM? ”

The answer had been used before: “RE-EDUCATION CAMPS” (BRAINWASHING to use a more accurate term). And for those who withstood the brainwashing? Again, using what had been DONE UNDER OTHER COMMUNIST REVOLUTIONS: ELIMINATION. MURDER (to use a term bonnie and clyde loathed to admit”)

ACTION (VIOLENCE); TERROR as “SOCIAL JUSTICE” – SCAPEGOATING and MOB RULE
TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY – POLITICALLY CORRECT CONFORMITY
OBAMA MENTOR WANTED AMERICANS PUT in
RE-EDUCATION CAMPS
by Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Friday, May 4, 2012

Paul Joseph Watson: “In light of a newly uncovered U.S. army document that outlines plans for
prisoners, including U.S. citizens, to be RE-EDUCATED in DETENTION CAMPS …
weather underground terrorist Bill Ayers, once called for precisely the same thing.
According to former FBI agent larry grathwohl, who was assigned to infiltrate the weather
Underground’s Central Committee, the organization run by Bill Ayers carried out bombings
targeting the Pentagon, the State Department, as well as police stations and federal buildings,” …
In an attempt to cause the COLLAPSE of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and
open the door for cuban, north vietnamese, chinese and russian troops to occupy the
country.

Grathwohl stated that Ayers and his group planned to deal with Americans who would try to
resist this takeover by “establishing re-education centers in the south-west. Asked what he
would do with those who still refused to convert to communism, Ayers said that they would
HAVE to be “ELIMINATED,” as in 25 MILLION AMERICANS WOULD BE KILLED
IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS”. Grathwohl said the Weathermen told him the CAMPS
would be used to “RE-EDUCATE people into the NEW WAY of THINKING”

Princeton SDS 1967 meeting delegate – “TACTICS? it’s too late … let’s BREAK WHAT WE
CAN. Make as many answer as we can. TEAR THEM APART”
Jonah Goldberg: The preference for arousing passion at the expense of truth and reason
defined the agenda of those fighting in the trenches. The practice of “LYING FOR JUSTICE”
was acceptable and infused into the movement. For most of the activists, deceit was not the
point. The point was PASSION, MOBILIZATION, ACTION.

“I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few” – Adolf Hitler
“UNIVERSAL EDUCATION is the most corroding and DISINTEGRATING POISON that liberalism has ever invented for its OWN DESTRUCTION”- Hitler

Alinsky did not write his little book of Rules For Radicals against the tsar of Tussia, nor against
mob demagogues in general. Alinsky became the hero for other agitators – people who used to
call themselves ‘communist agitators. Starting with the huge expansion of the U.S. college
campuses in the 1960s, saul alinsky’s rules for radicals WENT VIRAL. Middle-class kids
WITH NO PERSONAL EXPERIENCE of poverty or suffering – compared to blacks in the
south and the Jews and others in Europe and Asia – all went around with Alinsky’s Rules For
Radicals in their backpacks.

Radicalism became romantic. Alienated and ignorant kids yearned to become che guevara and
kill the capitalists. That’s how RICH KIDS like Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn
LEARNED THEIR THEOLOGY. It’s how they became heroes in their own eyes. Such
saintly people, giving their all for the poor and helpless. Hillary rodham complained about her
authoritarian father when she was a child, and instantly on getting to wellesley she fell for saul
alinsky and his rules, and became an admiring disciple of the MASTER of
SCAPEGOATING.

Hillary’s first major political act was to join the staff of the senate watergate committee, where
she wrote a legal brief for the committee on why president Richard Nixon should not, repeat
not, be allowed legal counsel in his impending impeachment and trial.
The persecuted become the persecutor; pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it

HILLARY the VICTIMIZED CHILD – at least IN HER OWN MIND – became the really
visceral HATER of the Clinton White House”
“those children of wealth worshipped men of violence, and sanitized them – che, mao, fidel, carlos the jackal, ayers, mumiah, the list goes on”
The Reverend JEREMIAH WRIGHT preaches MOB incitement. Take the RAGE THAT PEOPLE FEEL and direct it to the most convenient human victim.”
“jeremiah wright started life as a black muslim, as he tells it, and then studied black liberation
theology. what’s blt? well, pope benedict says it’s a cover name for marxism. in this case,
racial marxism”lenin whipped up the bolshevik mobs to kill the kulaks. It doesn’t matter where
you direct the rage.

