MANUFACTURED CRISIS – “FAKE NEWS”?
FASCIST CRUSADE- UTOPIAN “COLLECTIVE SALVATION” – Jonah Goldberg
LEFT WING (fascist)VIOLENCE-“CRUSADE”

PROLOGUE: FASCISM seeks COLLECTIVE “salvation”, eventually producing a TOTALITARIAN society of ONE, single, “organic” “WHOLE” benefiting ALL, COMPLETE CONFORMITY allowing no “separateness”. Fascism promises UTOPIA through THIS-worldly political “REBIRTH”, redemption and realization of “meaning”, “solutions” to never ending “CRISIS”, overcome with revolutionary “CRUSADES” of “ACTION” of “social justice” based on their own “WILL to POWER”, instincts and feelings, which typically produce reactionary tantrums by “heretics” who seek limitations on their power and/or critically question fascist utopian lack of “reason”, “reality” and/or DYSTOPIAN RESULTS. (“tragic” UNintended consequences) Totalitarian, all powerful GOD-STATES use political-religion to promise “heaven on earth”. Mussolini said “fascism IS a religion”. Fascists purposely mix and confuse politics and religion, Government and God, co-opting “God” in their pursuit of political POWER, a POLITICAL RELIGION OF government idol worship. The sheep-like masses, contemptible “clingers” and “deplorables”, require leadership by an elite “enlightened” political governing ruling class and/or messianic “CULT of PERSONALITY” (“gods” IN government). Contemptuous of freedom and democratic self-government, the “god OF government” seeks to SOCIALLY ENGINEER utopian “political paradise” through “science” and an evolutionary “Cult of “Progress”. A utopian FUTURE requires INDOCTRINATION of YOUTH and CENSORSHIP of anything contradicting politically correct conformity, preventing eventual totalitarian control on ALL aspects of society, propagated and proselytized by elite media “priests” and educational “seminaries”. Utopian idealism requires total elimination of anything old & corrupt, erasing past history, destroying politically INcorrect dogmas, and/or persecuting non-utopian “heretics” (“tragic” realist “phobes”) which question and PREVENT the “CULT of PROGRESS” and necessary transformational change “we can ALL believe in”.

FASCISM #1-The Collective #2-Rebirth #3-Crisis & Crusade #4-Action #5-Politics as Religion #6-Contempt for Democracy #7-The Cult of Personality #8-Social Engineering #9-Youth #10-Censorship #11- Fascist Economics (2017)

Fascism #3:
CRISIS – CRUSADE: Mobilizing SOCIETY like an ARMY

“A state of war only serves as an EXCUSE for DOMESTIC TYRANNY” – Solzhenitsyn

Mobilizing SOCIETY like an ARMY
Crisis brings CONFORMITY and UNITY of purpose that mobilizes people. Crisis results in “things getting done”. War is a tool for “sacrifice” towards “progress”.

CRISIS: Mobilizing SOCIETY like an ARMY PROGRESSIVE WAR & CRUSADE
CRISIS and CRUSADE:BUILDING SOCIALIST PARADISE
ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS: GREEN FASCISM – SAVING the PLANET
OUR HEALTH “CRISIS”: FOOD FASCISM
The STRATEGY of MANUFACTURED CRISIS
GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN
MANUFACTURED CRISIS: INVENTING a RAPE EPIDEMIC

CRISIS: Mobilizing SOCIETY like an ARMY PROGRESSIVE WAR & CRUSADE

SYNOPSIS:

a core value of crisis is the imposition of war values on society – ”struggle” was good for the national and individual spirit
crisis-conflict-struggle prohibits “ordinary” rules of behavior
the sense of crisis brings conformity and unity of purpose that mobilizes people
crisis-conflict-struggle provides “opportunity” to create organization in the collective crusade towards “progress”

Jonah Goldberg: A core value of crisis is the imposition of war values on society
The sense of crisis brings conformity and unity of purpose that mobilizes people war is a tool
for “progress”. Crisis-conflict-struggle prohibits “ordinary” rules of behavior
Crisis-conflict-struggle provides “opportunity” to create
“progress” crisis creates “crusade”(“holy” war). “Crisis” required organization of the collective – CRUSADE. towards “PROGRESS”.

“I WANT WAR. To me all means will be right” – Adolph Hitler
”You never want a serious crisis to go to waste, and what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you didn‘t think you could do before.” – Rahm Emanuel
“A state of war only serves as an EXCUSE for domestic TYRANNY” – Solzhenitsyn

The militarization of society was considered the best available means towards “progress” for
the “organic” whole. [Today’s] “liberal fascism isn’t militaristic, but the same passions that
prompted progressives to talk in terms of ‘industrial armies’ and ‘going over the top’ for the
blue eagle lurk beneath today’s liberal rhetoric. War was seen as a communal, unifying
experience that focused the public’s mind on the common good and whose passions and
discipline could be harnessed to socially ‘useful’ ends”.

Today the modern left is in many ways openly anti-war and avowedly pacifist. But liberals still yearn nostaglically for the unifying experience of the labor and civil rights movements.
Fascism was militaristic because militarism was “progressive” at the beginning of the 20th Century. Technocrats and poets alike saw the military as the best model for organizing and
mobilizing society.

The idea that WAR was the source of moral values had been pioneered by German intellectuals.

Progressive intellectuals leaped at the opportunity to REMAKE SOCIETY through the discipline of the sword. The war effort “is the story of the conversion of a hundred million
combatively INDIVIDUALISTIC PEOPLE INTO A VAST COOPERATIVE EFFORT in which the GOOD of the UNIT is SACRIFICED to the GOOD of the WHOLE.
felix adler – the regimentation of society bringing us closer to creating the “perfect man … a fairer and more beautiful and more righteous type than any … that has yet existed”
The moral tonic the war would provide and how it was the highest, best cause for all people Dedicated to liberal, progressive values. The ordeal of war brings out the magnificent
resources of youth. John Dewey was giddy that the war might force Americans to give up much of our economic freedom … we shall have to lay by our good natured individualism and
march in step.

If the war went well, it would CONSTRAIN “the INDIVIDUALISTIC tradition” and convince Americans of “the supremacy of public need over private possessions.  Dewey ridiculed pacifists who couldn’t recognize the “immense impetus to reorganization afforded by this war” and social possibilities.

John Dewey: “laissez-faire is dead. long live social control”
Herbert Croly – War “should bring with it a politial and economic organization better able to redeem its obligations at home”

War is an EXCUSE to EXPAND GOVERNMENT CONTROL over economics.
The desire was to IMPOSE a UNIFYING, TOTALITARIAN moral order that regulated the individual inside his home and out “classic” fascism elevates martial values and the militarization of government and society under the banner of nationalism.  Croly expressed his hope that america’s entry into the war would provide “the tonic of a serious moral adventure”. Walter Lippmann promised that hostilities would bring out a “transvaluation of values as radical as anything in the history of intellect.

Jonah Goldberg: “It was a transparent invocation of Neitzsche’s call for OVERTURNING ALL traditional morality. The call to war could be used to SMASH the OLD ORDER. Lippmann
declared that our understanding of democracy, liberty and equality would have to be re-thought from their foundations as fearlessly as religious dogmas were in the 19th century”.
Woodrow Wilson – “There are some splendid things that come to a nation through thediscipline of war”.

Richard Ely was a fervent believer in “industrial armies’ and a zealous believer in the draft – “the moral effect of taking boys off the street corners and out of saloons
and drilling them is excellent”. Hitler – “the war … made possible for us a the solution of a whole series of problems that could never have been solved in normal times”.

Jonah Goldberg: “In It Takes a Village, Hillary Clinton cheers the way crises erase the wall between business and government but laments that the social benefits of natural disasters
and wars are temporary. hillary clinton: “why does it take a crisis to open our eyes and hearts to our common humanity. In response to the problem, liberals have manufactured one ‘crisis’
after another in their quest to find a new moral equivalent of war, from the war on cancer, to global warming, to countless economic crises”

A brief perusal of the last hundred years of economic journalism from the left would have you believe that the most prosperous century in human history was one long, extended economic
crisis. FREE societies are DISORGANIZED – people “do their own thing. “Our disorganized competitive life must pass into an organic cooperative life”. – Walter Rauschenbusch

CRISIS RESULTS in “THINGS GETTING DONE” – people are required to SACRIFICE and “do their part”. Addressing congress in 1964, President Lyndon Johnson declared a “WAR ON POVERTY”. LBJ’s legislation was a MORAL CRUSADE – “For the first time in our history, it is possible to conquer poverty.’ FASCISM brings social organization and ORDER OUT of “CHAOS”.
‘An individual has no meaning apart from the society in which his individuality has been formed” – Herbert Croly Croly thought “national life” should be like school – which frequently demands “severe coercive measures”.