Jonah Goldberg: The President was MANHANDLED by a FASCIST GOON in front of an
audience made up of the campus community. Events came to a climax when students took over
the student union and local radio station. Armed with rifles and shotguns, they demanded
an ethnically pure educational institution staffed and run by members of their own race.
When it was suggested that those who opposed their agenda might be killed, most of the
‘moderates’ quickly reversed course and supported the militants. Eventually the fascist thugs
got everything they wanted. The authorities gave in to their demands.
The few who remained opposed QUIETLY LEFT the university.

Where did this happen? the University of Berlin in 1932? Milan in 1922? good guesses.
This happened at CORNELL in the spring of 1969. Paramilitary black nationalists
under the banner of the Afro-American Society seized control of the university after waging
and increasingly aggressive campaign of INTIMIDATION and VIOLENCE.
The PUBLIC EXCUSE of the armed seizure of the Cornell student union was a cross burning
outside a black dorm. this was later revealed to be a HOAX orchestrated by
The black radicals themselves in order to provide a PRETEXT FOR THEIR VIOLENCE.
This Reichstage fire tactic worked perfectly, as the gun-toting fascist squadristi stormed
straight hall in the predawn hours, rousting bleary-eyed parents who were staying there for
parents weekend.
These bewildered souls who had the misfortune to bankroll the educations of the very gun-toting
scholarship students now calling them ‘pigs’ were forced to jump from a three foot high cargo
deck into the freezing Ithaca rain.

THIS is NAZISM in ITS WORST FORM”, declared a mother with breathless, if
understandable, exaggeration in it’s strictly political dimension, there is no denying that the
movement’s activist core was little more than a FASCIST YOUTH CULT. indeed the
movement of the 1960s may be considered the THIRD GREAT FASCIST MOVEMENT of
the 20th century. they were an avant-garde movement that sought to REDEFINE not only
POLITICS but HUMAN NATURE ITSELF.
Black Liberation, ‘revolutionary’ violence was always justified so long as you insisted that
the bloodied corpse had somehow been an accomplice to OPPRESSION.
WHITES BECAME the NEW JEWS.

The BLACK POWER MOVEMENT from “Liberal Fascism” by Jonah Goldberg

“Over the generations, black leaders have ranged from noble souls to shameless charlatans.” – Thomas Sowell

Jonah Goldberg: Black athletes raised their FISTS in protest at the 1968 Olympics. The image
was entirely derivative of FASCIST aesthetics”. The FIST is the synthesis of our theory” – an
Italian fascist in 1920. By the end of the decade, the civil rights movement had for all intents
and purposes become a black POWER movement. BLACK POWER, with its clenched fists,
afro-pagan mythology, celebration of VIOLENCE, emphasis on racial PRIDE and disdain for
liberalism was arguably america’s most authentic indigenous fascism. In it’s strictly political
dimension, there is no denying that the movement’s activist core was little more than a
FASCIST YOUTH CULT.

Indeed the movement of the 1960s may be considered the third great fascist movement of the
20th century. Stokely Carmichael – at one time the ‘prime minister’ of the black panther party
Himself DEFINED BLACK POWER (a term he originated) as a movement that will
SMASH EVERYTHING WESTERN CIVILIZATION HAS CREATED.
CARMICHAEL SHARED HITLER’s DREAM of building a folkish racial state upon the
ashes of the old order. When one reads the racial indoctrination taught to the children of
Nazi Germany, it’s difficult to see the difference between Carmichael’s BLACK pride and
Hitler’s GERMAN pride.

What is the first commandment of every national socialist – love germany above all else and your ethnic pride as your self” stated a nazi catechism. The connections between black nationalism and nazism, fascism and other supposedly right-wing racist groups are not merely rhetorical – or recent.

VIOLENCE has been a part of nearly ALL revolutionary movements. Fascists inherently
REJECT the PAST in their quest to build a UTOPIAN FUTURE, PERSECUTE
“HERETICS” against “progress”. In the past it has been all the black people who have
done all the dying … now the time has come when the pigs are going to die”, shouted a leader
of the black radicals.