CRISIS and CRUSADE: BUILDING SOCIALIST PARADISE

EDWARD BELLAMY – LOOKING BACKWARD
WOODROW WILSON, WAR CRISIS & CRUSADE

The LIES THAT SOLD OBAMACARE
THEY WENT BEYOND the “YOU CAN KEEP YOUR PLAN” PLEDGE
by Mona Charen

“This is good. war … striking down individualism and building up collectivism” – George Perkins
the war for Wilson and other “progressives” was a crusade to “redeem” the whole world (fascist spiritual “re-birth” & renewal)

In 1888, Edward Bellamy published a novel Looking Backward . The book sold hundreds of thousands of copies and was hailed as the biggest book sensation since Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Set in the future, Bellamy described a MILITARIZED, UTOPIAN SOCIETY in the year 2000.  Workers belonged to a UNIFIED “industrial ARMY”. The economy was run by all-powerful central planners. Citizens were drafted into their work occupations. Every able bodied citizen [is] bound to work for the nation, whether with mind or muscle. The story’s preacher states that America has FINALLY CREATED the KINGDOM of HEAVEN on EARTH.

Bellamy’s vision of a militarized, nationalistic, socialist UTOPIA captivated the minds of progressives everywhere. Overnight, Bellamite “nationalist clubs” appeared across the country clubs dedicated to “the nationalization of industry and the promotion of the brotherhood of humanity. Bellamy believed that his brand of socialistic nationalism was the true application of Jesus’ teachings. President Barack Obama linked his economic policies to his Christian faith – Obama: “Jesus would back higher taxes”.

His cousin Francis bellamy was co-founder of the society of Christian Socialists. Francis Bellamy wrote “the Pledge of Allegiance” as an expression of “MILITARY SOCIALISM”-
“… the training of citizens in the common knowledge and … DUTIES of citizenship belongs irrevocably to the state”. – Francis Bellamy   The pledge was originally accompanied by a roman
or “fascist” salute to the flag in American public schools. The Nazis got the idea of their salute from American “national socialists.

Woodrow Wilson stated the U.S. entered the great war “to SAVE the world for democracy.
It was NOT SIMPLY ANOTHER WAR – IT BECAME a “CRUSADE” (holy war).
The progressives did not argue for totalitarianism because the war demanded it. They argued for totalitarianism and were DELIGHTED that the WAR MADE IT POSSIBLE. But World War I also proved to be the undoing of the progressive dream of american collectivism. The total mobilization of the war reawakened in its aftermath the traditional American resistance to such tyranny.

In the 1920s the progressives sulked while americans enjoyed remarkable prosperity and the Russians and Italians (in their view) had ‘all the fun of remaking the world. The Great Depression came just in time; it put the progressives back in the driver’s seat. FDR brought no new ideas to government; he merely dusted off the ideas he had absorbed as a member of the Wilson Administration.

JFK’s “martyrdom” provided a profound psychological CRISIS that proved useful for the
liberal goals and ideas. Johnson used it to transform progressivism into a FULL BLOWN
MASS POLITICAL RELIGION. No longer dependent on war or economic crisis,
progressivism finally got a clean shot at creating the sort of society it had long preached about
the PSYCHOLOGICAL ANGST and ANOMIE that progressives believed lay at the core of
capitalist society could be HEALED by the ministrations of the STATE. The war for Wilson
and other “progressives” was a CRUSADE to “REDEEM” the whole world (fascist spiritual
renewal). A draft was enacted for the first time in U.S. history.
“This is good. War striking down individualism and building up collectivism” – George Perkins

CRISIS and CRUSADE: BUILDING SOCIALIST PARADISE
The LIES THAT SOLD OBAMACARE
THEY WENT BEYOND the “YOU CAN KEEP YOUR PLAN” PLEDGE
by Mona Charen November 22, 2013

“MEDICINE is the KEYSTONE of the ARCH of SOCIALISM” – Vladimir Lenin

Many Americans are questioning the credibility and honesty of the obama administration, having been promised on numerous occasions they could keep their private insurance plans
and doctors. The notion that the nation faced a “CRISIS” of “46 MILLION UNINSURED” was DISHONEST.

The truth about the uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office, was that 71 % were without insurance for a year or less. Only about 16 % were uninsured for two or more
years. More than 9 million of those counted among the uninsured were not citizens.
Another 6 million who said they were without insurance actually were signed up with
medicaid, and 4 million more were eligible for medicaid but had failed to enroll.
The true number of the uninsured was closer to 15 million. (5 million of whom were young,
single adults) The CBO estimates that even if obamacare were fully implemented and worked
smoothly, the number of uninsured Americans in 2023 would be 30 MILLION.

We have heard President Obama say that Obamacare would not add a dime to the deficit,
people would be able to keep their doctors, premiums would not rise – and in many cases
would be cheaper than a cell phone bill – all demonstrably FALSE.
As H.L. Mencken put it when describing a generic DEMAGOGUE,
“Preach[ing] doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.

Obama breathlessly and dramatically reiterated that ‘If you like your health care plan, you
could keep it’(period), not to mention the promise of a significant REDUCTION in
premiums. But it’s turning out to be untrue, or as the new york times might say,
‘INCORRECT PROMISES’ were made. Amazingly, LYING to the American people –
in effect, deceiving and betraying their trust – is NOT a PROBLEM for the left –
the ENDS JUSTIFY the MEANS.

Besides, you’re not expert or smart enough to know what’s good for you. It’ll work out in the
end when the unwashed masses realize how wonderful it will all be in some distant point in the
future. Despite the fact coercion, manipulation, prevarication, intimidation, subterfuge,
intrigue and agitation must be used in order to get them to the UTOPIAN fantasy land of
“HEAVEN ON EARTH”– a “SOCIALIST PARADISE”.

CRISIS: “GREEN” FASCISM –
[Totalitarian] CRUSADE to SAVE the EARTH

Jonah Goldberg: GLOBAL WARMING produces a multitude of “fascist” tendencie.
The beauty of global warming is that it TOUCHES EVERYTHING we do. Its most tangible
ingredient is that it is an INVALUABLE CRISIS MECHANISM .

“GREEN” FASCISM employs community, spiritual rebirth, politics as a religion in a time of
CRISIS, the need for authenticity and meaning through collective ACTION. Spiritual
REBIRTH with and through “nature”, community and spiritual rebirth by returning to a
mythic, utopian past “nature worship” that has it’s own “temptation” and “fall” from the
Garden of Eden – the ‘white male’ modern world tempted mankind to take the wrong turn
out of an Edenic past. Surrender to the global nanny state and create [a] ‘economic
dictatorship’ progressives yearn for.

NEVER WASTE a GOOD CRISIS, CLINTON SAYS on CLIMATE
by Pete Harrison BRUSSELS March, 2009

(Reuters) – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an audience Friday
“NEVER WASTE a GOOD CRISIS,” and highlighted the opportunity of
rebuilding economies in a greener, less energy-intensive way.
Jonah Goldberg: GLOBAL WARMING PRODUCES a MULTITUDE of “FASCIST”
TENDENCIES. The beauty of global warming is that it TOUCHES EVERYTHING WE DO.
Ultimately, environmentalism is fascistic not because of its airy and obscure metaphysical
assumptions about the existential plight of man. Its most tangible ingredient is that it is an
INVALUABLE ‘CRISIS MECHANISM’”. “Green” fascism employs community,
spiritual rebirth, politics as a religion in a time of CRISIS, the need for authenticity and
meaning through collective action.

Skeptics are called traitors, holocaust deniers and ‘tools of the carbon interests’. – enemies of
the state (community). Spiritual REBIRTH with and through “nature”.
al gore:“industrial civilization mask[s] our deep loneliness for that communion with the world”
…”that can lift our spirits … [and] fill our senses with the richness and immediacy of life
itself.” REBIRTH fueled by a sense of “CRISIS”. Gore constantly insists that global
warming is the DEFINING CRISIS of our time “FIXED” only by fascist the cult of action –
“when your baby has a fever, you take ACTION”.

“You do whatever your doctor says. No time for debate, no room for argument”
We must get “beyond politics” – “this is the moment when we must come together to
SAVE this PLANET”. “SURRENDER to the global nanny state and create [a] ‘economic
dictatorship’ progressives yearn for. Gore’s family amassed it’s wealth from the oil industry.
Is ENVIRONMENTALISM our NEW “CIVIC” RELIGION ?

“Let us resolve that we will not leave our children a world where the oceans rise and famine spreads and terrible storms devastate our lands.” – Barack Obama
Some of the biggest cases of mistaken identity are among intellectuals who have trouble remembering that they are not God. – Thomas Sowell

CRISIS: “GREEN” FASCISM [TOTALITARIAN]
CRUSADE to SAVE the EARTH

The NAZIS were for FIGHTING AIR POLLUTION, CREATING NATURE PRESERVES
and “SUSTAINABLE” FORESTRY
“this is a religion that says the world, the earth, is where holiness resides.” Margot Adler, NPR Correspondent
(pre-modern)and/or “NEW AGE” (post-modern) BELIEFS ???
MAKING METAPHYSICAL ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT the EXISTENTIAL PLIGHT of MAN
ALSO MAKING SCIENTIFIC ASSUMPTIONS – IS IT A CYCLICAL VARIATION? Is it CAUSED BY MANKIND or NATURE ? (the sun?)

Jonah Goldberg: Joseph Sax describes his fellow environmentalists as “secular prophets
preaching a message of secular salvation. U.S. House Representative ed markey hailed gore as
a prophet during gore’s congressional testimony in 2007. “Reduce, Re-use, Recycle” are
taught like catechisms in schoolrooms across the country.
Maryland is the first state to impose a new requirement to graduate from high school –
something called environmental literacy. What is that? State senator j. b. jennings is asking “
is it going to be fact or theory-based, which is usually political, theory driven … about global
warming or climate change.” Which is not to say we should not be “eco-friendly” – but have
these “fascists” gone to an extreme? People express concern about the content but what is
important to know is that this.

The new requirement doesn’t actually mandate any content at all. The new rule is a
regulation from the state board of education, not a law passed by the legislature, so it lays out
no specifics. Governor O’Malley offers no real details but praises it, saying it will “infuse core
subjects with lessons about conservation and smart growth and the health of our natural
world.”
The guide says “consumption of natural resources, air and water pollution, and the impacts of
climate change are among the many complex challenges that threaten human health,
economic development and national security”. It talks about the need to “take informed
action“ – what EXACTLY does that mean?

GLOBAL CONNING: TEMPERATURE DATA COOKED in
“BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER”
by Selwyn Duke The New American February 9, 2015

Selwyn Duke: WHAT do you get when you combine copious amounts of government grant
money, layers of dishonesty, the heat of environmental activism, a few dollops of ambition,
and a glaze of science in a political pressure cooker? It’s a recipe for enriching a few,
impoverishing most, and serving up bad policy all around.

If you’ve ever wondered why you’re buried in snow but keep hearing about how we’ve
experienced “officially, the second warmest year on record” (when we’re not being told it could
be the warmest year on record), know that “officially” relates to the pronouncements of
officials, and “official temperature records” have been “systematically ‘adjusted’ to show the
earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.”

So writes the Telegraph’s Christopher Booker, reporting on how, as his title puts it,
“the fiddling with temperature data is the BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER”
DATA RAPE – COOKED government figures are NOTHING NEW. Gallup’s CEO recently
reported on how the official unemployment rate is illusory, and the obama administration’s
deportation numbers are fiction, too. But where these deceptions are designed to assuage, the
temperature-record MANIPULATION is MEANT to ALARM. Booker had tackled the
“warmest year on record” claim about 2014 two weeks ago, citing a blog post by a man named
Paul Homewood entitled “massive tampering with temperatures in South America”.

At issue was NASA’s Goddard institute for space studies (giss) data, which showed profound
warming across a swath of territory from paraguay to brazil. Booker wrote, “noting that weather
stations there were thin on the ground, he [homewood] decided to focus on three rural stations
covering a huge area of Paraguay. Giss showed it as having recorded, between 1950 and 2014,
a particularly steep temperature rise of more than 1.5c: twice the accepted global increase for the
whole of the 20th century.

As Homewood himself wrote – providing an illustrative map showing that there simply is
no data on much if not most of the world – about the dearth of data-collection stations,
one of the regions that has contributed to GISS’ ‘hottest ever year’ is South America, particularly
Brazil, Paraguay and the northern part of Argentina.

In reality, much of this is FABRICATED, as they have no stations anywhere near much of this
area. Booker then continued, “but when Homewood was then able to check GISS’s figures
against the original data from which they were derived, he found that they had been
ALTERED far from the new graph, showing any rise, it showed temperatures in fact having
declined over those 65 years by a full degree. when he did the same for the other two stations,
he found the same.

In each case, the original DATA SHOWED NOT a rise but a DECLINE. In fact, the revised
data charts for the three stations almost appear to be the raw data charts flipped over left to
right, thus showing a temperature change quite the opposite of what the raw data shows.
As Homewood put it, much of the hottest-year claim is based on “a large chunk of South
America, where there is LITTLE ACTUAL DATA, and where the data that does exist has been
ADJUSTED OUT of ALL RELATION to REALITY.

Homewood has animated raw/revised data charts for the three weather stations at his website,
SHOWING the DRAMATIC ALTERATION of the DATA. In booker’s most recent piece,
he provides more information, writing, “following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe
of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the
SAME SUSPICIOUS ONE-WAY ‘ADJUSTMENTS’. … These are the very records on which
scientists and politicians rely for their belief in ‘global warming’”.

He continues: Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of
the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees w) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees e) again, in
nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to
1 degree c or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded.
This has surprised no one more than Traust Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research
for the Iceland M.E.T. office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch)

Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice
years”. Around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s
economy. Yet this just continues a long pattern of government-funded scientists crying
warm wolf. As fox news wrote in january, 2013 reporting on the national oceanic and
atmospheric agency’s (noaa) claim that 2012 was “the warmest year ever for the nation”:
“2012 [wasn’t] necessarily warmer than it was back in the 1930s. … NOAA has made so many
adjustments to the data it’s ridiculous,” Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of
Alabama in huntsville, told foxnews.com. NOAA has adjusted the historical climate data
many times, skeptics point out, most recently last October. The adjusted data is meaningless
garbage. It bears no resemblance to the thermometer data it starts out as,” [popular climate
blogger steve] goddard told foxnews.com

He’s not the only one to question noaa’s efforts. Every time noaa makes adjustments, they mak
recent years [relatively] warmer. I am very suspicious, especially for how warm they have made
2012,” Spencer said.

Fox also reported that the noaa fell back on an old argument when defending its manipulation,
writing, “government climate scientist peter thorne, speaking in his personal capacity, said that
there was consensus for the adjustments. One might first note, as the new american has reported
before, that “consensus” itself is often manipulated, a good example being the debunked
claim that “97 % of scientists affirm anthropogenic global warming.

Even more significantly, however, citing scientific consensus is just a version of the
argumentum ad populum fallacy – and it is a thoroughly unscientific appeal. Late author
Michael Crichton expressed this truth brilliantly in a 2003 Caltech lecture, saying, “historically,
the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by
claiming that the matter is already settled.

Crichton pointed out that consensus is a political concept, not a scientific one, stating that
science “requires only one investigator who happens to be right. Crichton continued,
“In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible RESULTS.
The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

After providing numerous examples of castigated, consensus-condemned scientists who
turned out to be right, crichton cut to the matter’s heart, saying, “Consensus is invoked only in
situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees
that E=mc2. Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. it would never
occur to anyone to speak that way. In other words, when you have the facts, you present them.
CONSENSUS is something you TALK about WHEN YOU DON’T HAVE the FACTS.
This brings us to WHY the GOVERNMENT is “ADJUSTING” TEMPERATURE DATA ?

Government climate models that had PREDICTED CLIMATIC CHANGES HAVEN’T AT
ALL FIT THE FACTS of HOW the CLIMATE HAS CHANGED, BUT the
GOVERNMENT STILL WANTS TO USE what they say about future climate to make
today’s policy. So they need to CHANGE the “facts”
This DATA RAPE is NO SMALL MATTER, as Meteorologist Anthony Watts told
Fox News, “In the business and trading world, people GO TO JAIL for such
MANIPULATIONS of DATA”.

”Someone once said that the most important knowledge is knowledge of our own ignorance.”
“‘global warming’ is just the latest in a long line of hysterical crusades to which we seem to be increasingly susceptible” – Thomas Sowell

Social Media Liberals in Uproar Over Photo of Steven Spielberg and Trophy Kill

Jay Branscomb posted the photo on Sunday along with the caption: “Disgraceful photo of
recreational hunter happily posing next to a Triceratops he just slaughtered. Please share so
the world can name and SHAME THIS DESPICABLE MAN.”

Steven Spielberg, I’m disappointed in you. I’m not watching any of your movies again
ANIMAL KILLER,” commented another. Disgraceful. No wonder dinosaurs became extinct.
Sickos like this kill every last one of them as soon as they are discovered. He should be in
prison,” another followed up.

At it’s “BEST”, pseudo-science that is misguided, utopian ”wishful thinking that is debatable
environmental naturalistic “fundamentalism” that is pseudo-scientific and biologically
questionable.