The STUDENTS wanted to RUN the universities,which to traditional academics was akin to
INMATES RUNNING the ASYLUMS. Professors who deviated from the new orthodoxy
faced all the familiar tactics of the campus left of the 1960s. Their classrooms were barricaded
or occupied, THREATS were put in their mail, DENUNCIATIONS were posted on campus
bulletin boards and published in student newspapers, lecturers were HECKLED.
When administrators tried to block or punish these antics, the students mounted MASSIVE
PROTESTS, and students naturally won, often forcing the resignation of the administrator
readers of a certain age probably know next to nothing about the Cornell Uprising, and an
even larger number probably have a hard time reconciling this spectacle with the IMAGE of the
1960s conjured by the popular culture.
Liberal baby boomers have smeared the lens of memory with vaseline, depicting the
would-be revolutionaries as champions of PEACE and LOVE – FREE love at that!
Self-styled revolutionaries had grown increasingly brazen in their campaign to FORCE
CONCESSIONS from the university. Students and professors who were labeled
RACE TRAITORS received DEATH THREATS. ENEMIES of the racial nation were
SAVAGELY BEATEN by ROAMING THUGS. Guns were brought onto the campus, and
students dressed up in military uniforms. professors were HELD HOSTAGE, BADGERED,
INTIMIDATED and THREATENED whenever their teaching
CONTRADICTED RACIAL ORTHODOXY.

At Cornell most of the black students were admitted on what we’d today call affirmative action,
with lower than average sat scores. Many of the gun-toting revolutionaries were recruited to
the school precisely because they fit [the] STEREOTYPE of the NOBLE ‘GHETTO YOUTH
the AUTHENTIC negro … given preference over other blacks with higher scores and better
qualifications – because more qualified blacks were too ‘white’
By the end of the decade, the civil rights movement had for all intents and purposes become a
black power movement. black power, with its clenched fists, afro-pagan mythology,
celebration of VIOLENCE, emphasis on racial pride and disdain for liberalism was arguably
america’s most authentic indigenous fascism.

MARCUS GARVEY, the founder of the black nationalism movement, admitted in 1922 that
his ideology was perfectly simpatico with mussolini’s – ‘we were the first fascists he declared’”
the founder of the black nationalist movement, marcus garvey, mandated as far back as the
1920’s that black groups should BORROW their ideas and methods from white supremacists
groups, such as the KKK and NAZIS.
GARVEY PROPHESIED that ONE DAY the BLACK RACE WOULD PRODUCE THEIR
OWN “BLACK HITLER”.

“No greater injury can be done to any youth than to let him feel that BECAUSE HE BELONGS to this or that RACE he will be advanced in life regardless of HIS OWN merits or efforts.”
– Booker T. Washington

In the 1930s and 1960s, the left’s popular-front approach yielded power –
and that is the true object of liberal nostalgia; nothing more, nothing less. It is not unity he
left longs for but victory; unity on terms not their own (such as the staid conformity of the
1950s)
Universities became tools of totalitarian indoctrination, not liberal “education”.
The self-styled revolutionaries had grown increasingly brazen in their campaign to force
concessions from the university. Stewart Alsop: The fascistic ovetones are obvious to anyone
who has seen those forest of arms raised in unison by the revolutionary young, or heard their
mindless shouted chants. Surely, anyone with a sense of the political realities can smell the
danger that these silly, kind, irrational people, in their cushioned isolation from reality, are
bringing upon us all”

”academic freedom” must be re-defined so that students and professors alike could work together toward the larger cause
cornell university president james a. perkins was a product of the progressive-pragmatic tradition of william james and john dewey” …
“perkins … rejected the idea that universities should be dedicated to the pursuit of eternal truths and traditional scholarship”
perkins was hostile to the idea that the past had much to say about the present
“for perkins, the watchword was ‘relevance’, which in the 1960s quickly led to ‘empowerment’”
fascists inherently reject the past in their quest to build a [dys]utopian future

“perkins believed that universities should be laboratories for social change, training grounds for ‘experts’ who would parachute into the real world and ’fix’ society, like the progressives of wilson’s and fdr’s day”
“for these reasons – plus a decided lack of courage – perkins prostrated himself to fascist goons while he ruthlessly turned his back on those whose educations, jobs and even lives were threatened by black power radicals”
german students insisted that they be taught “german science” and “logic”
the black radicals wanted to be taught “black science” and “black logic” by black professors, demanding a separate school tasked “to create the tools necessary for the formation of a black nation” they backed up these demands not with arguments but with violence and “passionate” assertion

In John Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” Satan, expelled from heaven, wakes up next to the
burning lake in hell, rationalizing the situation: “better to reign in hell than serve in Heaven”.