At its “WORST”, pseudo-scientific “CRISIS” deviously used to enact
“TOTALITARIAN” POLITICAL CONTROL

Van Jones, Obama Green Jobs Czar: “we want to move from suicidal gray capitalism to some
kind of eco-capitalism where … we’re not — you know fast-tracking the destruction of the
whole planet. So the green economy will start off as a small subset and we are going to push
until it becomes the engine for TRANSFORMING the WHOLE SOCIETY.”

Our industrial society, in its present creation, is jeopardizing. we need a more profound
perception of what is at stake” Will that be ENOUGH? NO, it won’t be enough. we want to
go beyond excess and exploitation and oppression altogether, but that’s a process.”
A green economy begins to replace some of the clunking and chugging of ugly machines
with the wise effort of beautiful, skilled people. that means more jobs.
fascist populism and cult of action.

I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people i met in jail, trying to
be a revolutionary. The incident deepened my disaffection with the system and accelerated
my political radicalization. I met all these young radical – I mean really radical, communists
and anarchists. This is what i need to be a part of.

The white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the p
eople of color communities because they don’t have a racial justice frame:
“if the road to social transformation can be paved only by saints who never make mistakes, the road will never be built.”

ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION SAVING the EARTH through the GOD of GOVERNMENT
[SAVIORS vs STEWARDS]

Is global warming or cooling simply being used as an excuse for big government to grow
even bigger and take control of the lives of everyone on the planet? Is the goal to control every
aspect of a person’s life by implementing tons of regulations to control global warming or
cooling. Real science is reproducible, and “falsifiable”.

“Climatology” as practiced by “the goreacle” and the “manniac”, is not. Once “science”
bought into “evolution“, the sky became the limit, because “science” became a tool of the
totalitarian dictators and not to discover gods world and how it works
“Science” and those who manipulate it) became the humanists’ “RELIGION”
humanists believe that man is god. unsurprisingly liberals are humanists

Environmental “UTOPIA”: GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL“CRISIS”: CONFLICTING WORLD VIEWS
[SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHIES, POLITICS] SAVIORS vs STEWARDS

Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with
regard to sustainable development. Agenda 21 is a product of the united nations conference
on environment and development (earth summit) held in rio de janeiro, brazil in 1992
it is an “action agenda” for the u.n., other multilateral organizations, and individual
governments around the world that can be executed at local, national and global levels.
The “21” refers to the 21st century. At the 1992 Earth Summit, 178 governments
voted to adopt the program … Agenda 21, a 300-page document divided into 40 chapters that
have been grouped into 4 sections
According to the United Nations, “Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken
globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the united nations system, governments, and
major groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment”.

The EPA’s Agenda 21 manual, stated: “The REAL ENEMY is HUMANITY ITSELF.
The damage people cause the planet is a function of demographics equal to the degree of
development. Jonah Goldberg: “much as liberals have painted themselves as ‘pro-child’ and
their opponents as ‘anti-child’ PHILOSOPHY & POLITICAL AGENDAS DISGUISED AS
SCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL “SALVATION” THROUGH GLOBAL
TOTALITARIANISM …
To DISAGREE with LIBERALS on STATIST REMEDIES to ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
MAKES YOU ‘AGAINST’ the ENVIRONMENT
“For conservatives, we are STEWARDS of the earth … making informed choices between
competing goods onservationists use property rights and market mechanisms to
CONSERVE NATURAL RESOURCES FOR POSTERITY. To eco-fascists, the
environment is an area where markets and democracy should have little sway”
”many on the left believe we must romanticize nature in order to create the political will to
SAVE IT”“such romanticism becomes a SUBSTITUTE RELIGION and dissenters heretics”.

Goldberg:“ENVIRONMENTAL UTOPIANISM
is as IMPOSSIBLE as any other ATTEMPT to CREATE a HEAVEN on EARTH”

ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION: SAVING the EARTH through the GOD of GOVERNMENT
[SAVIORS vs STEWARDS]

“I’m a SOVEREIGN HUMAN BEING who deserves life and freedom”
vs.
“I’m a PARASITIC ORGANISM killing my host planet and need to be eradicated”
is this part of an environmental “agenda” to create massive controls over human activities?

“SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT”, like communism or fascism, is a PHILOSOPHY of
GOVERNANCE complete with its OWN AGENDA, BELIEFS and GOALS.
“Sustainable development”, is a “WORLDVIEW” based upon philosophical assumptions, a
political philosophy CLAIMING to be “SCIENTIFIC”.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT is a political philosophy that is built upon three pillars
known as the “3e’s”, or “the triple bottom line” – ecological integrity, economic prosperity and
social equity sustainable development demands that the perfect balance of “the triple bottom
line” be the deciding lens through which all community development, growth, and decisions are
viewed. All growth which FAILS to achieve this perfect balance is considered unsustainable.

America and the world are in the midst of what the sustainable development movement calls
“the GREAT TRANSITION” to a “sustainable” NEW MODEL of LIVING.
Traditional capitalism and the American way of life is a FAILING and INEQUITABLE
system that MUST BE REPLACED with a new governance system to
achieve SUSTAINABILITY and a JUST world. (“SOCIAL JUSTICE”)

”SAVIORS” vs. “STEWARDS” of the EARTH
physical “nature” vs. human “natural rights”

“STEWARDS” say humanity can USE the earth’s “renewable” resources within the political
framework of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. Humanity is capable of responsibly
using the earth’s resources without destroying the earth.
“SAVIORS” complain of self-destructive human nature incapable of preservation;
we must “SAVE” the EARTH from a “myopic” (near-sighted) humanity bent on
DESTROYING it’s “HOST”.

The pro-AGENDA 21 WORLDVIEW says we must “SAVE” the EARTH from a “myopic”
(near-sighted) humanity bent on DESTROYING IT’S “HOST”. In the not far off future,
America and the world are in the midst of CRISIS -what the sustainable development movement
calls “the GREAT TRANSITION” to a sustainable NEW MODEL of LIVING.
United Nations sustainable development seeks TO BRING EVERYTHING UNDER ITS
CONTROLLING GRASP. Traditional Capitalism and the American way of life is a
FAILING and INEQUITABLE system that must be replaced with a new governance system
in order to achieve sustainabilityand a just world.
“CRISIS” towards “SOCIAL JUSTICE” is EVOKED.

Sustainable development philosophy teaches that humanity is LIVING BEYOND the “carrying capacity” of the earth. We are in the midst of multiple CRISES that are converging to create conditions that are not livable unless they are halted by a rapid global transition to a sustainable development system. The radical new philosophy of sustainable development calls for a COMPLETE CHANGE in the lifestyle of the average American citizen.

The following practices are all considered to be UNSUSTAINABLE: fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism, dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of pastures” – joan peros
radical change – Where and how we build our homes, what products we use, which food
we eat, what and how much we consume, and which methods of transportation. We choose
almost every college and university in the nation has become indoctrinated with the philosophy
of sustainable development, from campus infrastructure and administration to student life.

The curriculum of America’s universities are awash in this radical, collectivist philosophy
Sustainable Development and AGENDA 21 promote a paradigm shift away from the norm of
national borders and individual nation-states toward a globalist, collective, one-world,
interdependent and interconnected planetary mindset. Sustainable development promotes
high density, urban, pedestrian oriented, low carbon, walkable communities and discourages
traditional american automobile usage, suburban lifestyles and development. The sustainable
development PHILOSOPHY perceives the CAR and the ongoing use of FOSSIL FULES as
UNSUSTAINABLE conflicting “worldviews”.

”SAVIORS” vs. “STEWARDS” of the EARTH
physical “nature” vs. human “natural rights”

human beings are the “problem”, not the “solution”
critics of the “saviors” say they have a “flawed” view of nature
“saviors” exhibit a narrow, fundamentalist “worship” of “nature”
bumper sticker in berkeley: “animals are little people in fur coats”
do animals = people ???
critics of the “saviors” say global warming or “climate change” is questionable “science”
critics of the creation of this idealistic “new” human and society criticized it for its lack of
realism
“Surely anyone with a sense of political realities can smell the danger that these silly, kind, irrational people, in their cushioned isolation from reality, are bringing upon us all”
“Would you bet your paycheck on a weather forecast for tomorrow?
If not, then why should this country BET BILLIONS on GLOBAL WARMIN
PREDICTIONS that have EVEN LESS FOUNDATION?“ – Thomas Sowell
CRITICS of the “SAVIORS” SAY ENVIRONMENTALISM BECOMES a “TOOL” to HIDE a HIDDEN AGENDA POWER (and global tyranny)
“THERE HAVE EXISTED, in EVERY AGE and EVERY COUNTRY,
TWO DISTINCT ORDERS of MEN – the LOVERS of FREEDOM and the DEVOTED ADVOCATES of POWER” – Robert Hayne

Environmental “CRISIS” is used by a fascist elite who “know better” to
“SOCIALLY ENGINEER” a UTOPIA OR a FUTURE DYSTOPIA.

The ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA is a SPIRITUAL agenda with EARTH WORSHIP at
its ROOT. Unbeknownst to many, the highway to modern environmentalism passed through
Nazi Germany. By 1935, the Third Reich was the GREENEST regime on the planet.
Many scholars have rightly focused on Nazi racism over the years, but have often failed to notice
that GERMAN SOCIAL DARWINISM was ROOTED IN ECOLOGY.

It is a well documented though seldom highlighted fact that the nazis were very much into
environmentalism – NOT FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM’s SAKE, BUT RATHER as a
MEANS of OPPRESSION and CONTROL.
“The Nazis conducted horrific experiments on children but at the same time they banned
medical experiments on animals green. The same Nazi monsters who committed crimes of
unimaginable barbarity also advocated vegetarianism, organic agriculture, forest
preservation and homeopathic healthcare.”
HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY EXPLAIN THIS?
What was the CONNECTION between the INHUMAN BRUTALITY of the Nazis and their
gushing IDEALIZATION of ‘NATURE’?”

“I do not see why man should not be as CRUEL as NATURE” – Adolf Hitler
winston churchill warned of a NEW DARK AGE made more sinister by PERVERTED science

“Most environmentalists LOVE COLLECTIVISM and are prepared to marry almost every regime that claims to work for a clean and green environment. That makes this group extremely
SUSCEPTIBLE to the arguments of tyrants. Environmental “CRISIS” is USED by a
fascist elite who “know better” to “SOCIALLY ENGINEER” a UTOPIA-DYSTOPIA.

Some believe that UTOPIA CAN BE ACHIEVED if more BIOLOGICALLY and
intellectually SUPERIOR people are produced and INFERIOR ones are slowly
ELIMINATED from the population from its inception, the eugenics movement has wedded its
VISION of the FUTURE with the remarkable ADVANCES in the natural SCIENCES.

According to eugenicists, SCIENCE (the pseudo-science of ‘hereditarian BIOLOGY’) has
allegedly enlightened society on the genetic basis to ELIMINATE social ills like poverty and
criminality. “SCIENCE”to eliminate SOCIAL problems, in the form
of POPULATION CONTROL – birth control, eugenics, sterilization and eventually genocide.
This poisonious philosophies of nature-worship and “PURITY”, twisted science and
SOCIAL ENGINEERING towards eugenic “utopia” of life would LEAD not only to
Nazi Germany, but our own “CULTURE of DEATH”.

Margaret Sanger hired black ministers, doctors and other leaders to HELP “PARE DOWN” the
SUPPOSEDLY “SURPLUS” BLACK POPULATION. Sanger’s Birth Control Review cast
Nazi Eugenics (and state enforced “sterilization”) in a positive light.
The book Freakonomics (2005) argued that statistically abortion cuts crime. Legalized
abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime” … “legalized abortion,
therefore, led to less crime. Freakonomics excised all references to race. It never connected
that the ABORTED FETUSES were DIS-PROPORTIONATELY BLACK and THAT
BLACKS CONTRIBUTE DIS-PROPORTIONATELY to the CRIME RATE.
Therefore, REDUCING the size of the BLACK POPULATION REDUCES CRIME
the point – is “EUGENICS” (then and now) inherently BIASED and “RACIST” ???
WHO in society DECIDES. Who BREEDS and who does not?
Just who was Margaret Sanger? PATRON SAINT of a woman’s right to choose?
or GENOCIDAL COLLABORATOR of reproductive Eugenics,
who believed society [the state] had the right to sterilize those “unfit” to breed …
or abort the “unfit” or force them to live on government farms for the rest of their lives?

Elements were enshrined as AMERICAN national policy by forced sterilization and
segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states.
Ultimately, eugenics practitioners COERCIVELY STERILIZED some 60,000 Americans,
barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in “colonies,” and
persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning.“ Elitists, utopians and so-called
“progressives” fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a
better world. The intent: populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and
biological kind – and less or none of everyone else.

It is a well documented though seldom highlighted fact that the NAZIS were very much into
environmentalism – NOT FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM’s SAKE, BUT RATHER as a
MEANS of POLITICAL OPPRESSION and CONTROL.
“NATURE” and “SCIENCE” were USED and TWISTED to build ‘UTOPIA”.

The Nazis created nature preserves, championed sustainable forestry, curbed air pollution,
and designed the autobahn highway network as a way of bringing germans closer to nature
It can be credited to the CUNNING of the DICTATOR that HE REALISED HE
COULD NOT SUBMIT the GERMAN PEOPLE BY TERROR ALONE. It was vital that
they would LEARN to LOVE THEIR OWN ENSLAVEMENT. Hitler reasoned lots of
trees and wide-open spaces would take the minds of his subjects off the war he was preparing
and the liberties lost. PERSONAL LIBERTY is GLADLY SACRIFICED FOR WHAT is
CALLED ‘the GREATER GOOD’.

The Nazis derogatively labeled and TARGETED “the eternal Jew” as a biological menace who
tried to OVERCOME NATURE through international commercialism and
cosmopolitanism. The Jews were not a volk, had no peasants, and owned no land, but were
only traders and PARASITES.’ The Jews were NOT “CONNECTED” to “NATURE”.
To oppose the Jews meant to struggle against the “UN=NATURAL evils of modern society’.

Volkish and Nazi hatred of Jewish people was not necessarily religious. The Volkists and
Nazis hated Christianity, almost as much as they despised Judaism, and used NATURE
WORSHIP to establish a state pagan religion to REPLACE THEM.
To Hitler, the Jews were UN-NATURAL, IN-organic PARASITES whose ELIMINATION
was NECESSARY to PRESERVE their “natural’ hosts, Germany.

Just as today’s greens IDEALIZE pre-capitalist society, so did the Volkists and the Nazis.
“Their ‘BLOOD and SOIL’ racism was wholly the product of this BACKWARD FANTASY.
It was nothing more than the desire to cling onto the world as it was BEFORE.
As with the Nazi’s DEMONIZATION of Jewish people.
The Nazis DID NOT believe that ANY human life that stands in the way of
THEIR “NATURAL” DESIRES has ANY VALUE.
ARE the UNBORN burdensome ‘PARASITES’,
JUST LIKE JEWS were ‘PARASITES’ in the eyes of the Nazis?

The Nazis sought an “ORGANIC NATION LIVING in HARMONY with a pre- or
non-Christian ECOSYSTEM. OBSESSION with the ORGANIC order pervaded the
German fascist midset. Hitler insisted that there was no gap between the organic and inorganic
worlds. The belief that the entire society was one organic whole LEFT NO ROOM for those
who DID NOT CONFORM.
Like Nietzsche and the Volkists, Hitler and the Nazis hated the morality of the Judeo-Christian
tradition. They DESPISED the MORAL RESTRAINTS of civilisation and embraced the
romance of pagan SAVAGERY as more ‘AUTHENTIC’.
“I do not see why man should not be as CRUEL as NATURE” – Adolf Hitler

MODERN ENVIRONMENTALISM, to many people, SEEMS SO INNOCENT. Himmler hoped to switch the S.S. entirely to organic food. The green policies of the Nazis were more than a mere episode or aberration in environmental history at large.
They POINT to LARGER MEANINGS and demonstrate with brutal clarity that CONSERVATIONISM and ENVIRONMENTALISM are not and have NEVER been VALUE-FREE OR INHERENTLY BENIGN ENTERPRISES.

Instead of letting chance factors dominate reproduction decisions, Hitler proposed that the
SCIENTISTS USE the POWER of the STATE to influence these decisions so that the
gene pool would shift to what “informed conclusions” concluded was the desired direction.
Hitler believed that the Nazi race programs would further evolution by intelligently deciding which traits were not beneficial, and preventing those with them from reproducing

“From the ‘PRESERVATION of FAVORED RACES in the STRUGGLE FOR LIFE’ [THAT IS,
Darwin ‘s subtitle to Origin of Species] it was a SHORT STEP to the PRESERVATION of
FAVORED INDIVIDUALS, CLASSES OR NATIONS and from their PRESERVATION to
THEIR GLORIFICATION.
DARWINISM BY ITSELF DID NOT PRODUCE the HOLOCAUST, BUT without
Darwinism, especially in its Social Darwinist and EUGENICS PERMUTATIONS, neither
Hitler nor his Nazi followers would have had the NECESSARY SCIENTIFIC
UNDERPINNINGS to CONVINCE THEMSELVES and their collaborators that one of the
WORLD’s GREATEST ATROCITIES was REALLY MORALLY PRAISEWORTHY.
i.e. – science itself is not necessarily the problem … it’s humanity’s (flawed/”sinful”) use
of science for our own selfish, flawed means churchill’s “new dark age … made through power
practiced by “perverted” people [not science]
“NATURE”, “SCIENCE” and “The ENVIRONMENT” USED to MASK to a
“HUMAN” EXCUSE for IN-HUMANITY”
“It is when people form together as GROUPS, under the “mask” of “righteousness”,
that people lose a sense of individual responsibility and ACT LIKE “BEASTS” – Aristotle