Stewart Alsop: “surely anyone with a sense of political realities can smell the danger “that these
silly, kind, irrational people, in their cushioned isolation from reality, are bringing upon us
all. the danger starts with the universities, but it does not end there. that is what makes them
much more scary” stewart alsop, The Greening of America
fascist “action” manifested in american history
peter berger observed the [american] radicals in action …
berger explored a lot of themes common to 1960s radicals and european fascists
“i was repeatedly reminded of the storm troopers that marched through my childhood in europe” the table-thumping for a new
volk [people] centered “community”… that would replace capitalism with a more “organic” totalitarian approach were the nazis and 1960s radicals both delusional “dreamers” ???…
“romantics” building utopia (“feelings” vs “facts”)
… who threw adolescent “temper tantrums” against the “cold logic” of their parents …
“spoiled little brats” with an exaggerated sense of victimization and sense of (their own) “social” justice
fascist violence based on the cult of unreason, lust for action, and craving for
“authenticity”(being “real”) seeking to “be real”, lacking any sense of “reality”?
the german-jewish novelist thomas mann wrote the nazi revolution was “without underlying
ideas, … against everything nobler, better, decent, against freedom, truth and justice.
the “common scum” had won the day, “accompanied by vast rejoicing on the part of the
masses” hippie “rebels with a cause” or rebels without a “clue”?

“The death of one man is a tragedy. the death of millions is a statistic” – Stalin

REVOLUTIONARY ACTION – TERROR:
HERETICS , SCAPEGOATS & ENEMIES of the STATE
MOB “SOCIAL JUSTICE”
SYNOPSIS
historians debate whether stalin’s dictatorship marked a decisive break with previous
bolshevik practice under lenin
was stalin a traitor to “true” communist revolution?…
did the “tyrant” stalin betray what lenin meant to do?
or was stalin a continuation of the brutal and dictatorial system installed under lenin
did stalin “finish” what lenin “started”?
scholars have increasingly favored the “continuity” thesis, articulated by richard pipes in his book russia under the bolshevik regime
richard pipes: “stalin was a true leninist that faithfully followed [lenin’s] political
philosophy and practices … “every ingredient of … stalinism save one – murdering fellow
communists – he had learned from lenin, and that includes the two actions he is most
severely condemned: collectivization and mass terror” – richard pipes
LENIN: “THERE’S NO REVOLUTION POSSIBLE WITHOUT TERROR”
richard pipes: ”stalin’s megalomania, his vindictiveness, his morbid paranoia, and other
[horrible] personal qualities … should not obscure the fact that stalin’s ideology and modus
operandi were Lenin’s
1)a small group of “professional” revolution-aries
2)strict “party” discipline
3)conspiracy and secrecy

was stalin “michael corleone” in relation to “the godfather” lenin ???
were the bolsheviks “gangsters”, with STALIN being the WORLD’s ULTIMATE GANGSTER
was marx’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” destined to become just “plain” dictator-ship???
did marxist, utopian “heaven on earth” become “hell” ?

When stalin’s mother was on her deathbed, josip visited her briefly. When she asked him what he did with his time, he paused, and told her, “i’m something like the czar.”
ironically, after working to overthrow the rule and legacy of the czars …
Did Stalin become the greatest czar ??? “MEET the NEW BOSS, SAME as the OLD BOSS”

“you can never be happy and dress yourself solely in the glass of other men’s approval.”
– nicholas flood davis

Psalm 2:1 – WHY do the HEATHEN RAGE, and the PEOPLE IMAGINE a VAIN THING? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, AGAINST the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall LAUGH: the Lord shall have them IN DERISION.
Life in general has never been even close to FAIR, so the pretense that the government can make it fair is a valuable and inexhaustible asset to politicians who want to expand government.
– Thomas Sowell