We should heed the warning of Lukács, that, ‘fascist DEMAGOGY and TYRANNY was only
the ultimate culmination of a long process which initially had an ‘innocent’ look”
the IDEALISATION of NATURE and the ORGANIC, the nostalgia for the Middle Ages, the anti-capitalism, the hatred of bankers, … cities and industry, the idealisation of peasant life … all this defined THEIR POISONOUS IDEOLOGY.
It was the GREEN attempt of the Nazis to RECREATE a PEASANT SOCIETY
It was their GREEN REJECTION of the Judeo-Christian tradition,
their GREEN RETURN to PAGAN ANIMAL-WORSHIP.
“I am FREEING man from the RESTRAINTS of intelligence and a degrading …
FALSE vision called CONSCIENCE and MORALITY” – Hitler

CHESTERTON was the first to CONDEMN what many of his peers praised.:
“EUGENICS, as discussed, evidently means the CONTROL of SOME MEN over the
marriage and unmarriage of OTHERS; and probably means the control of the FEW OVER the marriage and unmarriage of the MANY” – G.K. Chesterton
Chesterton showed no sign of being intimidated by the prestige of his foes. On the contrary,
he thundered against eugenics, ranking it one of the GREAT EVILS of modern society
In one of the most chillingly accurate prophecies of the century, Chesterton WARNED that
the IDEAS that eugenics had UNLEASHED were likely to BEAR BITTER FRUIT in another
nation. That nation was Germany, the “very land of scientific culture from which the ideal of
a SUPERMAN HAD COME. The very group that Nazism tried to exterminate, eastern
European Jews, and the group it. Targeted for later extermination, the Slavs, were two of
those whose BIOLOGICAL UNFITNESS eugenists sought so eagerly to confirm, SUBSTITUTE “EUGENICS” = “ENVIRONMENT” ??????

– “I do not see why man should not be as CRUEL as NATURE” – Adolf Hitler
“for just as man is the best of the animals when completed, when separated from law and adjudication he is the worst of all” – Aristotle (mankind’s “inhumanity”)
– “ANY man’s death diminishes me, for I am a part of mankind” – John Donne
Dinesh D’Souza: “The CRIMES of atheism have generally been perpetrated through hubristic
ideology that sees MAN, NOT GOD, as the CREATOR of VALUES, using the latest
techniques of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, MAN SEEKS TO DISPLACE GOD and
CREATE a SECULAR UTOPIA HERE ON EARTH. Of course if some people –
the Jews, the landowners, the unfit, or the handicapped – have to be ELIMINATED in order to
achieve this utopia, this is a price the atheist tyrants and their apologists have shown themselves
quite WILLING TO PAY. Thus they confirm the truth of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s dictum,
“IF GOD IS NOT, EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED”

OUR HEALTH “CRISIS”: FOOD FASCISM

“Some of the biggest cases of mistaken identity are among intellectuals who have trouble remembering that they are not God.” – Thomas Sowell

G.K. Chesterton also attacked the SCIENTIFICALLY JUSTIFIED regimentation that others
call the “HEALTH POLICE”.

The SAME RATIONALIZATIONS that JUSTIFIED EUGENICS, chesterton notes, can also
be used to DEPRIVE a working man of his beer or any man of his pipe. First published in
1922, there’s a startling relevance to what chesterton had to say about METTLESOME
BUREAUCRATS who deprive life of its little pleasures and freedoms.

It’s now generally agreed that eugenics was born of a paranoia fed by EVOLUTION and by
the ignorance and blind prejudice” of social elites. The thing that really is TRYING to
TYRANNIZE THROUGH GOVERNMENT is SCIENCE. The thing that really does use the
secular arm is scienceand the CREED that really is levying tithes and CAPTURING
SCHOOLS, … enforced by fine and imprisonment, … proclaimed not in sermons but in
statues, and spread not by pilgrims but by POLICEMAN – that CREED is the great but
disputed system of thought which began with evolution and has ended in eugenics.
– G.K. Chesterton

Jonah Goldberg: ”The Nazis used the slogan, ‘the COMMON GOOD supercedes the
PRIVATE GOOD to justify POLICING individual health for the sake of the body politic.
Certain failures of health care have become, in a sense, CRIMES against society,
“Because society has to pay for their consequences … you have a DUTY to be healthy”,
stated the Hitler Youth Health Manual.
In effect, we have said PEOPLE OWE IT TO SOCIETY to stop misbehaving.”
New England Journal of Medicine – “The government has the perfect right to influence
personal behavior to the best of it’s ability … if it is for the welfare of the individual and the
community as a whole.” The Nazis sought an “organic nation living in harmony with a
pre- or non-Christian ecosystem. Himmler hoped to switch the S.S. entirely to organic food.

OBSESSION with the ORGANIC order pervaded the German fascist midset. Hitler insisted
that there was no gap between the organic and inorganic worlds. The entire society
was one organic whole left no room for those who did not want to behave. Your home, your
private thoughts, everything was part of the organic body politic, which the state was charged
with redeeming. The fixation with children allows social planners to stop ‘child abusers’
who might smoke near children, even outdoors.

“FASCIST” Spiritual REBIRTH with and through “NATURE”,
COMMUNITY by RETURNING to a MYTHIC, utopian PAST:
“The essence of WHOLE FOODS .. to provide ‘PRE-MODERN AUTHENTICITY’ …
people with ‘MEANING’” – new york times
“at GAIAM, we believe that all of the earth’s living matter, air, air oceans and land”…
“form an interconnected system that can be seen as a single entity”
“GAIA, MOTHER EARTH, was honored on … Crete … 4000 years ago by the
Minoan civilization” … “in our every deliberation, we must consider the
IMPACT of OUR DECISIONS on the NEXT SEVEN GENERATIONS”, so sayeth the great law of the Iriquois Confederacy – and the label on
every roll of seventh generation-brand toilet paper … “envirokids chooz organic foods”

Jonah Goldberg: WHOLE FOODS “CONCOCT[s] what amounts to a NEW PAN HUMAN
ETHNICITY … “faux (fake) ethnicities grounded in IMAGINED or romantic PASTS” …
Goldberg mentions HE SHOPS FREQUENTLY at Whole Foods:
“NONE of this is EVIL and it is certainly WELL-MEANING” … BUT …
“GREEN” FASCISM employs community, spiritual rebirth, politics as a RELIGION in a
time of CRISIS, the need for authenticity and meaning through collective ACTION.
Spiritual REBIRTH with and through “nature”, community and spiritual rebirth by
returning to a MYTHIC, utopian PAST
“nature worship” thas it’s own “temptation” and “fall” from the Garden of Eden –
the ‘white male’ modern world tempted mankind to take the wrong turn
out of an Edenic past. Surrender to the global nanny state and create [a]
‘economic dictatorship’ progressives yearn for.
the common good supercedes the private good”;

Childhood obesity is “not just a health issue for children, it’s a national security issue,”
Obama said. “You have to get the whole country behind this because it’s affecting our ability
to protect our freedom”. Food police chief Michelle Obama unveils new federal government
nutrition rules all schools will have to meet. Obama has urged food manufacturers and
retailers to curb the marketing of unhealthy foods. Foodmakers, fast-food chains, and media
companies have teamed up to battle government efforts to create voluntary nutritional
guidelines for foods marketed to children.

N.C. FOOD ‘INSPECTOR’ SENDS GIRL‘S LUNCH HOME AFTER DETERMINING
IT’S NOT HEALTHY ENOUGH

A North Carolina mom is irate after her four-year-old daughter returned home late last month with an uneaten lunch the mother had packed for the girl earlier that day. Someone at the school determined the lunch wasn’t healthy enough and sent it back home. It contained a turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips and apple juice. But for the inspector on hand that day, it didn’t meet the healthy requirements

North Carolina pre-kindergarten programs are required to evaluate the lunches being
provided and determine if they meet usda nutrition guidelines. If they do not meet usda
nutrition guidelines, the program must provide an alternative. The girl was given chicken
nuggets instead. Also, her mother was then sent a bill for the cafeteria food. The division of
child development and early education at the department of health and human services
requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs — including in-home day care centers –
to meet usda guidelines. Lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one
serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from
home. When home-packed lunches do not include all of the required items, child care
providers must supplement them with the missing ones.

“I pack her lunchbox according to what she eats. It always consists of a fruit. it never consists
of a vegetable. She eats vegetables at home because I have to watch her because she doesn’t
really care for vegetables.”

“Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should
soon want bread” – Thomas Jefferson
“OBESITY has reached EPIDEMIC proportions.” Richard Carmona, Surgeon General, 2003

PLACING OBESE CHILDREN in FOSTER HOMES a CONTROVERSIAL
PROPOSITION by Chris Woolston July 14, 2011
Foster care might be the best place for extremely overweight kids – or so says Dr. David Ludwig, director of the optimal weight for life program at children’s hospital in boston, and one of the country’s leading crusaders against childhood obesity. Writing in the July 13 [2011] issue of the journal of the american medical assn., ludwig says that “parenting deficiencies” can contribute to a child’s weight problem.

Ludwig goes on to say that “in severe cases of childhood obesity, removal from the home may
be justifiable from a legal standpoint because of imminent health risks and the parents’ chronic
failure to address medical problems.. Ludwig says foster homes would be a last resort, but it’s
an option that should be kept on the table. When you see a 150-pound third-grader at the mall,
you probably feel sympathy tinged with a little shock. ludwig evidently sees evidence of
child abuse. Free speech for anything remotely “pro-tobacco” has been culturally banned and
almost totally abolished by law. “Pro-tobacco” has been culturally banned.

BARACK OBAMA and the STRATEGY of MANUFACTURED CRISIS
by James M. Simpson September 28, 2008 American Thinker

America waits with bated breath while Washington struggles to bring the u.s. economy back
from the brink of disaster. But many of those same politicians caused the crisis, and if left to
their own devices will do so again.

Obama can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if
not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the u.s. since the 1960s – the
cloward-piven strategy of orchestrated crisis.

The strategy was first elucidated in the may 2, 1966 issue of the nation magazine by a pair of
radical socialist Columbia University professors, richard andrew cloward and frances fox
piven. The “cloward-piven strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the
government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into
CRISIS and economic COLLAPSE. Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer
Saul Alinsky. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” alinsky wrote in
his book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every
Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the LIBERAL SOCIAL
CONTRACT, HUMAN AGENCIES INEVITABLY FALL SHORT.

The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to
replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one. Their strategy to create political,
financial and social CHAOS that would result in revolution, blended alinsky concepts with
their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their
revolutionary change, cloward and piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted
by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation’s wealth.

Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of “crisis” they were trying to create by crisis,
we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur
spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest
which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention
capitalizing on the racial unrest of the 1960s, cloward and piven saw the welfare system as their first target.

According to a city journal article by sol stern, welfare rolls increased from 4.3 million to
10.8 million by the mid-1970s. As a result, in New York City, where the strategy had been
particularly successful, “one person was on the welfare rolls… for every two working in the
city’s private economy. Compassion gone mad: the movement’s impact on new york city was
jolting: welfare caseloads, already climbing 12% a year in the early sixties, rose by 50% during
Mayor Lindsay’s first two years; spending doubled… the city had 150,000 welfare cases in
1960; a decade later it had 1.5 million.

The vast expansion of welfare in new york city that came of the nwro’s cloward-piven tactics
sent the city into bankruptcy in 1975. Rudy Giuliani cited cloward and piven by name as
being responsible for “an effort at economic SABOTAGE”. Giuliani also credited Cloward-
Piven with changing the cultural attitude toward welfare from that of a temporary
expedient to a lifetime entitlement, an attitude which in-and-of-itself has caused perhaps the
greatest damage of all.

This kind of mass influence is cumulative because benefits are continuous. Once eligibility for
basic food and rent grants is established, the drain on local resources persists indefinitely
The next time you drive through one of the many blighted neighborhoods in our cities, or read of
the astronomical crime, drug addiction, and out-of-wedlock birth rates, or consider the failed
schools, strapped police and fire resources of every major city, remember cloward and piven’s
thrill that “…the drain on local resources persists indefinitely”

The radical left’s offensive to promote illegal immigration is “cloward-piven on steroids”
the disease, crime and overcrowding brought by illegal immigrants places a heavy burden on
every segment of society and of government, threatening to split this country apart at the
seams.
In the meantime, radical leftist efforts to grant illegal immigrants citizenship guarantee a
huge pool of new democrat vote. With little border control, terrorists can also filter in
masked protestors wearing military style uniforms glare at citizens to assure them they have
nothing to fear from the hordes of illegals descending onto their small town.

The mortgage crisis sent a shock wave through wall street and panicked world financial markets like no other since the stock market crash of 1929. But this was a problem created in washington long ago
It originated with the community reinvestment act (cra), signed into law in 1977 by president
Jimmy Carter. The CRA was Carter’s answer to a grassroots activist movement started in
Chicago, and forced banks to make loans to low income, high risk customers. PhD economist
and former Texas Senator Phil Gramm has called it: “a vast EXTORTION scheme against
the nation’s banks.”
In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at acorn began pushing charges of “redlining”-claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants; this allowed various studies to be ginned up that seemed to validate the original accusation.
In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications-but the overwhelming reason wasn’t racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances. ACORN showed its colors again in 1991, by taking over the house banking committee room for two days to protest efforts to scale back the CRA. Obama represented acorn in the buycks-roberson v. citibank fed. sav. bank, 1994 suit against redlining most significant of all, acorn was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the clinton administration that greatly expanded the CRA and laid the groundwork for the fannie mae, freddie mac borne financial crisis.

Barack Obama was the attorney representing acorn in this effort. with this new authority,
acorn used its subsidiary, acorn housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
A 1995 strengthening of the community reinvestment act required banks to find ways to provide
mortgages to their poorer communities. It also let community activists intervene at yearly bank
reviews, shaking the banks down for large pots of moneybanks that got poor reviews were
punished; some saw their merger plans frustrated; others faced direct legal challenges by the
Justice Department.
Flexible lending programs expanded even though they had higher default rates than loans with
traditional standards. On the web, you can still find cra loans available via acorn with
“100% financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don’t report it
on your tax returns.” Credit counseling is required, of course.

In 2005, republicans sought to rein in fannie and freddie. but it failed due to an intense lobbying
effort put forward by fannie and Freddie. In his few years as a U.S. Senator, Obama has
received campaign contributions of $126,349, from Fannie and Freddie, second only to the
$165,400 received by Senator Chris Dodd, who has been getting donations from them since
1988. His closest advisers are a dirty laundry list of individuals at the heart of the financial
crisis: former fannie mae ceo jim johnson; former fannie mae ceo and former clinton budget
director frank raines; and billionaire failed superior bank of chicago board chair penny pritzker
God grant those few responsible yet remaining in washington, d.c. the strength to prevent this
massive fraud from occurring … the courage to stand up in the face of this marxist tidal wave.

MANUFACTURED CRISIS: INVENTING a RAPE EPIDEMIC
December 12, 2014 SEQUENCE INC.COM

We’ve all heard about this “college rape crisis” that has been manufactured and plastered all
over the internet and media. The story line is that there is an incredibly high instance of rape
on college campuses. It’s all a HOAX, and the situation becomes even more egregious when
so-called journalists make statements like “virtually everyone agrees.”
No, virtually everyone does not agree.

Occasionally, a brave soul will speak up and inform everyone that the “college rape crisis” story
is a myth. The hoax has been perpetuated through fake statistics and fake narratives, like
the story jackie told to rolling stone about the rape that never happened. This whole college rape
crisis hoax is insulting and belittling to real victims of rape. So where is the proof that this
crisis has been manufactured? Look no further than the bureau of justice statistics and a
study entitled Rape and Sexual Assault among College-Age Females, 1995-2013.

Basically, the study looked at the victimization rates of females between the ages of 18 and 24.
it specifically compared women who were enrolled in college to those who were not
Surprise, surprise! There is no college rape crisis!

The study found the rate of rape and sexual assault was 1.2 times higher for non-students
(7.6 per 1,000) than for students (6.1 per 1,000) And in case you’re wondering whether the
study took into consideration that some rape victims don’t report their assaults to police, the
answer is yes. the study did find that student victims of rape were more likely to not report the
incidents to police

Nonethless, the overall finding makes it clear that college students are not victims of rape at
massive rates. in fact, young women who are not in college are more likely to be victims of
rape. So let’s stop with the college rape crisis hoax. it is not helping anyone, and it is simply a
FRAUD.

The STRATEGY OF MANUFACTURED CRISIS
LENA DUNHAM, UVA, and FALSE RAPE ACCUSATIONS
by Selwyn Duke December 8, 2014 TheNEWAMERICAN.COM

When actresss Lena Dunham alleged in her recently published memoir not that kind of girl that
she was raped by a “campus Republican” while a student at Oberlin college, the blogosphere
was aflutter with incredulity. It now appears the skepticism was warranted, with an in-depth
Breitbart investigation finding that dunham’s claim “collapses under scrutiny”

For the record, we should review the “Girls” creator’s allegations. As I wrote in October:

[O]ne day when she was 19 and drunk and high as a kite on Xanax and cocaine, she entered a state of undress to relieve herself in a parking lot right in front her GOP friend [whom she identifies as “Barry”]. He then, to put it delicately, makes aggressive physical sexual overtures, after which she takes him back to her apartment; at this point, “in an attempt to convince herself that she’d given consent — [she] talks dirty to him as he forces himself on her,” she writes in her newly released memoir….

[T]here’s more to the story: when Dunham’s roommate characterized the incident as rape the next day, Dunham laughed. Years later, she pitched a version of the story to her “Girls” collaborators and still didn’t call it rape, though her co-writers would. And now they have her convinced.

Or maybe not. The recently released, weeks-long Breitbart investigation found — as others had already discovered — that there was in fact a Republican at Oberlin named Barry during the year of Dunham’s alleged attack (2005); however, the news outlet also learned that he didn’t even remotely match the description Dunham provided. As Breitbart wrote, “This man is by all accounts (including his own) innocent.” This didn’t prevent him from being implicated, though.

Not that this mattered to Dunham. Barry, who now is married with a family, requested for
weeks that Dunham clear his name — to no avail; he also started a legal fund, retained a lawyer,
and is considering a suit. But now Dunham’s publisher, Random House, has responded to the
Breitbart investigation by admitting that “Barry” was just a pseudonym, has said that it will alter
the memoir to reflect this fact, and is offering to pay the real Barry’s legal fees.

Perhaps the answer is that dunham’s “memoir” is more fiction than memories. in point of fact,
Breitbart found that none of the details she provided about her alleged attacker rang true
Breitbart writes, “to be sure we get the point, on three occasions dunham tells her readers
that her attacker is a Republican or a Conservative, and a prominent one at that — no less than
the ‘campus’s resident conservative.’”

It isn’t often that a magazine issues a full-scale retraction of a story accompanied by a mea culpa
and an apology to those it might have hurt, but that’s precisely what Rolling Stone did on Friday.
The issue was a University of Virginia rape allegation made by a student identified as “Jackie”
and related in an explosive piece by Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely. CNN
summarized the claim last month:

In “A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA [Nov. 19],” the student told Rolling Stone an upperclassman invited her to a party at the Phi Kappa Psi house in fall 2012 and seven men raped her over a three-hour period in a bedroom
She didn’t want to go to law enforcement but told the school’s Sexual Misconduct Board what happened, Rolling Stone reported. She said she became discouraged because she had difficulty obtaining statistics about campus sexual assaults….

The magazine, however, has now altered its apology, changing the line “our trust in her was misplaced” to “These mistakes are on Rolling Stone, not on Jackie.” Rolling Stone offered no explanation for the change.
Note that it cannot be said definitively that nothing happened to Jackie, though it does seem, in the least, that her story was embellished. But there’s no doubt Rolling Stone failed to apply proper journalistic standards.

And some are left to wonder if politically correct journalists will ever learn. The UVA story is somewhat reminiscent of the 2006 Duke University rape frame-up case, in which black stripper Crystal Gail Mangum falsely accused three white university lacrosse players of rape. The media and university staff rushed to judgment, treating the accused as guilty, tarnishing their reputations, and altering their lives, perhaps irreparably. Ultimately, the young men were exonerated; the prosecutor in the case, Mike Nifong, was disbarred for dozens of violations of North Carolina’s rules of professional conduct; and Mangum is now serving prison time for murder

Yet what about false accusers who simply kill others’ reputations? this seems of minor concern.
and mcardle’s piece, while critical of rolling stone, bears a title that says it all: “rolling stone’s
rape story fails victim. She did not mean the true victims of a false rape allegation: the men
whose reputations, lives, and psyches are raped
What matters, apparently, is not the truth but the narrative. as one oberlin figure, who refused
Breitbart access to information, told the news service about those accusing others of sexual
assault, “it’s just not important if they are telling the TRUTH”.

“CRISIS” – GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
WHERE’S SENSE of CRISIS in a 17% GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
by Byron York October 5, 2013

Byron York: “Everyone knows the phrase ‘government shutdown’ doesn’t mean the entire u.s.
government is shut down. so in a partial government shutdown, like the one underway at the
moment, how much of the government is actually shut down, and how much is not?
I asked a republican source on the senate budget committee for an estimate. this was the answer:
“Based on estimates drawn from CBO and OMB data, 83 % of government operations will
continue.”

This figure assumes that the government pays amounts due on appropriations obligated before
the shutdown ($512 billion), spends $225 billion on exempted military and civilian personnel,
pays entitlement benefits for those found eligible before the shutdown (about $2 trillion), and
pays interest costs when due ($237 billion).

This is about 83 % of projected 2014 spending of $3.6 trillion. So the government shutdown, at
least as measured by money spent, is really a 17 % government shutdown.

Perhaps that is why the effects of the shutdown, beyond some of the most visible problems, like
at the monuments and memorials on the washington mall, don’t seem to have the expected
intensity. Seventeen percent of federal expenditures is still a huge amount of money, and the
shutdown is affecting many people. But many more who are dependent on federal dollars are
still receiving their money, either as salary, transfer payment, or in some other form.

Viewed that way, it’s no wonder both republicans and democrats appear to believe they can
last the shutdown out, at least for a couple of weeks until they try to resolve the debt limit crisis
due to arrive October 17.
Fascism #3: CRISIS
“YOU NEVER WANT a SERIOUS CRISIS to GO TO WASTE, and WHAT I MEAN by that is an OPPORTUNITY to DO THINGS THAT YOU DIDN’T THINK YOU COULD DO BEFORE.” – Rahm Emanuel

The GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN MYTH
by Rush Limbaugh December 3, 2014

Rush Limbaugh: “The opining over whether or not the republicans ought to, quote, unquote,
shut down the government again is heating up, this time in the Washington Post.
Congressional republicans are brainstorming ways to punish president obama for
unilaterally deferring deportation for millions of illegal immigrants. That’s not what this is
about, punishing president obama. those of us who do not want amnesty for millions has
nothing to do with punishing Obama.
“It’s all about the country.” But, you see, even republicans inside the beltway are going to
read this story and they’re going to be obviously influenced why it, which is why it’s written
the way it is.”

“Yeah, that shutdown last year, does anybody remember that shutdown? do you remember
when the government shut down last december, folks? I mean, we were all alive, and we were
all paying attention. No, I’m serious. Do you remember when … no, no.

Do you remember when congress closed? do you remember when the dmv was? do you
remember when you couldn’t get your welfare check?
Do you remember when social security checks didn’t show up? do you remember when medicare and medicaid weren’t working?”
Do you remember you couldn’t get on the sleigh ride concession out at yellowstone park? that’s my memory, all of that happened.”

There wasn’t any government shutdown. and they’re calling it a partial shutdown now;
they’re calling it a partial shutdown then”
Seventeen percent of government operations were shut down. This whole notion of a
government shutdown is language that is being used once again to negatively impact the
Republican party and its fortunes. I ask anyone, do you remember when the government was
shut down last December? Do you remember when whatever you need from government wasn’t
available? Do you remember a government office closed?”

That was a real shutdown in 1995. That one lasted a couple of months and clinton worked
with the government employees union to stack the deck on that one. They ended up getting
their Thanksgiving turkeys. They got their back pay. Nobody lost a dime on that government
shutdown. I seriously want you to think back and ask yourself, do you remember, has your life
been so impacted, so affected by a government shutdown that you remember every moment of
it, and it was so bad that you do not ever want to experience it again?”

I would maintain that not a single one of you, outside of the occasional government employee,
can even remember the government shutdown from last december and you can’t remember
being affected by it.. If you had to face an open question today about what part of the
government was shut down and what happened as a result, you are clueless.

The only thing that you can remember about it is that the Republicans shut down the
government, and the next thing you remember about it is the republicans shut down the
government because they hate government and they hate everybody depending on
government. That’s probably what you remember, if even you remember that. And the only
reason you remember that is because that was the media template, that was the narrative.

Let’s put that in perspective. It wasn’t a government shutdown. Once again, you have a
poll stacked, questions structured to get the desired result. So the media runs around and asks
people who don’t even know the government’s been shut down, they’re not even affected by it,
and they ask them a loaded question about the government shutdown, and of course what does
that mean to people?”

“It means hell, Washington’s closed, it means nothing’s happening.”

Of course that’s not what it means, but you go ask people this, particular the low-information
crowd, “oh, yeah, Republicans, did they do it? I strongly oppose.
And so the blame is set up, the poll comes out to affirm the blame”
It’s not about a government shutdown. that’s another thing. It’s a diversionary move, this
whole label to describe legitimate constitutional legislative action that the executive branch
can take to stop an out-of-control president is not shutting down the government”
It’s a LOADED term, it is an INCINDIARY term, it is not apt, it is not a legitimate description
of what happens.